Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

The Journal of Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.746

CiteScore 2016: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.348
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.383

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1458-6126
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 32, Issue 3 (Jun 2015)

Issues

Smoking cessation and gender differences – results from a Swedish sample

Tove Sohlberg
Published Online: 2015-06-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nsad-2015-0025

Abstract

AIM – Previous research has concluded that prevalence of smoking, reasons to quit and strategies to become smoke-free vary markedly by gender. Yet we lack a more comprehensive understanding of the process leading to a quit attempt and a positive long-term outcome, and of the gender-specific mechanisms behind successful cessation. My aim is therefore to investigate reasons of smoking and motives, mechanisms and factors of smoking cessation, with special regard to gender differences.

DATA/METHOD – Between October 2009 and May 2010, respondents were recruited through the Swedish Monitor project. Each month 1 500 individuals from a representative sample in the Swedish population (n=12 000) were interviewed on the telephone. In a screening process, previous daily smokers who had been smoke-free for at last 12 months were asked to answer a postal survey (n=1 683) concerning their process to a smoke-free life. The analyses consist of both descriptive statistics and factor analyses.

RESULTS – The results indicate that women’s smoking filled an important role in life and that the cessation process was quite complex. Women often met harsh consequences from smoking, quitting for the sake of others. They tended to plan their cessation in advance and made more often use of professional help and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) than men. Men tended to experience their smoking as quite unproblematic and typically quit for more self-oriented reasons. They seldom planned their cessation in advance, but many made use of snuff or snus, and about half were still using it. More than men, women perceived physical problems in not smoking, but also more social and personal benefits.

CONCLUSIONS – Gender differences were found in reasons to smoke, reasons to quit and strategies to quit smoking. Because the smoking cessation process is gendered, strategies and policy decisions should be gender sensitive, taking into account an array of specific needs.

Keywords: Smoking cessation; process; gender differences; Sweden; factor analyses

REFERENCES

  • Amos, A., & Mackay, J. (2010). Tobacco and women. In P. Boyle, P. N. Gray, J. Henningfield, J.Seffrin & W.A. Zatonski (Eds.), Tobacco. Science, Policy, and Public Health (pp. 323–346). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Arborelius. E. (1993). Varför gör dom inte som vi säger??: teori och praktik om att påverka människors levnadsvanor. [Why don’t they do as we say?? Theory and practise on how to affect people’s living habits] Partille: Upjohn Förlag.Google Scholar

  • Bernaards, C. M., Twisk, J. W. R., Snel, J., van Mechelen, W. & Kemper, H. C. G. (2001). Is calculating pack-years retrospectively a valid measure to estimate life-time tobacco smoking? A comparison between prospectively calculated pack-years and retrospectively calculated pack-years. Addiction 96(11), 1653–1662.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cisneros Örnberg, J., & Sohlberg, T. (2012). Swedish tobacco policy: From rational choice to ‘harm to others’. In M. Hellman, G. Roos & J. von Wright (Eds.), A Welfare Policy Patchwork. Negotiating the Public Good in Times of Transition. (pp. 65–82). Helsinki: Nordic Welfare Centre.Google Scholar

  • Coughlin, S. S. (1990). Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(1), 87–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fagerström, K-O & Schneider, N.G (1989). Measuring Nicotine Dependence: A Review of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12(2), 159–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flöter. S & Kröger. C (2007). Self Change: The rule among Smokers. In H. Klingemann & L. Carter Sobell (Eds.) Promoting Self-Change From Addictive Behaviours. Practical implications for Policy. Prevention and Treatment. (pp. 105–118). NY: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar

  • Gilljam, H. & Galanti, R. (2003). Role of snus (oral moist snuff) in smoking cessation and smoking reduction in Sweden. Addiction, 98(9), 1183–1189.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graham. H & Der. G (1999). Patterns and predictors of smoking cessation among British women. Health Promotion International, 14(3), 231–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grotvedt. L.. & Stavem. K. (2005). Association between age, gender and reasons for smoking cessation. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 72–76.Google Scholar

  • Hudmon, K. S., Pomerleau, C. S., Brigham, J., Javitz, H., & Swan, G. E. (2005). Validity of retrospective assessments of nicotine dependence: A preliminary report, Addictive Behaviors, 30(3), 613–617.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, T. P. & Mott, J. A. (2001). The reliability of self-reported age of onset of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use. Addiction, 96(8), 1187–1198.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kenkel, D., Lillard, D. R. & Mathios, A (2003). Smoke or fog? The usefulness of retrospectively reported information about smoking. Addiction, 98(9), 1307–1313.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Lund, K. E., McNeill, A., & Scheffels, J. (2010). The use of snus for quitting smoking compared with medicinal products. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12(8). 817–822.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Magnusson, S & Nordgren, P (1994). Om tobak. Bakgrund och kommentarer till tobakslagen. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar

  • OECD (2012). Smoking among adults. In Health at a Glance: Europe 2012. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Public Health Agency of Sweden [Folkhälsomyndigheten] (2014, March 10). Hälsa på Lika Villkor [Health on Equal Terms]. Retrieved from http://folkhalsomyndigheten.se/amnesomraden/statistik-och-undersokningar/enkater-och-undersokningar/nationella-folkhalsoenkaten/levnadsvanor/tobaksvanor/

  • Ramstedt. M., Lindell, A. & Raninen, J. (2013). Tal om alkohol 2012. En statistisk årsrapport från Monitor-projektet [Annual statistical report on alcohol]. Research report no. 67 Stockholm: SoRAD.Google Scholar

  • Ramström, L-M & Foulds, J. (2006). Role of snus in initiation and cessation of tobacco smoking in Sweden. Tobacco Control, 15(3), 422–424.Google Scholar

  • Schachter. S (1982). Recidivism and Self-Cure of Smoking and Obesity. American Psychologist, 37(4), 436–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scheffels, J, Lund, K. E. & McNeill, A (2012). Contrasting snus and NRT as metohods to quit smoking. an observational study. Harm Reduction Journal, 9(10), 1–8.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Singleton. J. K. Levin. R. F. Feldman. H. R. & Truligo-Londrigan. M. (2005). Evidence for Smoking Cessation: Implications for Gender-Specific Strategies. Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing. 2(2), 63–74PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • SNIPH; The Swedish National Institute of Public Health (2004). Tobak och avvänjning [Tobacco and detoxification] Faktaskrift 2004:29.Google Scholar

  • SNIPH; The Swedish National Institute of Public Health (2009, October 23). Nationella folkhälsoenkäten: Hälsa på lika villkor [Health on equal terms] Retrieved from http://www.fhi.se/sv/Statistik-uppfoljning/Nationellafolkhalsoenkaten/

  • SNIPH; The Swedish National Institute of Public Health (2011). Tobak. Kunskapsunderlag för Folkhälsopolitisk rapport 2010 [Tobacco. Basis of knowledge for Public Health report 2010] Report R 2011:11.Google Scholar

  • SNIPH; The Swedish National Institute of Public Health (2012, July 24). Retrieved from http://www.fhi.se/Vart-uppdrag/Alkohol-narkotika-dopning-tobak-och-spel/Samband-ANTS/

  • Sohlberg, T. (2012). Tal om tobak 2012: Tobakskonsumtionen i Sverige 2012. [Annual statistical report about tobacco from the Monitor project]. SoRAD Rep. No 66. Stockholm: Stockholm university. SoRAD.Google Scholar

  • Sohlberg, T & Wennberg, P (2014). Developmental pathways to smoking cessation. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 14(2), 96–106.Google Scholar

  • Statistics Sweden [SCB] (2004). Bruk och missbruk. Vanor och ovanor. Hälsorelaterade levnadsvanor 1980–2002 [Healthrelated habits of life]. Report no 105. Örebro: SCB-tryck.Google Scholar

  • Waldron, I (1991). Patterns and Causes of Gender Differences in Smoking. Social Sience and Medicine, 32(9), 989–1005.Google Scholar

  • Wennberg, P., Svensson, J. & Ramstedt. M (2011). The effects of missing data when surveying alcohol habits. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 28(1), 43–50.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • West, R., McEwen, M. and Bates, C. (1999). Sex and smoking: comparisons between male and female smokers. Retrieved from www.rjwest.co.uk/resources.php

  • World Bank (1999). Curbing the Epidemic: Governments and the Economics of Tobacco Control. Washington D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-05-22

Accepted: 2014-10-10

Published Online: 2015-06-22

Published in Print: 2015-06-01


Citation Information: Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, ISSN (Online) 1458-6126, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nsad-2015-0025.

Export Citation

© Tove Sohlberg. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in