Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Multicultural Learning and Teaching

Editor-in-Chief: Obiakor, Festus / Algozzine, Robert

Managing Editor: Banks, Tachelle

Online
ISSN
2161-2412
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Understanding Dialect and Developing Critical Literacy with English Language Learners

Heather Coffey / Liv Davila / Lan Kolano
Published Online: 2013-06-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2012-0006

Abstract

English language learners (ELLs) are the fastest growing population in the US schools (National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), 2011); these students are consistently outperformed by their White counterparts on the National Assessment of Educational Progress data (NCES, 2011). While traditional English as a second language (ESL) classes emphasize building students’ knowledge of spoken and written aspects of the English language, focusing on vocabulary and grammar instruction, we propose that ESL instruction might also include a focus on more nuanced elements of the language such as dialect and register and the relation between power and language, which is critical literacy. This article defines critical literacy in working with ELLs, explores the potential benefit of understanding language/power relationships, and provides one unit plan that will enable teachers to facilitate this development of knowledge.

Keywords: critical literacy; English language learners; multicultural education

References

  • Alford, J. (2001). Learning language and critical literacy: Adolescent ESL students. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45(3), 238–242.Google Scholar

  • Behrman, E. (2006). Teaching about language, power, and text: A review of classroom practices that support critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49(6), 490–498.Google Scholar

  • Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, policy and practice. Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Blackledge, A. (2000). Literacy, power and social justice. Staffordshire, England: Trentham Books.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Cervetti, G., Pardales, M., & Damico, J. (2001). A tale of differences: Comparing the traditions, perspectives, and educational goals of critical reading and critical literacy. Reading Online. 4(9). Retrieved from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/cervetti/

  • Comber, B. (2001). Classroom explorations in critical literacy. In H. Fehring & P. Green (Eds.), Critical literacy: A collection of articles from the Australian Literacy Educators’ Association (pp. 90–102). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar

  • Cummins, J. (2003). BICS and CALP: Origins and rationale for the distinction. In C. B. Paulston & G. R. Tucker (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: The essential readings (pp. 322–328). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press.Google Scholar

  • Dunbar, P. (1903). When Malindy sings. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead, and Co.Google Scholar

  • Dunbar, P. (1913). We wear the mask: The complete poems of Paul Laurence Dunbar. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead, and Co.Google Scholar

  • Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. (2004). Making content comprehensible to English language learners: The SIOP model (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

  • Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. New York, NY: Pearson ESL.Google Scholar

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Gaines, E. (1993). A lesson before dying. New York, NY: Vintage.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Giroux, H. (2001). Culture, power and transformation in the work of Paulo Freire. In F. Schultz (Ed.), SOURCES: Notable selections in education (3rd ed.) (pp. 77–86). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.Google Scholar

  • Lankshear, C., & Lawler, M. (1987) Literacy, Schooling, and Revolution. New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

  • Lankshear, C., & McLaren, P. (Eds.). (1993). Critical literacy: Politics, praxis, and the postmodern. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

  • Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Lohrey, A. (1998). Critical literacy: A professional development resource. Melbourne: Language Australia; the National Language Institute of Australia.Google Scholar

  • Luke, A. (1997). Critical approaches to literacy. In V. Edwards & D. Corson (Eds.), Literacy (Vol. 2, pp. 143–151). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

  • Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43(5), 448–461.Google Scholar

  • Luke, A. (2004). At last: The trouble with English. Research in the Teaching of English, 39, 85–95.Google Scholar

  • McLaren, P. (2003). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar

  • Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (2001). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 21(2), 132–141.Google Scholar

  • Morrell, E. (2008). Critical literacy and urban youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar

  • National Center for Educational Statistics. (2011). National Assessment of Educational Progress. The nation’s report card: Reading 2011. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2011/2012457.asp

  • North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI). (2010). Headcount and home languages. Retrieved from http://esllearnnc.sharpschool.com/cms/One.aspx?portalId=4502459&pageId=7605316

  • Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2004). Critical pedagogy and language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Shor, I. (1999). What is critical literacy? In Darder, A., Baltodano, M., & Torres, R.D. (Eds) (2003). The Critical Pedagogy Reader (pp. 282–304). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar

  • Simpson, A. (1996). Critical questions: Whose questions? The Reading Teacher [Online] 50(2), 118–127. Available at: Proquest Database, ISSN: 00340561.Google Scholar

  • Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.Google Scholar

  • Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. Houndsmills: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar

  • Wolfram, W. (2003). Language variation in the American south: An introduction. American Speech, 78(2), 123–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wolfram, W., & Schilling-Estes, N. (2006). American English Dialects and variation. Madden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-06-18


Citation Information: Multicultural Learning and Teaching, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 115–132, ISSN (Online) 2161-2412, ISSN (Print) 2194-654X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2012-0006.

Export Citation

© 2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in