Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Moral Philosophy and Politics

Editor-in-Chief: Schefczyk, Michael

Managing Editor: Schmidt-Petri, Christoph

Ed. by Meyer, Lukas Heinrich / Peacock, Mark / Schaber, Peter

2 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2194-5624
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Sufficientarianism and the Measurement of Inequality

Rudolf Schuessler
Published Online: 2018-10-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2017-0057

Abstract

What impact should sufficientarianism have on the measurement of inequality? Like other theories of justice, sufficientarianism influences how economic inequality is conceived. For the purpose of measurement, its standards of justice can be approximated by income-based thresholds of sufficiency. At which income level could a threshold of having enough be pegged in OECD countries? What would it imply for standard indicators of inequality, such as decile comparisons of cumulated income, income spreads, or the Gini coefficient? This paper suggests some answers to these questions, showing that sufficientarian ideas could make a difference with respect to the measurement of inequality in a society.

Keywords: social justice; inequality; sufficientarianism; distributive justice

References

  • Arneson, R. (2013). ‘Egalitarianism (Last Version 2013)’, in E. Zalta (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL=http://plato.stanford.edu/egalitarianism (accessed on 7th April, 2018).

  • Atkinson, A. and Piketty, T. (eds.). (2010). Top Incomes: A Global Perspective (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Axelsen, D. and Nielsen, L. (2014). ‘Sufficiency as Freedom from Duress’, Journal of Political Philosophy, URL=doi: (accessed on 4th August, 2017).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barry, B. (1998). ‘Social Exclusion, Social Isolation and the Distribution of Income’, CASE paper 12, London School of Economics.Google Scholar

  • Benbaji, Y. (2005). ‘The Doctrine of Sufficiency: A Defence’, Utilitas 17: 310–332.Google Scholar

  • Benbaji, Y. (2006). ‘Sufficiency or Priority?’, European Journal of Philosophy 14: 327–348.Google Scholar

  • Brennan, P. (2014). ‘Subsidiarity in the Tradition of Catholic Social Theory’, in M. Evans (ed.). Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 29–48.Google Scholar

  • Brighouse, H. and Robeyns, I. (eds). (2010). Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

  • Brown, C. (2005). ‘Priority or Sufficiency … or Both?’, Economics and Philosophy 24: 199–220.Google Scholar

  • Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (ed.) (2017). Lebenslagen in Deutschland, 5. Armuts- und Reichtumsbericht der Bundesregierung (Berlin: BMAS).Google Scholar

  • Casal, P. (2007). ‘Why Sufficiency Is Not Enough’, Ethics 117: 296–326.Google Scholar

  • Christiano, T. (2012). ‘Money in Politics’, in D. Estlund (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 241–257.Google Scholar

  • Comim, F., Qizilbash, M., and Alkire, S. (eds.). (2008). The Capability Approach. Concepts, Measures, and Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

  • Cowell, F. (2011). Measuring Inequality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Crisp, R. (2003). ‘Equality, Priority, and Compassion’, Ethics 113: 745–763.Google Scholar

  • Deveaux, M. (2017). ‘Re-Evaluating Sufficientarianism in Light of Evidence of Inequality’s Harms’, Ethics and Social Welfare, URL=doi: (accessed on 13th December, 2017).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Estella, A. (2002). The EU Principle of Subsidiarity and Its Critique (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Fleurbaey, M. (2016). ‘Economics and Economic Justice’, in E. Zalta (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/economic-justice (accessed on 3rd February, 2018).Google Scholar

  • Foster, J. (1998). ‘Absolute Vs Relative Poverty’, American Economic Review 88: 335–341.Google Scholar

  • Fourie, C. and Rid, A. (eds.) (2017). What Is Enough? Sufficiency, Justice, and Health (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Frankfurt, H. (1987). ‘Equality as an Ideal’, Ethics 98: 21–43.Google Scholar

  • Frankfurt, H. (2015). On Inequality (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

  • Freeland, C. (2012). Plutocrats (New York: Penguin).Google Scholar

  • Freiman, C. (2012). ‘Why Poverty Matters Most: Towards a Humanitarian Theory of Social Justice’, Utilitas 24: 25–40.Google Scholar

  • Gilens, M. (2012). Affluence and Influence. Economic Inequality and Political Power in America (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

  • Gosseries, A. (2011). ‘Sufficientarianism’, in E. Craig (ed.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL=doi: (accessed on 14th July, 2017).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hills, J. (2015). Wealth in the UK (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Hirose, I. (2015). Egalitarianism (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

  • Holtug, N. and Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (eds.). (2007). Egalitarianism. New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

  • Huseby, R. (2010). ‘Sufficiency: Restated and Defended’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 18: 178–197.Google Scholar

  • Kortmann, K. (2011). ‘Vermögen in Deutschland – Die methodische Anlage der Untersuchung’ [‘Wealth in Germany – The Methodology of The Inquiry’], in: Lauterbach et al. (2011a), pp. 15–28.Google Scholar

  • Lauterbach, W., Druyen, T., and Grundmann, M. (eds.). (2011a). Vermögen in Deutschland [Wealth in Germany] (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag).Google Scholar

  • Lauterbach, W., Kramer, M., and Ströing, M. (2011b). ‘Vermögen in Deutschland. Konzept und Durchführung’ [‘Wealth in Germany – Conception and Implementation’], in: Lauterbach et al. (2011a), pp. 29–53.Google Scholar

  • Nielsen, L. (2017). ‘What Is Our Real Concern with Real Inequality?’, Policy Studies Journal, URL=doi.org/10.1111/psj.12205 (accessed on 3rd February, 2018).

  • Papadopoulos, F. and Tsakloglou, P. (2008). ‘Social Exclusion in the EU. A Capability-Based Approach’, in: Comim et al., pp. 242–257.Google Scholar

  • Parfit, D. (2000). ‘Equality and Priority’, in M. Clayton and A. Williams (eds.). The Ideal of Equality (New York: St Martins Press), pp. 81–126.Google Scholar

  • Piketty, T. and Saez, E. (2006). ‘The Evolution of Top Incomes’, NBER working paper 11955, Harvard University.Google Scholar

  • Robeyns, I. (2017). ‘Having Too Much’, in J. Knight and M. Schwartzberg (eds.). Wealth (New York: New York University Press), pp. 1–44.Google Scholar

  • Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior (New York: W.W. Horton).Google Scholar

  • Sen, A. (1980). ‘Equality of What?’, in S. McMurrin (ed.). The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press), pp. 196–220.Google Scholar

  • Sen, A. (1983). ‘Poor Relatively Speaking’, Oxford Economic Papers 35: 153–169.Google Scholar

  • Sen, A. (1997). On Economic Inequality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Sen, A. (2000). Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar

  • Shields, L. (2012). ‘The Prospects for Sufficientarianism’, Utilitas 24: 101–117.Google Scholar

  • Shields, L. (2016). Just Enough. Sufficiency as a Demand of Justice (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar

  • Stiglitz, J. (2012). The Price of Inequality (New York: W.W. Horton).Google Scholar

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-10-25


Citation Information: Moral Philosophy and Politics, ISSN (Online) 2194-5624, ISSN (Print) 2194-5616, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2017-0057.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in