Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

The Journal of Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.746

CiteScore 2016: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.348
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.383

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1458-6126
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 28, Issue 2 (Jan 2011)

Issues

Risky drinking of alcohol in Sweden: A randomized population survey comparing web- and paper-based self-reports

Håkan Källmén
  • STAD-section, Centre for Research in Psychiatry, Teknologg. 8E, 11360 Stockholm, Sweden
/ Kristina Sinadinovic
  • Dept. of Clin. Neur. & Stockholm Centre for Dependence, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
/ Anne Berman
  • Dept. of Clin. Neur. & Stockholm Centre for Dependence, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
/ Peter Wennberg
  • SoRAD, Stockholm Centre for Dependence & Stockholm University
Published Online: 2011-06-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10199-011-0013-4

Risky drinking of alcohol in Sweden: A randomized population survey comparing web- and paper-based self-reports

AIMS - This study compared data quality and response rates for the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in a web-based versus in a paper-and-pencil format survey. SETTING - Subjects were randomised to one of two parallel samples, one web-based and the other paper-based. Data were collected during 2009. RESULTS - The web-based format yielded a lower response rate compared to the paper version (26.2% vs. 53.6%), internal consistency was quite similar (0.82 vs. 0.77), while the mean AUDIT scores were higher in the web-based format for both men and women. Conclusions - Future studies should focus on methods for combining different administration methods in order to maximize response rates.

  • Babor, T. & Higgings-Biddle, J. & Saunders, J. & Monteiro, M. (2001): AUDIT, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary care. Geneva: WHOGoogle Scholar

  • Bason, J. (2000): Comparison of telephone mail, web, and IVR surveys of drug and alcohol use among university of Georgia students. Paper presented at the American Associations of Public Opinion ResearchGoogle Scholar

  • Bergman, H. & Källmén, H. (2002): Alcohol use among Swedes and a psychometric evaluation of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Alcohol and Alcoholism 37: 245-251Google Scholar

  • Bergman, H. & Källmén, H. (2003): Svenska kvinnor har fått mer riskfyllda och skadligare alkoholvanor. Undersökning av förändringar i svenskarnas alkoholvanor åren 1997-2001. (Swedish women show more hazardous and harmful alcohol habits. I nvestigation of changes in Swede's alcohol habits during the period 1997-2001). Läkartidningen 100: 1028-1035Google Scholar

  • Caetano, R. (2001): Non-response in alcohol and drug surveys: a research topic in need of further attention. Addiction 96: 1541-1545PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Findahl, O. (2007): Sverige i Europa (Sweden in Europe). Hudiksvall: World Internet InstituteGoogle Scholar

  • Findahl, O. (2008a): Svenskarna och internet 2007 (The Swedes and Internet 2007). Hudiksvall: World Internet InstituteGoogle Scholar

  • Findahl, O. (2008b): Internet i ett internationellt perspektiv - Del 2. Sverige i världen (Internet in an international perspective - Part 2. Sweden in the world). Hudiksvall: World Internet InstituteGoogle Scholar

  • Kypri, K. & Gallagher, S. (2003): Incentives to increase participation in an Internet survey of alcohol use: a controlled experiment. Alcohol & Alcoholism 38: 437-441Google Scholar

  • Kypri, K. & Stephenson, S. & Langley, J. (2004): Assesment of Nonresponse Bias in an Internet Survey of Alcohol Use. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 28: 630-634Google Scholar

  • Källmén, H. & Wennberg, P. & Berman, A. H. & Bergman, H. (2007): Alcohol habits in Sweden during 1997-2005, as measured with the AUDIT. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 61: 466-470Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Link, M. & Mokdad, A. (2005): Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: Comparison of web, mail and telephone approaches. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 66: 239-245Google Scholar

  • McCabe, S. & Boyd, C. & Couper, M. & Crawford, S. & D'Arcy, H. (2002): Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and U. S. mail. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 63: 755-761Google Scholar

  • McCabe, S. E. & Diez, A. & Boyd, C. J. & Nelson, T. F. & Weitzman, E. R. (2006): Comparing web and mail responses in a mixed mode survey in college alcohol use research. Addictive behaviors 31: 1619-1627Google Scholar

  • Miller, E. T. & Neal, D. J. & Roberts, L. J. & Baer, J. S. & Cressler, S. O. & Metrik, J. & et.al (2002): Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between Internet-based assessment and traditional methods? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 16: 56-63CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saunders, J. B. & Aasland, O. G. & Babor, T. F. & De La Fuente, J. R. & Grant, M. (1993): Development of Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption - II. Addiction 88: 791-804Google Scholar

  • Selin, K. H. (2006): Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): What does it screen for? Performance of the AUDIT against four different criteria in a Swedish population sample. Substance use & Misuse 41: 1181-1189Google Scholar

  • Sinadinovic, K. & Wennberg, P. & Berman, A. H. (2011): Population screening of risky alcohol and drug use via Internet and Interactive Voice Response (IVR): A feasibility and psychometric study in a random sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 114 (1): 55-60Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, Y. C. & Lee, C. M. & Lew-Ting, C. Y. & Hsiao, C. K. & Chen, D. R. & Chen, W. J. (2005): Survey of substance use among high school students in Taipei: Web-based questionnaire versus paper-and-pencil questionnaire. Journal of Adolescent Health 37: 289-295Google Scholar

  • Werner, P. (2005): On the Cost-Efficiency of Probability Sampling Based Mail Surveys with a Web Response Option. Linköping: University of LinköpingGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, D. L. & Aquilino, W. S. & Supple, A. I. (1998): A comparison of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaires in a survey on smoking, alcohol, and other drug use. Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 331-353.Google Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2011-06-03

Published in Print: 2011-01-01


Citation Information: Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, ISSN (Online) 1458-6126, ISSN (Print) 1455-0725, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10199-011-0013-4.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in