Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Metaphysica

International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics

Managing Editor: Koridze, Georg

Ed. by Hüntelmann, Rafael / Meixner, Uwe / Tegtmeier, Erwin

Editorial Board: Addis, Laird / Davies, Brian / Hochberg, Herbert / Johansson, Ingvar / Kanzian, Christian / Klima, Gyula / Koons, Robert C / Künne, Wolfgang / Löffler, Winfried / Mulligan, Kevin / Nef, Frederic / Oaklander, Nathan / Oderberg, David / Orilia, Francesco / Plantinga, Alvin / Potrc, Matjaz / Rapp, Christof / Reicher-Marek, Maria Elisabeth / Schantz, Richard / Scholz, Oliver R. / Seibt, Johanna / Simons, Peter / Smith, Barry / Stoecker, Ralf / Strobach, Niko / Trettin, Käthe / Wachter, Daniel


CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.257
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.369

Online
ISSN
1874-6373
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Time as Motion

Emiliano Boccardi
  • Corresponding author
  • Center for Logic, Epistemology and History of Science, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas 13083-970, Brazil
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-03-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2018-0015

Abstract

The arena of the philosophy of time has been largely concerned with deciding whether tense distinctions reflect absolute metaphysical distinctions or not. After bringing the debate over the metaphysical status of instantaneous velocity to bear on the debate over the nature of temporal passage, I argue that we should further investigate whether aspectual distinctions reflect objective and absolute metaphysical distinctions too. I conclude that those who think that being realist about tense uniquely makes room for the idea that time passes should be realist about the progressive too.

Keywords: passage of time; intrinsic velocity; motion; tense realism; A-theory of time; calculus; progressive aspect

References

  • Albert, D. Z. 2000. Time and Chance. Cambridge (MA), London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Arntzenius, F. 2000. “Are There Really Instantaneous Velocities?” The Monist 83: 187–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bergson, H. 1998 [1911]. Creative Evolution. Translated by Arthur Mitchell. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

  • Bigelow, J. 1991. “Worlds Enough for Time.” Noûs 25: 1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bigelow, J., and R. Pargetter. 1990. Science and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Boccardi, E. 2015. “If It Ain’t Moving It Shall Not Be Moved.” In Special Issue of Topoi: Time and Time Experience, edited by R. Ciuni and G. Torrengo, 34 (1): 171–185.Google Scholar

  • Boccardi, E. 2016. “Recent Trends in the Philosophy of Time: An Introduction to Time and Reality I.” In Special Issue of Manuscrito: Time and Reality I, edited by E. Boccardi, 39: 5–34.Google Scholar

  • Broad, C. D. 1923. Scientific Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, J. 2002. “Instantaneous Motion.” Philosophical Studies 110: 49–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christensen, F. 1993. Space-Like Time. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

  • Crisp, T. 2007. “Presentism and the Grounding Objection.” NOÛS 41 (1): 90–109.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dummett, M. 2000. “Is Time a Continuum of Instants?” Philosophy 75 (294): Oct., 2000 497–515.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fine, K., ed. 2005. “Tense and Reality.” In Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers, 261–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Forrest, P. 2004. “The Real but Dead Past: A Reply to Braddon-Mitchell.” Analysis 64: 358–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • James, W. 1987. Writings 1902–1910. New York, NY: Literary Classics of the United States Inc.Google Scholar

  • Lange, M. 2005. “How Can Instantaneous Velocity Fulfill Its Causal Role?” The Philosophical Review 114 (4): 433–468.

  • Leftow, B. 2014. “Instants, Events, and God.” In Debates in the Metaphysics of Time, edited by N. Oaklander. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

  • McLaughlin, W., and S. Miller. 1992. “An Epistemological Use of Nonstandard Analysis to Answer Zeno’s Objections against Motion.” Synthese 92 (3): 371–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Montague, R. 1974. “Towards a Proper Treatment of Quantification in English.” In Formal Philosophy, edited by R. H. Thomason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • Oaklander, N. 2010. “McTaggart’s Paradox and Crisp’s Presentism.” Philosophia 38: 229–241.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Prior, A. 1968. Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Prior, A. N. 1970. “The Notion of the Present.” Studium Generale 23: 245–248.Google Scholar

  • Robinson, A. 1966. Non-Standard Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar

  • Russell, B. 1903 [1938]. Principles of Mathematics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar

  • Russell, B. 1981 [1929]. “Mathematics and the Metaphysicians.” In Mysticism and Logic, edited by B. Russel, 59–74. Totawa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar

  • Russell, B. 2001 [1929]. The Problem of Infinity Considered Historically, reprinted in Salmon, W. C., 2001, Zeno’s Paradoxes, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co. Inc.Google Scholar

  • Skow, B. 2012. “Why Does Time Pass?.” Nous 46 (2012): 223–242.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, S. 2003. “Are Instantaneous Velocities Real and Really Instantaneous?.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2003): 261–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tallant, J. 2010. “A Sketch of A Presentist Theory of Passage.” Erkenntnis 73: 133–140.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Tallant, J. 2016. “Temporal Passage and the ‘No Alternate Possibilities’ Argument.” In Special Issue of Manuscrito: Time and Reality I, edited by E. Boccardi, Vol. 39: 35–47.Google Scholar

  • Tooley, M. 1988. “In Defense of the Existence of States of Motion.” Philosophical Topics 16 (1): 225–254.Google Scholar

  • Tooley, M. 1997. Time, Tense, and Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Williams, D. C. 1951. “The Myth of Passage.” Journal of Philosophy 48: 457–472.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-03-16

Published in Print: 2018-03-26


Citation Information: Metaphysica, Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 157–183, ISSN (Online) 1874-6373, ISSN (Print) 1437-2053, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2018-0015.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in