Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Metrology and Measurement Systems

The Journal of Committee on Metrology and Scientific Instrumentation of Polish Academy of Sciences

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.140

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.554
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.363
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 1.260

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-1941
See all formats and pricing

Fir Filters Compliant with the IEEE Standard for M Class PMU

Krzysztof Duda
  • Corresponding author
  • AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Automatics, Computer Science and Biomedical Engineering, Al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
  • Email:
/ Tomasz P. Zieliński
  • AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science, Electronics and Telocomminications, Al. A. Mickiewicza 30, Kraków, Poland
  • Email:
Published Online: 2016-12-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mms-2016-0055

Abstract

In this paper it is shown that M class PMU (Phasor Measurement Unit) reference model for phasor estimation recommended by the IEEE Standard C37.118.1 with the Amendment 1 is not compliant with the Standard. The reference filter preserves only the limits for TVE (total vector error), and exceeds FE (frequency error) and RFE (rate of frequency error) limits. As a remedy we propose new filters for phasor estimation for M class PMU that are fully compliant with the Standard requirements. The proposed filters are designed: 1) by the window method; 2) as flat-top windows; or as 3) optimal min-max filters. The results for all Standard compliance tests are presented, confirming good performance of the proposed filters. The proposed filters are fixed at the nominal frequency, i.e. frequency tracking and adaptive filter tuning are not required, therefore they are well suited for application in lowcost popular PMUs.

Keywords: phasor estimation; phasor measurement unit; FIR filter; cosine window; flat-top window

References

  • [1] Synchrophasor Measurements for Power Systems, IEEE Standard C37.118.1, Dec. 2011.

  • [2] Synchrophasor Measurements for Power Systems − Amendment 1: Modification of Selected Performance Requirements, IEEE Standard C37.118.1a, Apr. 2014.

  • [3] Phadke, A.G., Thorp J.S. (2008). Synchronized Phasor Measurements and Their Applications. Springer. [Web of Science]

  • [4] Phadke, A.G., Thorp J.S. (2009). Computer Relaying For Power Systems. John Wiley and Sons.

  • [5] Premerlani, W., Kasztenny, B., Adamiak, M. (2008). Development and implementation of a synchrophasor estimator capable of measurements under dynamic conditions. IEEE Trans. Power Del., 23(1), 109-123. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • [6] Phadke, A., Kasztenny, B. (2009). Synchronized phasor and frequency measurement under transient conditions. IEEE Trans. Power Del., 24(1), 89-95. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • [7] Macii, D., Petri, D., Zorat, A. (2012). Accuracy analysis and enhancement of DFT-based synchrophasor estimators in off-nominal conditions. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 61(10), 2653-2664. [Web of Science]

  • [8] Belega, D., Petri, D. (2013). Accuracy analysis of the multicycle synchrophasor estimator provided by the interpolated DFT algorithm. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 62(5), 942-953. [Web of Science]

  • [9] Petri, D., Fontanelli, D., Macii, D. (2014). A frequency-domain algorithm for dynamic synchrophasor and frequency estimation. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 63(10), 2330-2340. [Web of Science]

  • [10] Barchi, G., Fontanelli, D., Macii, D., Petri, D. (2015). On the Accuracy of Phasor Angle Measurements in Power Networks. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 64(5), 1129-1139. [Web of Science]

  • [11] Barchi, G., Macii, D., Petri, D. (2013). Synchrophasor estimators accuracy: A comparative analysis. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 62(5), 963-973. [Web of Science]

  • [12] Barchi, G., Macii, D., Belega, D., Petri, D. (2013). Performance of synchrophasor estimators in transient conditions: A comparative analysis. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 62(9), 2410-2418. [Web of Science]

  • [13] de la O Serna, J.A. (2007). Dynamic Phasor Estimates for Power System Oscillation. IEEE Trans. on Instrum. Meas., 56(5), 1648−1657.

  • [14] Platas-Garza, M. A., de la O Serna, J. A. (2010). Dynamic phasor and frequency estimates through maximally flat differentiators. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 59(7), 1803-1811. [Web of Science]

  • [15] de la O Serna, J. A. (2015). Synchrophasor Measurement With Polynomial Phase-Locked-Loop Taylor- Fourier Filters. IEEE Trans. on Instrum. Meas., 64(2), 328−337.

  • [16] Belega, D., Fontanelli, D., Petri, D. (2015). Dynamic Phasor and Frequency Measurements by an Improved Taylor Weighted Least Squares Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 64(8), 2165-2178. [Web of Science]

  • [17] Belega, D., Macii, D., Petri, D. (2014). Fast synchrophasor estimation by means of frequency-domain and time-domain algorithms. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 63(2), 388-401. [Web of Science]

  • [18] Roscoe, A.J., Dickerson, B., Martin, K.E. (2015). Filter Design Masks for C37.118.1a-Compliant Frequency- Tracking and Fixed-Filter M-Class Phasor Measurement Units. IEEE Trans. on Instrum. Meas., 64(8), 2096−2107.

  • [19] Roscoe, A.J., Abdulhadi, I.F., Burt, G.M. (2013). P and M class phasor measurement unit algorithms using adaptive cascaded filters. IEEE Trans. Power Del., 28(3), 1447-1459. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • [20] Roscoe, A.J. (2013). Exploring the relative performance of frequency-tracking and fixed-filter phasor measurement unit algorithms under C37.118 test procedures, the effects of interharmonics, and initial attempts at Mering P-class response with M-class filtering. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 62(8), 2140-2153.

  • [21] Kamwa, I., Samantaray, S.R., Joos, G. (2014). Wide Frequency Range Adaptive Phasor and Frequency PMU Algorithms. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid., 5(2), 569-579.

  • [22] Kamwa, I., Samantaray, S., Joos, G. (2013). Compliance analysis of PMU algorithms and devices for widearea stabilizing control of large power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 28(2), 1766-1778. [Crossref]

  • [23] Castello, P., Liu, J., Muscas, C., Pegoraro, P.A., Ponci, F., Monti, A. (2014). A fast and accurate PMU algorithm for P+M class measurement of synchrophasor and frequency. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 63(12), 2837-2845. [Web of Science]

  • [24] Martin, K.E. (2015). Synchrophasor measurements under the IEEE standard C37.118.1-2011 with amendment C37.118.1a. IEEE Trans. Power Del., 30(3), 1514-1522. [Web of Science]

  • [25] Oppenheim, A.V., Schafer, R.W., Buck, J.R. (1999). Discrete-Time Signal Processing, 2nd Edition. Prentice-Hall.

  • [26] Duda, K., Zieliński, T.P., Barczentewicz, Sz. (2016). Perfectly Flat-Top and Equiripple Flat-Top Cosine Windows. IEEE Trans. on Instrum. Meas., 65(7), 1558-1567.

  • [27] Signal Processing Toolbox 6 User’s Guide, The Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA, Sep. 2010.

  • [28] Harris, F.J. (1978). On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. Proc. IEEE, 66, 51-83. [Crossref]

  • [29] Nuttall, A.H. (1981). Some Windows with Very Good Sidelobe Behavior. IEEE Trans. On Acoustics, Speech, And Signal Processing, ASSP-29(1), 84-91.

About the article

Received: 2016-07-01

Accepted: 2016-08-28

Published Online: 2016-12-13

Published in Print: 2016-12-01


Citation Information: Metrology and Measurement Systems, ISSN (Online) 2300-1941, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mms-2016-0055. Export Citation

© Polish Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in