Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Mineralogia

The Journal of Mineralogical Society of Poland

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.36

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.127
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.197

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1899-8526
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Mineralogy and petrology of two ordinary chondrites and their correlation with other meteorites

Krzysztof Owocki
  • Geological Institute, University of Adam Mickiewicz, ul. Maków Polnych 16, 61-686 Poznań, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Andrzej Pilski
Published Online: 2010-05-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10002-009-0009-9

Mineralogy and petrology of two ordinary chondrites and their correlation with other meteorites

Two ordinary chondrites are compared and classified using transmitted and reflected light microscopy and electron microprobe analyses. Both meteorites were confiscated by the Polish Customs Service at the border with Belarus. The first meteorite (called in this paper Terespol-1) is a L/LL6 chondrite, its classification being supported by the equilibrated compositions of olivine and orthopyroxene and the presence of large recrystallized feldspars (< 150 μm). The specimen examined experienced weak shock metamorphism (S3) and moderate weathering (although metal in the inner part of the meteorite seems to be unaffected by oxidization). The other meteorite (called in this paper Terespol-2) is a LL6 chondrite which experienced weak shock metamorphism (S3) and is unaffected by weathering. The Terespol-2 meteorite shares its classification with the Dhofar 1401 chondrite but the lack of data prevents further correlation. Both meteorites have been correlated with known findings from the Meteoritical Bulletin database and an attempt is made to identify their place of origin (fall event). Results indicate that Terespol-1 is most closely related to the Dhofar 1316 chondrite and we suggest that both meteorites at least came from the same parent body.

Keywords: ordinary chondrite; type 6 chondrite; shock metamorphism; Dhofar

  • Connolly C. H., Zipfel J., Folco L., Smith C., Jones R. H., Benedix G., Righter K., Yamaguchi A., Aoudjehane H. Ch., Grossman J. N. (2007). The Meteoritical Bulletin No. 91, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 42, 413-466. Retrieved from the Meteoritical Bulletin Database http://tin.er.usgs.gov/meteor/docs/mb92.pdf http://tin.er.usgs.gov/meteor/docs/mb92.pdf

  • Grossman J. N., & Zipfel J. (2001). The Meteoritical Bulletin No. 85, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 36, 293-322. Retrieved from the Meteoritical Bulletin Database http://tin.er.usgs.gov/meteor/docs/mb85.pdf http://tin.er.usgs.gov/meteor/docs/mb85.pdf

  • Lindsley D. H. (1983). Pyroxene thermometry. American Mineralogist, 68, 477-493.Google Scholar

  • Putirka K. D. (2005). Mantle potential temperatures at Hawaii, Iceland and mid-ocean ridges systems, as inferred from olivine phenocrysts: evidence for thermally driven mantle plumes. Geochemical and Geological Geosystems, 6, 1-14. DOI: 10.1029/2005GC000915CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stöffler D., Keil K., Scott E. R. D. (1991). Shock metamorphism of ordinary chondrites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 55, 3845-3867. DOI:10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00149-0Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Schmus W. R., & Wood J. A. (1967). A chemical-petrologic classification for the chondritic meteorites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 31, 47-765. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7037(67)80030-9CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2010-05-04

Published in Print: 2009-01-01


Citation Information: Mineralogia, Volume 40, Issue 1-4, Pages 107–116, ISSN (Online) 1899-8526, ISSN (Print) 1899-8291, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10002-009-0009-9.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in