Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics

Managing Editor: Koridze, Georg

Ed. by Hüntelmann, Rafael / Meixner, Uwe / Tegtmeier, Erwin

Editorial Board: Addis, Laird / Davies, Brian / Hochberg, Herbert / Johansson, Ingvar / Kanzian, Christian / Klima, Gyula / Koons, Robert C / Künne, Wolfgang / Löffler, Winfried / Mulligan, Kevin / Nef, Frederic / Oaklander, Nathan / Oderberg, David / Orilia, Francesco / Plantinga, Alvin / Potrc, Matjaz / Rapp, Christof / Reicher-Marek, Maria Elisabeth / Schantz, Richard / Scholz, Oliver R. / Seibt, Johanna / Simons, Peter / Smith, Barry / Strobach, Niko / Trettin, Käthe / Wachter, Daniel

CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.257
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.369

Print + Online
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Priority Monism Beyond Spacetime

Baptiste Le Bihan
Published Online: 2017-12-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2018-0005


I will defend two claims. First, Schaffer’s priority monism is in tension with many research programs in quantum gravity. Second, priority monism can be modified into a view more amenable to this physics. The first claim is grounded in the fact that promising approaches to quantum gravity such as loop quantum gravity or string theory deny the fundamental reality of spacetime. Since fundamental spacetime plays an important role in Schaffer’s priority monism by being identified with the fundamental structure, namely the cosmos, the disappearance of spacetime in these views might undermine classical priority monism. My second claim is that priority monism can avoid this issue with two moves: first, in dropping one of its core assumption, namely that the fundamental structure is spatio-temporal, second, by identifying the connection between the non-spatio-temporal structure and the derivative spatio-temporal structure with mereological composition.

Keywords: priority monism; quantum gravity; mereology; spacetime; fundamentality


  • Armstrong, D.M. 1978. “Naturalism, Materialism and First Philosophy.” Philosophia 8 (2–3):261–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benocci, M. 2017. “Priority Monism and Essentiality of Fundamentality: A Reply to Steinberg.” Philosophical Studies 174 (8):1983–1990.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chalmers, D.J. 1995. “Facing up to the Problem of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies ^2 (3):200–219.Google Scholar

  • Crowther, K.J. 2016. Effective Spacetime: Understanding Emergence in Effective Field Theory and Quantum Gravity. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Dowker, F. 2014. “The Birth of Spacetime Atoms as the Passage of Time.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1326:18–25.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Halvorson, H., and R. Clifton. 2002. “No Place for Particles in Relativistic Quantum Theories?.” Philosophy of Science 69 (1):1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huggett, N. 2017. “Target Space ≠ Space.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. doi: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huggett, N., and C. Wüthrich. 2013. “Emergent Spacetime and Empirical (In)Coherence.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (3):276–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Le Bihan, B. 2015a. “Un espace-temps de contingences.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rennes 1.Google Scholar

  • Le Bihan, B. 2015b. “No Physical Particles for a Dispositional Monist?.” Philosophical Papers 44 (2):207–232.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Le Bihan, B. 2016. “Super-Relationism: Combining Eliminativism about Objects and Relationism about Spacetime.” Philosophical Studies 173 (8):21522178.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Malament, D.B. 1977. “The Class of Continuous Timelike Curves Determines the Topology of Spacetime.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 18 (7):1399–1404. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matsubara, K. 2013. “Realism, Underdetermination and String Theory Dualities.” Synthese 190 (3):471–489.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matsubara, K. 2017. “Quantum Gravity and the Nature of Space and Time.” Philosophy Compass 12:3.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Maudlin, T.W.E. 2007. “Completeness, Supervenience and Ontology.” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40 (12):3151.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Monton, B. 2006. “Quantum Mechanics and 3ndimensional Space.” Philosophy of Science 73 (5):778–789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ney, A. 2015. “Fundamental Physical Ontologies and the Constraint of Empirical Coherence: A Defense of Wave Function Realism.” Synthese 192 (10):3105–3124.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Paul, L.A. 2002. “Logical Parts.” Noûs 36 (4):578–596.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paul, L.A. 2012. “Building the World from Its Fundamental Constituents.” Philosophical Studies 158 (2):221–256.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Rovelli, C. 2004. Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rovelli, C., and F. Vidotto. 2014. Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity: An Elementary Introduction to Quantum Gravity and Spinfoam Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Schaffer, J. 2009. “Spacetime the One Substance.” Philosophical Studies 145 (1):131–148.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaffer, J. 2010. “Monism: The Priority of the Whole.” Philosophical Review 119 (1):31–76.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Sidelle, A. 1989. Necessity, Essence, and Individuation: A Defense of Conventionalism. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Siegel, M. 2016. “Priority Monism Is Contingent.” Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):23–32. Ithaca.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Sklar, L. 1974. Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Steinberg, A. 2015. “Priority Monism and Part/Whole Dependence.” Philosophical Studies 172 (8):2025–2031.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Wüthrich, C. 2012. “The Structure of Causal Sets.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 43 (2):223–241.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Wüthrich, C. 2017a. “Raiders of the Lost Spacetime.” In Towards a Theory of Spacetime Theories, edited by D. Lehmkuhl, G. Schiemann and E. Scholz. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Wüthrich, C. 2017b. “Philosophie Der Physik.” In Grundriss Wissenschaftsphilosophie: Die Philosophien Der Einzelwissenschaften, edited by S. Lohse and T. Reydson, 201–228. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

  • Wüthrich, C., and C. Callender. 2017. “What Becomes of a Causal Set?.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (3):907–925.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-12-23

Published in Print: 2018-03-26

Citation Information: Metaphysica, Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 95–111, ISSN (Online) 1874-6373, ISSN (Print) 1437-2053, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2018-0005.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Baptiste Le Bihan and Niels Linnemann
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 2018
Vincent Lam and Christian Wüthrich
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 2018

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in