Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

The Journal of Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.768

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.321
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.485
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.618

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1458-6126
See all formats and pricing
Volume 32, Issue 3 (Jun 2015)

Issues

Justifications of national gambling policies in France and Finland

Virve Marionneau
  • Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki
  • Email:
Published Online: 2015-06-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nsad-2015-0027

Abstract

AIMS – The principles of free trade and free circulation of services within the European Union have created pressures to make the strictly controlled European gambling markets more open. According to the Court of Justice of the European Union, restrictions on gambling are only allowed if they are justified in admissible terms of consumer protection, prevention of criminal activity and protection of public order. This study compares the gambling laws of two European societies, France and Finland, to analyse how their legal frames of gambling have been adjusted to these principles.

DESIGN – The data consists of up-to-date legislation on gambling in Finland and France. A qualitative analysis was conducted to study whether new ways of justifying have been included in legislative texts and if these are substantiated by measures related to consumer protection or crime prevention.

RESULTS – France has mainly justified its restrictive policies on gambling in terms of preventing criminal activities while the Finnish legislation highlights the charitable causes funded by gambling proceeds, a claim not accepted by the Court of Justice of the European Union. Consumer protection is increasingly stressed in both countries, and the range of rationales has also grown notably since 2007.

CONCLUSION – While the vocabularies of justification accepted by the CJEU have expanded since 2007, these have not been substantiated by many new legislative measures. This is not attributed to political ill will but rather to the difficulty of changing existing legislative traditions.

Keywords: gambling; comparative studies; policy; regulation; sociology; Finland; France; European Union

REFERENCES

  • Bégin, C. (2001). Pour une politique des jeux [For a policy on games]. Paris: L’Harmattan.

  • Boltanski, L. & Thévenot, L. (2006 [1991]). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: University Press.

  • Chambers, K. (2011). Gambling for profit: Lotteries, gaming machines, and casinos in cross-national focus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  • Cisneros Örnberg, J. & Tammi, T. (2011). Gambling problems as a political framing – Safeguarding the monopolies in Finland and Sweden. Journal of Gambling Issues, 26, 110–125.

  • Collins, P. (2003). Gambling and the public interest. Westport: Praeger.

  • Cosgrave, J. & Klassen, T. (2001). Gambling against the state: The state and the legitimation of gambling. Current Sociology, 49(5), 1–15.

  • Coutant, A. (2008). La réglementation des jeux et le régime politique [The regulation of games and the political regime]. In M. Fèvre & F. Durand (Eds.), Jeux de hasard et Société (pp. 145–166). Paris: L’Harmattan.

  • Eadington, W. (2008). Gambling policy in the European Union: Monopolies, market access, economic rents, and competitive pressures among gaming sectors in the member states. In T. Coryn, C. Fijnaut, & A. Littler (Eds), Economic aspects of gambling regulation – EU and US perspectives (pp. 71–90). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • European Commission (2011). Green paper on online gambling in the internal market. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/services/gambling_en.htm

  • INSERM (Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale) (2008). Jeux de hasard et d’argent – Contextes et addictions [Gambling: Contexts and addictions]. Paris: Les éditions Inserm.

  • Järvinen-Tassopoulos, J. (2012). Gambling policy issues and the public good. In M. Hellmann, G. Roos, & J. Von Wright (Eds.), A welfare policy patchwork – Negotiating the public good in times of transition (pp. 83–97). Helsinki: NVC-Finland. [Web of Science]

  • Kingma, S. (2004). Gambling and the risk society: The liberalisation and legitimation crisis of gambling in the Netherlands. International Gambling Studies, 4(1), 47–67.

  • Kingma, S. (2008). The liberalization and (re)regulation of Dutch gambling markets: National consequences of the changing European context. Regulation & Governance, 2(4), 445–458.

  • Luoto, S. & Wickström, M. (2008). Kansanterveydelle. För Folkshälsoarbetet: Pajatson historia Suomessa [For national health: The history of Payazzo in Finland]. Helsinki: WSOY.

  • Majamäki, M. & Pöysti, V. (2012). Vocabularies of gambling justification among Finnish and French players. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(4), 496–512. [Web of Science]

  • Matilainen, R. (2010). A question of money? The founding of two Finnish gambling monopolies. In S. Kingma (Ed.), Global gambling: Cultural perspectives on gambling organization (pp. 21–37). New York: Routledge.

  • Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5(6), 904–913. [Crossref]

  • Orford, J. (2011). An unsafe bet? The dangerous rise of gambling and the debate we should be having. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Planzer, S. (2014). Empirical views on European gambling law and addiction. Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation (vol. I). Springer International Publishing.

  • Pöysti, V. (2014). Comparing recreational gamblers’ attitudes towards national gambling systems: A qualitative perspective. Journal of Gambling Issues, 29. doi:10.4309/jgi.2014.29.8 [Crossref]

  • Rahapelifoorumi (2006). Suomalainen rahapeli-, bingopeli-, tavara-arpajais- ja rahankeräyspolitiikka [Finnish policy on gambling, bingo, raffles and fundraising]. Sisäasiainministeriön julkaisu 28/2006. Helsinki: Sisäasiainministeriö,

  • Reith, G. (1999). The age of chance. Oxon: Routledge.

  • Room, R. (2005). The wheel of fortune: Cycles and reactions in gambling policies. Addiction, 100(9), 1226–1227. [PubMed]

  • Sénat (2007). La lutte contre la dépendance aux jeux [The battle against gambling addiction]. Les documents de travail du Sénat, série: législation comparé.

  • Swiss Institute of Comparative Law (2006). Study of gambling services in the internal market of the European Union – Final report. European Commission. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/services/docs/gambling/study1_en.pdf

  • Varvio, S. (2007). Katsaus Suomen rahapelijärjestelmään [An overview of the Finnish gambling system]. Stakesin työpapereita 24/2007. Helsinki: Stakes.

  • Verbiest, T. (2007). French and Belgian views of the European gambling regulation. In A. Littler & C. Fijnaut (Eds.), The regulation of gambling – European and national perspectives (pp. 127–160). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

CASE LAWS

  • C-275/92 Her Majesty’s Customs and Excise v Gerhart Schindler and Jörg Schindler [1994].

  • C-124/97 Markku Juhani Läärä, Cotswold Microsystems LTD and Oy Transatlantic Software Ltd v Kihlakunnansyyttäjä (Jyväskylä) and Finnish State [1999].

  • C-67/98 Questore di Verona v Diego Zenatti [1999].

  • C-6/01 Associação Nacional de Operadores de Máquinas Recreativas (Anomar) et alii v Estado português [2003].

  • C-64/08 Staatsanwaltschaft Linz v Ernst Engelmann [2010].

  • C-212/08 Zeturf Ltd v Premier ministre [2011].

  • C-447/08 and C-448/08 (Joined cases) Swedish State v Otto Sjöberg (C-447/08) and Anders Gerdin (C-448/08) [2010].

About the article

Received: 2014-04-10

Accepted: 2014-10-20

Published Online: 2015-06-22

Published in Print: 2015-06-01


Citation Information: Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, ISSN (Online) 1458-6126, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nsad-2015-0027. Export Citation

© Virve Marionneau. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in