Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics

Managing Editor: Koridze, Georg

Ed. by Hüntelmann, Rafael / Meixner, Uwe / Tegtmeier, Erwin

Editorial Board: Addis, Laird / Davies, Brian / Hochberg, Herbert / Johansson, Ingvar / Kanzian, Christian / Klima, Gyula / Koons, Robert C / Künne, Wolfgang / Löffler, Winfried / Mulligan, Kevin / Nef, Frederic / Oaklander, Nathan / Oderberg, David / Orilia, Francesco / Plantinga, Alvin / Potrc, Matjaz / Rapp, Christof / Reicher-Marek, Maria Elisabeth / Schantz, Richard / Scholz, Oliver R. / Seibt, Johanna / Simons, Peter / Smith, Barry / Strobach, Niko / Trettin, Käthe / Wachter, Daniel

CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.257
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.369

See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Aristotelian Context of the Existence-Essence Distinction in De Ente Et Essentia

Angus Brook
Published Online: 2019-10-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2019-2012


This paper explores the Aristotelian context of the real distinction between existence and essence thought to be posited in Thomas Aquinas’ early work De Ente Et Essentia. In doing so, the paper situates its own position in the context of contemporary scholarship and in relation to the contemporary trend to downplay Aristotle’s influence in Thomas Aquinas’ philosophy. The paper argues that re-reading De Ente Et Essentia in this way sheds new light on some of the crucial debates in contemporary Thomist scholarship, particularly with respect to the analogous relation between potency and act: essence and existence, the distinction between conceptual and causal explanation, and the relationship between philosophy and theology in the thought of Thomas Aquinas.

Keywords: Thomas Aquinas; the real distinction; essence; existence; potency and act; principle and cause


  • Aristotle. 1957. On the Soul, W. H. Hett (trans.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Aristotle. 2003. Metaphysics, Hugh Tredennick (trans.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bobik, Joseph. 1965. Aquinas on Being and Essence: A Translation and Interpretation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

  • Brook, Angus. March 2015. “Substance and the Primary Sense of Being in Aristotle.” The Review of Metaphysics LXVIII (3): Issue 271: 521–544.Google Scholar

  • Cajetan. 1964. Commentary on St Thomas Aquinas’ on Being and Essence, Kendzierski and Wade (trans.,). Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar

  • Corrigan, Kevin. 1984. “A Philosophical Precursor to the Theory of Essence and Existence in St Thomas Aquinas.” Thomist 48 (2): 219–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dougherty, M. V. 2004. “Aristotle’s Four Truth Values.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4): 585–609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fabro, Cornelio. September 1966. “The Transcendentality of Ens-Esse and the Ground of Metaphysics.” International Philosophical Quarterly 6 (3): 329–427.Google Scholar

  • Fabro, Cornelio. 1970. “Platonism, Neo-Platonism and Thomism: Convergencies and Divergencies.” The New Scholasticism 44 (1): 69–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fabro, Cornelio, and B. M. Bonansea. March 1974. “The Intensive Hermeneutics of Thomistic Philosophy: the Notion of Participation.” The Review of Metaphysics 27 (3): 449–491.Google Scholar

  • Gilson, Etienne. 1959. Elements of Christian Philosophy. New York: Doubleday & Co.Google Scholar

  • Gilson, Etienne. 1961. Being and Some Philosophers. The Hague: Europe Printing.Google Scholar

  • Guagliardo, O. P., A. Vincent, ed. 1996. “Introduction.” In Commentary on the Book of Causes. Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Heinaman, Robert. 1981. “Knowledge of Substance in Aristotle.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 101: 63–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Irwin, Terence. 1988. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kahn, Charles H. 2012. Essays on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kerr, Gaven. 2015. Aquinas’s Way to God: the Proof in De Ente Et Essentia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Knasas, John F. X. 2014. “The Intellectual Phenomenology of De Ente Et Essentia, Chapter Four.” The Review of Metaphysics 68 (1): 107–153.Google Scholar

  • Kosman, Aryeh. 2013. The Activity of Being. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kosman, Aryeh. 2014. Virtues of Thought: Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Cambridge MA: harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Masiello, Ralph J. 1971. “A Note on Essence and Existence.” The New Scholasticism 45: 491–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCleod, Owen. January 1995. “Aristotle’s Method.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar

  • McInerny, Ralph. 1998. “Introduction.” In Thomas Aquinas: Selected Writings. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

  • McInerny, Ralph, ed. 2006. Praeambula Fidei: Thomism and the God of the Philosophers. Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Novak, Michael. September 1963. “A Key to Aristotle’s ‘substance’.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (1): 1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Owens, Joseph. 1976. “Aquinas on Knowing Existence.” The Review of Metaphysics 29 (4): 670–690.Google Scholar

  • Owens, Joseph. 1981. “Stages and Distinction in De Ente: a Rejoinder.” Thomist 45(1): 99–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Owens, Joseph. 2007. Aristotle’s Gradations of Being in Metaphysics E-Z. South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar

  • Patt, Walter. 1988. “Aquinas’s Real Distinction and Some Interpretations.” The New Scholasticism 62 (1): 1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reale, Giovanni. 1980. The Concept of First Philosophy and the Unity of the Metaphysics of Aristotle, John R. Catan (Trans. & Ed.). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

  • Sweeney, Leo. 1963. “Existence/Essence in Thomas Aquinas’s Early Writings.” Proceedings of The American Catholic Philosophical Association.Google Scholar

  • Twetten, David B. 2006. “Really Distinguishing Essence from Esse.” Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics 6: 57–94.Google Scholar

  • Wedin, Michael. 2000. Aristotle’s Theory of Substance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wippel, John F. 1979. “Aquinas’ Route to the Real Distinction: A Note on De Ente Et Essentia.” Thomist 43(2): 279–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wippel, John F. March 2015. “Cornelio Fabro on the Distinction and Composition of Essence and Esse in the Metaphysics of Thomas Aquinas.” The Review of Metaphysics LXVII (3): 573–592.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-10-18

Published in Print: 2019-10-25

Citation Information: Metaphysica, Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 151–173, ISSN (Online) 1874-6373, ISSN (Print) 1437-2053, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2019-2012.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in