Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Multilingua

Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication

Ed. by Piller, Ingrid

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.685
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.702

CiteScore 2016: 0.60

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.600
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.805

Online
ISSN
1613-3684
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

“Cunt”: On the perception and handling of verbal dynamite by L1 and LX users of English

Jean-Marc Dewaele
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Applied Linguistics & Communication, Birkbeck University of London, London WC1B 5DT, UK
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-07-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2017-0013

Abstract

“Cunt” is currently one of the most offensive words in the English language and is usually censored in the English press and media. The present study looks firstly at differences between 1159 first (L1) and 1165 foreign (LX) users of English in their perceived understanding of the word, its perceived offensiveness and their self-reported frequency of use. Secondly, it considers the relationships between the dependent variables and a number of psychological, sociobiographical and linguistic profile variables. The findings suggest that LX users are less sure about the exact meaning of the word, underestimate its offensiveness and use it less frequently than L1 users. Links between understanding of the word and its perceived offensiveness vary for L1 and LX users. High levels of Extraversion, Neuroticism and Psychoticism were linked to more frequent use of the word, as were lower levels of education, a younger age, being a male and working in a swearing-rich environment for both L1 and LX users. Variation in the group of LX users was linked to age of onset of acquisition of English, context of acquisition, self-reported oral proficiency, frequency of use of English and having lived in an English-speaking environment.

Keywords: swearwords; English L1 and LX users; offensiveness; personality; frequency of use

References

  • Bailey, Lee Ann & Lenora A. Timm. 1976. More on women’s – and men’s – expletives. Anthropological Linguistics 18. 438–449.Google Scholar

  • Beers-Fägersten, Kristy. 2007. Swear word offensiveness. Saarland Working Papers in Linguistics 1. 14–37.Google Scholar

  • Beers-Fägersten, Kristy. 2012. Who’s Swearing Now?: The Social Aspects of Conversational Swearing. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Christie, Christine. 2013. The relevance of taboo language: An analysis of the indexical values of swearwords. Journal of Pragmatics 58. 152–169.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Culpeper, Jonathan. 2010. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2004a. Blistering barnacles! What language do multilinguals swear in?! Estudios de Sociolinguistica 5. 83–106.Google Scholar

  • Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2004b. The emotional force of swearwords and taboo words in the speech of multilinguals. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 25. 204–223.Google Scholar

  • Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2010. ‘Christ fucking shit merde!’ Language preferences for swearing among maximally proficient multilinguals. Sociolinguistic Studies 4. 595–614.Google Scholar

  • Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2011. The differences in self-reported use and perception of the L1 and L2 of maximally proficient bi- and multilinguals: A quantitative and qualitative investigation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 208. 25–51.Google Scholar

  • Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2013. Emotions in multiple languages, 2nd edn. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2015. British ‘Bollocks’ versus American ‘Jerk’: Do native British English speakers swear more –or differently- compared to American English speakers? Applied Linguistic Review 6. 309–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2016. Thirty shades of offensiveness: L1 and LX English users’ understanding, perception and self-reported use of negative emotion-laden words. Journal of Pragmatics 94. 112–127.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2017a. Glimpses of semantic restructuring of English emotion-laden words of American English L1 users residing outside the USA. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2017b. Self-reported frequency of swearing in English: Do situational, psychological and sociobiographical variables have similar effects on first and foreign language users? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 38. 330–345.Google Scholar

  • Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2017c. Why the dichotomy ‘L1 Versus LX User’ is better than ‘Native Versus Non-native Speaker’. Applied Linguistics doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eysenck, Sybil, Hans Jürgen Eysenck & Paul Barrett. 1985. A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences 6. 21–29.Google Scholar

  • Fraser, Bruce. 2010. Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In: Gunter Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging, 15–34. Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar

  • Gauthier, Michael & Adrien Guille. to appear. Gender and age differences in swearing: A corpus study of twitter. In Kristy Beers-Fägersten & Karyn Stapleton (eds.), Advances in swearing research: New languages and new contexts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Jane, Emma Alice. 2014. ‘Back to the kitchen, cunt’: Speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum 28. 558–570.Google Scholar

  • Jay, Kristin L. & Timothy B. Jay. 2015. Taboo word fluency and knowledge of slurs and general pejoratives: Deconstructing the poverty-of-vocabulary myth. Language Sciences 52. 251–259.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Jay, Timothy B. 1992. Cursing in America. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Jay, Timothy B. 2000. Why we curse: A neuro-psycho-social theory of speech. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Jay, Timothy B. & Kristin Janschewitz. 2008. The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research 4. 267–288.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Danette Ifert & Nicole Lewis. 2010. Perceptions of swearing in the work setting: An expectancy violations theory perspective. Communication Reports 23. 106–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kasper, Gabriel & K. R. Rose. 2001. Pragmatics in language teaching. In Kenneth R. Rose & Gabrielle Kasper (eds.), Language teaching, 1–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • MacLeod, Lauren. 2011. Swearing in the ‘tradie’ environment as a tool for solidarity. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication 4. 1–10.Google Scholar

  • McEnery, Anthony & Zhonghua Xiao. 2004. Swearing in modern British English: The case of ‘fuck’ in the BNC. Language and Literature 13. 235–268.Google Scholar

  • Mehl, Matthias R., Samuel D. Gosling & James W. Pennebaker. 2006. Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90. 862–877.Google Scholar

  • Mohr, Melissa. 2015. Holy Sh*t: A brief history of swearing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mougeon, Raymond, Terry Nadasdi & Katherine Rehner. 2010. The sociolinguistic competence of immersion students. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Muscio, Inga. 2009. Cunt: A declaration of independence, 2nd edn. Berkeley: Seal Press.Google Scholar

  • Pavlenko, Aneta. 2008. Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11. 147–164.Google Scholar

  • Rayson, Paul, Geoffrey Leech & Mary Hodges. 1997. Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: Some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2. 133–152.Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, H. Andrew, Johannes C. Eichstaedt et al. 2013. Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PLoS ONE 8(9). e73791.Google Scholar

  • Stephens, Richard. 2015. Black sheep: The hidden benefits of being bad. London: John Murray Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Terkourafi, Marina. 2008. Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language. Language, power and social process, 54–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Thelwall, Mike. 2008. Fk Yea I Swear: Cursing and Gender in a Corpus of Myspace Pages. Corpora 3. 83–107.Google Scholar

  • Vingerhoets, Ad J. J. M., Lauren M. Bylsma & Cornelis de Vlam. 2013. Swearing: A biopsychosocial perspective. Psychological Topics 22. 287–304.Google Scholar

  • Wachal, Robert S. 2002. Taboo or not taboo: That is the question. American Speech 77. 195–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Warriner, Amy B., Victor Kuperman & Marc Brysbaert. 2013. Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods 45. 1191–1207.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, Rosemary & Jean-Marc Dewaele. 2010. The use of web questionnaires in second language acquisition and bilingualism research. Second Language Research 26. 103–123.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-07-13


Citation Information: Multilingua, ISSN (Online) 1613-3684, ISSN (Print) 0167-8507, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2017-0013.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in