Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics

Managing Editor: Koridze, Georg

Ed. by Hüntelmann, Rafael / Meixner, Uwe / Tegtmeier, Erwin

Editorial Board: Addis, Laird / Davies, Brian / Hochberg, Herbert / Johansson, Ingvar / Kanzian, Christian / Klima, Gyula / Koons, Robert C / Künne, Wolfgang / Löffler, Winfried / Mulligan, Kevin / Nef, Frederic / Oaklander, Nathan / Oderberg, David / Orilia, Francesco / Plantinga, Alvin / Potrc, Matjaz / Rapp, Christof / Reicher-Marek, Maria Elisabeth / Schantz, Richard / Scholz, Oliver R. / Seibt, Johanna / Simons, Peter / Smith, Barry / Stoecker, Ralf / Strobach, Niko / Trettin, Käthe / Wachter, Daniel

CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.257
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.369

See all formats and pricing
More options …

About Aboutness

Joshua Rasmussen
Published Online: 2014-03-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2014-0011


I develop a new theory of the nature of aboutness. I begin by presenting an “aboutness” puzzle that exposes a problem for many theories of aboutness. I then develop the components for a theory of aboutness that can help us solve the puzzle. The theory of aboutness I offer depends upon a theory of propositions as ordered complexes of properties. I develop this theory of propositions and show how it relates to, or builds upon, some of the most recent theories of propositions in the literature. My end goal is to deepen our understanding of how the things we say and think relate to the things we say and think about.

Keywords: aboutness; Russell’s paradox; structured propositions; arrangements


  • Frege, G. 1956. “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry.” Mind 65(259):289–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanks, P. 2011. “Structured Propositions as Types.” Mind 120(477):11–52.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • King, J. 1996. “Structured Propositions.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 25(5):495–521.Google Scholar

  • King, J. 2007. The Nature and Structure of Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • King, J., S. Soames, and J. Speaks. Forthcoming. New Thinking about Propositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Menzel, C. 2010. “Problems with the Actualist Accounts”, Supplement to “Actualism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. Zalta, Summer 2010 edn., Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. ISSN 1095-5054. http://plato.stanford.edu/.

  • Pruss and Rasmussen. (forthcoming). “Problems with Plurals,” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics.Google Scholar

  • Rasmussen, J. 2103. “How Truth Relates to Reality,” American Philosophical Quarterly 50(2):167–180.Google Scholar

  • Russell, B. 1903. Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Salmon, N. 1986. Frege’s Puzzle. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Soames, S. 2002. Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Soames, S. 2012. What Is Meaning? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-03-14

Published in Print: 2014-04-01

Citation Information: Metaphysica, Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 173–186, ISSN (Online) 1874-6373, ISSN (Print) 1437-2053, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2014-0011.

Export Citation

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in