Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy

The Journal of NISPAcee

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1338-4309
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Performance Management: How the Swedish Administration of Transportation for the Disabled Succeeded. A Case Study of Transportation Service for the Disabled, the Municipality of Gothenburg

Iwona Sobis
  • Associate Professor, School of Public Administration, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Offolome Guepie Victorien Okouma
  • Alumnus of Master Program, School of Public Administration, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-07-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2017-0007

Abstract

Management by objectives (known also as performance management) has been perceived as a promising steering method in the public sector since the beginning of the 1990s (Smith 1993, 1995; Kravchuk and Schack 1996; Ballantine et al. 1998; Ferreira and Otley 2009 Verbeeten 2008). However, working out operative goals of public organizations seem to be a challenge because major objectives formulated by politicians are oft en unclear and difficult to measure (Rombach 1991; Lundquist 1992; Gray and Jenkins 1995; Lapsley 1999). It is known that public organizations’ services like school, health care, welfare care, collective transportation, infrastructure and cultural services are usually unprofitable. The Transportation Service for the Disabled in the Municipality of Gothenburg is an exception. It fulfilled most objectives and achieved a profit of 7,890,000 SEK for 2013, while the planned one was scheduled at 5,000,000 SEK. Maybe performance management used as the steering model caused that result but the criticism targeting management by objectives suggests that this method hardly can explain such a positive result. Brorström et al. (2005) and Grönlund and Modell (2006) argue that in Sweden management by objectives is usually used in combination with other control models. The purpose of this study is to describe and explain why the Transportation Service for the Disabled succeeded in 2013 and to provide practitioners nationally and internationally with some pragmatic ideas how to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of public services. We ask three sub-questions: How were the operative goals created within the Transportation Service for the Disabled? How were the operative goals followed up? What can be learned from this case study? The research is based on the analysis of state regulations, internal policy documents, reports and interviews with key respondents. The study shows that the performance management systems (PMS) in combination with a new organizational culture based on SMART solutions, mutual cooperation among staff, with local politicians and other stakeholders resulted in the increase of efficiency and even partly effectiveness. However, these findings deserve further research if there are other public administrations that succeeded because of using PMS and friendly organizational culture.

Keywords: Management by objectives; performance-management systems; public sector; efficiency; effectiveness; SMART; organizational culture; cooperation

References

  • Almqvist, Roland. 2006. New Public Management: Om konkurensutsättning, kontrakt och kontroll. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar

  • Ballantine, Joan, Stan Brignall and Sven Modell. 1998. “Performance Measurement and Management in Public Health Services: A Comparison of U.K. and Swedish Practice.” Management Accounting Research 9, 71–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bovaird, Tony and Elke Löffler. 2002. “Moving from Excellence Models of Local Service Delivery to Benchmarking ‘Good Local Governance’.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 68, 9–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boyne, George and Julian Gould-Williams. 2003. “Planning and Performance in Public Organizations.” Public Management Review 5(1), 115–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Broadbent, Jane and Richard Laughlin. 2009. “Performance Management Systems: A Conceptual Model.” Management Accounting Research 20, 283–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brorström, Björn, Anders Haglund and Rolf Solli. 2005. Förvaltningsekonomi. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Google Scholar

  • Carlin, Tyrone M. 2004. “Output-Based Management and the Management of Performance: Insights from the Victorian Experience.” Management Accounting Research 15, 267–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Denters, Bas and Lawrence E. Rose (eds). 2005. Comparing Local Governance: Trends and Developments. New York, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Drucker, Peter F. 1955. The Practice of Management. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

  • Ehrenberg, Rudolph H. and Ronald J. Stupak. 1994. “Total Quality Management: Its Relationship to Administrative Theory and Organizational Behavior in the Public Sector.” Public Administration Quarterly 18(1), 75–98.Google Scholar

  • Evans, James R. 2004. “An Exploratory Study of Performance Measurement Systems and Relationships with Performance Results.” Journal of Operations Management 22, 219–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferreira, Aldónio and David Otley. 2009. “The Design and Use of Performance Management Systems: An Extended Framework for Analysis.” Management Accounting Research 20, 263–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Färdtjänstnämndens budget of 2013 (Transportation Service Board’s Budget by 2013). Available at http://www5.goteborg.se/prod/Intraservice/Namndhandlingar/SamrumPortal.nsf/5AC9F2837E8D4BC4C1257A9F00252278/$File/Bilaga_Forslag_till_budget_2013.pdf?OpenElement (last accessed 14 September 2015).

  • Färdtjänstnämndens uppföljningsrapporter. 2013 (Transportation service follow-up reports of the Board of 2013). Available at http://www5.goteborg.se/prod/Intraservice/Namndhandlingar/SamrumPortal.nsf/F24B88FFD1383341C1257B5000260DFA/$File/Uppfoljningsrapport_1_2013.pdf?OpenElement (last accessed 14 September 2015).

  • Färdtjänstnämnden: Årsrapport. 2013 (Transportation Service Board: Annual Report 2013). Available at http://www5.goteborg.se/prod/Intraservice/Namndhandlingar/SamrumPortal.nsf/D606144B645C4416C1257C71004F8FF6/$File/Arsrapport%202013.pdf?OpenElement (last accessed 14 September 2015).

  • Goddard, Andrew. 2010. “Contemporary Public Sector Accounting Research: An International Comparison of Journal Papers.” The British Accounting Review 42, 75–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gray, Andrew and Bill Jenkins. 1995. “From Public Administration to Public Management; Reassessing a Revolution.” Public Administration 7(3), 75–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grönlund, Anders and Sven Modell. 2006. Effektivitet och styrning i statliga myndigheter [Efficiency and control of State authorities]. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Google Scholar

  • Halachmi, Arie. 2005. “Performance Measurement is only One Way of Managing Performance.” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54(7), 502–516. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410400510622197.Crossref

  • Hyndman, Noel and Ron Eden. 2000. “A Study of the Coordination of Mission, Objectives and Targets in UK Executive Agencies.” Management Accounting Research 11, 175–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hyndman, Noel and Ron Eden. 2001. “Rational Management, Performance Targets and Executive Agencies: Views from Agency Chief Executives in Northern Ireland.” Public Administration 79(3), 579–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hällstén, Freddy and Stefan Tengblad (ed.). 2006. Medarbetarskap i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar

  • Isgrove, Robert and Anoop Patel. 1993. “Quality Progress in UK Social Services Departments: An Exploratory Study.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 6(6), 55–66.Google Scholar

  • Johansson, Bertil and Britt Johansson. 1994. Att styra eller inte styra. En kritisk granskning av den svenska grundskolans förändrade styrning med inriktning mot planeringsdokument. Lund: Pedagogiska Institutionen.Google Scholar

  • Johanson, Ulf and Matti. Skoog. 2007. Verksamhetsstyrning, för förändring, förbättring och utveckling. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar

  • Kaplan, Robert S. and David P. Norton. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar

  • Kommunallagen (KL) (Local Government Act) 1991:900.Google Scholar

  • Kravchuk, Robert S. and Roland W. Schack. 1996. “Designing Effective Performance Measurement Systems under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993.” Public Administration Review 56(4), 348–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lag om färdtjänsten (SFS 1997:736) [Act on Transportation for the Disabled].Google Scholar

  • Lag om kollektivtrafik (SFS 2010:1065) [Act on Public Transport].Google Scholar

  • Lag om riksfärdtjänsten (SFS 1997:735) [Act on National Transportation for the Disabled].Google Scholar

  • Lapsley, Irvine. 1999. “Accounting and the New Public Management: Instruments of Substantive Efficiency or a Rationalizing Modernity?” Financial Accountability and Management 15(3–4), 201–207. Google Scholar

  • Lemieux-Charles, Louise, Wendy McGuire, François Champagne, Jan Barnsley, Donald Cole and Claude Sicotte. 2003. “The Use of Multilevel Performance Indicators in Managing Performance in Health Care Organizations.” Management Decision 41(8), 760–770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindgren, Lena. 2008. Utvärderingsmonstret. Kvalitets- och resultatmätning i den offentliga sektorn. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar

  • Lundquist, Lennart. 1992. Förvaltning, Stat, och samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Google Scholar

  • MacPherson, Malcolm. 2001. “Performance Measurement in Not-for-Profit and Public Sector Organization.” Measuring Business Excellence 5(2), 13–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Modell, Sven. 2004. “Performance Measurement Myths in the Public Sector: A Research Note.” Financial Accountability & Management 20(1), 39–55.Google Scholar

  • Otley, David. 1999. “Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research.” Management Accounting Research 10, 363–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ouchi, William G. 1977. “The Relationship between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control.” Administrative Science Quarterly 22, 95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peng, Tzu-Ju, Stephen Piken and Göran Roos. 2007. “Intellectual Capital and Performance Indicators: Taiwanese Healthcare Sector.” Journal of Intellectual Capital 8(3), 538–556.Google Scholar

  • Politiska inriktningsmål, 2013. [Policy orientation, 2013].Google Scholar

  • Rombach, Björn. 1991. Det går inte att styra med mål. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Google Scholar

  • Shah, Anwar and Sana Shah. 2006. “The New Vision of Local Governance and the Evolving Roles of Local Governments.” In Anwar Shah (ed.). Local Governance in Developing Countries: Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series. Washington DC: The World Bank, 1–46.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Peter. 1993. “Outcome-Related Performance Indicators and Organizational Control in the Public Sector.” British Journal of Management 4(3), 135–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, Peter. 1995. “Performance Indicators and Outcome in the Public Sector.” Public Money and Management 15(4), 13–16. Google Scholar

  • Stevens, Philip, Lucy Stokes and Mary O’Mahony. 2006. “Metrics, Targets and Performance.” National Institute Economic Review 197(1), 80–92.Google Scholar

  • Så här styrs staden. 2008. (In this way, the city is steered, 2008). Available at http://www4.goteborg.se/prod/sk/ledarsida/dalis2.nsf/vyFilArkiv/sa_styrs_staden.pdf/$file/sa_styrs_staden.pdf (last accessed 13 April 2014).

  • Trafikförsörjnings program 2013–2015 för färdtjänst och riksfärdtjänst. Göteborgs Stad. [Traffic Maintenance Programs for Special Transportation and National Mobility, 2013–2015. The Municipality of Gothenburg].Google Scholar

  • Vakkuri, Jarmo and Pentti Meklin. 2003. “The Impact of Culture on the Use of Performance Measurement Information in the University Setting.” Management Decision 41(8), 751–759.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Verbeeten, Frank H. M. 2008. “Performance Management Practices in Public Sector Organizations: Impact on Performance.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21(3), 427–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walle van de, Steven. 2008. “Comparing the Performance of the National Public Sectors: Conceptual Problems.” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 57(4), 329–338.Google Scholar

  • Wang, XiaoHu and Evan Berman. 2001. “Hypotheses about Performance Measurement in Counties: Findings from a Survey.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(3), 403–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yrkande (S, V, MP) Policy inriktningsmål, 2013 [Claim (S, V, MP) Policy orientation, 2013].Google Scholar

  • Zineldin, Mosad. 2006. “The Quality of Health Care and Patient Satisfaction: An Exploratory Investigation of the 5Qs Model at Some Egyptian and Jordanian Medical Clinics.” International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 19(1), 60–92.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-07-08

Published in Print: 2017-06-01


Citation Information: NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, ISSN (Online) 1338-4309, ISSN (Print) 1337-9038, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2017-0007.

Export Citation

© 2017 NISPAcee. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in