Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Nordic Tax Journal

1 Issue per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Policy evaluation methods in tax research – new evidence and interpretations

Jarkko Harju
Published Online: 2015-05-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2014-0004


In this article I briefly describe the main questions related to the design of a tax system and introduce policy evaluation methods that can help us to learn about the effects of different taxes on different outcomes. Then I consider what various responses mean in terms of agents’ behavior and give my view of aspects that are important when tax systems are reformed. Finally I present the results of my PhD dissertation (Harju (2013)) and the contributions of the articles therein one by one, the aim being to offer examples of empirical tax research applying policy evaluation methods.

Keywords: Policy evaluation methods; difference-in-differences; tax reforms; tax incentives


  • Angrist, J.D., and Pischke J.S., 2010. The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2): 3-30.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Atkinson, A.B. and Stiglitz, J.E., 1976. The Design of Tax Structure: Direct Versus Indirect Taxation. Journal of Public Economics 6, 55-75.Google Scholar

  • Attanasio, O., Banks, J. and Wakefield, M., 2005. Effectiveness of tax incentives to boost (retirement) saving: theoretical motivation and empirical evidence. OECD Economic Studies, 39(2), 145-167.Google Scholar

  • Banks, J. and Diamond, P., 2010. The Base for Direct Taxation. Dimensions of Tax Design: the Mirrlees Review, J. Mirrlees, S. Adam, T. Besley, R. Blundell, S. Bond, R. Chote, M. Gammie, P. Johnson, G. Myles and J. Poterba (eds), Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bartelsman, E.J. and Beetsma, R.M., 2003. Why Pay More? Corporate Tax Avoidance Through Transfer Pricing in the OECD Countries. Journal of Public Economics 87, 2225-2252.Google Scholar

  • Bond, S., Chennells, L. and Devereux, M.P., 1996. Taxes and Company Dividends: A Microeconometric Investigation Exploiting Cross-section Variation in Taxes. Economic Journal 106, 320-333.Google Scholar

  • Bond, S.R., Devereux, M.P. and Klemm, A., 2007. Dissecting Dividend Decisions: Some Clues about the Effects of Dividend Taxation from Recent UK Reforms. In Auerbach, A., Hines, J.R. and Slemrod, J. (eds). Taxing Corporate Income in the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Carbonnier, C., 2007. Who pays sales taxes? Evidence from French VAT reforms, 1987-1999. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1219-1229.Google Scholar

  • CD 1999/85/EC. Commission Directive, read http://eur-lex.europa.eu/-LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1999:277:0034:0036:en:PDF Google Scholar

  • Chetty, R., 2009a. Sufficient statistics for welfare analysis: A bridge between structural and reduced-form methods. Annual Review of Economics, 1: 415-488Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Chetty, R., 2009b. Is the taxable income elasticity sufficient to calculate the deadweight loss? The implications of evasion and avoidance. American Economic Journal : Economic Policy 1(2): 31-52.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Chung, W., Disney, R., Emmerson, C. and Wakefield, M., 2008. Public policy and retirement saving incentives in the UK. In De Menil, G., Pestieau, P. and Fenge, R. (eds), Strategies for Pension Reform. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Clausing, K., 2003. Tax motivated transfer pricing and US intrafirm trade prices. Journal of Public Economics 87, 2207-2223.Google Scholar

  • Diamond, P. and Saez, E., 2011. The Case for a Progressive Tax: From Basic Research to Policy Recommendations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4): 165-90.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Disney, R., Emmerson, C. and Wakefield, M., 2010. Tax Reform and Retirement Saving Incentives: take-up of Stakeholder Pensions in the U.K. Economica, 77, p. 213-233.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Doyle, J. J. and Samphantharak, K., 2008. $2.00 Gas! Studying the effects of a gas tax moratorium. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 869-884.Google Scholar

  • Edmark, K. and Gordon, R., 2013. The choice of organizational form by closelyheld firms in Sweden: tax versus non-tax determinants. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22:219-243, 2013.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Feldstein, M. (1999). Tax avoidance and the deadweight loss of the income tax. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81: 674-680.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feldstein, M. (1995). The effect of marginal tax rates on taxable income: A panel study of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Journal of Political Economy, 103: 551-572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fjaerli, E. and Lund., D., 2001. The choice between owner's wage and dividends under the dual income tax. Finnish Economic Papers, 14, 104-119.Google Scholar

  • Gordon, R. and Slemrod, J., 2000. Are “real” responses to taxes simply income shifting between corporate and personal tax bases? In J. Slemrod (ed.), Does Atlas Shrug? The Economic Consequences of Taxing the Rich, Russell Sage Foundation and Harvard University Press, 240-280.Google Scholar

  • Gruber, J. and Saez, E., 2002. The elasticity of taxable income: evidence and implications. Journal of Public Economics 84, 1-32.Google Scholar

  • Harju, J., 2013. Essays on taxation - Evidence from tax reforms. VATT Publications series, No. 64.Google Scholar

  • Hines, J.R. and Rice, E.M., 1994. Fiscal Paradise: foreign tax havens and American business. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 149-182.Google Scholar

  • Huizinga, H. and Laeven, L., 2008. International profit shifting within multinationals: A multi-country perspective. Journal of Public Economics 92, 1164-1182.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Imbens, G.W. and Wooldridge, J.M., 2009. Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1): 5-86.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Jacob, M. and Alstadsæter, A. 2013. Payout policies of privately held firms: Flexibility and the role of income taxes. Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research with number 152.Google Scholar

  • Kleven, H., Knudsen, Kreiner, C.T., Pedersen, S. and Saez, E., 2011. Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence from a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark. Econometrica 79, 651-692.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kosonen, T., 2010. What was actually cut in barbers’ VAT cut? VATT working paper 18.Google Scholar

  • Kosonen, T., 2011. Encouragement and discouragement - Essays on taxation and government expenditure. VATT Publications 57, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland.Google Scholar

  • Marion, J. and Muehlegger, E., 2011. Fuel tax incidence and supply conditions. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), 1202-1212.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mankiw, G., Weinzierl, M. and Yagan D., 2010. Optimal Taxation in Theory and Practice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 23, Number 4, Fall 2009, Pages 147-174.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Mankiw, G., 2010. Spreading the Wealth Around: Reflections Inspired by Joe the Plumber. Eastern Economic Journal, 2010, 36, (285-298).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moffitt, R.A., 2004. The Role of Randomized Field Trials in Social Science Research: A Perspective from Evaluations of Reforms of Social Welfare Programs. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(5), 506-540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mirrlees, J.A., Adam, S., Besley, T., Blundell, R., Bond, S., Chote, R., Gammie, M., Johnson, P., Myles, G. and Poterba, J. (eds), 2010. Dimensions of Tax Design: the Mirrlees Review. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mirrlees, J.A., Adam, S., Besley, T., Blundell, R., Bond, S., Chote, R., Gammie, M., Johnson, P., Myles, G. and Poterba, J. (eds), 2011. Tax by Design: the Mirrlees Review. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Myles, G.D., 1989. Ramsey Tax Rules for Economies with Imperfect Competition. Journal of Public Economics 38, 95-115.Google Scholar

  • Myles, G.D., 1995. Public Economics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ramsey, F.P., 1927. A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation. The Economic Journal, 37(145), 47-61 Pirttilä, J. and Selin, H., 2011. Income shifting within a dual income tax system. Evidence from the Finnish tax reform of 1993. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113(1), 120-144.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Saez, E., 2001. Using Elasticities to Derive Optimal Income Tax Rates. Review of Economic Studies 68, 205-22.Google Scholar

  • Selin, H., 2008. Four Empirical Essays on Responses to Income Taxation. Economic Studies 110, Department of Economics, Uppsala University.Google Scholar

  • Sivadasan, J. and Slemrod, J., 2008. Tax law changes, income-shifting and measured wage inequality: Evidence from India. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 2199-2224.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Slemrod, J., 1992. Do Taxes Matter? Lessons from the 1980's. American Economic Review, 82(2), 250-56.Google Scholar

  • Slemrod, J., Blumenthal, M. and Christian, C., 2001. Taxpayer response to an increased probability of audit: evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. Journal of Public Economics, 79(3), 455-483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sørensen, P., 1994. From the global income tax to the dual income tax: Recent tax reforms in the Nordic countries. International Tax and Public Finance, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 57-79, February.Google Scholar

  • Yagan, D., 2013. Capital Tax Reform and the Real Economy: The Effects of the 2003 Dividend Tax Cut. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-05-15

Published in Print: 2014-05-01

Citation Information: Nordic Tax Journal, Volume 2014, Issue 1, Pages 76–92, ISSN (Online) 2246-1809, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2014-0004.

Export Citation

© 2015. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in