Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Moral Philosophy and Politics

Editor-in-Chief: Schefczyk, Michael

Managing Editor: Schmidt-Petri, Christoph

Ed. by Meyer, Lukas Heinrich / Peacock, Mark / Schaber, Peter


CiteScore 2018: 0.41

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.565

Online
ISSN
2194-5624
See all formats and pricing
More options …

In for a Penny, or: If you Disapprove of Investment Migration, Why Do You Approve of High-Skilled Migration?

Lior ErezORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8025-5905
Published Online: 2019-10-09 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2018-0083

Abstract

While many argue investment-based criteria for immigration are wrong or at least problematic, skill-based criteria remain relatively uncontroversial. This is normatively inconsistent. This article assesses three prominent normative objections to investment-based selection criteria for immigrants: (i) that they wrongfully discriminate between prospective immigrants (ii) that they are unfair, and (iii) that they undermine political equality among citizens. It argues that either skill-based criteria are equally susceptible to these objections, or that investment-based criteria are equally shielded from them. Indeed, in some ways investment-based criteria are less normatively problematic than skill-based criteria. Given this analysis, the resistance to investment-based migration criteria, but not to skill-based criteria, is inconsistent.

Keywords: discrimination; ethics of immigration; equality of opportunity; investment migration; political equality

References

  • Abizadeh, A. (2008). ‘Democratic Theory and Border Coercion’, Political Theory 36 (1): 37–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Abizadeh, A. 2014. ‘Review of the Ethics of Immigration by Joseph H. Carens’, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/the-ethics-of-immigration/. (accessed on April 28, 2014)

  • Abrahamian, A. (2015). The Cosmopolites: the Coming of the Global Citizen (New York, NY: Columbia Global Reports).Google Scholar

  • Alexander, L. (1992). ‘What Makes Wrongful Discrimination Wrong Biases, Preferences, Stereotypes, and Proxies’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141 (1): 149–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alexander, L. 2016. ‘Is Wrongful Discrimination Really Wrong?’, San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 17–257. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2909277. (accessed on September 24, 2019).

  • Armstrong, C. (2018). ‘The Price of Selling Citizenship’, in R. Bauböck (ed.). Debating Transformations of National Citizenship (Cham: Springer), pp. 25–28.Google Scholar

  • Barry, B. (1995). ‘Spherical Justice and Global Injustice’, in D. Miller and M. Walzer (eds.). Pluralism, Justice, and Equality (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 67–80.Google Scholar

  • Becker, G. and Lazear, E.P. (2013). ‘A Market Solution to Immigration Reform’, Wall Street Journal sec. Opinion. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323375204578271531542362850. (accessed on March 2, 2013).

  • Blake, M. (2002). ‘Discretionary Immigration’, Philosophical Topics 30 (2): 273–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blake, M. (2008). ‘Immigration and Political Equality’, San Diego Law Review 45: 963–980.Google Scholar

  • Borjas, G. (2014). Immigration Economics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

  • Borna, S. and Stearns, J.M. (2002). ‘‘the Ethics and Efficacy of Selling National Citizenship’’, Journal of Business Ethics 37 (2): 193–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boucher, A. (2016). Gender, Migration and the Global Race for Talent (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Brennan, J. and Jaworski, P.M. (2015). ‘Markets without Symbolic Limits’, Ethics 125 (4): 1053–1077.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brock, G. and Blake, M. (2014). Debating Brain Drain: May Governments Restrict Emigration? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Caney, S. (2001). ‘Cosmopolitan Justice and Equalizing Opportunities’, Metaphilosophy 32 (1–2): 113–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Card, D. and Peri, G. (2016). ‘Immigration Economics by George J. Borjas: A Review Essay’, Journal of Economic Literature 54 (4): 1333–1349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carens, J. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Cole, P. (2014). ‘Beyond Reason: the Philosophy and Politics of Immigration’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (5): 503–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cox, A. (2004). ‘Citizenship, Standing, and Immigration Law’, California Law Review 92 (2): 373–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Czaika, M. and Parsons, C.R. (2017). ‘The Gravity of High-Skilled Migration Policies’, Demography 54 (2): 603–630.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Džankić, J. (2019). The Global Market for Investor Citizenship (Cham: Springer).Google Scholar

  • Ellermann, A. (forthcoming). ‘Human-Capital Citizenship and the Changing Logic of Immigrant Admissions’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.Google Scholar

  • European Parliament. 2014. ‘Resolution on EU Citizenship for Sale, 2013/2995(RSP).’Google Scholar

  • Ferracioli, L. (2017). ‘Citizenship Allocation and Withdrawal: Some Normative Issues’, Philosophy Compass 12 (12): e12459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fine, S. (2016). ‘Immigration and Discrimination’, in S. Fine and L. Ypi (eds.). Migration in Political Theory: the Ethics of Movement and Membership (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 125–150.Google Scholar

  • Fine, S. and Ypi, L. (2016). Migration in Political Theory: the Ethics of Movement and Membership (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Goodin, R.E. (2007). ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 35 (1): 40–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hainmueller, J. and Hiscox, M.J. (2010). ‘Attitudes toward Highly Skilled and Low-Skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment’, American Political Science Review 104 (1): 61–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hellman, D. (2008). When Is Discrimination Wrong? (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

  • Hidalgo, J. (2016). ‘Selling Citizenship: A Defence’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (3): 223–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, P. (2013). Immigration Justice (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar

  • Johnston, L. 2013. ‘A Passport at Any Price? Citizenship by Investment through the Prism of Institutional Corruption’. ID 2324101. Edmond J. Safra Research Lab Working Papers. (Harvard, MA: Endmond J. Safra Center for Ethics). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2324101. (accessed on September 24, 2019).

  • Joppke, C. (2005). Selecting by Origin: Ethnic Migration in the Liberal State (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

  • Kofman, E. (2018). ‘Family Migration as a Class Matter’, International Migration 56 (4): 33–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lenard, P.T. (2018). ‘Democratic Citizenship and Denationalization’, American Political Science Review 112 (1): 99–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lim, D. (2017). ‘Selecting Immigrants By Skill: A Case Of Wrongful Discrimination?’, Social Theory & Practice 43 (2): 369–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lim, D. (forthcoming). ‘The Indirect Gender Discrimination of Skill-Selective Immigration Policies’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.Google Scholar

  • Lindauer, M. (2017). ‘Immigration Policy and Identification across Borders’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 12 (3): 280–303.Google Scholar

  • Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2014). Born Free and Equal?: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature of Discrimination (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • MacKay, D. (2016). ‘Are Skill-Selective Immigration Policies Just?’, Social Theory and Practice 42 (1): 123–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manfredi, C.P. (1998). ‘Judicial Review and Criminal Disenfranchisement in the United States and Canada’, The Review of Politics 60 (2): 277–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, D. (1992). ‘Deserving Jobs’, The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-) 42 (167): 161–181.Google Scholar

  • Miller, D. (1995). ‘Complex Equality’, in D. Miller and M. Walzer (eds.). Pluralism, Justice, and Equality (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 197–225.Google Scholar

  • Miller, D. (2016). Strangers in Our Midst (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

  • Mills, C. (2015). ‘Race and Global Justice’, in B. Buckinx, J. Trejo-Mathys and T. Waligore (eds.). Domination and Global Political Justice: Conceptual, Historical and Institutional Perspectives (New York, NY and Abingdon: Routledge), pp. 181–205.Google Scholar

  • Ochoa, P. (2018). ‘What Money Can’t Buy: Face-to-Face Cooperation and Local Democratic Life’, in R. Bauböck (ed.). Debating Transformations of National Citizenship (Cham: Springer), pp. 43–46.Google Scholar

  • Parker, O. (2017). ‘Commercializing Citizenship in Crisis EU: the Case of Immigrant Investor Programmes’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (2): 332–348.Google Scholar

  • Pevnick, R. (2011). Immigration and the Constraints of Justice: between Open Borders and Absolute Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

  • Reiman, J. (2005). ‘Liberal and Republican Arguments against the Disenfranchisement of Felons’, Criminal Justice Ethics 24 (1): 3–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sager, A. (2016). ‘Methodological Nationalism, Migration and Political Theory’, Political Studies 64 (1): 42–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Segall, S. (2012). ‘What’s so Bad about Discrimination?’, Utilitas 24 (1): 82–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shachar, A. (2016). ‘Selecting By Merit’, in S. Fine and L. Ypi (eds.). Migration in Political Theory: the Ethics of Movement and Membership (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 165–204.Google Scholar

  • Shachar, A. (2017). ‘Citizenship for Sale?’, in A. Shachar, R. Bauböck, I. Bloemraad and M.P. Vink (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 786–816, 789–815.Google Scholar

  • Shachar, A. (2018). ‘Dangerous Liaisons: Money and Citizenship’, in R. Bauböck (ed.). Debating Transformations of National Citizenship (Cham: Springer), pp. 7–16.Google Scholar

  • Shachar, A. and Hirschl, R. (2014). ‘On Citizenship, States, and Markets’, Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (2): 231–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tanasoca, A. (2018). The Ethics of Multiple Citizenship (Cambridge, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

  • Tannock, S. (2011). ‘Points of Prejudice: Education-Based Discrimination in Canada’s Immigration System’, Antipode 43 (4): 1330–1356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Fossen, A. (2007). ‘Citizenship for Sale: Passports of Convenience from Pacific Island Tax Havens’, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 45 (2): 138–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York, NY: Basic Books).Google Scholar

  • Wellman, C.H. and Cole, P. (2011). Debating the Ethics of Immigration: Is There a Right to Exclude? (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Yong, C. (2017). ‘Immigration Rights and the Justification of Immigration Restrictions’, Journal of Social Philosophy 48 (4): 461–480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ypi, L. (2018). ‘Borders of Class: Migration and Citizenship in the Capitalist State’, Ethics & International Affairs 32 (2): 141–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-10-09


Citation Information: Moral Philosophy and Politics, ISSN (Online) 2194-5624, ISSN (Print) 2194-5616, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2018-0083.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in