Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

New Global Studies

Ed. by Chanda, Nayan / Iriye, Akira / Mazlish, Bruce / Sassen, Saskia

Online
ISSN
1940-0004
See all formats and pricing
More options …

South–South Cooperation and IBSA: More Trade in Politics

Adriana Schor
  • Corresponding author
  • Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de São Paulo, Av Lucio Martins Rodrigues s/n Travessas 4 e 5, São Paulo 05508-020, Brazil
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-06-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2014-0015

Abstract

There is a consensus in the literature that India–Brazil–South Africa (IBSA) Forum is not about trade. The main argument is that the three economies do not have enough complementarities to foster trade and that their cooperation in trade issues is undermined by competition for developed countries’ markets access. This report shows that this argument does not hold. Not only there are potential gains from trade among India, Brazil and South Africa, but also their exports are not sufficient similar to affirm that they are essentially rivals concerning market access. Moreover, it discusses the potential political gains that an increased trade among IBSA members can bring about. More trade can increase cooperation in multilateral negotiations and helps to sustain the coalition of developing countries.

Keywords: South–South cooperation; international trade; IBSA

References

  • Alden, C., and M. A. Vieira. 2005. “The New Diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and Trilateralism.” Third World Quarterly 26(7):1077–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Areias, A. C. 2010. Os Limites da Cooperação: O Brasil e o G-20 nas negociações agrícolas da Organização Mundial de Comércio. Dissertação de Mestrado em Relações Internacionais, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar

  • Baier, S. L., and J. H. Bergstrand. 2001. “The Growth of World Trade: Tariffs, Transport Costs, and Income Similarity.” Journal of International Economics 53(1):1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brulhart, M. 2008. “An Account of Global Intraindustry Trade, 1962–2006”. Background Paper, World Development Report 2009, UNCTAD.Google Scholar

  • Celli, U., M. Salles, D. Tussie, and J. Peixoto. 2010. “Mercosur in South-South Agreements: In the Middle of Two Models of Regionalism.” UNCTAD Virtual Institute.Google Scholar

  • De, P. 2005. “Trade in IBSA Economic Cooperation: The Role of Transportation Linkages.” RIS Discussion Papers.Google Scholar

  • Dupas, G. 2006. “South Africa, Brazil and India: Divergence, Convergence and Alliance Perspectives”. In India, Brazil and South Africa: Perspectives and Alliances, edited by Fábio Villares. São Paulo: Editora UNESP.Google Scholar

  • Flemes, D. 2007. “Emerging Middle Powers’ Soft Balancing Strategy: State and Perspectives of the IBSA Dialogue Forum.” GIGA Working Paper.Google Scholar

  • Flemes, D. 2009. “India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) in the New Global Order: Interests, Strategies and Values of the Emerging Coalition.” International Studies 46(4):401–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgot, R., and A. Cooper. 1990. “Middle Power Leadership and Coalition Building: Australia, the Cairns Group and the Uruguay Round of Trade Negotiations.” International Organization 44(4):589–632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hurrell, A., and A. Narlikar. 2005. “A New Politics of Confrontation? Developing Countries at Cancun and Beyond.” Mimeograph.Google Scholar

  • Jonsson, G., and A. Subramanian. 2001. “Dynamic Gains from Trade: Evidence from South Africa.” IMF Staff Paper 48(1):197–224.Google Scholar

  • Kahler, M., and J. Oddell. 1989. “Developing Country Coalition-Building and International Trade Negotiations.” In Developing Countries and the Global Trading System, edited by John Whalley. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar

  • Krajewski, M. 2000. “From Green Room to Glass Room: Participation of Developing Countries and Internal Transparency in the WTO Decision Making Process”. A TradeWatch Paper.Google Scholar

  • Krishna, P., and D. Mitra. 1998. “Trade Liberalization, Market Discipline and Productivity Growth: New Evidence from India.” Journal of Development Economics 56(2):447–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krugman, P., and M. Obstfeld. 2010. Economia Internacional. São Paulo: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

  • Kume, H., G. Piani, and P. Miranda. 2005. “Índia-Mercosul: Perspectivas De Um Acordo De Preferências Comerciais.” Texto de discussão no. 1120, IPEA.Google Scholar

  • de Lima, M. R. S. 2005. “A Política Externa Brasileira e os Desafios da Cooperação Sul-Sul.” Revista Brasileira De Política Internacional 48(1):24–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lima, M. 2010. “Brasil e Polos Emergentes do Poder Mundial: Rússia, Índia, China e África do Sul.” In O Brasil e os Demais BRICS: Comércio e Política, edited by R. Baumann. CEPAL, Escritório do Brasil/IPEA.Google Scholar

  • Mancuso, W. P. 2007. “O Empresariado Como Ator Político no Brasil: Balanço da Literatura e Agenda de Pesquisa.” Revista de Sociologia E Política 28:131–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mancuso, W. P., and A. J. de Oliveira. 2006. “Abertura Econômica e Ação Coletiva do Empresariado no Brasil.” Lua Nova Revista de Cultura e Política 69:147–72.Google Scholar

  • Mikic, M., and J. Gilbert. 2009. Trade Statistics in Policy Making: A Handbook of Commonly Used Trade Indices and Indicators. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

  • Narlikar, A. 2003. International Trade and Developing Countries: Bargaining Coalitions in the GATT & WTO. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Narlikar, A., and D. Tussie. 2004. “The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing Countries and Their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO.” World Economy 27(7):947–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Odell, J., and A. Ortiz Mena. 2004. “How to Negotiate Over Trade: A Summary of New Research for Developing Countries.” University of Southern California.Google Scholar

  • Oliveira, A., J. Onuki, and E. N. Oliveira. 2006. “Coalizões Sul-Sul e Multilateralismo: Índia, Brasil e África do Sul.” Contexto Internacional 28(2):465–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Onuki, J., and A. Oliveira. 2012. “New Role of Brazil in the Global Governance.” Paper presented at 2012 ISA World Forum.Google Scholar

  • Quereshi, A. H. 2003. “Participation of Developing Countries in the WTO Dispute Settlement System.” Journal of African Law 47(2):174–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schor, A. 2004. “Heterogeneous Productivity Response to Tariff Reduction. Evidence from Brazilian Manufacturing Firms.” Journal of Development Economics 75:373–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tussie, D. 1987. The Less Developed Countries and the World Trading System: A Challenge to the GATT. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar

  • Valls Pereira, L. 2006. “Os Acordos Comerciais Sul-Sul Firmados Pelo Mercosul: Uma Avaliação Sob a Ótica Brasileira.” Revista Brasileira de Comércio Exterior 86:2–11.Google Scholar

  • Vieira, M., and C. Alden. 2011. “India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA): South-South Cooperation and the Paradox of Regional Leadership.” Global Governance 17:507–28.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-06-24

Published in Print: 2014-07-01


Citation Information: New Global Studies, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 183–201, ISSN (Online) 1940-0004, ISSN (Print) 2194-6566, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2014-0015.

Export Citation

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in