Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Metrology and Measurement Systems

The Journal of Committee on Metrology and Scientific Instrumentation of Polish Academy of Sciences

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.598

CiteScore 2016: 1.58

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.460
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.228

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Distinguishing the Plateau and Valley Components of Profiles From Various Types of Two-Process Textures

Wiesław Graboń
  • Corresponding author
  • Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Paweł Pawlus
  • Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-12-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mms-2016-0046


This paper presents methods of separating the plateau part for various types of two-process profiles, having the traces of two processes. The traditional method based on the plateau-valley threshold, according to the ISO 13565-3 standard, is not always sufficient, since the valley portion can include plateau roughness. Starting and finishing points of each plateau in the measured profiles should be determined. The procedure found in the technical literature depends on setting not only the plateau-valley threshold but also a lower threshold. This approach was a little modified for profiles that contain both random and deterministic topography components. A new procedure of determination of the lower threshold was proposed for stratified profiles containing two deterministic parts. The valleys can be characterized by their widths and the distance between them. In addition, a description of the material probability curve is proposed.

Keywords: surface topography; two-process texture; material ratio


  • [1] Thomas, T.R. (2014). Roughness and functions. Surface Topography. Metrology and Properties, 2(1), 014001.Google Scholar

  • [2] Campbell, J.C. (1973). Cylinder bore surface roughness in internal combustion engines. Its appreciation and control. Wear, 19(2), 163−168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Pawlus, P. (1993). Effects of honed cylinder surface topography on the wear of piston-piston ring-cylinder assemblies under artificially increased dustiness conditions. Tribology International, 26, 49−55.Google Scholar

  • [4] Santochi, M., Vignale, M. (1982). A study on the functional properties of the honed surface. CIRP Annals, 31(1), 432−434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Willis, E. (1986). Surface finish in relation to cylinder liners. Wear, 109(1−4), 351−366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Grabon, W., Pawlus, P., Sep, J. (2010). Tribological characteristics of one-process and two-process cylinder liner honed surfaces under reciprocating sliding conditions. Tribology International, 43(10), 1882−1892.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Nilsson, B., Rosen, B.G., Thomas, T.R., Wiklund, D., Xiao, L. (2004). Oil pockets and surface topography: mechanism of friction reduction. XI International Colloquium on Surfaces, Chemnitz, Addendum.Google Scholar

  • [8] Etsion, I. (2005). State of the art in laser surface texturing. ASME Journal of Tribology, 127(1), 248−253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Yu, H., Huang, W., Wang, X. (2013). Dimple patterns for different circumstances. Lubrication Science, 25(2), 67−78.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Nielsen, H.S. (1988). New approaches to surface roughness evaluation of special surfaces. Precision Engineering, 10(4), 209-213.Google Scholar

  • [11] Zipin, R.B. (1990). Analysis of the Rk surface roughness parameter proposals. Precision Engineering, 12(2), 106-108.Google Scholar

  • [12] Malburg, M.C., Raja, J. (1993). Characterization of surface texture generated by plateau-honing process. CIRP Annals, 42(1), 637-640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Anderberg, C., Pawlus, P., Rosen, B.G., Thomas, T.R. (2009). Alternative descriptions of roughness for cylinder liner production. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(4), 1936−1942.Google Scholar

  • [14] Whitehouse, D.J. (1985). Assessment of surface finish profiles produced by multiprocess manufacture. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 199(4), 263-270.Google Scholar

  • [15] Codgell, J.D. (2008). A Convolved multi-Gaussian probability distribution for surface topography application. Precision Engineering, 32(1), 34−46.Google Scholar

  • [16] Pawlus, P. (2008). Simulation of stratified surface topographies. Wear, 264(5−6), 457−463.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Pawlus, P., Grabon, W. (2008). The method of truncation parameters measurement from material ratio curve. Precision Engineering, 32(4), 342−347.Google Scholar

  • [18] Dzierwa, A., Pawlus, P., Zelasko, W. (2014). Comparison of tribological behaviors of one-process and twoprocess steel surfaces in ball-on-disc tests. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 228, 1195−1210.Google Scholar

  • [19] Dzierwa, A., Pawlus, P., Zelasko, W., Reizer, R. (2013). The study of the tribological properties of oneprocess and two-process textures after vapour blasting and lapping using pin-on-disc tests. Key Engineering Materials, 527, 217−222.Google Scholar

  • [20] Greenwood, J.A., Williamson, J.B.P. (1966). Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. London, 295(1442), 300−319.Google Scholar

  • [21] Leefe, S.E. (1998). “Bi-Gaussian” representation of worn surface topography in elastic contact problems. Tribology for Energy Conservation, Dowson, D., et al., 281−290.Google Scholar

  • [22] Godi, A, Kuhle, A, De Chiffre L. (2014). A plateau-valley separation method for textured surfaces with a deterministic pattern. Precision Engineering, 38(1), 190−196.Google Scholar

  • [23] Godi, A., Kuhle, A., De Chiffre L. (2014). A new procedure for characterizing textured surfaces with a deterministic pattern of valley features. Meas. Sci. Technol, 24(8), 085009.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Jakubiec, W., Brylski, M. (2003). Validation of software for calculation the surface roughness parameters according to ISO 13565-3. Proc. of 9th International Conference on Metrology and Properties of engineering Surfaces, Halmstad University, Sweden, 77−84.Google Scholar

  • [25] Watts, D.G., Bacon, W. (1974). Using an hyperbola as a transition model to fit two-regime straight-line data. Technometrics, 16(3), 369−373.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Grabon, W., Pawlus, P. (2010). Probability description of two-process surface topography. 10th International Symposium on Measurement and Quality Control 2010 (ISMQC 2010) Osaka, Japan, 5−9 Sep., 380−384.Google Scholar

  • [27] Grabon, W., Pawlus, P., Galda, L., Dzierwa, A., Podulka, P. (2011). Problems of surface topography with oil pockets analysis. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 311(1), 012023.Google Scholar

  • [28] Grabon, W., Pawlus, P., Koszela, W., Reizer, R. (2014). Proposals of methods of oil capacity calculation. Tribology International, 75, 117−122. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-02-24

Accepted: 2016-05-30

Published Online: 2016-12-13

Published in Print: 2016-12-01

Citation Information: Metrology and Measurement Systems, Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 593–602, ISSN (Online) 2300-1941, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mms-2016-0046.

Export Citation

© Polish Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in