Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Metaphysica

International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics

Ed. by Hüntelmann, Rafael / Meixner, Uwe / Tegtmeier, Erwin

Together with Cumpa, Javier

Editorial Board Member: Addis, Laird / Davies, Brian / Hochberg, Herbert / Johansson, Ingvar / Kanzian, Christian / Klima, Gyula / Koons, Robert C / Künne, Wolfgang / Löffler, Winfried / Mulligan, Kevin / Nef, Frederic / Oaklander, Nathan / Oderberg, David / Orilia, Francesco / Plantinga, Alvin / Potrc, Matjaz / Rapp, Christof / Reicher-Marek, Maria Elisabeth / Schantz, Richard / Scholz, Oliver / Seibt, Johanna / Simons, Peter / Smith, Barry / Stoecker, Ralf / Strobach, Niko / Trettin, Käthe / Wachter, Daniel

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.12

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.111
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.530

Online
ISSN
1874-6373
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Points Don’t Pass – Against the Identity Theory of Passage

Thorben Petersen
Published Online: 2014-05-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2014-0016

Abstract

The basic divide in the metaphysics of time is between those who defend a dynamic view and those who defend a static view. Whereas the former hold that time does truly pass, the latter take the passage of time to be some sort of illusion. Recently, however, an alternative minority view developed, according to which passage is identical either with the succession of times in the four-dimensional manifold or with the temporally ordered sequence of events located at these. I want to argue that something is wrong with the identity theory of passage. If passage and time qua part of the manifold are identical, then talk of passage should be translatable into talk about time qua part of the manifold (and vice versa). I show that this is not always possible.

Keywords: time; passage; ontological reduction; translation

References

  • Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Deng, N. 2010. “Beyond A- and B-Time’ Reconsidered.” Philosophia 38(4):741–53.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Deng, N. 2013. “Fine’s McTaggart, Temporal Passage and the a Versus B-Debate.” Ratio 26(1):19–34.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dyke, H. 2008. Metaphysics and the Representational Fallacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Frege, G. 1892. “Über Sinn Und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift Für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik, N.F 100:25–50. Reprinted in: Frege, G; Textor, M. (ed.), Funktion – Begriff – Bedeutung. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.Google Scholar

  • Friedman, M. 1983. Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gale, R. M. 1962. “Tensed Statements.” Philosophical Quarterly 12(46):53–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lehmkuhl, D. 2012. “On Time in Spacetime.” Philosophia Naturalis 49(2):225–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Le Poidevin, R. 1998. “The Past, Present and Future of the Debate about Tense.” In Questions of Time and Tense, edited by R. Le Poidevin. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Maudlin, T. 2002. “Remarks on the Passing of Time.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102(3):237–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McTaggart, J. M. E. 1908. “The Unreality of Time.” Mind 17(68):457–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mellor, D. H. 1998. Real Time II. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Oaklander, N. 2012. “A-, B- and R-Theories of Time: A Debate.” In The Future of the Philosophy of Time, edited by A. Bardon. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Perry, J. 1979. “The Problem of the Essential Indexical.” Noûs 13(1):3–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prior, A. N. 1959. “Thank Goodness That’s Over.” Philosophy 34(128):12–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rayo, A. 2013. The Construction of Logical Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Russell, B. 1906. “Review of Symbolic Logic and Its Applications by Hugh MacColl.” Mind 15(58):255–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Savitt, S. 2002. “On Absolute Becoming and the Myth of Passage.” In Time, Reality and Experience, edited by C. Callender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Savitt, S. 2013. “Being and Becoming in Modern Physics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta forthcoming. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/spacetime-bebecome/

  • Sider, T. 2001. Four-Dimensionalism: Am Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sider, T. 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sklar, L. 1974. Space, Time, and Spacetime. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Smart, J. J. C. 1959. “Sensations and Brain Processes.” Philosophical Review 68(2):141–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomasson, A. 2007. Ordinary Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Williams, D. C. 1951. “The Myth of Passage.” Journal of Philosophy 48(15):457–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-05-21

Published in Print: 2014-11-28


Citation Information: Metaphysica, ISSN (Online) 1874-6373, ISSN (Print) 1437-2053, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2014-0016.

Export Citation

©2014 by De Gruyter. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in