Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

The Journal of Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.768

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.321
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.485
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.618

Open Access
See all formats and pricing


Select Volume and Issue

Former heavy drinkers’ multiple narratives of recovery

1Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research

2Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research

© Anne-Sofie Christensen et al.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Citation Information: Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 245–257, ISSN (Online) 1458-6126, DOI: 10.1515/nsad-2015-0024, June 2015

Publication History

Published Online:


AIM – This article explores the multiplicity of former heavy drinkers’ narratives. The focus lies on turning points from heavy drinking among people who have recovered through self-change and among those who recovered by participating in Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings.

DESIGN – We conducted 42 qualitative interviews with media-recruited informants in 2009–2013. The interviews allowed the respondents to narrate their life histories of drinking and quitting drinking, including accounts of causality and order of events.

RESULTS – These narratives are enactments shaped in the practice and context in which they were experienced. It is argued that the multiplicity of drinking narratives results not only from the fact that people have different experiences while drinking nor only from different people having different ways of recovering from a problematic consumption. The multiplicity is also the result of the very enactment of recovering and the lives lived after the recovery. The multiplicity is created in practice and is revealed in the narratives.

CONCLUSIONS – The narratives and the enactment of the narratives of one’s past, present and future that occur when making momentous changes in one’s life – such as stopping drinking – are all essential for the process of quitting alcohol and the life to be lived hereafter. We should therefore pay more attention to the multiplicity that is created in the enactment of narratives in the process of recovery.

Keywords: narratives; complexity; life histories; Alcoholics Anonymous; self-change; multiplicity


  • Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class and change in an urban community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Becker, G. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special references to education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Bloomfield, K., Elmeland, K., & Villumsen, S. (2013). Rusmidler i Danmark – forbrug, holdninger og livsstil [Substances in Denmark – use, attitudes and life styles]. Aarhus: Center for Rusmiddelforskning, Aarhus Universitet.

  • Blomqvist, J. (1999). Inte bara behandling – vägar ut ur alkoholmissbruket [Not only treatment – ways out of alcohol use]. Stockholm: Bjurner och Bruno.

  • Blomqvist, J. (2002). Recovery with and without treatment: A comparison of resolutions of alcohol and drug problems. Addiction Research & Theory, 10(2), 119–158. [CrossRef]

  • Callaghan, R. C., & Cunningham, J. A. (2002). Gender differences in detoxification: Predictors of completion and re-admission. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23, 399–407.

  • Cain, C. (1991). Personal stories: Identity acquisition and self-understanding in Alcoholics Anonymous. Ethos, 19(2), 210–253. [CrossRef]

  • Cloud, W., & Granfield, R. (2008). Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Substance Use and Misuse, 43, 1971–1986. [PubMed]

  • Cunningham, J. A., Lin, E., Ross, H. E., & Walsh, G. W. (2000). Factors associated with untreated remissions from alcohol abuse or dependence. Addictive Behaviours, 25(2), 317–321.

  • Elmeland, K., & Hecksher, D. (2010). Forandring uden behandling [Change without treatment]. Stof, 14, 17–21.

  • Elmeland, K., & Christensen, A. S. (2012). We all know the way back … or do we? Paper presented at the 38th Annual Alcohol Epidemiological Symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society. Stavanger, Norway. June 4–8, 2012.

  • Elmeland, K., & Villumsen, S. (2013). Changes in Danish public attitudes and norms regarding alcohol consumption and alcohol policy. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 6(13), 525–538.

  • Hecksher, D. (2006). Tidligere misbrugeres fortællinger. Identitet, forandring og strategier [Former addicts’ stories. Identity, change and strategies]. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

  • Jackson, M. (2002). The politics of storytelling: Violence, transgression and intersubjectivity. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.

  • Klingemann, H., & Sobell, L. C. (Eds.) (2007). Promoting self-change from addictive behaviors: Practical implications for policy, prevention and treatment. New York: Springer.

  • Klingemann, H., Sobell M. B., & Sobell L. C. (2009). Continuities and changes in self-change research. Addiction, 105(9), 1510–1518. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Web of Science]

  • Klingemann, J. (2011). Lay and professional concepts of alcohol dependence in the process of recovery from addiction among treated and non-treated individuals in Poland – a qualitative study. Addiction Research and Theory, 19(3), 266–275. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • Koski-Jännes, A. (1998). Turning point in addiction careers: Five case studies. Journal of Substance Misuse, 3, 226–233.

  • Labouvie, E. (1996). Maturing out of substance use: Selection and self-correction. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(2), 457–476.

  • Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.

  • Pedersen, M. U., & Hecksher, D. (2008). Døgnbehandling af alkoholafhængige. Forløb, tilbagefald og køn [Inpatient treatment of the alcohol dependent. Progress, relapse and gender]. Aarhus: Center for Rusmiddelforskning, Aarhus Universitet.

  • Rosenqvist, P. (1992). From the rib of AA. Contemporary Drug Problems, 19, 605–630.

  • Rumph, H. J., Bischoff G., Hapke, U., Meyer, C., & John, U. (2000). Studies on natural recovery from alcohol dependence: Sample selection bias by media solicitation? Addiction, 95(5), 765–775. [CrossRef]

  • Skinner, H. A. (1984). Instruments for assessing alcohol and drug problems. Bulletin of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviour, 3, 21–33.

  • Sobell, M. B., & Sobell, L. C. (2005). Guided self-change model of treatment for substance use disorders. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 19(3), 199–210.

  • Steffen, V. (1997). Life stories and shared experience. Social Science Medicine, 45(1), 99–111. [CrossRef]

  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.

  • Valverde, M. & White-Mair K. (1999). “One day at a time” and other slogans for everyday life: The ethical practices of Alcoholics Anonymous. Sociology, 33(2), 393–410.

  • White, W., & Kurtz, E. (2005). The varieties of recovery experience. International Journal of Self Help and Self Care, 3(1–2), 21–61.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.