Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Nordic Tax Journal

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2246-1809
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

Corporate tax in an international environment – Problems and possible remedies

Seppo Kari
  • Corresponding author
  • Associate Professor and Research Director, VATT Institute for Economic Research
  • Email:
Published Online: 2015-09-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2015-0001

Abstract

The paper addresses the problems of corporate taxation in a globalized world. It first considers recent trends in international practices and then reviews the literature on the effects of corporate taxes in closed and open economies. The paper emphasizes the severity of the problems caused by current international tax rules. It compares various national and international policy alternatives and considers two recent Nordic tax reform proposals as examples of national-level solutions. The problems of current international corporate taxation are fundamental. Introducing increasingly tight antiavoidance measures could serve as a medium-term approach but does not provide any promising long-term solution. There should be more research concerning initiatives that would reform the fundamental principles of the international tax system.

Keywords: corporation tax; international taxation; multinational firms; tax avoidance

References

  • Altshuler R. and Hubbard R.G. (2003), The effect of of the tax reform act of 1986 on the location of assets in financial services firms. Journal of Public Economics 87, 109-127. [Crossref]

  • Apel M. and Södersten J. (1999), Personal taxation and investment incentives in a small open economy. International Tax and Public Finance 6, 79-88. [Crossref]

  • Arena M. and Kutner G. (2015), Territorial Tax System Reform and Corporate Financial Policies. Review of Financial Studies, Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming. [Crossref]

  • Athanasiou A. (2014), U.S. Drug Companies Seeing Green in Irish Inversions. Tax Notes International 75, 351-354.

  • Auerbach A., Devereux M. and Simpson H. (2010), Taxing Corporate Income. In Mirrlees J., Adam S., Besley T., Blundell R., Bond S., Chote R., Gammie M., Johnson P., Myles G., Poterba J. (eds.). Dimensions of Tax Design: The Mirrlees Review, 837-893. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

  • Ault H. (2013), Some Reflections on the OECD and the Sources of International Tax Principles. Tax Notes International 70, 1195-1201.

  • Beer S. and Loeprick J. (2014), Profit shifting: drivers of transfer (mis)pricing and the potential of countermeasures. International Tax and Public Finance 22, 426-451. [Crossref]

  • Blouin J., Huizinga H., Laeven L. and Nicodème G. (2013), Thin capitalization rules and multinational firm capital structure. Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation, WP 1323, Oxford.

  • Boadway R. and Bruce N. (1984), A General Proposion on the Design of a Neutral Business Tax. Journal of Public Economics 24, 231-239. [Crossref]

  • Bond S. and Devereux M.P. (2002), Cash flow taxes in an open economy. CEPR Discussion Paper 3401, London.

  • Brøchner J., Jensen J., Svensson P. and Sørensen P.B. (2006), The Dilemmas of Tax Coordination in the Enlarged European Union. CESifo Working Paper No. 1859, Munich.

  • Bucovetsky S. (1991), Asymmetric tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics 30, 167-181. [Crossref]

  • Büttner T., Overesch M., Schreiber U. and Wamser G. (2012), The Impact of Thin-Capialization Rules on the Capital Structure of Multinational Firms. Journal of Public Economics 96, 930-938. [Crossref]

  • Büttner T. , Overesch M. and Wamser G. (2014), Anti Profit-Shifting Rules and Foreign Direct Investment. CESifo Working Paper No. 4710, Munich.

  • De Mooij R. (2012), Tax Biases to Debt Finance: Assessing the Problem, Finding Solutions. Fiscal Studies, 33, 489-512.

  • De Mooij R. and Ederveen S. (2008), Corporate Tax Elasticities: A Reader’s Guide to Empirical Findings. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24, 680-697. [Crossref]

  • De Mooij R.A, and Devereux M.P.(2011), An Applied Analysis of ACE and CBIT Reforms in the EU. International Tax and Public Finance 18, 93 - 120. [Crossref]

  • De Mooij R. and Nicodème G. (2008), Corporate Tax Policy and Incorporation in the EU, International Tax and Public Finance 15, 478-498 [Crossref]

  • Desai M., Foley F. and Hines J. (2001), Repatriation Taxes and Dividend Distortions. National Tax Journal 54, 829-851. [Crossref]

  • Desai M., Foley F. and Hines J. (2007), Dividend Policy Inside theMultinational Firm. Financial Management 36, 5-26.

  • Desai M., and Hines J. (2003), Evaluating International Tax Reform, National Tax Journal 56, 487-502. [Crossref]

  • Devereux M.P. (2008), Taxation of outbound direct investment: economic principles and tax policy considerations, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24, 698-719. [Crossref]

  • Devereux M.P. (2012), Issues in the Design of Taxes on Corporate Profit. National Tax Journal 65, 709-730. [Crossref]

  • Devereux M.P. and de la Feria R. (2014), Designing and implementing a destination-based corporate income tax. Oxford University Center for Business Taxation WP 14/07. Oxford.

  • Devereux M.P., Griflth R. and Klemm A. (2002), Corporate Income Tax Reforms and International Tax Competition. Economic Policy, October, 450-95.

  • Devereux M.P. and Loretz S. (2013), What do We Know about Corporate Tax Competition. National Tax Journal 66, 745-774 [Crossref]

  • Devereux M.P. and Vella J. (2014), Are We Heading Towards a Corporate Tax System Fit for the 21st Century? Fiscal Studies 35, 449-475. [Crossref]

  • Dharmapala D. (2014), What Do We Know About Base Erosion and Profit Shifting? A Review of the Empirical Literature, Fiscal Studies 35, 421-448. [Crossref]

  • Diamond P. and Mirrlees J.A. (1971), Optimal Taxation and Public Production I: Production Efficiency. American Economic Review 61, 8 - 27.

  • Egger P. andWamser G. (2011), The Impact of Controlled Foreign Company Legislation on Real Investments Abroad: A Two-dimensional Regression Discontinuity Design. CEPR Working Paper No. 8460, London.

  • Feld L. and Heckemeyer J. (2011), FDI and Taxation: A Meta-study. Journal of Economic Surveys 25, 233-272. [Crossref]

  • Foley C. F., Hartzell J. C., Titman S. and Twite G. (2007), Why do firms hold so much cash? A tax-based explanation. Journal of Financial Economics 86, 579-607. [Crossref]

  • Folkvord B. and Riis Jacobsen M. (2014), Corporate income tax and the international challenge. Nordic Tax Journal 2014:2, 55-87.

  • Fuest C. (2008), The European Commission’s proposal for a common consolidated corporate tax base. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24, 720-739. [Crossref]

  • Fuest C. and Weichenrieder A.J. (2002), Tax Competition and Profit shifting: On the Relationship between Personal and Corporate Tax Rates. IFO-Studien 48, 611-632.

  • Gordon R.H. (1986), Taxation of Investment and Savings in a World Economy. American Economic Review 76, 1086-1102.

  • Griffith R., Hines J. and Sørensen P.B. (2010), International Capital Taxation. In Mirrlees J., Adam S., Besley T., Blundell R., Bond S., Chote R., Gammie M., Johnson P., Myles G., Poterba J. (eds.). Dimensions of Tax Design: The Mirrlees Review, 914-996. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

  • Grubert H. and Altschuler R. (2013), Fixing the system: An Analysis of Alternative Proposals for the Reform of international Tax. National Tax Journal 66, 671-712. [Crossref]

  • Harberger A. (1962), The incidence of the corporation income tax. Journal of Political Economy 70, 214-240.

  • Haufler A. and Runkel M. (2012), Firms’ financial choices and thin capitalization rules under tax competition. European Economic Review 56, 1087-1103. [Crossref]

  • Heckemeyer J. and Overesch M. (2013),Multinational Profit Response to Tax Differentials: Effect Size and Shifting Channels. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 13-045, Mannheim.

  • Hines J. (2014), How Serious is the Problem of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting? Canadian Tax Journal 62, 443-454.

  • IFS Capital Taxes Group (1991): Equity for Companies: A Corporation Tax for the 1990s. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

  • IFS (2009), IFS Green Budget. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, London. http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/4417

  • IMF (2014), Spillovers in International Corporate Taxation. IMF Policy Paper, May 9, 2014.

  • Kari S. and Ropponen O. (2014), Literature review of the dynamic effects of corporate income taxation. VATT Mimeo No. 40, VATT, Helsinki.

  • Keen M. and Konrad K. (2013), The Theory of International Tax Coordination and Competition. In Auerbach A. J., Chetty R., Feldstein M. and Saez E. (eds.) Handbook of Public Economics, Volume 5, 257-328, Elsevier.

  • Lindhe T. and Södersten J. (2012), The Norwegian shareholder tax reconsidered. International Tax and Public Finance 19, 424-441. [Crossref]

  • Lodin S.O. (2014), An Overview of the Proposal of the Swedish Government Committee on Corporate Taxation. Nordic Tax Journal 2014:2, 43-54.

  • Lohse T., Riedel N. and Spengel C. (2012), The Increasing Importance of Transfer Pricing Regulations: A Worldwide Overview. Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper 12/27, Oxford.

  • Lohse T. and Riedel N. (2013), Do Transfer Pricing Laws Limit International Income Shifting? Evidence from EuropeanMultinationals. CESifo Working paper No. 4404, Munich.

  • Loretz S. (2008), Corporate taxation in the OECD in a wider context. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24, 639-660. [Crossref]

  • Mirrlees J., Adam S., Besley T., Blundell R., Bond S., Chote R., Gammie M., Johnson P., Myles G., Poterba J. (2011), Tax by design: The Mirrlees Review. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

  • NOU (2014), Kapitalbeskatning i en internasjonal økonomi. Norges offentlige utredninger, NOU 2014:13, Oslo.

  • OECD (1998), Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue. Organisation for the Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.

  • OECD (2010), Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations. Organisation for the Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.

  • OECD (2013): Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. Organisation for the Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.

  • Raimondos-Møller P., Nielsen S.B and Schjelderup G. (2010), Company Taxation and Tax Spillovers: Separate Accounting versus Formula Apportionment. European Economic Review 54, 121 - 132.

  • Ruf M. and Weichenrieder A.J. (2012), The Taxation of Passive Foreign Investments: Lessons from German Experience. Canadian Journal of Economics 45, 1504 - 1528. [Crossref]

  • Ruf M. and Weichenrieder A.J. (2013), CFC Legislation, Passive Assets and the Impact of the ECJ’s Cadbury-Schweppes Decision. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4461, Munich.

  • Ruding committee (1992), Report of the Committee of Independent Experts on Company Taxation. European Community, Brussels.

  • SOU (2014), Neutral bolagsskatt - för ökad effektivitet och stabilitet. Slutbetänkande av Företagsskattekommitten. Statens Offentliga Utredningar, SOU 2014:40. Stockholm.

  • Sørensen P.B. (2005). Taxation of shareholder income and the cost of capital in an open economy: theory and applications to the Nordic countries. Danish Journal of Economics 143, 433-447.

  • Sørensen P.B. (2007) Can capital income taxes survive? And should they? CESifo Economic Studies 53, 172-228, Munich. [Crossref]

  • Toder E. and Viard A. (2014), Major Surgery Needed: A Call for Structural Reform of the US Corporate Income Tax. Tax Policy Center Publications, April 4. 2014. http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=413090

  • US Department of Treasury (1992), Integration of the Individual and Corporate Tax System: Taxing Business Income Once. U.S. Government Printing Oflce, Washington.

  • Voget J. (2011), Relocation of headquarters and international taxation. Journal of Public Economics 95, 1067-1081. [Crossref]

  • Wamser G. (2013), The Impact of Thin-Capitalization Rules on External Debt Usage - a Propensity Score Matching Approach. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 76, 764-781.

  • Zuckman G. (2013), The Missing Wealth of Nations: Are Europe and the U.S. Net Debtors or Net Creditors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 128, 1321-1364. [Crossref]

About the article

Received: 2014-08-20

Accepted: 2015-02-15

Published Online: 2015-09-25

Published in Print: 2015-09-01



Citation Information: Nordic Tax Journal, ISSN (Online) 2246-1809, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2015-0001. Export Citation

© 2015. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in