Abstract
C11H16N2O, orthorhombic, Pbca (no. 61), a = 10.7388(6) Å, b = 9.8449(5) Å, c = 21.1259(14) Å, V = 2233.5(2) Å3, Z = 8, Rgt(F) = 0.0582, wRref(F2) = 0.1795, T = 293 K.

Editor-in-Chief: Huppertz, Hubert
Ed. by Reiß, Guido
6 Issues per year
IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.152
Cite Score 2016: 0.15
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.123
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.196
C11H16N2O, orthorhombic, Pbca (no. 61), a = 10.7388(6) Å, b = 9.8449(5) Å, c = 21.1259(14) Å, V = 2233.5(2) Å3, Z = 8, Rgt(F) = 0.0582, wRref(F2) = 0.1795, T = 293 K.
This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.
CCDC no.:: 1478571

Tables 1 and 2 contain details of the measurement method and a list of the atoms including atomic coordinates and displacement parameters.
Data collection and handling.
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2).
1,1-Dimethyl-3-(2-phenylethyl)urea was synthesized from reaction of (2-phenylethyl)amine with dimethylcarbamoyl chloride (1.1 mole equivalents) in the presence of triethylamine (1.4 mole equivalents) in dichloromethane under reflux for 1 h. Recrystallization using a mixture of ethyl acetate and diethyl ether (1:3 by volume) gave the title compound (~99%) as colourless crystals, mp 89–90 °C (lit. 88–90 °C [1]; 81–82 °C [2]).
All H atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined using a riding model. For the methyl groups, C—H bonds were fixed at 0.96 Å and Uiso(H) set to 1.5 Ueq(C) with free rotation around the C—C bond (HFIX 137 in SHELX [13]). For the rest of the hydrogens, Uiso(H) was set to 1.2 Ueq(C) with aromatic C—H and N—H distances of 0.93 and 0.86 Å, respectively.
The synthesis of substituted ureas is of great interest for both academia and industry since ureas represent various biologically active compounds [2], [3], [4]. Urea derivatives can be synthesized using various efficient procedures [5], [6], [7]. Regioselective lithiation of aromatic ureas with lithium reagents followed by reaction with electrophiles at low temperatures is considered to be one of the most clean, efficient and convenient processes for the production of a large number of substituted derivatives in high yields [8], [9], [10], [11].
The asymetric unit (Figure) of the crystal structure consists of a molecule of C11H16N2O. In the crystal, the amide group is involved in N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding (N⋯O distance = 2.850(2) Å, N—H⋯O angle = 152.4°) leading to the formation of C(4) chains [12] along the [010] direction.
The authors extend their appreciation to the College of Applied Medical Sciences Research Centre and the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for their funding of this research.
Smith, K.; El-Hiti, G. A.; Alshammari, M. B.: Lithiation and substitution of N′-(ω-phenylalkyl)-N,N-dimethylureas. Synthesis 44 (2012) 20139–2022. Google Scholar
Wilson, A. A.; Garcia, A.; Houle, S.; Sadovski, O.; Vasdev, N.: Synthesis and application of isocyanates radiolabeled with carbon-11. Chem. Eur. J. 17 (2011) 259–264. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Gennäs, G. B.; Mologni, L.; Ahmed, S.; Rajaratnam, M.; Marin, O.; Lindholm, N.; Viltadi, M.; Gambacorti-Passerini, C.; Scapozza, L.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J.: Design, synthesis, and biological activity of urea derivatives as anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors. Chem. Med. Chem. 6 (2011) 1680–1692. Google Scholar
Kocyigit-Kaymakcioglu, B.; Celen, A. O.; Tabanca, N.; Ali, A.; Khan, S. I.; Khan, I. A.; Wedge, D. E.: Synthesis and biological activity of substituted urea and thiourea derivatives containing 1,2,4-triazole moieties. Molecules 18 (2013) 3562–3576. Google Scholar
Artuso, E.; Degani, I.; Fochi, R.; Magistris, C.: Preparation of mono-, di-,and trisubstituted ureas by carbonylation of aliphatic amines with S,S-dimethyl dithiocarbonate. Synthesis 22 (2007) 3497–3506. Google Scholar
Mizuno, T.; Nakai, T.; Mihara, M.: Synthesis of unsymmetrical ureas by sulfur-assisted carbonylation with carbon monoxide and oxidation with molecular oxygen under mild conditions. Synthesis 15 (2009) 2492–2496. Google Scholar
Thalluri, K.; Manne, S. R.; Dev, D.; Mandal, B.: Ethyl 2-cyano-2-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyloxyimino)acetate-mediated Lossen rearrangement: single-pot racemization-free synthesis of hydroxamic acids and ureas from carboxylic acids. J. Org. Chem. 79 (2014) 3765–3775. Google Scholar
Smith, K.; El-Hiti, G. A.; Alshammari, M. B.: Directed lithiation of N′-(2-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethyl)-N,N-dimethylurea and tert-butyl (2-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethyl)carbamate. Synthesis 46 (2014) 394–402. Google Scholar
Smith, K.; El-Hiti, G. A.; Alshammari, M. B.: Control of site of lithiation of 3-(aminomethyl)pyridine derivatives. Synthesis 45 (2013) 3426–3434. Google Scholar
Smith, K.; El-Hiti, G. A.; Alshammari, M. B.: Variation in the site of lithiation of 2-(2-methylphenyl)ethanamine derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 77 (2012) 11210–11215. Google Scholar
Smith, K.; El-Hiti, G. A.; Hegazy, A. S.: Lateral lithiation of N′-(2-methylbenzyl)-N,N-dimethylurea and N-(2-methylbenzyl)pivalamide: synthesis of tetrahydroisoquinolines. Synthesis 8 (2010) 1371–1380. Google Scholar
Grell, J.; Bernstein, J.; Tinhofer, G.: Investigation of hydrogen bond patterns: a review of mathematical tools for the graph set approach. Crystallogr. Rev. 8 (2002) 1–56.. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M.: A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A64 (2008) 112–122. Google Scholar
Agilent. CrysAlisPRO. Agilent Technologies, Yarnton, England, 2014. Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J.: WinGX and ORTEP for Windows: an update. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45 (2012) 849–854. Google Scholar
Received: 2016-03-14
Accepted: 2016-05-08
Published Online: 2016-05-21
Published in Print: 2016-12-01
Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - New Crystal Structures, Volume 231, Issue 4, Pages 1065–1066, ISSN (Online) 2197-4578, ISSN (Print) 1433-7266, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ncrs-2016-0052.
©2016 Gamal A. El-Hiti et al., published by De Gruyter.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0
Comments (0)