Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

NEW PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL

Moral Philosophy and Politics

Editor-in-Chief: Schefczyk, Michael

Managing Editor: Schmidt-Petri, Christoph

Ed. by Meyer, Lukas Heinrich / Peacock, Mark / Schaber, Peter

2 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2194-5624
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Right to Exclude, Human Rights,and Political Facts

Henning Hahn
Published Online: 2016-09-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2015-0034

Abstract

In this paper I will defend a limited right to exclusion. Legitimate states are entitled to refuse the entrance of unwanted immigrants, if necessary with force. However, I will also work out leverage points for a cosmopolitan critique of this view, one that starts with national borders as they are and constructs human rights conditionalities as they could be. In particular, I propose an immanent critique of Michael Blake’s jurisdictional theory of immigration. Blake gives a compelling argument that sovereign states have a prerogative to decide upon their own border policies, a prerogative that is only constrained by the international human rights regime. However, even if cosmopolitans accept this argument (which I think they should), they still have good reasons to expand the prevailing human rights regime in three respects: with regard to the classification of basic human rights, the domain of human rights obligations, and blind spots of the current human rights regime.

Keywords: Michael Blake; human rights; political feasibilities; right to exclude; migration ethics

References

  • Abizadeh, A. (2008). ‘Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders’, Political Theory 36 (1): 37–65.Google Scholar

  • Beitz, C. (2009). The Idea of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Blake, M. (2014). ‘The Right to Exclude’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (5): 521–537.Google Scholar

  • Blake, M. (2013). ‘Immigration, Jurisdiction, and Exclusion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs41 (2): 103–130.Google Scholar

  • Blake, M. (2012). ‘Equality Without Documents’, in: C. MacLeod (ed.). Justice and Equality (Calgary: University of Calgary Press), pp. 99–122.Google Scholar

  • Blake, M. (2001). ‘Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3): 257–296.Google Scholar

  • Brezger, J. (2014). ‘Zur Verteidigung des Menschenrechts auf Bewegungsfreiheit. Eine Antwort auf Michael Blake’, Zeitschrift für Menschenrechte 8 (2): 30–49.Google Scholar

  • Caney, S. (2005). Justice Beyond Borders (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Carens, J. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Carens, J. (1987). ‘Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders’, The Review of Politics49 (2): 251–273.Google Scholar

  • Cassee, A. (2015). ‘Das Recht auf Globale Bewegungsfreiheit. Eine Verteidigung’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Beihefte 141: 55–77.Google Scholar

  • Estlund, D. (2011). ‘Human Nature and the Limits (If Any) of Political Philosophy’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (3): 207–237.Google Scholar

  • Gilabert, P. (2008). ‘The Feasibility of Basic Socioeconomic Human Rights’, The Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237): 659–681.Google Scholar

  • Hahn, H. (2014). ‘Human Rights as the Universal Language of Critique. A Political Approach’, Zeitschrift für Menschenrechte 7 (2): 42–58.Google Scholar

  • Herzog, L. (2015). ‘Distributive Justice, Feasibility Gridlocks, and the Harmfulness of Economic Ideology’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (5): 957–969.Google Scholar

  • Honneth, A. (2014). Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar

  • Ignatieff, M. (2001). Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

  • James, A. (2005). ‘Constructing Justice for Existing Practice: Rawls and the Status Quo’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (3): 281–316.Google Scholar

  • Kates, M., Pevnick, R (2014). ‘Immigration, Jurisdiction, and History’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (2): 179–194.Google Scholar

  • Lawford-Smith, H. (2013). ‘Understanding Political Feasibility’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 21 (3): 243–259.Google Scholar

  • Oberman, K. (2016). ‘Immigration as a Human Right’, in S. Fine, L. Ypi (eds.). Migration in Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 32–56.Google Scholar

  • Murphy, L. (2000). Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Pogge, T. (2002). World Poverty and Human Rights (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar

  • Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

  • Risse, M. (2005). ‘Do We Owe the Global Poor Assistance or Rectification?’ Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1): 9–18.Google Scholar

  • Shachar, A. (2009). The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

  • Shue, H. (1980). Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and US Foreign Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

  • Thomson, J. (1971). ‘A Defense of Abortion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1): 47–66.Google Scholar

  • Valentini, L. (2012). ‘Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map’, Philosophy Compass 7 (9): 654–664.Google Scholar

  • Valentini, L. (2011). Justice in a Globalized World: A Normative Framework (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Young, I. (2013). Responsibility for Justice (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Ypi, L. (2008). ‘Statist Cosmopolitanism’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (1): 48–71.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-09-24

Published in Print: 2016-11-01


Citation Information: Moral Philosophy and Politics, Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 247–267, ISSN (Online) 2194-5624, ISSN (Print) 2194-5616, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2015-0034.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in