Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Multicultural Learning and Teaching

Editor-in-Chief: Obiakor, Festus / Algozzine, Robert

Managing Editor: Banks, Tachelle

Online
ISSN
2161-2412
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Positioning Theory: Kinesiology Students’ Experiences Teaching in an Adapted Aquatics Practicum

Takahiro Sato / Justin Haegele
Published Online: 2017-07-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2016-0025

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe and explain undergraduate students’ positions of teaching and assisting students with disabilities during adapted aquatics practicum experiences. The participants were eight kinesiology students who enrolled in an introductory adapted physical education (APE) course at a public university in the Midwest region of the United States. This study used a descriptive qualitative research method and exploratory case study design (Yin, 2003). This case study was situated in the positioning theory. The term positioning means to analyze interpersonal encounters from a discursive viewpoint (Hollway, 1984). This framework allows researchers to explore the capacity of students to position themselves and, in this case, to describe how undergraduate students negotiate and implement aquatics lessons with students with disabilities. The data sources were face-to-face interviews, self-reflective journaling entries, and follow–up e-mail messages. Data were analyzed using constant comparative analysis and we uncovered the following themes: (a) ethical and unethical treatment of students with disabilities, (b) conflicts of parents’ and students’ interests, and (c) medical and gender sensitivity. This study’s results indicate that all the undergraduate students were becoming, albeit novice, reflective practitioners and ascribed their own reflective positions to their sense of advocacy. They were concerned that they had managerial challenges that exacerbated the difficulties in adjusting to the disability, medical, family and gendered backgrounds of students with disabilities. To improve preparation of undergraduate students, APE course instructors are required to use an appropriate adapted aquatic curriculum model such as the curriculum and assessment model. Using the logic of the positioning theory, researchers should study undergraduate students’ self and interactive positioning about assisting and teaching students with various levels of disabilities in adapted aquatic settings.

Keywords: adapted aquatics; disability; kinesiology; undergraduate students; practicum

References

  • Adams, A., Bondy, E. & Kuhel, K (2005). Pre-service teacher learning in an unfamiliar setting. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(2), 41–62.Google Scholar

  • Andreouli, E (2010). Identity, positioning and self-other relations. Papers on Social Representations, 19(1). 14.1–14.13.Google Scholar

  • Apache, R. R. G. & Rizzo, T (2005). Evaluating effectiveness of an infusion learning model on attitudes of physical education majors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 101, 177–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barnes, M. (2004). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Australia The use of positioning theory in studying student participation in collaborative learning activitiesMelbourne.Google Scholar

  • Berukoff, K. D. & Hill, G. M (2010). A study of factors that influence the swimming performance of Hispanic high school students. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education, 4, 409–421.Google Scholar

  • Billingsley, B. S., Carlson, E. & Klein, S (2004). The working conditions and induction support of early career special educators. Exceptional Children, 70(3), 333–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boeije, H. R (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Bon, S. C. & Bigbee, A. J (2011). Special education leadership: Integrating professional and personal codes of ethics to serve the best interests of the child. Journal of School Leadership, 21, 324–359.Google Scholar

  • Bullock, L. M., Gable, R. A. & Mohr, J. D (2008). Technology-mediated instruction in distance education and teacher preparation in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31(4), 229–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conatser, P (2004). Aquatic supervision for individuals with disabilities. Adapted Physical Education, 6(5). Retrieved fromhttp://www.pelinks4u.org/archives/adapted/050104.htm.Google Scholar

  • Conatser, P (2007). Inclusion in aquatics—Perceptions of instructor preparedness in training, equipment utilization, and in class management. Palaestra, 23(2), 38–43.Google Scholar

  • Conatser, P (2008). International perspectives of aquatic instructors’ attitudes toward teaching swimming to children with disabilities. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education, 2, 256–265.Google Scholar

  • Conatser, P. & Block, M. E (2002). Adapted aquatics and inclusion. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 73(5), 31–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conatser, P., Block, M. E. & Gansneder, B (2002). Aquatic instructors’ beliefs toward inclusion: The theory of planned behavior. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 172–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conatser, P., Block, M. E. & Lepore, M (2000). Aquatic instructors’ attitudes toward teaching students with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 173–183.Google Scholar

  • Davies, B. & Harré, R (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellestad, J. & Stets, J. E (1998). Jealousy and parenting: Predicting emotions from identity theory. Sociological Perspectives, 41(3), 639–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grenier, M (2011). Co-teaching in physical education: A strategy for inclusive practice. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 28, 95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grenier, M (2007). Inclusion in physical education: From the medical model to social constructionism. Quest, 59(3), 298–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harré, R. & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.) (2003). The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political and cultural contexts. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

  • Harré, R. & Slocum, N (2003). Disputes as complex social events: The uses of Positioning Theory. Harré, R. & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), The self and others (pp. 123–136). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

  • Harré, R. & Van Langenhove, L (1999). The dynamics of social episodes. Harré, R. & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 1–13). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Healy, S., Block, M. & Judge, J (2014). Certified adapted physical educator’s perceptions of advantages and disadvantages of online line teacher development. Palaestra, 28(4), 14–16.Google Scholar

  • Hermans, H. J. M (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hill, S. E. & Buss, D. M (2006). Envy and positional bias in the evolutionary psychology of management. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27, 131–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hodge, S. R., Davis, R., Woodard, R. & Sherrill, C (2002). Comparison of practicum types in changing teacher candidates’ attitudes and perceived competence. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 155–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hodge, S. R. & Jansma, P (1999). Effects of contact time and location of practicum experiences on attitudes of physical education majors. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 48–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hodge, S. R, Sato, T, Mukoyama, T & Kozub, F (2013). Development of the physical educators’ judgments about inclusion instrument for Japanese physical education majors. International Journal of Disability, Development, & Education, 60(4), 332–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hodge, S. R., Tannehill, D. & Kluge, M (2003). Exploring the meaning of practicum experiences for PETE students. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20, 381–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hollway, W (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. Henriques, J., W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 227–263). London, England: Methuen.Google Scholar

  • Jacobs, J., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A (2002). Ontogeny of children’s self-beliefs: Gender and domain differences across grades one through 12. Child Development, 73, 509–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, R. A (1999). Direct perception and symbol forming in positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 37–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judge, T. A. & Bono, J. A (2000). Five factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 751–765.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuhfuss, E. & Lucas, M. D (2010). Examining the relationship of swimming and autism spectrum disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 8, 16–21.Google Scholar

  • Langendorfer, S. J. & Bruya, L. D (1995). Aquatic readiness developing water competence in young children. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar

  • Lareau, A (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Lepore, M., Gayle, G. W. & Stevens, S (1998). Adapted aquatics programming: A professional guide. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar

  • Martin, K. & Kudláček, M (2010). Attitudes of pre-service teachers in an Australian university towards inclusion of students with physical disabilities in general physical education programs. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 3(1), 30–48.Google Scholar

  • McVee, M. B., Baldassarre, M. & Bailey, N. (2004). 53rd National Reading Conference yearbook, (pp. 281–295). Positioning theory as lens to explore teachers’ beliefs about literacy and cultureOak Creek, WINational Reading Conference.Google Scholar

  • Meho, L. I (2006). E-mail interviews in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1284–1295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Merriam, S. B (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

  • Milligan, M. & Neufeldt, A (2001). The myth of asexuality: A survey of social and empirical evidence. Sexuality and Disability, 19(2), 91–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neufeld, A., Harrison, M., Stewart, M., Hughes, K. & Spitzer, D (2002). Immigrant women: Making connections to community resources for support in family caregiving. Qualitative Health Research, 12(6), 751–768.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nilsson, L., Eklof, A. & Ottosson, T (2009). ‘I’m entitled to make mistakes and get corrected’: Students’ self positioning in inquiries into academic conduct. Critical Discourse Studies, 6(2), 127–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norris, M. L (2012). Developing a culture of trust among novice swimmers. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education, 6, 81–91.Google Scholar

  • Ortiz-Castillo, E. Physical activity patterns and factors influencing physical activity participation among adolescents with physical disabilities in urban communities 2011 (3493243, The Ohio State University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 335 Retrieved fromhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/919556867?accountid=9783(919556867).

  • Patton, M (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Sato, T. & Haegele, J. A (2017). Graduate students’ practicum experiences instructing students with severe disabilities in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 23(2), 196–211. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sato, T & Haegele, J. A (2016). Graduate students’ initial exploration of teaching students with disabilities in physical education. International Journal of Special Education, 31(3), 1–30.Google Scholar

  • Sato, T. & Hodge, S. R (2012). Exploring the meaning African American PETE teacher candidates ascribe to their aquatic experiences. Journal of Negro Education, 81(4), 379–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sato, T., Hodge, S. R., Casebolt, K. & Samalot-Rivera, A (2015). Physical education teacher candidates’ perspectives about instructing children with disabilities in adapted aquatics. International Journal of Aquatic Research in Education, 9, 308–328.Google Scholar

  • Summers, L. A. & Wallace, J (2013). The effects of adapted aquatics on swimming skills in children with autism. Kentucky Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 50(2), 48.Google Scholar

  • Tsangaridou, N. & O’Sullivan, M (1994). Using pedagogical reflective strategies to enhance reflection among pre-service physical education teachers. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 14, 13–33.Google Scholar

  • Varela, C. & Harré, R (1996). Conflicting varieties of realism: Casual powers and the problems of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 26, 313–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weiss, M., McCullagh, P., Smith, A. & Berlant, A (1998). Observational learning and the fearful child: Influence of peer models on swimming performance and psychological responses. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 380–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yaggie, J. A. & Armstrong, J (2002). Flexibility outcomes of children with spastic cerebral palsy during a semester of play-based therapy. Clinical Kinesiology, 56(2), 19–24.Google Scholar

  • Yin, R. K (2003). Case study research design and methods (3rd.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Yoon, B (2008). Uninvited guests: The influence of teachers’ roles and pedagogies on the positioning of English language learners in the regular classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 495–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-07-07


We gratefully acknowledge the grant funding support of National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education.


Citation Information: Multicultural Learning and Teaching, Volume 12, Issue 2, 20160025, ISSN (Online) 2161-2412, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2016-0025.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in