Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Mathematical Modelling in Civil Engineering

The Journal of Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest

4 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Update of the P100-1 Concrete Provisions

Viorel Popa
Published Online: 2014-12-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmce-2014-0014


In an effort to improve the harmonization of the Romanian design codes with the Eurocodes, the revision of the Seismic Design Code, P100-1, started in April 2010 and ended in September 2013. The main issues addressed during the revision process are presented in this paper. They include re-outlining the fundamental requirements for seismic design, revision of the seismic action, improvement of the specific provisions for the design of reinforced concrete, steel, composite, wood and masonry structures and non-structural components. This paper focuses on the specific provisions for reinforced concrete structures but general information about the fundamental requirements and the seismic action are presented as well.

Keywords : seismic; code; Eurocode; reinforced; concrete; performance; goals


  • [1] European Committee for Standardization (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. EN1998-1. Brussels.Google Scholar

  • [2] Ministry of Transport, Constructions and Tourism (2006). Seismic Design Code. Part 1 - Design Provisions for Buildings. P100-1/2006. Bucharest, Romania.Google Scholar

  • [3] Ministry of Public Works and Land Management (1992). Code for seismic design of civil, cultural, agricultural and industrial facilities. P100/1992. Bucharest, Romania.Google Scholar

  • [4] Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration (2013Seismic Design Code. Part 3 - Seismic assessment of existing buildings. P100-3/2008. Bucharest, Romania. Google Scholar

  • [5] Ministry of Regional Development and Tourism (2008). Seismic Design Code. Part 1 - Design Provisions for Buildings. P100-1/2013). Bucharest.Google Scholar

  • [6] American Society for Civil Engineers (2005). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. ASCE 7-05. Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration (2012). Design code: basis of structural design. CR0/2012. Bucharest, Romania.Google Scholar

  • [8] Romanian Association for Standardization (2004). Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. SR EN1992-1-1. Bucharest, Romania.Google Scholar

  • [9] Romanian Institute of Standardization (1990). Design and detailing of concrete, reinforced concrete and prestressed structural elements. STAS 10107/0-90. Bucharest, Romania.Google Scholar

  • [10] Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration (2013). Design code for concrete shear wall structures. CR2-1-1.1/2013. Bucharest, Romania.Google Scholar

  • [11] Postelnicu T., Damian I. (2009). Optimizarea proiectarii structurilor pentru hale parter. National Symposium "Noi reglementari pentru beton (producere, proiectare, executie)”: Bucharest, Romania: Conspress Bucureşti.Google Scholar

  • [12] American Concrete Institute. (2011). Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318-11. Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar

  • [13] Paulay T, Priestley M.J.N. (1990). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. The United States of America: John Willey & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

  • [14] Seismology Committee, Structural Engineers Association of California (2008). “Reinforced concrete structures” Article 9.01.010, SEAOC blue book - Seismic design recommendations. California.Google Scholar

  • [15] Buzăianu B., Zamfirescu D. (2011). Studiu privind aplicarea normelor europene la calculul structurilor cu pereţi structurali din beton armat. Civil Engineering National Conference. Bucharest: Conspress.Google Scholar

  • [16] Park R., Paulay T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures. The United States of Americ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • [17] Postelnicu T., Popa V. (2009). Proiectarea nodurilor cadrelor de beton armat in codurile de proiectare actuale. AICPS Journal no. 2-3/2009. Bucharest: Marlink.Google Scholar

  • [18] Postelnicu T., Popa V. (2013). Sper o primă revizuire a codului de proiectare seismică. National Symposium "Noi reglementari pentru beton (producere, proiectare, executie)”. Bucharest: Conspress.Google Scholar

  • [19] Popa V., Cotofana D. (2006). Displacement capacity estimation for RC columns. Comparison between analytical and experimental results. 1st European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

  • [20] Zamfirescu D., Gutunoi A., Damian I. (2011). Studiu asupra relaţiei dintre deplasarea inelastică şi cea elastică pentru cutremure vrâncene. Civil Engineering National Conference. Bucharest: Conspress.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-12-30

Published in Print: 2014-09-01

Citation Information: Mathematical Modelling in Civil Engineering, Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 36–47, ISSN (Online) 2066-6934, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmce-2014-0014.

Export Citation

© by Viorel Popa. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in