Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Metaphysica

International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics

Managing Editor: Koridze, Georg

Ed. by Hüntelmann, Rafael / Meixner, Uwe / Tegtmeier, Erwin

Editorial Board: Addis, Laird / Davies, Brian / Hochberg, Herbert / Johansson, Ingvar / Kanzian, Christian / Klima, Gyula / Koons, Robert C / Künne, Wolfgang / Löffler, Winfried / Mulligan, Kevin / Nef, Frederic / Oaklander, Nathan / Oderberg, David / Orilia, Francesco / Plantinga, Alvin / Potrc, Matjaz / Rapp, Christof / Reicher-Marek, Maria Elisabeth / Schantz, Richard / Scholz, Oliver R. / Seibt, Johanna / Simons, Peter / Smith, Barry / Strobach, Niko / Trettin, Käthe / Wachter, Daniel


CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.257
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.369

Online
ISSN
1874-6373
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Meso-level Objects, Powers, and Simultaneous Causation

Tobias Hansson Wahlberg
Published Online: 2017-03-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2017-0003

Abstract

I argue that Mumford and Anjum’s recent theory of simultaneous causation among powerful meso-level objects is problematic in several respects: it is based on a false dichotomy, it is incompatible with standard meso-level physics, it is explanatory deficient, and it threatens to render the powers metaphysics incoherent. Powers theorists are advised, therefore, to adopt a purely sequential conception of causation.

Keywords: causation; dispositions; meso-level objects; meso-level physics; powers; simultaneity

References

  • Armstrong, D.M. 1983. What Is a Law of Nature?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Armstrong, D.M. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Aronson, J. 1971. “The Legacy of Hume’s Analysis of Causation.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 2 (2):135–156.Google Scholar

  • Benson, H. 1995. University Physics, revised ed.. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Bird, A. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brentano, F. 1988. Philosophical Investigations on Space, Time and the Continuum. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

  • Chakravartty, A. 2013. “Getting Causes from Powers.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64:895–899.Google Scholar

  • Dowe P., 2000. Physical Causation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dupré, J. 1993. The Disorder of Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ellis, B. 2001. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fair, D. 1979. “Causation and the Flow of Energy.” Erkenntnis 14 (3):219–250.Google Scholar

  • Glynn, L. 2012. “Getting Causes from Powers.” Mind 121 (484):1099–1106.Google Scholar

  • Grünbaum, A. 1967. Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hansson, T. 2006. “Too Many Dispositional Properties.” SATS–Nordic Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):37–42.Google Scholar

  • Hansson Wahlberg, T. 2009. “4-D Objects and Disposition Ascriptions.” Philosophical Papers 38 (1):35–72.Google Scholar

  • Harré, R., and E.H. Madden 1973. “Natural Powers and Powerful Natures.” Philosophy 48 (185):209–230.Google Scholar

  • Harré, R., and E.H. Madden 1975. Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Hennig, B. 2016. “Getting Causes from Powers.” Philosophical Quarterly 66 (263):414–417.Google Scholar

  • Huemer, M., and B. Kovitz 2003. “Causation as Simultaneous and Continuous.” Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):556–565.Google Scholar

  • Hume, D. 1740/1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd ed. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hussey, E. 1983/1993. “Introduction.” In Aristotle Physics Books III and IV, edited by E. Hussey. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Ingthorsson, R. 2002. “Causal Production as Interaction.” Metaphysica 3 (1):87–119.Google Scholar

  • Ingthorsson, R. 2007. “Is There a Problem of Action at a Temporal Distance?.” SATS–Nordic Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):138–154.Google Scholar

  • Jammer, M. 1999. Concepts of Force. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, W.E. 1924. Logic, Part III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Körner, S., and R.M. Chisholm 1988. “Editors’ Introduction to the English Edition.” In Philosophical Investigations on Space, Time and the Continuum, edited by F. Brentano, vii-xxiii. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

  • Le Poidevin, R. 1991. Change, Cause and Contradiction. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Lowe, E.J. 2012. “Mumford and Anjum on Causal Necessitarianism and Antecedent Strengthening.” Analysis 72 (4):731–735.Google Scholar

  • Maudlin, T. 2002. Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Maudlin, T. 2012. Philosophy of Physics: Space and Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • McKitrick, J. 2013. “Getting Causes from Powers.” Analysis 73 (2):402–404.Google Scholar

  • Mellor, D.H. 1974. “In Defense of Dispositions.” The Philosophical Review 83 (2):157–181.Google Scholar

  • Mellor, D.H. 1995. The Facts of Causation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Mellor, D.H. 1998. Real Time II. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Molnar, G. 2003. Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mumford, S. 1998. Dispositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mumford, S. 2004. Laws in Nature. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Mumford, S. 2009. “Powers and Persistence.” In Unity and Time in Metaphysics, edited by L. Honnefelder, E. Runggaldier and B. Schick, 223–236. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Mumford, S., and R.L. Anjum 2011. Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Price, H. 1996. Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Russell, B. 1912–1913. “On the Notion of Cause.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13:1–26.Google Scholar

  • Russell, B. 1948. Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

  • Shoemaker, S. 1980. “Causality and Properties.” In Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, edited by P. Van Inwagen, 109–135. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

  • Smith, B., and A.C. Varzi 2000. “Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):401–420.Google Scholar

  • Taylor, E.F., and J.A. Wheeler 1992. Spacetime Physics. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar

  • Tooley, M. 1997. Time, Tense, and Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Varzi, A. 2013. “Boundary.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E.N. Zalta. Accessed 4 December 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/boundary/.

About the article

Published Online: 2017-03-22

Published in Print: 2017-04-01


Citation Information: Metaphysica, Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 107–125, ISSN (Online) 1874-6373, ISSN (Print) 1437-2053, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2017-0003.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[3]
Tobias Hansson Wahlberg
Synthese, 2018

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in