Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Nordic Tax Journal

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2246-1809
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

Corporate income tax and the international challenge

Benn Folkvord
  • University af Stavanger
/ Michael Riis Jacobsen
  • Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise
Published Online: 2015-05-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2014-0019

Abstract

Although globalization has contributed immensely to growth and prosperity around the world, it is a growing challenge for tax policy makers. Globalization and greater mobility of tax bases increase the relative importance of taxes in corporations’ investment decisions. The combination of highly mobile capital, inadequacies in existing tax laws and a total change of international business environment have led to the fundamental problem in international tax law labeled by the OECD as the problem of BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting), along with severe competition among countries to attract investments and business activities. These challenges are the topic for the 2014 seminar of the Nordic Tax Research Council. Based on the Nordic national reports we discuss these challenges

Keywords: Corporate Tax; Globalization; Tax competition; BEPS; GAAR; SAAR

References

  • Andersen, T.M., et al. (2007), “The Nordic Model - Embracing Globalisation and Sharing Risks, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, ETLA B232.

  • Bucovetsky, S. and J.D. Wilson (1991), Tax Competition with Two Tax Instruments”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21, 333-350.

  • Chen, D. and J. Mintz (2012), “2012 Annual Global Tax Competitiveness Ranking - A Canadian Good News Story”, SPP Research Paper, Vol. 5 Issue 28.

  • Diamond, P. and J. Mirrlees (1971), “Optimal Taxation and Public Production I Production efficiency” American Economic Review 61, 8-27.

  • SOU 2014: 40 “Neutral bolagskatt - för ökad effektivitet och stabilitet” Spengel, C. et.al. (2012), “Effective Tax Levels using the Devereux/Griffith Methodology”, Project for the EU Commission 2012, TAXUD/2008/CC/099

  • Sørensen, P.B. (2007), “Can capital income Taxes Survive? And Should They?”, CESifo Economic studies, Vol. 53 2/2007, 172-228.

  • Sørensen, P.B. (2010), “Swedish Tax Policy: Recent trends and Future Challenges”, ESO 2010: 4.

  • Tropina, J. et al., (2010), “Tax Income Differences between Multinational and Domestic Corporations in Norway: A Panel Data Approach”, SNF project no 1185 “Profit Shifting in Norway: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis”.

  • Thomann, C. (2014), “Recent developments in Corporate Taxation in Sweden”, Nordic tax Journal (forthcoming).

  • Wilson, D.E. (1986), “A Theory of Interregional Tax Competition”, Journal of Urban Economics, 95, 835-56.

  • Zodrow, G.R., and P. Mieszkowski (1986), “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods”, Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356-70.

About the article

Published Online: 2015-05-15

Published in Print: 2014-11-01



Citation Information: Nordic Tax Journal, ISSN (Online) 2246-1809, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2014-0019. Export Citation

© 2015. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in