Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Multilingua

Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication

Ed. by Piller, Ingrid


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.800
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.109

CiteScore 2018: 0.95

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.881
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.152

Online
ISSN
1613-3684
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 36, Issue 4

Issues

Playing the game and speaking the right language: Language policy and materiality in a bilingual preschool activity

Anna Martín-Bylund
Published Online: 2017-06-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2016-0021

Abstract

What are the material-semiotic relationships between a language policy and a table game activity in a bilingual preschool? Using Actor-Network Theory (ANT), the aim of this article is to explore this question, working with both human and nonhuman aspects of the activity, symmetrically, at the same level. The game playing activity takes place at a bilingual, Spanish-Swedish preschool in Sweden, which adopts a 50-50 approach in daily interaction. In interplay with video recordings, field notes and Actor-Network Theory, four different actor-network scenes of the activity are produced. Children, teacher, game pieces, die, cards, linguistic and other elements are described in the same language, as well as symmetrically drawn together in material-semiotic relations. The results indicate that the activity revolves mainly around two different, multilayered, and sometimes conflicting interests: to play the game and to speak the right language. The article describes the interrelatedness between these interests and how bilingualism emerges, transforms and becomes temporarily different in the relations of the actor-network. The approach opens up new avenues for understanding different constructions of bilingualism not in terms of a flexible-separate dichotomy but as entangled with one another in material-semiotic relations, which may illuminate creative potentials in the relations of policy and practice rather than implementation.

Keywords: language policy; bilingualism; flexible-separate; Actor-Network Theory (ANT); material-semiotic; human and nonhuman; early childhood education

References

  • Auer, Peter. 1984. Bilingual conversation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

  • Auer, Peter. 1999. Code-switching in conversation: Language interactions and identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Auer, Peter. 2005. A postscript: Code-switching and social identity. Journal of Pragmatics 37(3). 403–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bailey, Benjamin. 2007. Heteroglossia and boundaries. In Monica Heller (ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach, 257–274. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. Dialogic imagination: Four essays. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist in Michael Holquist (ed.). Austin, TX and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. Translated by Vern W. McGee. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Barron-Hauwaert, Suzanne. 2004. The one-parent-one-language approach. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Blackledge, Adrian & Angela Creese (eds.). 2014. Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy (Educational Linguistics 20). New York: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Busch, Brigitta. 2014. Building on heteroglossia and heterogeneity: The experience of a multilingual classroom. In Adrian Blackledge & Angela Creese (eds.), Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy (Educational Linguistics 20), 21–40. New York: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bylund, Anna & Polly Björk-Willén. 2015. Multilingual becoming in reading: A picture storybook-reading-assemblage in early years education. In Sandie Mourão & Monica Lourenco (eds.), Early years second language education: International perspectives on theory and practice, 78–91. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Callon, Michel. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In John Law (ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? 196–223. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • Callon, Michel. 1991. Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In John Law (ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination, 132–165. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Callon, Michel & John Law. 1993. Agency and the hybrid collectif. South Atlantic Quarterly 94(2). 445–465.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, Deborah. 1995. Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Canagarajah, Suresh. 2007. The ecology of global English. International Multilingual Research Journal 1(2). 89–100.Google Scholar

  • Canagarajah, Suresh. 2013. Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Creese, Angela & Adrian Blackledge. 2011. Separate and flexible bilingualism in complementary schools: Multiple language practices in interrelationship. Journal of pragmatics 43. 1196–1208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cromdal, Jakob. 2000. Code-Switching for all practical purposes: Bilingual organization of children’s play (Linköping Studies in Arts and Science 223). Linköping: Linköping University dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Döpke, Susanne. 1992. One parent one language: An interactional approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Eisenberg, Ann R. 1985. Learning to describe past experiences in conversation. Discourse Processes 8(2). 177–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fenwick, Tara & Richard Edwards (eds.). 2012. Researching education through actor-network theory. London: Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar

  • Gafaranga, Joseph. 2000. Language separatedness. A normative framework in studies of language alternation. Esdudios de sociolingüística 1. 65–84.Google Scholar

  • Gafaranga, Joseph. 2007. Code-switching as a conversational strategy. In Peter Auer & Li Wei (eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual communication, 279–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • García, Ofelia. 2009. Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden and Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • García, Ofelia & Li Wei. 2014. Translanguaging. Language, bilingualism and education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Grammont, Maurice. 1902. Observations sur la langue des enfants [Observations on child language]. Paris: Mélanges Meillet.Google Scholar

  • Grosjean, François. 1982. Life with two languages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Haraway, Donna. 1990. Simians, cyborgs, and women. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar

  • Heller, Monica. 1999. Linguistic minorities and modernity: A sociolinguistic ethnography. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Holmen, Anne & Jens Norman Jorgensen. 1997. Aspects of the linguistic development of minority children in a majority school. In Jens Norman Jorgensen & Anne Holmen (eds.), The development of successive bilingualism in school-age children (Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism, 27). Copenhagen: The Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.Google Scholar

  • Jacquemet, Marco. 2005. Transidiomatic practices: Language and power in the age of globalization. Language and Communication 25. 257–277.Google Scholar

  • Jaspers, Jürgen. 2011. Multilingual structures and agencies. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 1157–1160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jörgensen, Jens Norman. 2008. Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism 5. 161–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kyratzis, Amy, Jennifer F. Reynolds & Ann-Carita Evaldsson. 2010. Introduction. Heteroglossia and language ideologies in children’s peer play interactions. Pragmatics (International Pragmatics Association) 20(4). 457–466.Google Scholar

  • Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

  • Latour, Bruno. 1992. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Wiebe E. Bieker & John Law (eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, 225–258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Law, John. 1999. After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In John Law & John Hassard (eds.), Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Makoni, Sinfree & Alastair Pennycook. 2007. Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • McLean, Chris & John Hassard. 2004. Symmetrical absence/symmetrical absurdity: Critical notes on the production of actor-network accounts. Journal of Management Studies 41(3). 493–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1988. Code switching as indexical of social negotiations. In Monica Heller (ed.), Codeswitching: Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives, 151–186. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Ogilvie-Whyte, Sharon. 2004. An analytical ethnography of children’s agency, power and social relations. An actor-network theory approach. Sterling: University of Sterling dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Pennycook, Alastair. 2010. Language as a local practice. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Prout, Allan. 2005. The future of childhood. Towards the interdisciplinary study of children. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Rampton, Ben. 1995. Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. England: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Shohamy, Elana. 2006. Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Spolsky, Bernard. 2004. Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Spolsky, Bernard. 2009. Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Spolsky, Bernard. 2012. What is language policy? In Bernard Spolsky (ed.), The Cambridge handbook on language policy, 3–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Stenliden, Linnéa. 2014. Visual storytelling interacting in school. Learning conditions in the social science classroom (Linköping Studies in Pedagogic Practices, 20). Linköping Studies in Education and Social Sciences, 6. Linköping: Linköping University dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Strathern, Marilyn. 1996. Cutting the Network. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2. 517–535.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • The Swedish National Agency for Education. 2010. Läroplan för förskolan Lpfö 98 [Curriculum for the preschool, Lpfö 1998]. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar

  • Wei, Li. 2011. Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 1222–1235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-06-29

Published in Print: 2017-07-26


Citation Information: Multilingua, Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 477–499, ISSN (Online) 1613-3684, ISSN (Print) 0167-8507, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2016-0021.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Anna Martín-Bylund
Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2017, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in