Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section


Moral Philosophy and Politics

Editor-in-Chief: Schefczyk, Michael

Managing Editor: Schmidt-Petri, Christoph

Ed. by Meyer, Lukas Heinrich / Peacock, Mark / Schaber, Peter

2 Issues per year

See all formats and pricing
In This Section

Transformable Goods and the Limits of What Money Can Buy

David G. Dick
  • Corresponding author
  • Philosophy, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
  • Email:
Published Online: 2016-04-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2015-0016


There are some things money literally cannot buy. Invariably transformable goods are such things because when they are exchanged for money, they become something else. These goods are destroyed rather than transferred in monetary exchanges. They mark out an impassable limit beyond which money and the market cannot reach. They cannot be for sale, in the strongest and most literal sense. Variably transformable goods are similar. They can be destroyed when offered or exchanged for money, but they differ in their ability to sometimes emerge from financial transactions intact. Analyzing transformable goods reveals informative and surprising results. Like other goods and commodities, they are agent relative, defined by the way particular agents value them. Inside the same transaction, a good could be transformable for one agent and not another, depending on how and what these agents value in the transaction. Applying this conceptual framework can reveal otherwise obscure facets of existing and future debates about the ethics and limits of markets. To demonstrate this, the framework is here applied to Richard Titmuss’s arguments about markets in blood, clarifying and illuminating some of his most confusing claims. Applying this framework to other debates may reveal even more striking results.

Keywords: ethics and markets; market limits; money; value; goods and commodities


  • Anderson, Elizabeth. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1995.

  • Cerasoli, Christopher P., Jessica M. Nicklin, and Michael T. Ford. “Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 140, no. 4 (2014): 980–1008. [Web of Science]

  • Coase, Ronald H. “Lighthouse in economics.” Journal of Law and Economics 17 (1974): 357–376.

  • Frey, Bruno S., and Felix Oberholzer-Gee. “The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out.” The American Economic Review 87 (1997): 746–755.

  • Heyman, James, and Dan Ariely. “Effort for payment a tale of two markets.” Psychological Science 15, no. 11 (2004): 787–793.

  • Kant, Immanuel. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Trans. James Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1981.

  • Keller, Kevin Lane. “Managing the growth tradeoff: Challenges and opportunities in luxury branding.” Journal of Brand Management 16, no. 5 (2009): 290–301.

  • Posner, Richard A. Economic Analysis of Law. Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1973.

  • Radin, Margaret Jane. Contested Commodities:[the trouble with trade in sex, children, body parts, and other things]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.

  • Sandel, Michael J. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York: Macmillan, 2012.

  • Satz, Debra. Why Some Things Should not be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

  • Sidgwick, Henry. The Principles of Political Economy, New York: Macmillan, 1901.

  • Titmuss, Richard. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. New York: Pantheon, 1971.

  • Walzer, Michael. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books, 1983.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-04-22

Citation Information: Moral Philosophy and Politics, ISSN (Online) 2194-5624, ISSN (Print) 2194-5616, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2015-0016. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in