Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

New Global Studies

Ed. by Chanda, Nayan / Iriye, Akira / Mazlish, Bruce / Sassen, Saskia

3 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
1940-0004
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Mismeasuring Humanity: Examining Indicators Through a Critical Global Studies Perspective

Eve Darian-Smith
Published Online: 2015-11-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2015-0018

Abstract

Social and economic indicators measure and monitor the relative level of each country’s “progress”, be this in education, poverty, mortality, gross domestic product and so on. This essay examines indicators in the contemporary development paradigm and their use by the United Nations, World Bank, NGOs and corporations, as well as their increasing presence in global governance decision-making. Drawing upon a critical global studies perspective, I argue that indicators are producing and privileging certain kinds of knowledge over other kinds of knowledge that may not be so easily “captured” by nationally structured numerical reductionism. Reflecting on the limitations of the Human Development Index and the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals, I suggest that the empirical data produced ultimately mismeasure the fullness of human experience and often undervalue non-western worldviews. I conclude by returning to the insights suggested by a global studies perspective and offer a number of recommendations for envisaging and shaping a more inclusive post-development paradigm.

Keywords: indicators; development; knowledge; global studies; global south; MDGs/SDGs

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L. 2009. “Dialectics of Women’s Empowerment: The International Circuitary of the “Arab Development Report 2005.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 41:83–103.Google Scholar

  • Adely, F. J. 2009. “Educating Women for Development: The Arab Human Development Report 2005 and the Problem with Women’s Choices.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 41:105–22.Google Scholar

  • Amar, P. 2013. The Security Archipelago: Human-Security States, Sexuality Politics and the End of Neoliberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Amin, S. 2009. “Millennium Development Goals: A Critique from the South.” Accessed February 1, 2015. http://monthlyreview.org/2006/03/01/the-millennium-development-goals-a-critique-from-the-south/.

  • Apffel-Marglin, F. 1996a. “Introduction: Rationality and the World.” In Decolonizing Knowledge: From Development to Dialogue, edited by F. Apffel-Marglin and S. A. Marglin, 1–39. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Apffel-Marglin, F. 1996b. “Rationality, the Body, and the World: From Production to Regeneration.” In Decolonizing Knowledge: From Development to Dialogue, edited by F. Apffel-Marglin and S. A. Marglin, 142–81. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Atkinson, A. B., and E. Marlier. 2010. Analyzing and Measuring Social Inclusion in a Global Context. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

  • Bates, W. 2009. “Gross National Happiness.” Asian-Pacific Economic Literature 23 (2):1–16.Google Scholar

  • Beattie, A. 2014. “The New UN Development Goals, Still Missing the Point.” Accessed February 1, 2015. http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2014/08/21/the-new-un-development-goals-still-missing-the-point/

  • Beck, U. 2005. Power in a Global Age: A New Global Political Economy. New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. 1986. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Buroway, M. 2014. “Preface.” In Global Knowledge Production in the Social Sciences: Made in Circulation, edited by K.Wiebke, E. Çelik, C. Ersche, and V. Wöhrer, xiii–xvii. Franham, Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, A. 2015. “Law and Society Scholarship After the Turn to Culture and Away From the State.” Anthropology of this Century (3): May 2015.

  • Cohn, B. S. 1996. Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Conley, J. M. 2011. “Comment.” Current Anthropology 54 (3):93.Google Scholar

  • Cooley, A., and J. Snyder, eds. 2015. Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dados, N., and R. Connell. 2014. “Neoliberalism, Intellectuals and Southern Theory.” In Global Knowledge Production in the Social Sciences: Made in Circulation, edited by K. Wiebke, E. Çelik, C. Ersche, and V. Wöhrer, 195–213. Franham, Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • Dar, O. A., and M. S. Khan. 2011. “Millennium Development Goals and the Water Target: Details, Definitions and Debate.” Tropical Medicine & International Health 16 (5):540–4.Google Scholar

  • Darian-Smith. 2013a. Laws and Societies in Global Contexts: Contemporary Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Darian-Smith, E. 2010. Religion, Race, Rights: Landmarks in the History of Modern Anglo-American Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

  • Darian-Smith, E. 2012. “Rereading W.E.B. Du Bois: The Global Dimensions of the US Civil Rights Struggle.” Journal of Global History 7:483–505.Google Scholar

  • Darian-Smith, E. 2013b. “‘Locating a Global Perspective’. Symposium: Legal Scholarship and Globalization: Engagements with William Twining.” Transnational Legal Theory 4 (4):524–6.Google Scholar

  • Darian-Smith, E. 2014. “Global Studies—the Handmaiden of Neoliberalism?.” Globalizations 2 (2):164–8.Google Scholar

  • Darian-Smith, E. 2015. “The Constitution of Identity: New Modalities of Nationality, Citizenship, Belonging and Being.” In The Handbook of Law and Society, edited by A. Sarat and P. Ewick, 351–66. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Darian-Smith, E., and P. McCarty. 2016, forthcoming. Writing Global Research: Interdisciplinary Theories, Designs and Methods for Global Studies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Davis, K., A. Fisher, B. Kingsbury, and S. Engle Merry, eds., 2012. Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Classification and Rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Duve, T. 2013. “European Legal History—Global Perspectives.” Working paper for the Colloquium ‘European Normativity—Global Historical Perspectives’ (Max-Planck-Institute, September 2–4, 2013).

  • Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fehling, M., B. D. Nelson, and S. Venkatapuram. 2013. “Limitations of the Millennium Development Goals: A Literature Review.” Global Public Health 8 (10):1109–22.Google Scholar

  • Fukuda-Parr, S., and A. Ely Yamin, eds., 2015. The MDGs, Capabilities and Human Rights: The Power of Numbers to Shape Agendas. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Gould, S. J. 1996, revised edition. The Mismeasure of Man. London and New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar

  • Gudeman, S. 2008. Economy’s Tension: The Dialectics of Community and Market. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

  • Gunn, G. 2013. Introduction: Mapping and Remapping the Global” in Giles Gunn Ideas to Die for: The Cosmopolitan Challenge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Hasso, F. S. 2009. “Empowering Governmentalities Rather Than Women: The Arab Human Development Report 2005 and Western Development Logics.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 41:63–82.Google Scholar

  • Hickel, J. 2015. “The Problem with Saving the World.” Jacobin. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/08/global-poverty-climate-change-sdgs/Google Scholar

  • Ittmann, K., D. D. Cordell, and G. Maddox. 2010. The Demographics of Empire: The Colonial Order and the Creation of Knowledge. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

  • Juergensmeyer, M. 2011. “What Is Global Studies?.” Global-e: A Global Studies Journal 5. http://global-ejournal.org/2011/05/06/what-is-global-studies-3/Google Scholar

  • Juergensmeyer, M., ed. 2014. Thinking Globally: A Global Studies Reader. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Landes, D. 1998. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. New York: Little Brown & Co.Google Scholar

  • Lipsitz, G. 2010. “Ethnic Studies at the Crossroads.” Kalfou: A Journal of Comparative and Relational Ethnic Studies Spring 2010:11–15.

  • Lorimer, D. A. 1978. Colour, Class, and the Victorians: English Attitudes to the Negro in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar

  • McCarty, P. 2014a. “Communicating Global Perspectives.” Basel Papers in European Global Studies 5:27–37.Google Scholar

  • McCarty, P. 2014b. “Globalizing Legal History”. Rechtsgeschichte – Legal History 22:283–91.Google Scholar

  • McCarty, P. 2014c, revised first edition. Integrated Perspectives in Global Studies. San Diego, CA: Cognella Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Merry, S. E. 2011. “Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance.” Current Anthropology 54 (3):83–95.Google Scholar

  • Merry, S. E. 2016. The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Violence Against Women, and Human Trafficking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Merry, S. E., and S. Wood. 2015. “Quantification and the Paradox of Measurement: Translating Children’s Rights in Tanzania.” Current Anthropology 56 (2), April.Google Scholar

  • Merry, S. E., K. Davis, and B. Kinsbury, eds. 2015. The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nandy, A. 1983. The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self Under Colonialism. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o. 1986. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. London: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar

  • Obeng-Odoom, F. 2013. “Africa’s Failed Economic Trajectory: A Critique.” African Review of Economics and Finance 4 (2):151–75.Google Scholar

  • Omi, M., and H. Winant. 2015. Racial Formation in the United States, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Ostrom, E. 2009. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Pieterse, N. Jan 1999. “Critical Holism and the Tao of Development.” In Critical Development Theory: Contributions to a New Paradigm, edited by R. Munck and D. O’Hearn, 63–88. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar

  • Pieterse, N. Jan. 2013. “What Is Global Studies?.” Globalizations 10:4.Google Scholar

  • Porter, E. 2010. The Problem of the Future World: W.E.B. Du Bois and the Race Concept at Midcentury. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rehbein, B. 2014. “Epistemology in a Multicentric World.” In Global Knowledge Production in the Social Sciences: Made in Circulation, edited by K.Wiebke, E. Çelik, C. Ersche, and V. Wöhrer, 217–22. Franham, Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • Rottenburg, R., S. E. Merry, J. Mugler, and S. Park, eds. 2015. The World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge Through Quantification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Said, E. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

  • Said, E. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

  • Said, E. 1994. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

  • Santos, B., ed. 2007. Another Knowledge Is Possible. Beyond Northern Epistemologies. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar

  • Sardar, Z. 1999. “Development and the Locations of Eurocentrism.” In Critical Development Theory: Contributions to a New Paradigm, edited by R. Munck, and D. O’Hearn, 44–62. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar

  • Sarkosy, N. 2010. “Foreword.” In Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn’t Add up: the Report, edited by J. E. Stiglitz, A. Sen, J.-P. Fitoussi, vii–xv. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar

  • Sen, A. 1998. Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar

  • Shipman, P. 1994. The Evolution of Racism: Human Differences and the Use and Abuse of Science. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

  • Shore, C. 2008. “Audit Culture and Illiberal Governance: Universities and the Politics of Accountability.” Anthropological Theory 8 (3):278–98.Google Scholar

  • Smith, L. T. 2012. Decolonizing Methodogies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, 2nd ed. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar

  • Steger, M. 2009. The Rise of the Global Imaginary: Political Ideologies from the French Revolution to the Global War on Terror. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Steger, M., ed. 2015. The Global Studies Reader, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Stigler, S. M. 1989. “Francis Galton’s Account of the Invention of Correlation.” Statistical Science 4 (2):73–9.Google Scholar

  • Stiglitz, J. E., A. Sen, and J.-P. Fitoussi. 2010. Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up: The Report. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar

  • Strathern, M., ed. 2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Tarabini, A. 2010. “Education and Poverty in the Global Development Agenda: Emergence, Evolution and Consolidation.” International Journal of Educational Development 30 (2):204–12.Google Scholar

  • Tideman, S. G. 2011. “Gross National Happiness.” In Ethical Principles and Economic Transformation – A Buddhist Approach, edited by L. Zsolnai. Issues in Business Ethics 33:133–53.Google Scholar

  • Weber, M. 1950. General Economic History. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Wiebke, K., E. Celik, C. Ersche, and V. Wohrer, eds. 2014. Global Knowledge Production in the Social Sciences: Made in Circulation. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-11-26

Published in Print: 2016-04-01


Citation Information: New Global Studies, Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 73–99, ISSN (Online) 1940-0004, ISSN (Print) 2194-6566, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2015-0018.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in