Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Miscellanea Geographica

Regional Studies on Development

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.40

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.227
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.404

14 points
in the Ministerial journal value rating scale.

Covered by e.g. Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, formerly Thomson Reuters) and SCOPUS by Elsevier

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2084-6118
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Natural capital as a factor in regional competitiveness

Armand Kasztelan
Published Online: 2015-10-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mgrsd-2015-0010

Abstract

Environmental resources and values (natural capital) should be seen as a key factor in regional competitiveness. However, little attention has been paid so far to the role of natural capital in the process of achieving competitive advantage from the territorial perspective. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to present the results of a study on the environmental competitiveness of Polish regions. The author’s contribution to the theory is the use of taxonomic metrics for research purposes. Based on certain predefined criteria the environmental potential of each voivodship was assessed in 2004 and 2012. For research purposes, 26 indicators of state, pressure, and environmental protection were proposed. Owing to the fact that the subset of diagnostic variables (indicators) contained elements that could not be directly aggregated, their unification was achieved using standardization formulas. The methodology proposed by the author might be used to assess environmental competitiveness in different regions or countries. The results of the performed analyses indicated that the Subcarpathian province scored highest in terms of environmental competitiveness, while Swiętokrzyskie province scored lowest.

Keywords: Natural capital; environment; region; competitiveness; regional development Poland

References

  • Bartmann, H 1996, Umweltökonomie – Ökologische Ökonomie, Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

  • Borozan, D 2008, ‘Regional competitiveness: some conceptual issues and policy implications’ in Interdisciplinary management research IV, eds D Barkovic & B Runzhiemer, Faculty of Economics in Osijek, Osijek, pp.50–63.Google Scholar

  • Camagni, R (2008), ‘Regional competitiveness: towards a concept of territorial capital’ in Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe. European Competiveness and Global Strategies, eds R Capello et al., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, pp. 33-47.Google Scholar

  • Camagni, R & Capello, R (2013), ‘Regional competitiveness and territorial capital: a conceptual approach and empirical evidence from the European Union’, Regional Studies, Volume 47, Issue 9, pp. 1383-1402.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Constantin, D-L 2006, ‘Recent advances in territorial competition and competitiveness analysis’, Romanian Journal of European Affairs, vol. 6, no. 3, pp.71–81.Google Scholar

  • Costanza, R & Daly, H E 1992, ‘Natural capital and sustainable development’, Conservation Biology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp.37–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Degórski, M 2010, ‘Socio-economic responses to the environment and ecosystem services in regional development’, Geographia Polonica, 83, 2, pp.83–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ehrlich, P R & Wilson, E O 1991, ‘Biodiversity studies: science and policy’, Science, 253, pp.758–762.Google Scholar

  • Ekins, P, Simon, S, Deutsch, L, Folke C & De Groot, R 2003, ‘A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability’, Ecological Economics, 44, 2-3, pp.165–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • GUS 2005, Ochrona Środowiska 2005, GUS, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • GUS 2013, Ochrona Środowiska 2013, GUS, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Hellwig, Z 1968, ‘Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom ich rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę wykwalifikowanych kadr’, Przegląd Statystyczny, no. 4, pp.307–326.Google Scholar

  • Hydzik, P 2012, ‘Zastosowanie metod taksonomicznych do oceny poziomu rozwoju społeczno-ekonomicznego powiatów województwa podkarpackiego’, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, nr 286, z. 19 (2), pp. 17-32.Google Scholar

  • Jędrusik, M 2014, ‘The elusive sustainable development of small tropical islands’, Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 26–30. DOI: 10.2478/mgrsd-2014-0026.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kasztelan, A 2010, ‘Środowiskowa konkurencyjność regionów – próba konceptualizacji’, Problemy Ekorozwoju-Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 5, no. 2, pp.77–86.Google Scholar

  • Kasztelan, A 2011, ‘Ocena środowiskowej konkurencyjności regionów w Polsce’, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, no. 166, pp.258–268.Google Scholar

  • Kasztelan, A 2013a, ‘A comparative analysis of the environmental competitiveness of Lubelskie and Zachodniopomorskie voivodships’, Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska-Annual Set The Environment Protection, vol. 15, pp.637–648.Google Scholar

  • Kasztelan, A 2013b, ‘Regional development based on environmental competitive advantages – a comparative analysis of Polish voivodships’, Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp.105–122.Google Scholar

  • Kijek, A 2013, Ryzyko sektorowe przemysłu przetwórczego. Modelowanie i ocena. Wydawnictwo UMCS, Lublin.Google Scholar

  • Kukuła, K 2000, Metoda unitaryzacji zerowanej, PWN, Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Łogwiniuk, K 2011, ‘Zastosowanie metod taksonomicznych w analizie porównawczej dostępu do infrastruktury ICT przez młodzież szkolną w Polsce’, Economy and Management, 1/2011, pp.7–23.Google Scholar

  • Martin, R (2005), Thinking about regional competitiveness: critical issues, East Midlands Regional Development Agency, Nottingham.Google Scholar

  • Madej, T 2002, ‘Funkcje pełnione przez środowisko przyrodnicze’ in Gospodarka a środowisko przyrodnicze, Wyd. Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin, pp.79–88.Google Scholar

  • Malovics, G 2007, The role of natural capital in regional development, 2nd Central European Conference in Regional Science – CERS, Technical University of Košice, Košice, pp. 648–655.Google Scholar

  • Michałowski, A 2012, ‘Ecosystem services in the light of a sustainable knowledge-based economy’, Problemy Ekorozwoju-Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 97–106.Google Scholar

  • Pawłowski, A 2013, ‘Sustainable development and globalization’, Problemy Ekorozwoju- Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 8 no. 2, pp. 5–16.Google Scholar

  • Rucinska, S. & Rucinsky, R 2007, Factors of regional competitiveness, 2nd Central European Conference in Regional Science – CERS, Technical University of Košice, Košice, pp. 902–911.Google Scholar

  • Sztumski, W 2009, ‘Mitologia rozwoju zrównoważonego’, Problemy Ekorozwoju – Problems of Sustainable Development, vol 4, no. 2, pp. 13–23.Google Scholar

  • Wokoun, R, Damborský, M, Kouřilová, J & Krejčová, N 2012, The competitiveness of regions in the EU, ERSA conference papers, Available from: http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa12/e120821aFinal00790.pdf. [09.04.2015]

About the article

Received: 2014-11-27

Accepted: 2015-06-15

Published Online: 2015-10-26

Published in Print: 2015-09-01


Citation Information: Miscellanea Geographica, ISSN (Online) 2084-6118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mgrsd-2015-0010.

Export Citation

© 2015 Armand Kasztelan, published by De Gruyter Open. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in