Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Metaphysica

International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics

Managing Editor: Koridze, Georg

Ed. by Hüntelmann, Rafael / Meixner, Uwe / Tegtmeier, Erwin

Editorial Board: Addis, Laird / Davies, Brian / Hochberg, Herbert / Johansson, Ingvar / Kanzian, Christian / Klima, Gyula / Koons, Robert C / Künne, Wolfgang / Löffler, Winfried / Mulligan, Kevin / Nef, Frederic / Oaklander, Nathan / Oderberg, David / Orilia, Francesco / Plantinga, Alvin / Potrc, Matjaz / Rapp, Christof / Reicher-Marek, Maria Elisabeth / Schantz, Richard / Scholz, Oliver R. / Seibt, Johanna / Simons, Peter / Smith, Barry / Strobach, Niko / Trettin, Käthe / Wachter, Daniel


CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.257
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.369

Online
ISSN
1874-6373
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Towards a Naturalistic Philosophy

José Ignacio Galparsoro
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Philosophy, University of the Basque Country, Avenida de Tolosa, 70. E-20018-SAN SEBASTIAN Spain
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-03-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2017-0002

Abstract

This paper is an invitation to reflect on the advisability of analysing philosophy from a naturalistic perspective. That is, from a perspective that considers philosophy as if it was one more cultural object, which can be studied using the tools that we have available to us today and that are provided by disciplines such as evolutionary psychology or anthropology oriented by a distinctly cognitivist approach. A central concept in the analysis is that of “intuitive ontology” – closely linked to intuitive (or folk-) philosophy or the spontaneous, naïve (natural) way of thinking that is associated with common sense – which is a result of the evolutionary process and a source of metaphysical prejudices such as dualism. A metaphilosophical reflection, such as that proposed here, identifies the “natural” character of a transcendent metaphysics that is still too close to intuitive philosophy, and the interest of constituting a naturalistic philosophy that is fully conscious of its “unnatural” or “counterintuitive” character.

Keywords: intuitive ontology; intuitive philosophy; metaphilosophy; naturalism

References

  • Astuti, R. 2001. “Are We All Natural Dualist? A Cognitive Developmental Approach”. The Malinowski Memorial Lecture, 2000 [online]. London: LSE Research Online. http://eprints.Ise.ac.uk/archive/00000471. Available online: November 2005.

  • Atran, S. 1998. “Folk Biology and the Anthropology of Science: Cognitive Universals and Cultural Particulars.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21:547–609.Google Scholar

  • Ayala, F.J. 1987. “The Biological Roots of Morality.” Biology & Philosophy 2 (3):235–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bloom, P. 2004. Descartes’ Baby. How the Science of Child Development Explains What Makes Us Human. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Bloom, P. 2007. “Religion Is Natural.” Developmental Science 10 (1):147–151.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bloom, P. 2009. “Religion Belief as an Evolutionary Accident.” In The Believing Primate, edited by M.J. Murray and J. Schloss, 118–127. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar

  • Bloom, P. 2012. “Religion, Morality, Evolution.” Annual Review of Psychology 63:179–199.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bloom, P. 2013. Just Babies: The Origins of Good and Evil. New York: Crown.Google Scholar

  • Bloom, P., and D. Skolnick Weisberg. 2007. “Childhood Origins of Adult Resistance to Science.” Science 316:996–997.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boyer, P. 1994. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas. A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Boyer, P. 1998. “Cognitive Tracks of Cultural Inheritance: How Evolved Intuitive Ontology Governs Cultural Transmission.” American Anthropologist 100 (4):876–889.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boyer, P. 1999. “Human Cognition and Cultural Evolution.” In Anthropological Theory Today, edited by H.L. Moore, 206–233. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Boyer, P. 2000. “Natural Epistemology of Evolved Metaphysics? Developmental Evidence for Early-Developmental Evidence for Early-Developed, Intuitive, Category-Specific, Incomplete, and Stubborn Metaphysical Presumptions.” Philosophical Psychology 13:277–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained. the Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Boyer, P. 2003. “Religious Thought and Behaviour as By-Products of Brain Function.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (3):119–124.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Boyer, P. 2008. “Religion: Bound to Believe?” Nature 445:1038–1039.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Boyer, P., and C. Barrett. 2005. “Domain Specificity and Intuitive Ontology.” In The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, edited by D.M. Buss, 96–118. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Carruthers, P., S. Stich, and M. Siegal. 2002. The Cognitive Basis of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • De Cruz, H., and J. De Smedt. 2007. “The Role of Intuitive Ontologies in Scientific Understanding — The Case of the Human Evolution.” Biology and Philosophy 22:351–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dennett, D.C. 2003. Freedom Evolves. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

  • Dennett, D.C. 2006. Breaking the Spell. Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

  • Galparsoro, J.I. 1995. “La volonté de puissance chez Nietzsche. Tentative d’une explication naturaliste du monde.” Les études Philosophiques 4: 457–480.Google Scholar

  • Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency. Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Gelman, S.A. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gelman, S.A., and L.A. Hirschfeld. 1999. “How Biological Is Essentialism?” In Folkbiology, edited by D.L. Medin and S. Atran, 403–446. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Girotto, V., T. Pievani, and G. Vallortigara. 2008. Nati per Credere. Perché Il Nostro Cervello Sembra Predisposto a Fraintendere La Teoria Di Darwin? Torino: Codice Editori.Google Scholar

  • Goldman, A.I. 1991. Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Goldman, A.I. 2015. “Naturalizing Metaphysics with the Help of Cognitive Science.” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, Volume 9, edited by K. Bennett and D.W. Zimmerman, 171–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hauser, M.D. 2006. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

  • Joyce, R. 2006. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. 1955. Tristes Tropiques. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar

  • Mithen, S. 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind. A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science. Thames and Hudson: London.Google Scholar

  • Nietzsche, F. 1967-sq. Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter (Hrsg.: Giorgio Colli & Mazzino Montinari).Google Scholar

  • Pinker, S. 2002. The Blank Slate. the Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

  • Ridley, M. 1996. The Origins of Virtue. Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

  • Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining Culture. A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Sperber, D. 1999. “Voir autrement la culture”. In Des Idées qui viennent, edited by Roger-Paul Droit and Dan Sperber, 91–105. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

  • Tooby, J., and L. Cosmides. 1992. “The Psychological Foundations of Culture.” In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, edited by J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby, 19–136. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tort, P. 2008. L’effet Darwin. Sélection naturelle et naissance de la civilisation. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

  • Wellman, H.M. 1990. The Child’s Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Wolpert, L. 1992. The Unnatural Nature of Science. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-03-22

Published in Print: 2017-09-26


Citation Information: Metaphysica, Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 167–186, ISSN (Online) 1874-6373, ISSN (Print) 1437-2053, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2017-0002.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in