Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Nordic Tax Journal

1 Issue per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Rise and Fall of Swedish Wealth Taxation

Magnus Henrekson / Gunnar Du Rietz
Published Online: 2015-05-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2014-0002


We study the evolution of modern Swedish wealth taxation from its introduction in**1911 until it was abolished in 2007. The rules concerning valuation of assets, deductions/exemptions and tax schedules to characterize effective wealth tax schedules are described. These rules and schedules are used to calculate marginal and average wealth tax rates for three differently endowed owners of family firms and individual fortunes corresponding to a large, medium-sized and small firm. The overall trend in the direct wealth tax was rising until 1971 for owners of large and medium-sized firms and for individuals of equally-sized wealth consisting of non-corporate assets. Average direct wealth tax rates were low until 1934, except for 1913 when a progressive defense tax was levied. There were three major tax hikes: in 1934, when the wealth tax was more than doubled, in 1948 when tax rates were doubled again and in 1971 for owners of large firms and similarly sized non-corporate fortunes. Effective tax rates peaked in 1973 for owners of large firms and in 1983 for individuals with large non-corporate wealth. Reduction rules limited the wealth tax rates from 1934 for fortunes with high wealth/income ratios. The wealth tax on unlisted net business equity was abolished in 1991. Tax rates for wealthy individuals were decreased in 1991 and in 1992 and then remained at 0.5-1 percent through 2006, depending on whether the reduction rule was applicable. Tax rates for small-firm owners and small individual fortunes were substantially lower. Aggregate wealth tax revenues were rela-tively small; they never exceeded 0.4 percent of GDP in the postwar period and amounted to 0.16 percent of GDP in 2006.

Keywords: Wealth tax; Tax avoidance; Entrepreneurship


  • Björklund, Anders, Jesper Roine and Daniel Waldenström (2012), “Intergenerational Top Income Mobility in Sweden: Capitalist Dynasties in the Land of Equal Opportunity?” Journal of Public Economics 96(5-6), 474-484.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, Steven J., and Magnus Henrekson (1997), “Industrial Policy, Employer Size and Economic Performance in Sweden.” In Richard B. Freeman, Robert Topel and Birgitta Swedenborg (eds), The Welfare State in Transition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Du Rietz, Gunnar, and Magnus Henrekson (2014), “Swedish Wealth Taxation, 1911-2007.” IFN Working Paper No. 1000. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.Google Scholar

  • Du Rietz, Gunnar, Magnus Henrekson and Daniel Waldenström (2012), “The Swedish Inheritance and Gift Taxation, 1885-2004.” IFN Working Paper No. 936. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.Google Scholar

  • Du Rietz, Gunnar, Dan Johansson and Mikael Stenkula (2013), “The Evolution of Swedish Labor Income Taxation in a 150-year Perspective: An In-depth Characterization.” IFN Working Paper No. 977. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.Google Scholar

  • Du Rietz, Gunnar, Dan Johansson and Mikael Stenkula (2014), “A 150-year Perspective on Swedish Capital Income Taxation.” IFN Working Paper No. 1004. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.Google Scholar

  • Edin, Per-Olof, Ingemar Hanssoon and Sven-Olof Lodin (2005), Reformerad ägarbeskattning - effektivitet, prevention, legitimitet. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar

  • Eklund, Klas (1998), Jakten på den försvinnande skatten. Globalisering och rörliga skattebaser. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.Google Scholar

  • Englund, Göran (1975), Beskattning av arv och gåva. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar

  • Genberg, Torsten (1942), Skatteutvecklingen sedan sekelskiftet. Stockholm: Skattebetalarnas Förening [Swedish Taxpayers’ Association].Google Scholar

  • Hochguertel, Stefan, and Henry Ohlsson (2012), “Who is at the Top? Wealth Mobility over the Life Cycle.” Working Paper No. 2012:1. Center for Fiscal Studies, Uppsala University.Google Scholar

  • Lodin, Sven-Olof (2009), Professorn som blev näringslivstorped. Min tid i skattepolitiken. Stockholm: Ekerlids.Google Scholar

  • Nykvist, Jenny (2008), “Entrepreneurship and Liquidity Constraints: Evidence from Sweden.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 110(1), 23-43.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • OECD (2011). Taxing Wages 2010. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

  • Ohlsson, Henry (2011), “The Legacy of the Swedish Gift and Inheritance Tax, 1884-2004.” European Review of Economic History 15(3), 530-569.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Regeringens proposition 1991/92: 60, Om skattepolitik för tillväxt. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar

  • Regeringens proposition 1996/97:117, Ny förmögenhetsskattelagstiftning. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar

  • Regeringens proposition 2007/08:26, Slopad förmögenhetsskatt m.m. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar

  • Rodriguez, Enrico (1980), Offentlig inkomstexpansion: en analys av drivkrafterna bakom de offentliga inkomsternas utveckling i Sverige under 1900-talet. Malmö: Liber Läromedel.Google Scholar

  • SFS 1910:115, förordning 115 [Swedish Statutes 1910, Regulation No. 115].Google Scholar

  • SFS 1938:369, Kungl. Maj:ts förordning om ändring i vissa delar av förordningen den 28 september (nr 373) om statlig inkomst och förmögenhetsskatt.Google Scholar

  • SOU 1951:51, Betänkande angående den statliga direkta beskattningen/1949 års skatteutredning. Stockholm: Nordiska bokhandeln.Google Scholar

  • SOU 1969:54, Kapitalbeskattningen. Betänkande avgivet av kapitalskatteberedningen. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar

  • SOU 1971:46, Teknisk översyn av kapitalbeskattningen. Slutbetänkande avgivet av kapitalskatteberedningen. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar

  • SOU 1977:91, Översyn av skattesystemet. Slutbetänkande av 1972 års skatteutredning. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.Google Scholar

  • SOU 2002:47, Våra skatter. Slutbetänkande av Skattebasutredningen. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar

  • SOU 2004:36, Reformerade egendomsskatter: Huvudbetänkande av Egendomsskattekommittén. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar

  • Söderberg, Hans (1996), Inkomstskattens utveckling under 1900-talet. En vägvisare för skatteberäkningar åren 1921-1996. Stockholm: Skattebetalarnas Förening [Swedish Taxpayers’ Association]. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-05-15

Published in Print: 2014-05-01

Citation Information: Nordic Tax Journal, Volume 2014, Issue 1, Pages 9–35, ISSN (Online) 2246-1809, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2014-0002.

Export Citation

© 2015. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in