Information transfer in the central nervous system (CNS) is mainly based on chemical synapses. The spatiotemporal pattern of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs largely dictates the output activity of a neuron. Pioneering studies in the 1950s to 1970s revealed that synaptic inhibition in the adult mammalian brain is primarily mediated by the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Intact GABAergic transmission serves as the basis for a balance of excitation and inhibition, impairments of which contribute to diverse CNS disorders. In addition, in vitro investigations revealed that the mode of GABA action undergoes a profound change during development. In the present review we will outline the principles underlying this ontogenetic development and particularly discuss novel results obtained from in vivo investigations in the immature brain.
GABAergic inhibition in the adult brain
Fast postsynaptic GABA actions are primarily mediated by ionotropic GABAA receptors (GABAARs), i. e. ligand-gated ion channels mainly permeable to chloride and, to a lesser extent, bicarbonate (Bormann et al., 1987) (Fig. 1A). GABAAR-dependent inhibition relies on two main mechanisms: I) hyperpolarization (voltage inhibition) and II) increase in membrane conductance (shunting inhibition). Hyperpolarization requires that the reversal potential of GABAAR-dependent currents (EGABA) is more negative than the membrane potential (Vm), and therefore crucially depends on a low intracellular chloride concentration [Cl−]in. Shunting inhibition, in contrast, short-circuits excitatory membrane currents which are generated, for example, at neighboring glutamatergic synapses. According to Ohm’s law, the local decrease in membrane resistance attenuates changes in Vm, which is notably independent of the electrochemical driving force (DFGABA = Vm – EGABA). In other words, even depolarizing GABAAR-dependent currents may cause inhibition of neuronal activity.
Hence, hyperpolarizing GABAAR-mediated responses involve chloride influx which, in turn, reduces DFGABA. The bicarbonate permeability of GABAARs may further promote such chloride loads: Since the reversal potential of bicarbonate (approximately –10 mV) is considerably more positive than the resting membrane potential, GABAAR activation leads to a depolarizing efflux of bicarbonate. At the same time, the intracellular bicarbonate concentration is stabilized by carbonic anhydrases (isoforms 2 and 7) (Fig. 1A). Intense GABAAR activation may therefore cause a rapid collapse of the driving force of chloride, but not bicarbonate. This mechanism may mediate GABAAR-dependent depolarization in adult neurons which will result in a further passive chloride load (see Hübner & Holthoff, 2013).
Neuronal chloride extrusion
Neurons require mechanisms of chloride extrusion in order to maintain efficient (not necessarily hyperpolarizing) synaptic inhibition. Neuronal chloride extrusion is mainly mediated by electroneutral, secondary active K+/Cl– co-transport (Misgeld et al., 1986) (Fig. 1A). In most neurons of the adult CNS, the latter function is represented by the K+/Cl– co-transporter KCC2 (SLC12A5) (Rivera et al., 1999; Hübner et al., 2001). However, [Cl−]in may also be modulated by Na+-dependent (e. g. NCBE und NDCBE) and Na+-independent (e. g. AE3, anion exchanger 3) Cl–/HCO− 3 exchangers (Hübner & Holthoff, 2013). Furthermore, chloride channels are involved in the regulation of [Cl−]in by dissipating electrochemical gradients due to passive ion flow. An example is the inwardly rectifying chloride channel ClC-2 which substantially contributes to the resting membrane conductance of hippocampal pyramidal cells and participates in chloride extrusion (efflux) following activity-induced chloride loads (Rinke et al., 2010).
Ontogenetic alterations in chloride homeostasis
It is frequently overlooked that a low [Cl−]in represents a specialization of mature neurons and, at the same time, an exceptional case in cell biology. Indeed, a similar situation does not apply to immature neurons. Seminal studies of the 1990s revealed a marked increase in neuronal chloride extrusion during the first month of postnatal development in rodents (Luhmann & Prince, 1991), largely resulting from a developmental increase in KCC2 expression (Rivera et al., 1999; Hübner et al., 2001) (Fig. 1B). Which are the consequences of a low capacity of chloride extrusion for GABAergic transmission in the immature CNS? A large body of evidence obtained from in vitro preparations shows that GABA mostly depolarizes immature neurons (Ben-Ari et al., 1989). This conclusion has been corroborated by multiple electrophysiological and optical methods that do not affect [Cl−]in (Owens et al., 1996; Yamada et al., 2004; Achilles et al., 2007; Kirmse et al., 2010; Tyzio et al., 2011). Main conclusions from these investigations are: 1) EGABA is typically less negative than the resting membrane potential (i. e. DFGABA is depolarizing); 2) GABA may induce action potential firing in immature neurons; 3) [Cl−]in declines during postnatal development.
Unless solely carried by efflux of bicarbonate, GABA-dependent depolarization reflects a non-passive chloride distribution. The latter results from secondary active chloride accumulation mainly mediated by the electroneutral Na+/K+/2Cl– co-transporter NKCC1 (SLC12A2) (Yamada et al., 2004; Sipilä et al., 2006; Wang & Kriegstein, 2008; Pfeffer et al., 2009). In addition, experiments in brain slices revealed that NKCC1-dependent chloride accumulation is essential for the generation of certain forms of synchronized network activity (so-called giant depolarizing potentials) (Ben-Ari et al., 1989; Pfeffer et al., 2009). Together, the aforementioned observations led to the widely accepted conclusion that GABA functions as an important (possibly the most important) excitatory neurotransmitter in the developing brain. Whereas most earlier studies in rodents reported a decline in NKCC1 expression over postnatal development (for review see Kirmse et al., 2011), recent quantitative data from human samples do not support this conclusion (Kang et al., 2011) (Fig. 1B). As to which extent chloride transporters other than NKCC1 contribute to the maintenance of DFGABA in immature neuronal cells has not yet been fully resolved (Hübner & Holthoff, 2013).
The value of steady-state measurements in in vitro models
Typical EGABA values measured in neonatal neurons in vitro are in the range of –60 to –30 mV. Consequently, NKCC1 is not at thermodynamic equilibrium (in which ECl −~–10 mV), but mediates a net inward transport of chloride. The discrepancy reflects a dynamic steady state depending on both chloride transport and passive chloride currents (via ion channels) in which alterations in chloride conductance (gCL −) or chloride transport affect [Cl−]in and thereby EGABA. In addition, electrophysiological analyses revealed a low capacity of NKCC1-mediated chloride accumulation in immature cells (Achilles et al., 2007). Data from brain slices, for instance, confirmed that increased synaptic GABAAR activation may strongly reduce DFGABA. Early network activity typically occurs in the form of discrete bursts reflecting large numbers of co-active neurons and involving barrages of GABAAR-mediated postsynaptic currents (PSCs) (Khazipov et al., 2004; Kummer et al., 2016). Hence, such ionic plasticity might be particularly relevant under in vivo conditions. Consequently, EGABA in the intact brain cannot be deduced from in vitro estimates. In order to properly assess the functions of GABAergic transmission, in vivo measurements are therefore of crucial importance.
Cellular and network effects of GABAergic transmission in the immature CNS in vivo
Due to a lack of in vivo data, the concept of GABAergic depolarization/excitation was seriously questioned in recent years. Specifically, it was postulated that GABAergic depolarization represents an artefact of in vitro preparations due to I) energetic deprivation (Rheims et al., 2009) or II) traumatic injury resulting from the slicing procedure (Dzhala et al., 2012). However, these concerns could not be substantiated in a series of independent studies (for review see Kirmse et al., 2011; Ben-Ari et al., 2012).
Recent in vivo investigations have considerably extended our present understanding of GABA actions in the intact immature brain. Using gramicidin-perforated patch-clamp recordings, Zhang and colleagues demonstrated a depolarizing mode of GABA action in retinal ganglion cells of intact zebrafish larvae (Zhang et al., 2010). GABA actions shifted from de- to hyperpolarizing between two and three days post fertilization precisely coinciding with the emergence of sensory-evoked postsynaptic responses. Moreover, sub-threshold depolarizing GABAergic inputs have recently been demonstrated in the optic tectum of Xenopus laevis tadpoles (stage 41–44) (van Rheede et al., 2015).
Cell-attached current-clamp recordings from layer 2/3 neurons in mice at postnatal days 3–4 yielded first direct electrophysiological evidence of GABA-dependent depolarization in the intact mammalian brain (Kirmse et al., 2015). Two-photon Ca2+ imaging data further suggested that NKCC1-mediated chloride accumulation is critical for the maintenance of depolarizing GABA responses in vivo (Kirmse et al., 2015). An unexpected outcome of this study was that GABAAR activation alone did not suffice to induce action potential firing. This observation implies a mainly sub-threshold GABAergic depolarization in vivo – in contrast to previous in vitro findings (Achilles et al., 2007; Kirmse et al., 2010). What are the consequences for the generation of early network activity? In order to address the question, Valeeva and colleagues recently employed an optogenetic strategy by selectively expressing channelrhodopsin-2 in GABAergic interneurons and recording glutamatergic PSCs (EPSCs) (Valeeva et al., 2016). The latter serve as a measure of activity of presynaptic glutamatergic neurons. Interestingly, EPSC frequency was increased by stimulation of GABAergic interneurons in acute brain slices, but reduced in vivo. These results provided convincing evidence for a primarily inhibitory action of GABA in vivo already in the neonatal period and pointed to a substantial discrepancy between in vivo and acute slice models. Though speculative, a gCL −-dependent shift in EGABA represents a plausible explanation.
A principal form of coordinated network activity in the neonatal neocortex in vivo are so-called spindle bursts or Ca2+ clusters which occur at low frequencies and reflect a column-like activation of cortical neurons (Khazipov et al., 2004; Kummer et al., 2016). In line with the above conclusions, local block of GABAARs was found to increase the frequency and horizontal extent of these network events both in the somatosensory (Minlebaev et al., 2007) and occipital (Kirmse et al., 2015) cortex. One interesting aspect is that the generation of Ca2+ clusters and spindle bursts was largely independent of NKCC1 (Minlebaev et al., 2007; Kirmse et al., 2015). At present, it is not possible to conclusively assess as to which extent a similar situation also applies to other brain regions. For example, systemic administration of the NKCC1/2 inhibitor bumetanide was reported to result in a complete and reversible suppression of sharp waves in the neonatal hippocampus in vivo (similar to giant depolarizing potentials in vitro). While this finding was interpreted as evidence for a requirement of GABAergic depolarization (Sipilä et al., 2006), it should be recalled that bumetanide exhibits a particularly low blood-brain barrier permeability. Consequently, it remains unclear whether the observed effect does indeed result from attenuated GABAergic depolarization or rather peripheral actions of bumetanide.
Potential developmental functions of depolarizing GABA in vivo
Why are immature neurons equipped with a low capacity of chloride extrusion which promotes GABAAR-dependent depolarization? Obviously, this question is teleological in nature. Nonetheless, three potential scenarios shall be discussed in the following.
Scenario 1: The existing degree of chloride extrusion is sufficient to maintain effective GABAergic inhibition.
This possibility could be regarded as a trivial case, but is expressis verbis hardly discussed. The underlying provocative idea is that a specific requirement for depolarizing (sic!) GABAergic transmission does not exist. The scenario is based on recent in vivo data that identified GABA as an inhibitory transmitter of the immature brain as well as a lack of direct evidence for GABAergic excitation in vivo. Accordingly, the developmental increase in chloride extrusion capacity could essentially reflect an increased demand which, in turn, results from an enormous increase in GABAergic synapse density during the same developmental period (Fig. 1B). It should further be noted that the maintenance of low [Cl−]in by means of KCC2 is energetically expensive because chloride co-transport depends on the electrochemical K+ gradient and, therefore, the activity of Na+/K+-ATPase. This aspect might be particularly relevant for the time period of structural assembly during brain development.
Scenario 2: The low capacity of chloride extrusion predisposes to excitatory GABA responses which are crucial for the generation of early network activity.
The scenario is based on a large body of evidence from in vitro investigations suggesting that GABA is an important excitatory neurotransmitter during early CNS development (Kirmse et al., 2011). Excitatory GABA effects crucially depend on active chloride accumulation and occur (in a first approximation) if EGABA is more positive than the action potential threshold. As discussed above, the scenario is hardly supported by currently available in vivo data (but see Sipilä et al., 2006). Further studies at the single-cell level are highly required in order to conclusively assess the discrepant nature of results obtained from in vitro and in vivo investigations, respectively.
Scenario 3: The low capacity of chloride extrusion enables depolarizing GABA responses which fulfil important developmental functions in the absence of overt postsynaptic excitation.
What is the developmental relevance of a primarily sub-threshold GABAergic depolarization in vivo? GABAAR activation may facilitate NMDA receptor- (NMDAR-) mediated currents in neonatal neurons in vitro by attenuating their voltage-dependent Mg2+ block (Leinekugel et al., 1997). This aspect could be relevant since it provides a mechanism by which GABA might promote NMDAR-dependent forms of synaptic plasticity. In immature neurons, many glutamatergic synapses are initially equipped with NMDARs but not AMPA receptors (AMPARs). Pairing presynaptic glutamate release with postsynaptic depolarization was experimentally shown to convert pure NMDAR-containing into functional NMDAR/AMPAR synapses within minutes (Durand et al., 1996). In principle, GABAARs are in a position to provide the required postsynaptic depolarization (Fig. 2). The concept is supported by investigations in the immature mouse neocortex in which GABA-mediated depolarization was abolished by knock-down of NKCC1. This resulted in a dramatic reduction in the frequency of AMPAR-mediated PSCs at postnatal weeks 2–3 accompanied by a profoundly lower density of dendritic spines. Importantly, synaptic impairments were rescued by overexpression of a voltage-independent NMDAR (Wang & Kriegstein, 2008). Daily systemic administration of the NKCC1 inhibitor bumetanide in rats from E15 to postnatal day (P) 7 caused similar synaptic alterations, but was ineffective if only performed in the postnatal period (Wang & Kriegstein, 2011). Owing to a low blood-brain barrier permeability and potential peripheral effects of bumetanide (see above), it remains unclear whether the described effects are causally related to an attenuation of cortical GABAergic depolarization. The same reasoning applies to the observation that systemic bumetanide application (P3–7) led to a moderate prolongation of the critical period of ocular dominance plasticity in rats (Deidda et al., 2015). In contrast to previous data, this effect was accompanied by a selective delay in the maturation of GABAergic synaptic transmission whereas the development of glutamatergic contacts, dendritic morphology and visual capabilities remained unaffected.
A slight delay in the maturation of glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses was also found in hippocampal pyramidal cells of constitutive NKCC1 knockout mice (Pfeffer et al., 2009). It should be noted, however, that constitutive NKCC1 knockout mice exhibit a severe phenotype unrelated to a lack of neuronal NKCC1. An alternative experimental strategy to abolish depolarizing GABA effects relies in the premature (over)expression of the chloride extruder KCC2. Here, a complicating factor is that KCC2 contributes to the structural development of dendritic spines via interactions with the cytoskeleton. In line with this, KCC2 overexpression via in utero electroporation resulted in a massive increase in spine density which was mimicked by a transport-deficient KCC2 variant and hence was independent of alterations in chloride homeostasis (Fiumelli et al., 2013).
The described interaction between GABAARs and NMDARs is assumed to be synapse-specific (Durand et al., 1996) and possibly independent of (supra-threshold) excitation of the postsynaptic neuron. Evidence for this suggestion has recently been obtained in the optic tectum of Xenopus laevis tadpoles (van Rheede et al., 2015). Here, visual stimulation at the onset of sensory development did not induce action potential discharge in a substantial fraction of tectal neurons. Interestingly, visual experience was suited to convert sub-threshold into supra-threshold responses within minutes. This process involved a selective strengthening of AMPAR-dependent PSCs and was crucially dependent on both GABAergic depolarization (via NKCC1) and NMDARs in vivo. Interestingly, depolarizing responses to GABA were exclusively observed in those tectal neurons which lacked sensory-evoked spiking activity. These data provide clear evidence for a developmental function of GABAergic depolarization in the optic tectum which is independent of postsynaptic excitation (van Rheede et al., 2015).
It is conceivable that neither of the aforementioned scenarios fully describes the functions of GABAergic transmission in the immature brain. In addition, it becomes apparent that a coherent picture of these functions cannot be drawn at present. The latter is partially related to the limited specificity of certain experimental manipulations of [Cl−]in, but possibly also reflects the complexity and diversity of GABA actions (in different brain areas, cell types, subcellular compartments etc.). Notwithstanding, recent in vivo research yielded first indications for developmental functions of depolarizing GABAergic transmission in the immature brain. As to which extent GABAergic depolarization mediates synaptic excitation in vivo remains an interesting question for future investigations. It should be stressed that GABAergic transmission mediates synaptic inhibition already in the immature brain. On the basis of currently available evidence, we postulate that a balance of GABAergic depolarization and inhibition is essential for the proper maturation of neonatal neuronal circuits.
Achilles K, Okabe A, Ikeda M, Shimizu-Okabe C, Yamada J, Fukuda A et al. (2007). Kinetic properties of Cl uptake mediated by Na+-dependent K+-2Cl cotransport in immature rat neocortical neurons. J Neurosci 27, 8616–8627. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Ari Y, Cherubini E, Corradetti R, Gaiarsa JL (1989). Giant synaptic potentials in immature rat CA3 hippocampal neurones. J Physiol 416, 303–325. Google Scholar
Ben-Ari Y, Woodin MA, Sernagor E, Cancedda L, Vinay L, Rivera C et al. (2012). Refuting the challenges of the developmental shift of polarity of GABA actions: GABA more exciting than ever! Front Cell Neurosci 6, 35. Google Scholar
Bormann J, Hamill OP, Sakmann B (1987). Mechanism of anion permeation through channels gated by glycine and gamma-aminobutyric acid in mouse cultured spinal neurones. J Physiol 385, 243–286. Google Scholar
Deidda G, Allegra M, Cerri C, Naskar S, Bony G, Zunino G et al. (2015). Early depolarizing GABA controls critical-period plasticity in the rat visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 18, 87–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dzhala V, Valeeva G, Glykys J, Khazipov R, Staley K (2012). Traumatic Alterations in GABA Signaling Disrupt Hippocampal Network Activity in the Developing Brain. J Neurosci 32, 4017–4031. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durand GM, Kovalchuk Y, Konnerth A (1996). Long-term potentiation and functional synapse induction in developing hippocampus. Nature 381, 71–75. Google Scholar
Fiumelli H, Briner A, Puskarjov M, Blaesse P, Belem BJ, Dayer AG et al. (2013). An Ion Transport-Independent Role for the Cation-Chloride Cotransporter KCC2 in Dendritic Spinogenesis In Vivo. Cereb Cortex 23, 378–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hübner CA, Stein V, Hermans-Borgmeyer I, Meyer T, Ballanyi K, Jentsch TJ (2001). Disruption of KCC2 reveals an essential role of K-Cl cotransport already in early synaptic inhibition. Neuron 30, 515–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kang HJ, Kawasawa YI, Cheng F, Zhu Y, Xu X, Li M et al. (2011). Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature 478, 483–489. Google Scholar
Khazipov R, Sirota A, Leinekugel X, Holmes GL, Ben-Ari Y, Buzsáki G (2004). Early motor activity drives spindle bursts in the developing somatosensory cortex. Nature 432, 758–761. Google Scholar
Kirmse K, Kummer M, Kovalchuk Y, Witte OW, Garaschuk O, Holthoff K (2015). GABA depolarizes immature neurons and inhibits network activity in the neonatal neocortex in vivo. Nat Commun 6, 7750. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirmse K, Witte OW, Holthoff K (2011). GABAergic depolarization during early cortical development and implications for anticonvulsive therapy in neonates. Epilepsia 52, 1532–1543. Google Scholar
Kummer M, Kirmse K, Zhang C, Haueisen J, Witte OW, Holthoff K (2016). Column-like Ca2+ clusters in the mouse neonatal neocortex revealed by three-dimensional two-photon Ca2+ imaging in vivo. Neuroimage 138, 64–75. Google Scholar
Leinekugel X, Medina I, Khalilov I, Ben-Ari Y, Khazipov R (1997). Ca2+ oscillations mediated by the synergistic excitatory actions of GABA(A) and NMDA receptors in the neonatal hippocampus. Neuron 18, 243–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann HJ, Prince DA (1991). Postnatal maturation of the GABAergic system in rat neocortex. J Neurophysiol 65, 247–263. Google Scholar
Misgeld U, Deisz RA, Dodt HU, Lux HD (1986). The role of chloride transport in postsynaptic inhibition of hippocampal neurons. Science 232, 1413–1415. Google Scholar
Owens DF, Boyce LH, Davis MB, Kriegstein AR (1996). Excitatory GABA responses in embryonic and neonatal cortical slices demonstrated by gramicidin perforated-patch recordings and calcium imaging. J Neurosci 16, 6414–6423. Google Scholar
Pfeffer CK, Stein V, Keating DJ, Maier H, Rinke I, Rudhard Y et al. (2009). NKCC1-dependent GABAergic excitation drives synaptic network maturation during early hippocampal development. J Neurosci 29, 3419–3430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rheims S, Holmgren CD, Chazal G, Mulder J, Harkany T, Zilberter T et al. (2009). GABA action in immature neocortical neurons directly depends on the availability of ketone bodies. J Neurochem 110, 1330–1338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rivera C, Voipio J, Payne JA, Ruusuvuori E, Lahtinen H, Lamsa K et al. (1999). The K+/Cl- co-transporter KCC2 renders GABA hyperpolarizing during neuronal maturation. Nature 397, 251–255. Google Scholar
Sipilä ST, Schuchmann S, Voipio J, Yamada J, Kaila K (2006). The cation-chloride cotransporter NKCC1 promotes sharp waves in the neonatal rat hippocampus. J Physiol 573, 765–773. Google Scholar
Tyzio R, Allene C, Nardou R, Picardo MA, Yamamoto S, Sivakumaran S et al. (2011). Depolarizing Actions of GABA in Immature Neurons Depend Neither on Ketone Bodies Nor on Pyruvate. J Neurosci 31, 34–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valeeva G, Tressard T, Mukhtarov M, Baude A, Khazipov R (2016). An Optogenetic Approach for Investigation of Excitatory and Inhibitory Network GABA Actions in Mice Expressing Channelrhodopsin-2 in GABAergic Neurons. J Neurosci 36, 5961–5973. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Rheede JJ, Richards BA, Akerman CJ (2015). Sensory-Evoked Spiking Behavior Emerges via an Experience-Dependent Plasticity Mechanism. Neuron 87, 1050–1062. Google Scholar
Wang DD, Kriegstein AR (2011). Blocking Early GABA Depolarization with Bumetanide Results in Permanent Alterations in Cortical Circuits and Sensorimotor Gating Deficits. Cereb Cortex 21, 574–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamada J, Okabe A, Toyoda H, Kilb W, Luhmann HJ, Fukuda A (2004). Cl- uptake promoting depolarizing GABA actions in immature rat neocortical neurones is mediated by NKCC1. J Physiol 557, 829–841. Google Scholar
Zhang RW, Wei HP, Xia YM, Du JL (2010). Development of light response and GABAergic excitation-to-inhibition switch in zebrafish retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol 588, 2557–2569. Google Scholar
About the article
Knut Kirmse (born 1981) studied Medicine at the Charité in Berlin. He performed his doctoral studies at the Institute of Neurophysiology (supervised by Rosemarie Grantyn and Sergei Kirischuk) for which he received the Robert-Koch award from the Charité in 2007. He continued his work on GABAergic synapses during brain development as a postdoctoral fellow before joining the BioImaging laboratory of Knut Holthoff and Otto W. Witte at Jena University Hospital in 2009. His main scientific interest focusses on the physiology of brain development, in particular the functions of GABAergic transmission and cortical pioneer neurons. Since 2013 Knut Kirmse is a junior research group leader at the Hans-Berger Department of Neurology Jena, in 2014 he received his venia legendi in Neurosciences.
Knut Holthoff (born 1964) studied Biology at the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf. At the Department of Neurology in the lab of Otto W. Witte, he wrote his doctoral thesis about intrinsic optical signals in rat brain slices. After a subsequent two-year postdoc, he moved to the lab of Rafael Yuste at Columbia University in New York, where he studied dendritic mechanisms of synaptic plasticity using 2-photon calcium imaging. Starting in 2001, he continued his studies in the lab of Arthur Konnerth at the Ludwig-Maximilians University in Munich and received his venia lengendi for Neurosciences at the Technical University Munich in 2007. His main scientific interest focuses on the physiology of synaptic transmission and the mechanisms of neuronal network activity in the brain. In 2008, he was appointed Professor for Experimental Neurology at the University Hospital Jena.
Published Online: 2017-02-10
Published in Print: 2017-02-01