Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

The Journal of Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.746

CiteScore 2016: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.321
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.485

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 32, Issue 5 (Dec 2015)


Monitoring local alcohol prevention in Sweden: Application of Alcohol Prevention Magnitude Measure (APMM)

Tony Nilsson
  • Department of Public Health Sciences Division of Social Medicine Karolinska Institute
  • Email:
/ Håkan Leifman
  • Department of Clinical Neuroscience Centre for Psychiatric Research Karolinska Institutet
  • Email:
/ Sven Andréasson
  • Department of Public Health Sciences Division of Social Medicine Karolinska Institutet
  • Email:
Published Online: 2015-11-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nsad-2015-0047


AIMS - National alcohol policy in Sweden has to a certain extent grown weaker, and there has instead been an increased focus on strengthening local alcohol prevention. Swedish municipalities carry out a variety of alcohol prevention activities, but there is little knowledge of how the magnitude of all these activities has developed over time. One reason for this lack of information is the limitation of tools for monitoring prevention activities locally. The aim of this study is 1) to develop an Alcohol Prevention Magnitude Measure (APMM) based on local data and 2) to analyse the development of local alcohol prevention by using APMM. DATA - The APMM is based on 37 different indicators of local prevention. Data derives from web-based surveys comprising all Swedish municipalities and from information on licensed premises at the local level. RESULTS - The results reveal that local alcohol prevention in Sweden, as measured by the APMM, has increased generally between 2006 and 2010. The increase is the result of more local policies and activities. CONCLUSION - The results indicate that the APMM captures real changes at the local level, as the APMM increased significantly in community intervention municipalities compared to others

Keywords: Alcohol; prevention; municipalities; composite indicator


  • Allebeck, P., Guldbrandsson, K., Boman, U., & Heinemans, N. (2012). Lokalt utvecklingsarbete med ambitioner (LUMA) - utvärdering av ett ANDT-projekt i 25 kommuner i Sverige [Local development work with ambitions - evaluation of ANDT projects in 25 municipalities in Sweden]. Unpublished report. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet.

  • Andréasson, S. (2002). Inledning [Introduction]. In S. Andréasson (Ed.), Den svenska supen i det nya Europa: Nya villkor för alkoholprevention: en kunskapsöversikt (pp. 9-28). [Swedish drinking in the new Europe: new conditions for alcohol prevention: a review of knowledge]. Vol. 2002:11. Stockholm: Swedish National Institute of Public Health.

  • Andréasson, S., Nilsson, T., & Bränström, R. (2009). Monitoring alcohol and alcohol related problems in Sweden. Contemporary Drug Problems, 36, 625-642. [Crossref]

  • Babor, T., Caetano, R., Casswell, S., Edwards, G., Giesbrecht, N., Graham, K., et al., … Rossow, I. (2003). Alcohol: No ordinary commodity - Research and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Brand, D. A., Saisana, M., Rynn, L. A., Pennoni, F., & Lowenfels, A. B. (2007). Comparative analysis of alcohol control policies in 30 countries. PLoS Med, 4(4), e151. [Crossref]

  • Engdahl, B., & Romelsjö, A. (2006). Utvärdering av preventionssamordnarnas arbete i Stockholm stad 2002-2006 [Evaluation of prevention co-ordinators’ work in the city of Stockholm 2002-2006]. Vol. 2008:51. Stockholm: Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD), Stockholm University and Karolinska Institutet.

  • Field, A., & Miles, J. (2010). Discovering statistics using SAS. London: SAGE Publications.

  • Gliksman, L., Douglas, R. R., Rylett, M., & Narbonne-Fortin, C. (1995). Reducing problems through municipal alcohol policies: The Canadian experience in Ontario. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 2, 105-118.

  • Grundh, M. (2011). Småkommunsatsningen. En utvärdering av små kommuners förebyggande arbete mot alkohol och narkotika i Värmlands och Örebro län [Focus on small municipalities. An evaluation of the prevention of alcohol and drugs in small municipalities in Värmland and Örebro]. Karlstad: Karlstad University.

  • Holder, H. (1998). Alcohol and the community: A systems approach to prevention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Jakobsson, M. (2011). 3x3. Implementering av lokalt förankrat alkohol och drogförebyggande arbete - en utvärdering [Implementing locally anchored drug prevention work]. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology.

  • Karlsson, T. (2014). Nordic alcohol policy in Europe. The adaptation of Finland’s, Sweden’s and Norway’s alcohol policies to a new policy framework, 1994-2013. Dissertation. Åbo Akademi University.

  • Karlsson, T., Lindeman, M., & Österberg, E. (2012). Does alcohol policy make any difference? Scales and consumption. Alcohol policy in Europe: Evidence from Amphora. The Amphora Project. Retrieved from http://amphoraproject.net/view.php?id_cont=45

  • Karlsson, T., & Österberg, E. (2007). Scaling alcohol control policies across Europe. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 14(6), 499-511.

  • Leifman, H., & Trolldal, B. (2014). Alkoholkonsumtionen i Sverige 2013 [Alcohol consumption in Sweden 2013]. Centralförbundet för alkohol- och narkotikaupplysning, CAN.

  • Naimi, T. S., Blanchette, J., Nelson, T. F., Nguyen, T., Oussayef, N., Heeren, T. C., … Xuan, Z. (2014). A new scale of the U.S. alcohol policy environment and its relationship to binge drinking. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 10-16. [Crossref]

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD and Joint Research Centre European Commission JRC.

  • Sharpe, A. (2004). Literature review of framework for macro-indicators. Ottawa: Centre for the Study of Living Standards.

  • Swedish government (2010). Regeringens proposition 2010/11:47. En samlad strategi för alkohol-, narkotika-, dopnings- och tobakspolitiken [Government proposition for a joint strategy for alcohol, drugs, doping and tobacco policy]. (2010/11:47). Stockholm.

  • Swedish National Institute of Public Health (2008). Effekter av lokalt alkohol- och narkotikaförebyggande arbete. Utvärdering av det förebyggande arbetet i sex försökskommuner. [Effects of local alcohol and drug prevention work. Evaluation of the prevention work in six municipalities]. Östersund: Swedish National Institute of Public Health.

  • Swedish National Institute of Public Health. (2009). Länsrapport 2008 [Regional report 2008]. Östersund.

  • World Health Organization (2011). Global status report on alcohol and health. Geneva.

  • World Health Organization (2012). Alcohol in the European Union: Consumption, harm and policy approaches. Copenhagen.

About the article

Received: 2015-05-04

Accepted: 2015-08-13

Published Online: 2015-11-26

Published in Print: 2015-12-01

Citation Information: Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, ISSN (Online) 1458-6126, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nsad-2015-0047. Export Citation

© by Tony Nilsson. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in