Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Metrology and Measurement Systems

The Journal of Committee on Metrology and Scientific Instrumentation of Polish Academy of Sciences

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.598

CiteScore 2016: 1.58

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.460
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.228

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 23, Issue 4


On Rapid Re-Design of UWB Antennas with Respect to Substrate Permittivity

Slawomir Koziel
  • Corresponding author
  • Reykjavík University, School of Science and Engineering, Menntavegur 1, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Adrian Bekasiewicz
Published Online: 2016-12-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mms-2016-0051


Re-design of a given antenna structure for various substrates is a practically important issue yet non trivial, particularly for wideband and ultra-wideband antennas. In this work, a technique for expedited redesign of ultra-wideband antennas for various substrates is presented. The proposed approach is based on inverse surrogate modeling with the scaling model constructed for several reference designs that are optimized for selected values of the substrate permittivity. The surrogate is set up at the level of coarse-discretization EM simulation model of the antenna and, subsequently, corrected to provide prediction at the high-fidelity EM model level. The dimensions of the antenna scaled to any substrate permittivity within the region of validity of the surrogate are obtained instantly, without any additional EM simulation necessary. The proposed approach is demonstrated using an ultra-wideband monopole with the permittivity scaling range from 2.2 to 4.5. Numerical validation is supported by physical measurements of the fabricated prototypes of the re-designed antennas.

Keywords: antenna design; geometry scaling; simulation-driven optimization; surrogate modeling; inverse modeling; substrate properties


  • [1] Nocedal, J., Wright, S. (2006). Numerical Optimization. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • [2] Viani, F., Salucci, M., Robol, F., Oliveri, G., Massa, A. (2012). Design of a UHF RFID/GPS fractal antenna for logistics management. J. Electromagnetic Waves App., 26, 480−492.Google Scholar

  • [3] Lizzi, L., Azaro, R., Oliveri, G., Massa, A. (2011). Printed UWB antenna operating over multiple mobile wireless standards. IEEE Ant. Wireless Prop. Lett., 10, 1429−1432.Google Scholar

  • [4] Koziel, S., Ogurtsov, S. (2014). Antenna design by simulation-driven optimization. Surrogate-based approach. Springer.Google Scholar

  • [5] Koziel, S., Bekasiewicz, A. (2016). A structure and simulation-driven design of compact CPW-fed UWB antenna. IEEE Ant. Wireless Prop. Lett., 15, 750−753.Google Scholar

  • [6] Koziel, S., Bekasiewicz, A. (2015). Fast EM-driven size reduction of antenna structures by means of adjoint sensitivities and trust regions. IEEE Ant. Wireless Prop. Lett., 14, 1681−1684.Google Scholar

  • [7] Ghassemi, M., Bakr M., Sangary, N. (2013). Antenna design exploiting adjoint sensitivity-based geometry evolution. IET Microwaves Ant. Prop., 7(4), 268−276.Google Scholar

  • [8] Koziel, S., Ogurtsow, S., Zieniutycz, W., Bekasiewicz, A. (2015). Design of a planar UWB dipole antenna with an integrated balun using surrogate-based optimization. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 14, 366−369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Koziel, S., Mosler, F., Reitzinger, S., Thoma, P. (2012). Robust microwave design optimization using adjoint sensitivity and trust regions. Int. J. RF and Microwave CAE, 22(1), 10−19.Google Scholar

  • [10] CST Microwave Studio, ver. 2013, CST AG, Bad Nauheimer Str. 19, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany, 2013.Google Scholar

  • [11] Ansys HFSS, ver. 14.0, ANSYS, Inc., Southpointe 275 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317, 2012.Google Scholar

  • [12] Wu, J., Zhao, Z., Nie, Z., Liu, Q.H. (2014). Bandwidth enhancement of a planar printed quasi-Yagi antenna with size reduction. IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop., 62(1), 463−467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Chu, Q.X., Mao, C.X., Zhu, H. (2013). A Compact Notched Band UWB Slot Antenna With Sharp Selectivity and Controllable Bandwidth. IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop., 61(8), 3961−3966.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Koziel, S., Bekasiewicz, A., Leifsson, L. (2016). Rapid EM-driven antenna dimension scaling through inverse modeling. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 15, 714−717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Conn, A.R., Gould, N.I.M., Toint, P.L. (2000). Trust-region methods. MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

  • [16] Li, L., Cheung, S.W., Yuk, T.I. (2013). Compact MIMO Antenna for Portable Devices in UWB Applications. IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop., 61(8), 4257-4264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-05-31

Accepted: 2016-07-09

Published Online: 2016-12-13

Published in Print: 2016-12-01

Citation Information: Metrology and Measurement Systems, Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 513–520, ISSN (Online) 2300-1941, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mms-2016-0051.

Export Citation

© Polish Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Muhammad Aziz Ul Haq and Slawomir Koziel
International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, 2017, Page e21204

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in