Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Multicultural Learning and Teaching

Editor-in-Chief: Obiakor, Festus / Algozzine, Robert

Managing Editor: Banks, Tachelle

Online
ISSN
2161-2412
See all formats and pricing
More options …

“Truth,” Interrupted: Leveraging Digital Media for Culturally Sustaining Education

Mary Frances Buckley-Marudas
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Teacher Education, Cleveland State University, 2121 Euclid Avenue JH 327, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-04-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2015-0001

Abstract

This inquiry into the digital discussion forums tied to two English classes in an urban public high school examines the potential of new media to honor the multicultural composition of classrooms and support teachers to design culturally sustaining pedagogies. Given the increasing significance of digital media as well as the growing diversity of our classrooms, it is critical that educational researchers, practitioners, and policymakers think about the ways in which new media could support multicultural teaching and learning. This work draws on socio-cultural constructions of literacy, resource pedagogies, and critical literacy frameworks. The author uses case study methodologies to understand how digital media, specifically networked technologies, support secondary level students as they wrestle with complex issues related to race, language, and culture. This article offers three central ideas that emerged from an analysis of student participants’ interactions across the networked spaces that were linked to the intellectual work of their English classes. This work has implications for educators at all levels who are committed to addressing issues related to race, language, class, and other identities that are salient in all classrooms. The author puts forth a pedagogical approach for sustaining multiculturalism in the context of rigorous academic work. This approach intentionally draws on digital media to cultivate culturally responsive education.

Keywords: multicultural; literacy; technology; pedagogy; adolescent

References

  • Alvermann, D. (2010). Adolescents’ online literacies: Connecting classrooms, digital media, and popular culture. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Alvermann, D., & Hinchman, K. (2011). Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescent’s lives: Bridging the everyday, academic divide. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy as social practice. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–15). Routledge: London.Google Scholar

  • boyd, d. (2011). Participating in the always-on lifestyle. In M. Mandiberg (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 71–76). New York, NY: New York University Press.

  • Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideologies in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Falmer.Google Scholar

  • Guinier, L. (2014). The tyranny of the meritocracy: Democratizing higher education in America. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

  • Hammersely, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Horst, H., Herr-Stephenson, B., & Robinson, L. (2009). Media ecologies. In M. Ito, H. Horst, M. Bittanti, d. boyd, B. Herr-Stephenson, P. G. Lange, C. J. Pascoe, & L. Robinson (Eds.), Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Living and learning with new media (pp. 29–78). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Ito, M. (2009). Participatory learning in a networked society: Lessons from the Digital Youth Project. Presentation for the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Presidential Session. Retrieved August 15, 2008, from http://www.itofisher.com/mito/publications/participatory_l.html.

  • Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., boyd, d., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H., Lange, P. G., Mahendran, D., Martinez, K. Z., Pascoe, C. J., Perkel, D., Robinson, L., Sims, C., & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Kamler, B. (2001). Relocating the personal: A critical writing pedagogy. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

  • Matthew, L., & Raina, A. (2012, February). Facebook reconciliations: Possibilities and challenges of new media for practitioner inquiry in peace education. Paper presented at the Ethnography in Education Research Forum, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Moje, E. B. (2011, December). Students and writers of online texts: Collaborative inquiry, comprehension, and context construction. Discussant at the Annual Conference of the Literacy Research Association, Jacksonville, FL.

  • Nakkula, M., & Toshalis, E. (2006). Understanding youth: Adolescent development for educators. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar

  • Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, J. (2010). Teaching tech-savvy kids: Bringing digital media into the classroom, Grades 5–12. New York, NY: Corwin.Google Scholar

  • Pew Internet and American Life Project, Pew Research Center (2012). Retrieved April 10, 2015 from http://pewinternet.org.

  • Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play. Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Street, B. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-04-12


Citation Information: Multicultural Learning and Teaching, Volume 12, Issue 2, 20150001, ISSN (Online) 2161-2412, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2015-0001.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in