Albert, D. Z. 2000. Time and Chance. Cambridge (MA), London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Arntzenius, F. 2000. “Are There Really Instantaneous Velocities?” The Monist 83: 187–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bergson, H. 1998 [1911]. Creative Evolution. Translated by Arthur Mitchell. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Bigelow, J. 1991. “Worlds Enough for Time.” Noûs 25: 1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bigelow, J., and R. Pargetter. 1990. Science and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boccardi, E. 2015. “If It Ain’t Moving It Shall Not Be Moved.” In Special Issue of Topoi: Time and Time Experience, edited by R. Ciuni and G. Torrengo, 34 (1): 171–185.Google Scholar

Boccardi, E. 2016. “Recent Trends in the Philosophy of Time: An Introduction to Time and Reality I.” In Special Issue of Manuscrito: Time and Reality I, edited by E. Boccardi, 39: 5–34.Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. 1923. Scientific Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. 2002. “Instantaneous Motion.” Philosophical Studies 110: 49–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, F. 1993. Space-Like Time. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Crisp, T. 2007. “Presentism and the Grounding Objection.” NOÛS 41 (1): 90–109.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

Dummett, M. 2000. “Is Time a Continuum of Instants?” Philosophy 75 (294): Oct., 2000 497–515.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Fine, K., ed. 2005. “Tense and Reality.” In Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers, 261–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Forrest, P. 2004. “The Real but Dead Past: A Reply to Braddon-Mitchell.” Analysis 64: 358–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

James, W. 1987. Writings 1902–1910. New York, NY: Literary Classics of the United States Inc.Google Scholar

Lange, M. 2005. “How Can Instantaneous Velocity Fulfill Its Causal Role?” The Philosophical Review 114 (4): 433–468.

Leftow, B. 2014. “Instants, Events, and God.” In Debates in the Metaphysics of Time, edited by N. Oaklander. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, W., and S. Miller. 1992. “An Epistemological Use of Nonstandard Analysis to Answer Zeno’s Objections against Motion.” Synthese 92 (3): 371–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Montague, R. 1974. “Towards a Proper Treatment of Quantification in English.” In Formal Philosophy, edited by R. H. Thomason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Oaklander, N. 2010. “McTaggart’s Paradox and Crisp’s Presentism.” Philosophia 38: 229–241.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

Prior, A. 1968. Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Prior, A. N. 1970. “The Notion of the Present.” Studium Generale 23: 245–248.Google Scholar

Robinson, A. 1966. Non-Standard Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1903 [1938]. Principles of Mathematics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1981 [1929]. “Mathematics and the Metaphysicians.” In Mysticism and Logic, edited by B. Russel, 59–74. Totawa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar

Russell, B. 2001 [1929]. The Problem of Infinity Considered Historically, reprinted in Salmon, W. C., 2001, Zeno’s Paradoxes, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co. Inc.Google Scholar

Skow, B. 2012. “Why Does Time Pass?.” Nous 46 (2012): 223–242.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

Smith, S. 2003. “Are Instantaneous Velocities Real and Really Instantaneous?.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2003): 261–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Tallant, J. 2010. “A Sketch of A Presentist Theory of Passage.” Erkenntnis 73: 133–140.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

Tallant, J. 2016. “Temporal Passage and the ‘No Alternate Possibilities’ Argument.” In Special Issue of Manuscrito: Time and Reality I, edited by E. Boccardi, Vol. 39: 35–47.Google Scholar

Tooley, M. 1988. “In Defense of the Existence of States of Motion.” Philosophical Topics 16 (1): 225–254.Google Scholar

Tooley, M. 1997. Time, Tense, and Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, D. C. 1951. “The Myth of Passage.” Journal of Philosophy 48: 457–472.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar