Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Nordic Journal of Migration Research

The Journal of Nordic Migration Research

4 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1799-649X
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 5, Issue 1 (Mar 2015)

Person, Time and Conduct in Alna

Thomas Hylland Eriksen
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Oslo, Norway
  • Email:
Published Online: 2015-03-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/njmr-2015-0006

Abstract

The comparative study of personhood has a long and distinguished peerage in anthropology, but it has rarely been applied to research on contemporary migration and diversity in Europe. Drawing on the contrast established by Louis Dumont between hierarchical holism and egalitarian individualism, as well as the subsequent debate, this essay argues that a significant shift takes place in the second generation, from a traditional, sociocentric concept of personhood to a reflexive, individualist one. Using empirical material from Alna in eastern Oslo, the aim is to show that the cultural diversity witnessed in the second generation is founded on individualism and thus compatible with reflexive modernity, even if it is often associated with sociocentrism. The distinction between cultural content and social organisation is essential for the argument.

Keywords: Norway; diversity; personhood; second generation

References

  • Aarset, MF 2014, Hearts and roofs. Family, belonging, and (un) settledness among descendants of immigrants in Norway, Ph D dissertation, Department of Social Anthropology, University of Oslo, Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Andersen, B 2013, Westbound and eastbound: making sameness and the making of separations in Oslo, Ph D dissertation, Department of Social Anthropology, University of Oslo, Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Andersen, B & Biseth, H 2013, ‘The myth of failed integration: the case of eastern Oslo’, City and Society, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5-24, DOI:10.1111/ciso.12004.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Appadurai, A 1988, ‘Putting hierarchy in its place’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 36-49, DOI:10.1525/ can.1988.3.1.02a00040.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barth, F 1981, Features of person and society in swat, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar

  • Barth, F (ed.) 1963, The role of the entrepreneur in northern Norway, Universitetsforlaget, Bergen.Google Scholar

  • Barth, F 1969, Ethnic groups and boundaries. The social organization of culture difference, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Blom, S 2010, Holdninger til innvandrere og innvandring 2010 (‘Attitudes to immigrants and immigration in 2010’), Report 56/2010, Statistics Norway, Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Borges, JL 1944, Ficciones, Editorial Sur, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P 1977, Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Brubaker, R 2004, Ethnicity without groups, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

  • Carrithers, M 1985, An alternative social history of the self. In The category of the person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History, eds.Google Scholar

  • M Carrithers, S Collins and S Lukes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 234-256.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, AP 1994, Self consciousness, Routledge, London.Google Scholar

  • Douglas, M 1966, Purity and danger: an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar

  • Døving, CA 2005, Norsk-pakistanske begravelsesritualer - en migrasjonsstudie. (‘Norwegian-Pakistani burial rituals - a migration study‘), Ph D dissertation, Department of Culture Studies and Oriental Languages, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Døving, R & Kielland, MG 2013, ‘Cake is halal, fat is sinful: cake and representation in Norway’, Ethnologia Europea, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 78-92.Google Scholar

  • Dumont, L 1971, Homo Hierarchicus: Essai sur le système des castes, Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar

  • Dumont, L 1977, Homo Æqualis I: Genèse et épanouissement de l‘idéologie économique, Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar

  • Eriksen, TH 2006, ‘Diversity versus difference: neo-liberalism in the minority debate’, in The making and unmaking of difference, eds. R Rottenburg, B Schnepel and S Shimada, Transaction, Bielefeld, pp. 13-36.Google Scholar

  • Eriksen, TH 2010, Samfunn (‘Society‘), Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Erstad, I 2015 Here, now and into the future: Child rearing among Norwegian-Pakistani mothers in Oslo, Norway. Ph D dissertation, Department of Social Anthropology, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Fortes, M 1973, ‘The concept of the person’, in Religion, morality and the person: essays on Tallensi religion, ed. M Fortes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 247-286.Google Scholar

  • Friedman, J 1994, Global culture and local process, Sage, London.Google Scholar

  • Furnivall, JS 1947, Colonial policy and practice: a comparative study of Burma and Netherlands India, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Giddens, A 1991, Modernity and self-identity, Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Geertz, C 1973, ‘Person, time and conduct in Bali’, in The interpretation of culture, ed. C Geertz, Basic Books, New York, pp. 360-411.Google Scholar

  • Goodman, M 1993, ‘African substratum: some cautionary words‘.Google Scholar

  • in Africanisms in Afro-American language varieties, ed. SS Mufwene, Georgia University Press, Athens, Georgia, pp. 64- 73.Google Scholar

  • Gullestad, M 2006, Plausible prejudice: everyday experiences and social images of nation, culture and race, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Handelman, D 1977, ‘The organization of ethnicity’, Ethnic Groups, vol. 1, pp. 187-200.Google Scholar

  • Hannerz, U 1996, Transnational connections, Routledge, London.Google Scholar

  • Henriksen, K 2010, Familieinnvandring og ekteskapsmønster 1990- 2008 (‘Family immigration and marriage patterns 1990-2008‘), Statistics Norway, Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Hundeide, K 2003, Ǟtte temaer for godt samspill (‘Eight themes for fruitful interplay‘), Vett & Viten, Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Jacobsen, C & Andersson, M 2012, ‘Gaza in Oslo: social imaginaries in the political engagement’, Ethnicities, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 821- 843.Google Scholar

  • Josephides, L 1991, ‘Metaphors, metathemes, and the construction of sociality: a critique of the new Melanesian ethnography’, Man, vol. 26, pp. 145-161.Google Scholar

  • Latour, B 1993, We have never been modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

  • LiPuma, E 1998, ‘Modernity and forms of personhood in Melanesia’, in Bodies and persons: comparative perspectives from Africa and Melanesia, eds. M Lambek and A Strathern, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 53-79.Google Scholar

  • Marriott, M 1976, ‘Hindu transactions: diversity without dualism’, in Transaction and meaning, ed. B Kapferer, Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Philadelphia, pp. 109-142.Google Scholar

  • Mauss, M 1985 [1938], ‘A category of the human mind: the notion of person; the notion of self‘ translated by WD Halls, in The category of the person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History, eds.Google Scholar

  • M Carrithers, S Collins and S Lukes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-25.Google Scholar

  • Mintz, SW 1974, Caribbean transformations, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar

  • Mintz, SW 2008, ‘Creolization and hispanic exceptionalism’, Review, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 251-265.Google Scholar

  • Mintz, SW 2010, Three ancient colonies: themes and variations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Palmié, S 2013, ‘Mixed blessings and sorrowful mysteries: second thoughts about ‘Hybridity’, Current Anthropology, vol. 54, pp. 1-20.Google Scholar

  • Robbins, J & Siikala, J 2014, ‘Hierarchy and hybridity: toward a Dumontian approach to contemporary cultural change’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 122-132.Google Scholar

  • Rugkåsa, M 2012, Likhetens dilemma: Om sivilisering og integrasjon i den velferdsambisiøse norske stat. (‘The predicament of equality: On civilisation and integration in the welfare ambitious Norwegian state‘), Gyldendal, Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Rushdie, S 1991, Imaginary homelands, Granta, London.Google Scholar

  • Smith, MG 1965, The plural society of the British West Indies, Sangster‘s, London.Google Scholar

  • SSB (Statistics Norway), 2013, Available from: http://www.ssb.no/ befolkning/statistikker/innvbef.Google Scholar

  • Stambøl, LS 2013, Flytting til og fra Oslos bydeler (‘Mobility to and from Oslo‘s boroughs‘), Statistics Norway, Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Stewart, C (ed.) 2007, Creolization: history, ethnography, theory, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar

  • Strandhagen, IJ 2008, Unge sjiamuslimer i Oslo. (‘Young Shi‘ite Muslims in Oslo‘), MA dissertation, Department of Culture Studies and Oriental Languages, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Strathern, M 1988, Gender of the gift: problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar

  • Taylor, C 1989, Sources of the self: the making of the modern identity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-09-10

Accepted: 2014-10-21

Published Online: 2015-03-01


Citation Information: Nordic Journal of Migration Research, ISSN (Online) 1799-649X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/njmr-2015-0006.

Export Citation

© 2015 Thomas Hylland Eriksen. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in