Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Metaphysica

International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics

Managing Editor: Koridze, Georg

Ed. by Hüntelmann, Rafael / Meixner, Uwe / Tegtmeier, Erwin

Editorial Board: Addis, Laird / Davies, Brian / Hochberg, Herbert / Johansson, Ingvar / Kanzian, Christian / Klima, Gyula / Koons, Robert C / Künne, Wolfgang / Löffler, Winfried / Mulligan, Kevin / Nef, Frederic / Oaklander, Nathan / Oderberg, David / Orilia, Francesco / Plantinga, Alvin / Potrc, Matjaz / Rapp, Christof / Reicher-Marek, Maria Elisabeth / Schantz, Richard / Scholz, Oliver R. / Seibt, Johanna / Simons, Peter / Smith, Barry / Strobach, Niko / Trettin, Käthe / Wachter, Daniel


CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.257
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.369

Online
ISSN
1874-6373
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The New Aristotelian Essentialists

Harold W. Noonan
Published Online: 2017-12-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2018-0004

Abstract

In recent years largely due to the seminal work of Kit Fine and that of Jonathan Lowe there has been a resurgence of interest in the concept of essence and the project of explaining de re necessity in terms of it. Of course, Quine rejected what he called Aristotelian essentialism in his battle against quantified modal logic. But what he and Kripke debated was a notion of essence defined in terms of de re necessity. The new Aristotelian essentialists regard essence as entailing but prior in the order of explanation to de re necessity. In what follows I argue that the concept of essence so understood has not been adequately explained and that any attempt to explain it, at least along the lines most familiar from the literature, must be flagrantly circular or make use of de re modal notions.

Keywords: essentialism; de dicto necessity; de re necessity; sortal concepts

References

  • Cowling, S. 2013. “The Modal View of Essence.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43:248–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fine, K. 1994. “Essence and Modality.” In Philosophical Perspectives 8: Logic and Language, edited by J. Tomberlin, 1–16. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Fine, K. 1995a. “Ontological Dependence.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:269–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fine, K. 1995b. “Senses of Essence.” In Modality, Morality, and Belief: Essays in Honor of Ruth Barcan Marcus, edited by W. Sinnott-Armstrong, D. Raffman and N. Asher, 53–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fine, K. 2000. “Semantics for the Logic of Essence.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 29:543–584.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kripke, S. 1972. “Naming and Necessity.” In Semantics of Natural Language, edited by D. Davidson and G. Harman, 252–355. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

  • Lowe, E.J. 2007. “Review of Mackie, How Things Might Have Been.” Mind 116:762–766.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lowe, E.J. 2008. “Two Notions of Being: Entity and Essence.” In Being: Developments in Contemporary Metaphysics: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62, edited by R. Le Poidevin, 23–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lowe, E.J. 2011. “Locke on Real Essence and Water as A Natural Kind: A Qualified Defence.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary 85:1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lowe, E.J. 2012. “What Is the Source of Our Knowledge of Modal Truths?.” Mind 121:919–950.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wildman, N. 2013. “Modality, Sparsity, and Essence.” Philosophical Quarterly 63:760–782.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-12-16

Published in Print: 2018-03-26


Citation Information: Metaphysica, Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 87–93, ISSN (Online) 1874-6373, ISSN (Print) 1437-2053, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2018-0004.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in