Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Metaphysica

International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics

Managing Editor: Koridze, Georg

Ed. by Hüntelmann, Rafael / Meixner, Uwe / Tegtmeier, Erwin

Editorial Board: Addis, Laird / Davies, Brian / Hochberg, Herbert / Johansson, Ingvar / Kanzian, Christian / Klima, Gyula / Koons, Robert C / Künne, Wolfgang / Löffler, Winfried / Mulligan, Kevin / Nef, Frederic / Oaklander, Nathan / Oderberg, David / Orilia, Francesco / Plantinga, Alvin / Potrc, Matjaz / Rapp, Christof / Reicher-Marek, Maria Elisabeth / Schantz, Richard / Scholz, Oliver R. / Seibt, Johanna / Simons, Peter / Smith, Barry / Strobach, Niko / Trettin, Käthe / Wachter, Daniel


CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.257
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.369

Online
ISSN
1874-6373
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Persistence Conditions and Identity

John Biro
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Philosophy, University of Florida, 330 Griffin-Floyd Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611-8545, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-02-09 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2019-2005

Abstract

Pluralists believe that there are cases of distinct but spatio-temporally coinciding things. The statue goes, the piece of clay remains: differing persistence conditions, different things. Yet while both are with us, they are obviously in the same place. The argument rests on two assumptions: that statues have their shape essentially and that pieces of clay do not. Only if we make both does the conclusion follow. Here I suggest that while both assumptions are plausible on their face, each may be questioned. Given this, we are not forced to accept their conjunction and can thus avoid the counter-intuitive conclusion it entails.

Keywords: pluralism; contingent identity; persistence conditions

References

  • Biro, J. 2017. “Are There Scattered Objects?” Metaphysica 18 (2): 155–65.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Biro, J. 2018. “Constitution and Identity.” Erkenntnis 83 (6): 1127–1138.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burke, M. 1980. “Cohabitation, Stuff and Intermittent Existence.” MIND 89: 391–405.Google Scholar

  • Cartwright, H. 1970. “Quantities.” The Philosophical Review LXX1X (1): 25–42.Google Scholar

  • Cartwright, R. 1975. “Scattered Objects.” In Analysis and Metaphysics, K. Lehrer, (ed.) Dordrecht, Reidel: 153–70Google Scholar

  • Cotnoir, A. J., and D. L. M. Baxter. 2014. Composition as Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Elder, C. 1998. “Essential Properties and Coinciding Objects.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 317–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbard, A. 1975. “Contingent Identity.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 4: 187–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gray, A. E. 2001. The Semantics and Metaphysics of Contingent Identity. PhD. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

  • van Inwagen, P. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Lowe, E. J. 1983. “The Identity of Artifacts.” The Journal of Philosophy 80/4: 220–32.Google Scholar

  • Rea, M. 1997. “Introduction.” In Material Constitution: A Reader. Latham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

  • Thompson, J. J. 1983. “Parthood and Identity Across Time.” The Journal of Philosophy 80 (4): 201–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-02-09

Published in Print: 2019-04-24


Citation Information: Metaphysica, Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 73–82, ISSN (Online) 1874-6373, ISSN (Print) 1437-2053, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2019-2005.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in