Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Miscellanea Geographica

Regional Studies on Development

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.40

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.227
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.404

14 points
in the Ministerial journal value rating scale.

Covered by e.g. Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, formerly Thomson Reuters) and SCOPUS by Elsevier

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2084-6118
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Tourist Neo-colonialism as an Indication of the Future of Islands. The Example of Borobodur (Central Java)

Paweł Cywiński
  • Department of World Regional Geography, Institute of Regional and Global Studies Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw. Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-06-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mgrsd-2015-0011

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the process of appropriation of public space by the tourism industry in island states with the example of the temple of Borobudur, addressing the question of the changing trends of the temple’s basic functions, from sacred to tourist functions, and the effects of the presented changes on the traditional users of the temple. The Borobudur temple complex has been (symbolically and practically) transferred from the hands of Buddhists into the hands of tourists. The Javanese cultural heritage has been commoditized in a systematic way and lacks religious functions. This is one example of how tourism increasingly appropriates spaces and redefines the meaning of cultural objects. Structural inhibitions to the Borobudur temple being used for traditional religious purposes can be considered an example of tourist neo-colonialism (both from the perspective of postcolonial theory and in light of previous research on the subject).

Keywords : Tourist Neo-colonialism; Tourism; Postcolonialism; Borobodur; Islands

References

  • Appadurai, A 1996, Modernity at Large. Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, University of Minnesota Press, London.Google Scholar

  • Bauman, Z 1994, Dwa szkice o moralności ponowoczesnej, Instytut Kultury, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Breu, F, Guggenbichler, S & Wollmann, J 2008, Tourism Development Revisited Concepts, Issues and Paradigms, SAGE Publications, Dehli. Google Scholar

  • de Chavez, R 1999, Globalisation and tourism: deadly mix for indigenous peoples. Available from: <http://www.twn.my/title/chavez-cn.htm.> [10 july 2014] Google Scholar

  • Errington, S 1993, ‛Making Progress on Borobudur: an old monument in new order’, Visual Anthropology Review, Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 32-59.Google Scholar

  • Fanon, F 1961, Les Damnés de la terre, ÉditionsMaspero, Paris.Google Scholar

  • Fanon, F 1967, Black Skin, White Masks, Grove Press, New York.Google Scholar

  • JanMohamed, AR 1985, ‛The Economy of Manichean Allegory: The Function of Racial Difference in Colonialist Literature’, Critiqual Intquiry, Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 59-87.Google Scholar

  • Jędrusik, M 2005, Wyspy tropikalne. W poszukiwaniu dobrobytu, Wydawnictwo Uniwerystetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Kausar, D., 2011, ‛Socio-economic Impacts of Heritage Tourism on Its Locality: A Case Study of Borobudur Temple Compounds World Heritage Site, Central Java’; Forum of International Developmet Studies, Vol. 40, pp. 131-150.Google Scholar

  • Kausar, D, Nishikawa, Y & Nishimura, Y 2011, ‘How could Management of Borobudur World Heritage Site be Enhances for Improving Tourism Impact for the Community?; A Preliminary Comparison witch Ankgor World Heritage Site’, Forum of International Developmet Studies, Vol. 40, pp. 31-42.Google Scholar

  • Loomba, A 2005, Colonialism/Postcolonialism, Routledge, London.Google Scholar

  • McElroy, JL 2003, ‘Tourism development in small islands across the world’. Geography Annals, 85B(4), pp. 231-242.Google Scholar

  • McKee, DL & Tisdell, CA 1990, Developmental issues in small island economies, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar

  • Mowforth, M & Munt, I., 2003, Tourism and sustainability: development and New tourism in the Third World, (2nd edition), Routledge, London.Google Scholar

  • Nandy, A 1983, The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self Under Colonialism, Oxford University Press, Dehli.Google Scholar

  • Nash, D 1989, ‘Tourism as a form of imperialism’ (In) Hosts and guests: The anthropology of tourism. (2nd edition). V. Smith, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

  • Nkrumah, K 1965, Neo-Colonialism, The Last Stage of Imperialism, Thomas Nelson & Sons, Ltd., London.Google Scholar

  • Nunez, T 1989, ‘Touristic studies in anthropological perspective’. (In) Hosts and guests: The anthropology of tourism. (2nd edition). V. Smith, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

  • Said, EW 1993, Culture and Imperialism, Vintage Books, London.Google Scholar

  • Schiller, H 1976, Communication and Cultural Domination, M.E. Sharpe, New York.Google Scholar

  • Soekmono, R 1976, Chandi Borobudur: A Monument of Mankind, The Unesco Press, Paris.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-11-27

Accepted: 2015-06-08

Published Online: 2015-06-30

Published in Print: 2015-06-01


Citation Information: Miscellanea Geographica, ISSN (Online) 2084-6118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mgrsd-2015-0011.

Export Citation

© by Paweł Cywiński. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in