Despite the intensive efforts within the last 50 years, it has only been possible to slightly, but not substantially, lower the mortality of cancer. On the other hand, considerable advances have been achieved for the other medical conditions, including the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and pneumonia . At the present time, there are three basic approaches for treating cancer: surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, all of these procedures have considerable side effects and often are not sufficient for the curative treatment of metastatic cancer. The tumor-specific drugs, such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have now been in use for several years with good results in certain types of cancer (e.g., Imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia) . The antibodies are also increasingly being used in oncology, although the antibody therapy sometimes has adverse systemic effects and often is expensive. For a subgroup of breast cancer patients, for example, the Her2-targeting antibodies are used successfully in treatment . However, the approval of some previous indications for the antibody therapy has even been withdrawn recently (the British National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence refused Avastin® (Bevacizumab) in colorectal carcinomas) . There has not yet been a real breakthrough in cancer therapy, in general.
According to the estimates by the US National Cancer Institute, nanomedicine will prove to be trailblazing in the future prevention, diagnostic investigation, and treatment of cancer . Nanotechnology has already found uses in many medical specialties, e.g., in otorhinolaryngology . It is widely used in the different disciplines, from imaging to regenerative medicine. Before being used for medical purposes, however, those substances have to be investigated closely to determine their effects on the organism. This field of research is called nanotoxicology. It investigates the effects of both the nanoparticles that occur naturally (in the environment) and those that are created by industry and traffic. Although a wide variety of materials are being used in medicine, the magnetic nanoparticles seem to hold the greatest potential of success. They are already established in clinical use as contrast media for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), e.g., Resovist® and Sinerem® . In addition, these particles can be guided non-invasively (drug delivery)  and have the ability to be heated (hyperthermia)  by external magnetic fields. A combination of diagnostic investigation and therapy, as “theranostics”, is, thus, possible. Therefore, magnetic nanoparticles have excellent potential to improve the treatment of cancer.
This review article presents and summarizes the current developments regarding magnetic nanoparticles in cancer therapy.
2 Relevance of nanotechnology to cancer therapy
Cancer is a huge burden not only to the healthcare system but also to the economy, in general. As the second most common cause of death in Europe, it generates annual costs of approximately 120 billion euro . This does not merely include the direct costs of hospital treatment, nursing care, and medication; this also includes the expenses for information and loss of production. The costs for the treatment alone account for about 36% of the total, while the early mortality and morbidity are responsible for another 36% . Considering the fact that the incidence of cancer increases with age, an escalation could be expected due to the present demographic trends. Irrespective of the dimension of the problem, the costs for healthcare per se are progressively increasing, which means that paying for the adequate treatment will become appreciably more difficult. The European Commission is assuming an increase in age-related public expenditure (healthcare and long-term nursing care, as well as pensions) by some five percentage points of the EU gross domestic product by the year 2060 . Therefore, a considerable reduction in the costs of cancer therapy is needed. This reduction would also make it possible to provide better care in the poorer countries of the developing world, where only the upper echelons of society can afford the costly surgeries, radio- or chemotherapy at the moment. Besides infectious diseases, cancer is the second biggest challenge in healthcare that these countries have to face. Finally, the treatment of cancer should not be so time-consuming and complicated that it is only possible to be carried out in a few highly specialized centers, accessible to just a restricted circle of patients. The smaller facilities must be able to provide this care as well, as only in this way sufficient healthcare provision can be guaranteed to the population. The treatment in the local centers would also have the advantage of reducing the costs for transportation, which are sometimes considerable and often not covered by the health insurance (or only under very specific conditions). Apart from these structural problems, it is essential that the existing forms of treatment will be improved, not only in terms of outcome and expenditure but also in terms of tolerability. Surgery, radio- and chemotherapy often have considerable side effects. These adverse effects often affect the patients more than the disease itself. The initial approach certainly consists of improving the existing methods and/or supplementing and combining them with the new procedures. The long-term goal has to be that everyone will have access to cancer therapy that is simple, cost-effective, and well-tolerated. With the help of nanotechnology, nowadays, this seems to be possible to achieve.
A multitude of new potential is opening up. Efforts are being made to simultaneously measure a wide range of known laboratory parameters, like tumor markers and biomarkers in vitro, using simple and cheap methods, as well as to discover further parameters with novel techniques. The nanoparticles are already being used as contrast agents in medical imaging, to visualize tumors more accurately, with respect not only to the margins and extent but also to distinguish between the active and inactive regions. Therewith, treatment such as radiotherapy can be planned and carried out more easily and efficiently. In addition, nanomedicine is being used to refine the monitoring of the disease progression so that the patient’s management can be adjusted promptly, if necessary. This review will focus more closely on the drug delivery, hyperthermia, and overcoming drug resistance as means of improvement of cancer therapy.
3 Cancer therapy with magnetic nanoparticle drug delivery
As the conventional chemotherapy is administered systemically, it often causes considerable adverse reactions such as nausea, hair loss, and bone marrow suppression, as well as liver and kidney toxicity. These aspects determine the dose of the chemotherapeutic agents and limit their effects on the tumor. Therefore, in the recent years, it has been a trend in cancer pharmacotherapy to identify substances with higher specificity. Although considerable success has already been achieved (e.g., Herceptin®), the limits of this strategy have become clear. The targeted blockage of a specific signaling pathway has led to the emergence of genetically mutated cancer cells that are able to circumvent this blockage by upregulation of an effective parallel, alternative, or overlapping pathway . That leads to broad-spectrum medicinal products being used again. The biodistribution of these substances is of particular relevance to targeted therapy. This is where nanotechnology comes in. It can be used to transport medicinal products very precisely to the intended site of action.
Magnetic nanoparticle drug delivery opens the possibility of using local enhancement methods, so that the drug can accumulate and act in a previously determined area. This method was first described in 1978 . It is based on the usage of three elements: iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), and nickel (Ni). All are ferromagnetic under physiological conditions, although they do not exhibit the same magnetization: Ni 55 emu/g, Co 160 emu/g, and Fe 218 emu/g. Mostly, they are used as hybrids with other metal ions, oxygen, or carbon dioxide. There are innumerable possibilities for such combinations . The iron compounds are predominantly used because of their biocompatibility. They show the lowest toxicity and are even used therapeutically for iron substitution . The nanoparticles are coated in order to prevent agglomeration, ensure stability, and provide a positive effect on biodistribution. A wide variety of materials, including fatty acids, polyethylene glycol (PEG), dextran, and chitosan may be used . Magnetic nanoparticles can transport various different substances and molecules, such as chemotherapeutic agents, antibodies, nuclear acids, radionuclides, etc. In principle, this approach can be used for any tumor, irrespective of its size, differentiation, or site.
3.2 Administration and biodistribution
The mode of administration is essential when using magnetic nanoparticles in cancer therapy. Depending on the purpose and target structure, the nanoparticles can be applied parenterally (intravenously or intra-arterially), by mouth, as an aerosol, or interstitially, i.e., directly into the tissue. Intravenous injection is usually preferred though. Many of these particles, however, are being trapped in the liver and spleen and get excreted via the kidneys . So, clearance from the bloodstream by metabolism and excretion might be a problem. Despite this, Chao et al. were able to reduce the tumor growth significantly in mice with hepatocellular carcinomas induced by subcutaneous injection. They administered doxorubicin-coupled magnetic nanoparticles intravenously and used a magnet to achieve local enhancement . Although the intra-arterial route is being used much less frequently, it has a greater potential. Working with rats and applying an external magnetic field, Chertok et al. increased the accumulation of the iron oxide nanoparticles in brain tumors by a factor of 1.8 after intra-arterial compared to intravenous injection . Magnetic nanoparticles can be administered as an aerosol in the treatment of lung cancer. Verma et al. developed a formulation (Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles coated with a polymer poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid (PGLA)) that has been well tolerated in both cell culture and animal studies (mice) . Hiraiwa et al. injected various magnetic nanoparticle formulations subcutaneously into the chest wall of rats and investigated whether there was any accumulation in the axillary lymph nodes . In contrast, Remsen et al. did not find any significant difference of enhancement in human lung cancer tissue after intravenous, intra-arterial, or intratumoral administration in a rat model . The direct instillation into the tumor is particularly used in hyperthermia .
The distribution of magnetic nanoparticles can be an active or passive process. Passive distribution occurs mainly by diffusion, after parenteral injection. The greater permeability of the tumor blood vessels is, thereby, useful, although it is often counteracted by the high pressure in the interstitial tissue of cancer. The nanoparticles can also be transported actively to the tumor by coupling them with appropriate tumor-specific ligands (e.g., antibodies). Magnetic nanoparticles, in particular, can be guided by means of a magnetic field. Coupling active substances with nanoparticles or encapsulating them into nanocarriers should improve their solubility, distribution, and stability. This should facilitate the crossing of biological barriers, as well as their uptake into cells, and an increase in the general tolerance.
Table 1 summarizes the actual use of magnetic nanoparticles in cancer therapy in vivo. For the sake of clarity, it does not include studies that were aimed only at imaging or demonstrating the practical enhancement of nanoparticle constructs without any therapeutic aspects (Table 1).
The nanoparticles consisting of nickel, cobalt, and/or iron can be guided by a magnetic field due to their ferromagnetism. In biomedicine, particularly, iron oxide nanoparticles are being used. However, the magnetic force on these particles decreases very rapidly with the increasing distance. As a result, it is hard to accumulate magnetic nanoparticles in tumors deep within the body by using an external magnetic field, making therapy difficult. Namiki et al., therefore, implanted magnets in mice before carrying out the treatment . Besides such implantation, it is also conceivable that the magnets can be put in preformed body cavities, which would make it possible to concentrate magnetic nanoparticles in deeper regions as well.
3.4 Active substances
3.4.1 Chemotherapeutic agents
There are many reports on chemotherapeutic agents attached to magnetic nanoparticles. Some of the latest studies are presented here. Shanta Singh et al. treated cancer cells lines using silicate nanoparticles with an yttrium, vanadium, or europium core and the anticancer drug doxorubicin, which was released in a pH-dependent manner. After adding iron oxide nanoparticles, an additional cytotoxic effect could be achieved by applying an alternating magnetic field . Fang et al. presented a formulation with iron oxide nanoparticles, poly-β-amino-ester-copolymer and doxorubicin, with which they managed to get a higher uptake and greater toxicity in the treatment of glioma cells than with the pure medication . By coating magnetic iron particles with β-cyclodextrin and F127 polymer, Yallapu et al. also modified the release of the encapsulated drug, resulting in a better therapeutic efficacy against cancer . Guo et al. used nickel-based magnetic nanoparticles, furnishing daunorubicin with a greater cytotoxicity against leukemia cells in vitro .
Magnetic drug targeting (MDT) to treat cancer is a specific form of drug delivery, being developed at our center that uses chemotherapeutic agents directly associated with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. The resulting suspension (ferrofluid) is injected into an artery, directly supplying the tumor. The particles and, hence, the attached drug are concentrated in the tumor by means of an external magnetic field (Figure 1) . These iron oxide nanoparticles have also been tested in vitro. Therapeutically relevant concentrations showed no toxicity . An electromagnet with a strong magnetic field gradient of up to 72 T/m at the pole tip and a high magnetic flux density was developed especially for this purpose . The flow and distribution of the nanoparticles were investigated in detail under the different experimental conditions in an ex vivo arterial model [55, 56]. Studies in rabbits demonstrated the accumulation of the nanoparticles with the anticancer drug mitoxantrone on histology, MRI, X-ray microtomography (μCT), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [57–59]. The application of an external magnetic field increased the nanoparticle enhancement per gram of tissue by a factor of 114 in the tumor and surrounding tissue, as shown by a quantitative analysis with 59Fe-labeled ferrofluids . Detailed imaging of the vascular supply is crucial for intra-arterial injection at an appropriate site. An interventional angiography system (Artis zee floor™, Siemens AG Healthcare Sector, Forchheim) which can provide both 2D and 3D images is most suited for this purpose (Figure 2). The complete regression of both the blood vessels supplying the tumor and of the tumor itself, has been reported after successful treatment . MDT can be used for all solid tumors, which has basically been demonstrated in an earlier animal study .
As sometimes there are considerable limitations to antibody therapy, efforts have been made to improve this type of treatment with the help of the drug delivery. By coupling antibodies with magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, Wang et al. detected cancer cells circulating in the blood of patients with non-small-cell carcinomas of the lung . Another method uses nanoimmunoliposomes. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are encapsulated by nanosized cationic liposomes with surface fragments of an antibody to the transferrin receptor, which shows an increased expression in cancer cells . These methods are not directly therapeutic approaches, but might enable the early diagnosis and prevention of recurrence.
Klein et al. used iron oxide nanoparticles to sensitize cancer cells to radiotherapy, in vitro. After the incorporation of the nanoparticles, a higher concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was found in the cells, improving the response to irradiation .
3.4.4 Gene therapy
Gene therapy holds a great potential in the treatment of cancer. The malignancy of a cell can ultimately be attributed to “dysfunctional genes.” Gene therapy can interfere at the origin of the tumor occurrence . The greatest obstacle is in applying “genetic medication,” i.e., getting the genetic material into the mutated cells. There is a lack of suitable and efficient transport agents, known as vectors, but magnetic nanoparticles can also be used here. The method is often referred to as magnetofection, meaning, the targeted transfection of cells with nucleic acids conjugated to magnetic nanoparticles, with the aid of a magnetic field . Qi et al. employed magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles to transport siRNA directly into cancer cells. Combining the technique with a magnet, they demonstrated a considerably higher efficacy of gene delivery than with other transfection reagents . Magnetofection has already been used in numerous studies in vivo; for example, Muthana et al. used magnetic nanoparticles to improve the uptake of transfected monocytes into tumors. They found considerably greater enhancement in cell cultures and in mice bearing the solid tumors . Plank et al. injected plasmid DNA (encoding a cytokine), associated with magnetic nanoparticles, directly into the tumor (fibrosarcoma in cats) and fixed it there by means of a magnet. Thereby, they activated the immune system against the tumor and reduced the probability of recurrence after surgery. They called the procedure Magnetovax® (Figure 3) . In a recent study, cobalt carbide nanoparticles were used. These cobalt nanoparticles, encapsulated in carbon shells, showed a good biotolerability and provided another tool for target-specific gene delivery .
4 Cancer therapy using hyperthermia with magnetic nanoparticles
Hyperthermia is certainly one of the oldest forms of cancer therapy. Up until the middle of the twentieth century, it was the standard treatment for inoperable tumors. The patients were given bacterial toxins to induce high body temperatures . Hyperthermia is used in many different forms – combined with other procedures such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy (temperature: 40°C–44°C), or used alone for thermal ablation (temperature: >60°C) . It is already well established as an adjuvant to radiotherapy in humans  and is also used in combination with chemotherapy in clinical practice .
4.2 Magnetic nanoparticles
As magnetic nanoparticles can be heated by the application of an alternating magnetic field, they can be used for local hyperthermia. Gilchrist et al. carried out the first investigations of this treatment method in 1957, when they heated iron oxide particles in lymph nodes of dogs . The idea was applied within the following years and further developed in many studies. The heating rate of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles depends not only on strength and frequency of the alternating field applied but also on the size of the particles used .
4.3 Types of hyperthermia
There are various possibilities for increasing the temperature in a particular area of the body. When using magnetic nanoparticles, increasing the temperature can be induced by an alternating magnetic field. Xu et al. studied hyperthermia with the assistance of cobalt nanoparticles, although they did not apply an alternating magnetic field. This research group heated the particles by ultrasonic sound (350 kHz) and showed that the effects of the nanoparticles in vitro depended on the exposure time and the nanoparticle concentration . However, as Rodriguez-Luccioni et al. demonstrated in a comparative study, the viability of cells in vitro was affected significantly more by magnetic hyperthermia than by heating in a water bath, which implicates that magnetic hyperthermia might have additional effects on tumor cell viability . In their study, Hedayati et al. defined the minimum size of a tumor for efficient hyperthermia with an alternating magnetic field. They determined a minimum tumor volume of 1 mm3 consisting of cells that had incorporated magnetic nanoparticles to facilitate hyperthermia effects . It is of interest to note that Asin et al. found no increase in temperature with the application of an alternating magnetic field in vitro. Even so, there was more cell death. The authors assumed that the alternating magnetic field caused mechanical cell damage by actuating intracellular iron oxide nanoparticles .
4.4 Release of active substances
Hyperthermia can also serve to release active substance from a nanoparticle/drug construct, which means that the site and the timing of the drug’s action can be determined precisely. Using an alternating magnetic field, Oliveira et al. increased the release of doxorubicin from a polymersome containing iron oxide nanoparticles, thus, achieving a greater toxicity in cell cultures . Using the same method, Li et al. also demonstrated a greater release of doxorubicin in vitro . In 2012, Koppolu et al. presented polymer-coated iron oxide nanoparticles, which likewise released doxorubicin in a temperature-dependent manner .
4.5 Thermal ablation
Kale et al. were able to heat in-house-produced nickel nanoparticles up to 75°C within 2 min in vitro, which is a very promising result regarding their use in hyperthermia or thermal ablation . Balivada et al. found an anticancer effect in mice after injecting magnetic nanoparticles either directly into the tumor or intravenously, followed by the exposure to an alternating magnetic field . Hyperthermia alone, with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles heated by an alternating magnetic field, is already being used for cancer treatment. This thermotherapy has been used in a phase I clinical trial to treat patients with a recurrence of prostate cancer . Combined with radiotherapy, hyperthermia has also been used in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (Figure 4) .
In principle, hyperthermia is conceivable with all magnetic nanoparticles. The first uses in patients are very promising, so a further improvement in cancer therapy is to be expected in the future.
5 Overcoming cancer drug resistance with the help of magnetic nanoparticles
5.1 Causes of drug resistance
Surgery is still the gold standard of treatment for most solid tumors. At the time of cancer diagnosis, the disease is no longer confined to the local growth but has already metastasized is in 50% of the patients. . Surgery can, therefore, no longer offer a curative treatment. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy, which are now the available options, also have their limitations. The tumor may be located in sites that are difficult to reach for the medication or are protected by other mechanisms such as a high hydrostatic pressure in the tissue or an unfavorable vascular supply. In addition, certain types of cancer are not sensitive to irradiation or anticancer drugs. One of the biggest problems, however, is the resistance to a particular therapy developing during the course of treatment. This is usually the cause of recurrence after radio- or chemotherapy. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are of particular importance in here. They are responsible for the simultaneous resistance to several different chemotherapeutic agents (multidrug resistance), as they transport these toxic substances out of the cells . Other mechanisms include the augmented DNA repair, effects on the cell cycle, and altered intracellular drug metabolism [85, 86].
5.2 Magnetic nanoparticles against cancer drug resistance
Nanotechnology allows the combination of a wide variety of substances and mechanisms of action, as well as their targeted use. Magnetic nanoparticles are coated with biocompatible materials and functionalized with one or more different active substances. It is, therefore, possible to use different therapeutic mechanisms concomitantly in one place, which greatly reduces the probability of resistance. For example, Tang et al. used magnetic nanoparticles with a manganese, zinc, and iron oxide core, as well as human albumin, folic acid, cisplatin, and the radionuclide 188rhenium. In this way, a triple effect of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hyperthermia could be achieved. They tested the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution in vivo in a tumor-bearing nude mouse model (human ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells in 21 BALB/C nude mice) . Another possibility is to increase the concentration of the anticancer drug to a level at which no malignant cell survives. A magnetic field for the tissue-specific enrichment of the magnetic nanoparticles and the attached drug is of great value for this purpose. This strategy is employed, for example, in MDT, as described previously. Even tumors that are already resistant to treatment can be more efficiently accessed by magnetic nanoparticles. One strategy is, for example, the simultaneous coupling of an anticancer drug and a medicinal product targeted against the mechanism of resistance. With this approach, Cheng et al. were successful in using magnetic nanoparticles loaded with a chemotherapeutic agent and an ABC transporter inhibitor. Testing the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin on K562/A02 cells (human chronic myeloid leukemia-resistant cell line) in vitro, they found a significantly enhanced effect on the cells compared to the antineoplastic agent bound to the nanoparticles without the ABC transporter inhibitor . Substances can be used that are not affected by the relevant mechanism of resistance or that target it directly (e.g., antibodies to ABC transporters) . Besides its core and biocompatible coating, in the ideal case, a functionalized nanoparticle should have four components to meet different tasks :
This effect is achieved by the association of substances that act directly against the tumor, such as chemotherapeutic agents, nucleic acids, radionuclides, etc. This heading also includes the induction of hyperthermia using an alternating magnetic field.
Overcoming cancer drug resistance
Substances aimed to provide an effective therapy by blocking drug resistance of the tumor are coupled to the nanoparticles. Here the ABC transporter inhibitors or antibodies come into consideration.
Diagnostic investigations and imaging
Functionalized nanoparticles should include a substance used for diagnostic purposes. This would allow therapy and diagnostic investigation to be combined into “theranostics”. Magnetic nanoparticles are already in use as contrast media in magnetic resonance imaging.
Enhancement at the target site
In order to concentrate the nanoparticles in the desired area and treat the tumor in a targeted manner, it is possible to combine them with antibodies that bind specifically to the tumor. The accumulation of magnetic nanoparticles using a magnetic field is another option.
6 Metastasized cancer – limitations and possibilities
The therapy of metastasized cancer will remain a great challenge, even when using nanotechnology. At the time of diagnosis, nearly 50% of the tumors did already spread. For this reason, only palliative care can be offered to most of these patients. Nevertheless, the therapy of the primary focus also results in therapeutic effects on the metastases . Of course, not every satellite tumor can be targeted by MDT as pursued by the Section for Experimental Oncology and Nanomedicine (SEON), but one can focus on life-threatening or massively quality-of-life-limiting metastases. However, there are already approaches to treat the metastasized cancer in a curative intention. Yang et al. introduced a new magnetic lymphatic-targeting drug delivery system, based on functionalized carbon nanotubes. They achieved successful inhibition of lymph node metastasis by the subcutaneous administration of gemcitabine-loaded magnetic multiwalled carbon nanotubes as well as with loaded magnetic-activated carbon particles under a magnetic field .
The treatment of cancer has already made considerable advances with the use of magnetic nanoparticles. There are numerous possibilities for their use. Drug delivery allows a wide variety of substances (chemotherapeutic agents, radionuclides, antibodies, nucleic acids, etc.) to be transported in a targeted manner to the site where they are needed and intended to act. It is possible to combine drug delivery with hyperthermia as adjuvant therapy, in order to improve the desired anticancer effects. But magnetic nanoparticles can also be used to enable local hyperthermia to be used alone. Thanks to nanotechnology, there are also many innovations in diagnostic imaging. The diagnostic and therapeutic goals can often be combined in “theranostics”, which is certainly an important aspect in the use of magnetic nanoparticles. The number of publications and the scope of research projects on the subject of magnetic nanoparticles in cancer therapy indicate that further significant improvements are to be expected in this field in the future. Given the demographic trends in the industrialized nations and the associated increasing relevance of cancer, the outlook seems promising.
The authors would like to thank the DFG (AL 552/3-3), the BMBF-Spitzencluster (01EX1012B), the Emerging Fields Initiative of the Friedrich Alexander University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, and the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung, Bad Homburg v. d. H. for their support.
Grodzinski P. The Workings of NCI nanotechnology alliance for cancer – an opportunity for a new class of diagnostic and therapeutic solutions based on nanotechnology. Salt Lake City, USA, 2007.Google Scholar
Druker BJ, Talpaz M, Resta DJ, Peng B, Buchdunger E, Ford JM, Lydon NB, Kantarjian H, Capdeville R, Ohno-Jones S, Sawyers CL. Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 1031–1037.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy CG, Morris PG. Recent advances in novel targeted therapies for HER2-positive breast cancer. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2012, 23, 765–776.Google Scholar
NICE lehnt weitere krebsmedikamente ab. Dt Ärzteblatt, 2010. Available at http://www.arzteblatt.de/nachtfricten/43932/nice-lehnt_weithre-krebsmedikamente-ab.
Durr S, Tietze R, Lyer S, Lyer S, Alexiou C. Nanomedicine in otorhinolaryngology – future prospects. Laryngorhinootologie 2012, 91, 6–12.Google Scholar
Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF, Deserno WM, Tabatabaei S, van de Kaa CH, de la Rosette J, Weissleder R. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348, 2491–2499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiou C, Tietze R, Schreiber E, Lyer S. Nanomedicine: magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery and hyperthermia – new chances for cancer therapy. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2010, 53, 839–845.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
European Technology Platform on Nanomedicine. Nanomedicine – nanotechnology for health. In Nanomedicine ETPo ed., Luxembourg, 2006.Google Scholar
Ärzteblatt D. Available at: http://www.aerzteblatt.de/studieren/nachrichten/51842/Krebs-kostet-in-Europa-120-Milliarden-Euro-pro-Jahr. In; 2012.
EU – Europäische Kommission (2009c). Die Auswirkungen der demographischen Alterung in der EU bewältigen, Mitteilung der Kommission, EU KOM(2009c) 180 endgültig.Google Scholar
Spinowitz BS, Kausz AT, Baptista J, Noble SD, Sothinathan R, Bernardo MV, Brenner L, Pereira BJ. Ferumoxytol for treating iron deficiency anemia in CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008, 19, 1599–1605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jain TK, Reddy MK, Morales MA, Leslie-Pelecky DL, Labhasetwar V. Biodistribution, clearance, and biocompatibility of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles in rats. Mol. Pharm. 2008, 5, 316–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chao X, Zhang Z, Guo L, Zhu J, Peng M, Vermorken AJM, Van de Ven WJM, Â·Chen C, Cui mail Y. A novel magnetic nanoparticle drug carrier for enhanced cancer chemotherapy. PLoS One 2012, 7, e40388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chertok B, David AE, Yang VC. Brain tumor targeting of magnetic nanoparticles for potential drug delivery: effect of administration route and magnetic field topography. J. Control. Release 2011, 155, 393–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verma NK, Crosbie-Staunton K, Satti A, Crosbie-Staunton K, Satti A, Gallagher S, Ryan KB, Doody T. Magnetic core-shell nanoparticles for drug delivery by nebulization. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2013, 11, 1–25.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa K, Ueda M, Takeuchi H, Oyama T, Irino T, Yoshikawa T, Kondo A, Kitagawa Y. Sentinel node mapping with thermoresponsive magnetic nanoparticles in rats. J. Surg. Res. 2012, 174, 48–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Remsen LG, McCormick CI, Roman-Goldstein S, Nilaver G, Weissleder R, Bogdanov A, Hellström I, Kroll RA, Neuwelt EA. MR of carcinoma-specific monoclonal antibody conjugated to monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles: the potential for noninvasive diagnosis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1996, 17, 411–418.Google Scholar
Wust P, Gneveckow U, Johannsen M, Böhmer D, Henkel T, Kahmann F, Sehouli J, Felix R, Ricke J, Jordan A. Magnetic nanoparticles for interstitial thermotherapy – feasibility, tolerance and achieved temperatures. Int. J. Hyperthermia 2006, 22, 673–685.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Agemy L, Friedmann-Morvinski D, Kotamrajua VR, Sugahar RL, Girard OM, Mattrey RF, Verma IM, Ruoslahti E. Targeted nanoparticle enhanced proapoptotic peptide as potential therapy for glioblastoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 17450–17455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiou C, Arnold W, Klein RJ, Parak FG, Hulin P, Bergemann C, Erhardt W, Wagenpfeil S, LÜbbe AS. Locoregional cancer treatment with magnetic drug targeting. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 6641–6648.Google Scholar
Alphandery E, Faure S, Seksek O, Guyot F, Chebbi I. Chains of magnetosomes extracted from AMB-1 magnetotactic bacteria for application in alternative magnetic field cancer therapy. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 6279–6296.Google Scholar
Balivada S, Rachakatla RS, Wang H, Samarakoon TN, Dani RK, Pyle M, Kroh FO, Walker B, Leaym X, Koper OB, Tamura M, Chikan V, Bossmann SH, Troyer DL. A/C magnetic hyperthermia of melanoma mediated by iron(0)/iron oxide core/shell magnetic nanoparticles: a mouse study. BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 119.Google Scholar
Bruners P, Braunschweig T, Hodenius M, Pietsch H, Penzkofer T, Baumann M, GÜnther RW, Schmitz-Rode T, Mahnken AH. Thermoablation of malignant kidney tumors using magnetic nanoparticles: an in vivo feasibility study in a rabbit model. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2010, 33, 127–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen J, Wu H, Han D, Xie C. Using anti-VEGF McAb and magnetic nanoparticles as double-targeting vector for the radioimmunotherapy of liver cancer. Cancer Lett. 2006, 231, 169–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeNardo SJ, DeNardo GL, Natarajan A, Miers LA, Foreman AR, Gruettner C, Adamson GN, Ivkov R. Thermal dosimetry predictive of efficacy of 111In-ChL6 nanoparticle AMF – induced thermoablative therapy for human breast cancer in mice. J. Nucl. Med. 2007, 48, 437–444.Google Scholar
Dutz S, Kettering M, Hilger I, MÜller R, Zeisberger M. Magnetic multicore nanoparticles for hyperthermia-influence of particle immobilization in tumour tissue on magnetic properties. Nanotechnology 2011, 22: 265102 (7pp).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fang C, Veiseh O, Kievit F, Bhattarai N, Wang F, Stephen Z, Li C, Lee D, Ellenbogen RG, Zhang M. Functionalization of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles with targeting ligands: their physicochemical properties and in vivo behavior. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2010, 5, 1357–1369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilger I, Hiergeist R, Hergt R, Winnefeld K, Schubert H, Kaiser WA. Thermal ablation of tumors using magnetic nanoparticles: an in vivo feasibility study. Invest. Radiol. 2002, 37, 580–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li XS, Li WQ, Wang WB. Using targeted magnetic arsenic trioxide nanoparticles for osteosarcoma treatment. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2007, 22, 772–778.Google Scholar
Li Z, Xiang J, Zhang W, Fan S, Wu M, Li X, Li G. Nanoparticle delivery of anti-metastatic NM23-H1 gene improves chemotherapy in a mouse tumor model. Cancer Gene Ther. 2009, 16, 423–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rainov NG, Zimmer C, Chase M, Chase M, Kramm CM, Chiocca EA, Weissleder R, Breakefield XO. Selective uptake of viral and monocrystalline particles delivered intra-arterially to experimental brain neoplasms. Hum. Gene Ther. 1995, 6, 1543–1552.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shen LF, Chen J, Zeng S, Zhou RR, Zhu H, Zhong MZ, Yao RJ, Shen H. The superparamagnetic nanoparticles carrying the E1A gene enhance the radiosensitivity of human cervical carcinoma in nude mice. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 2123–2130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka K, Ito A, Kobayashi T, Kawamura T, Shimada S, Matsumoto K, Saida T, Honda H. Intratumoral injection of immature dendritic cells enhances antitumor effect of hyperthermia using magnetic nanoparticles. Int. J. Cancer 2005, 116, 624–633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tang QS, Chen DZ, Xue WQ, Barry S, Demidenko E, Turk MJ, Hoopes PJ, Conejo-Garcia JR, Fiering S, Xiang JY, Gong YC, Zhang L, Guo CQ. Preparation and biodistribution of 188Re-labeled folate conjugated human serum albumin magnetic cisplatin nanoparticles (188Re-folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs) in vivo. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 3077–3085.Google Scholar
Toraya-Brown S, Sheen MR, Baird JR, Barry S, Demidenko E, Turk MJ, Hoopes PJ, Conejo-Garcia JR, Fiering S. Phagocytes mediate targeting of iron oxide nanoparticles to tumors for cancer therapy. Integr. Biol. (Camb) 2013, 5, 159–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tresilwised N, Pithayanukul P, Mykhaylyk O, Holm PS, HolzmÜller R, Anton M, Thalhammer S, AdigÜzel D, DÖblinger M, Plank C. Boosting oncolytic adenovirus potency with magnetic nanoparticles and magnetic force. Mol. Pharm. 2010, 7, 1069–1089.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang L, Dong J, Ouyang W, Wang X, Tang J. Anticancer effect and feasibility study of hyperthermia treatment of pancreatic cancer using magnetic nanoparticles. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 27, 719–726.Google Scholar
Wu YN, Chen DH, Shi XY, Lian CC, Wang TY, Yeh CS, Ratinac KR, Thordarson P, Braet F, Shieh DB. Cancer-cell-specific cytotoxicity of non-oxidized iron elements in iron core-gold shell NPs. Nanomedicine 2011, 7, 420–427.Google Scholar
Johannsen M, Gneveckow U, Thiesen B, Taymoorian K, Cho CH, WaldÖfner N, Scholz R, Jordan A, Loening SA, Wust P. Thermotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic nanoparticles: feasibility, imaging, and three-dimensional temperature distribution. Eur. Urol. 2007, 52, 1653–1661.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maier-Hauff K, Ulrich F, Nestler D, Niehoff H, Wust P, Thiesen B, Orawa H, Budach V, Jordan A. Efficacy and safety of intratumoral thermotherapy using magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles combined with external beam radiotherapy on patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J. Neurooncol. 2011, 103, 317–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Namiki Y, Namiki T, Yoshida H, Ishii Y, Tsubota A, Koido S, Nariai K, Mitsunaga M, Yanagisawa S, Kashiwagi H, Mabashi Y, Yumoto Y, Hoshina S, Fujise K, Tada N. A novel magnetic crystal-lipid nanostructure for magnetically guided in vivo gene delivery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 598–606.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shanta Singh N, Kulkarni H, Pradhan L, Bahadur D. A multifunctional biphasic suspension of mesoporous silica encapsulated with YVO(4):Eu(3+) and Fe(3)O(4) nanoparticles: synergistic effect towards cancer therapy and imaging. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 065101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fang C, Kievit FM, Veiseh O, Stephen ZR, Wang T, Lee D, Ellenbogen RG, Zhang M. Fabrication of magnetic nanoparticles with controllable drug loading and release through a simple assembly approach. J. Control. Release 2012, 162, 233–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yallapu MM, Othman SF, Curtis ET, Curtis ET, Gupta BK, Jaggi M, Chauhan SC. Multi-functional magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging and cancer therapy. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 1890–1905.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guo D, Wu C, Hu H, Wang X, Li X, Chen B. Study on the enhanced cellular uptake effect of daunorubicin on leukemia cells mediated via functionalized nickel nanoparticles. Biomed. Mater. 2009, 4, 025013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durr S, Lyer S, Mann J, Janko C, Tietze R, Schreiber E, Herrmann M, Alexiou C. Real-time cell analysis of human cancer cell lines after chemotherapy with functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32, 1983–1989.Google Scholar
Tietze R, Rahn H, Lyer S, Schreiber E, Mann J, Odenbach S, Alexiou C. Visualization of superparamagnetic nanoparticles in vascular tissue using XmuCT and histology. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2011, 135, 153–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seliger C, Jurgons R, Wiekhorst F, Eberbeck D, Trahms L, Iro H, Alexiou C. In vitro investigation of the behaviour of magnetic particles by a circulating artery model. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 311, 358–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiou C, Jurgons R, Schmid R, Erhardt W, Parak F, Bergemann C, Iro H. Magnetic drug targeting – a new approach in locoregional tumor therapy with chemotherapeutic agents. Experimental animal studies. HNO 2005, 53, 618–622.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiou C, Arnold W, Hulin P, Kleinb RJ, Renz H, Parak FG, Bergemann C, LÜbbe AS. Magnetic mitoxantrone nanoparticle detection by histology, X-ray and MRI after magnetic tumor targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2001, 225, 187–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rahn H, Gomez-Morilla I, Jurgons R, Alexiou Ch, Odenbach S. Microcomputed tomography analysis of ferrofluids used for cancer treatment. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2008, 20: 204152 (4pp).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiou C, Jurgons R, Schmid RJ, Bergemann C, Henke J, Erhardt W, Huenges E, Parak F. Magnetic drug targeting – biodistribution of the magnetic carrier and the chemotherapeutic agent mitoxantrone after locoregional cancer treatment. J. Drug Target. 2003, 11, 139–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyer S, Tietze R, Jurgons R, Struffert T, Engelhorn T, Schreiber E, DÖrfler A, Alexiou C. Visualisation of tumour regression after local chemotherapy with magnetic nanoparticles – a pilot study. Anticancer Res. 2010, 30, 1553–1557.Google Scholar
Wang Y, Zhang Y, Du Z, Wu M, Zhang G. Detection of micrometastases in lung cancer with magnetic nanoparticles and quantum dots. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 2315–2324.Google Scholar
Yang C, Rait A, Pirollo KF, Dagata JA, Farkas N, Chang EH. Nanoimmunoliposome delivery of superparamagnetic iron oxide markedly enhances targeting and uptake in human cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Nanomedicine 2008, 4, 318–329.Google Scholar
Klein S, Sommer A, Distel LV, Neuhuber W, Kryschi C. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as radiosensitizer via enhanced reactive oxygen species formation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 425, 393–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li C, Li L, Keates AC. Targeting cancer gene therapy with magnetic nanoparticles. Oncotarget 2012, 3, 365–370.Google Scholar
Qi L, Wu L, Zheng S, Wang Y, Fu H, Cui D. Cell-penetrating magnetic nanoparticles for highly efficient delivery and intracellular imaging of siRNA. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 2723–2730.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muthana M, Scott SD, Farrow N, Morrow F, Murdoch C, Grubb S, Brown N, Dobson J, Lewis CE. A novel magnetic approach to enhance the efficacy of cell-based gene therapies. Gene Ther. 2008, 15, 902–910.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen L, Mashimo T, Iwamoto C, Okudera H, Omurzak E, Ganapathy HS, Ihara H, Zhang J, Abdullaeva Z, Takebe S, Yoshiasa A. Synthesis of novel CoC(x)@C nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 045602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nauts HC, Fowler GA, Bogatko FH. A review of the influence of bacterial infection and of bacterial products (Coley’s toxins) on malignant tumors in man; a critical analysis of 30 inoperable cases treated by Coley’s mixed toxins, in which diagnosis was confirmed by microscopic examination selected for special study. Acta Med. Scand. Suppl. 1953, 276, 1–103.Google Scholar
Wust P, Hegewisch-Becker S, Issels R. Hyperthermia: current status and therapeutic results. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 2003, 128, 2023–2029.Google Scholar
Gonzales-Weimuller M, Zeisberger M, Krishnan KM. Size-dependant heating rates of iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic fluid hyperthermia. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321, 1947–1950.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xu Y, Mahmood M, Li Z, Dervishi E, Trigwell S, Zharov VP, Ali N, Saini V, Biris AR, Lupu D, Boldor D, Biris AS. Cobalt nanoparticles coated with graphitic shells as localized radio frequency absorbers for cancer therapy. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 435102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Luccioni HL, Latorre-Esteves M, Mendéz-Vega J, Méndez-Vega J, Soto O, Rodríguez AR, Rinaldi C, Torres-Lugo M. Enhanced reduction in cell viability by hyperthermia induced by magnetic nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 373–380.Google Scholar
Hedayati M, Thomas O, Abubaker-Sharif B, Zhou H, Cornejo C, Zhang Y, Wabler M, Mihalic J, Gruettner C, Westphal F, Geyh A, Deweese TL, Ivkov R. The effect of cell cluster size on intracellular nanoparticle-mediated hyperthermia: is it possible to treat microscopic tumors? Nanomedicine (Lond) 2013, 8, 29–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asin L, Ibarra MR, Tres A, Goya GF. Controlled cell death by magnetic hyperthermia: effects of exposure time, field amplitude, and nanoparticle concentration. Pharm. Res. 2012, 29, 1319–1327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira H, Perez-Andres E, Thevenot J, Sandre O, Berra E, Lecommandoux S. Magnetic field triggered drug release from polymersomes for cancer therapeutics. J. Control. Release 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconre/2013.01.013.Crossref
Koppolu B, Bhavsar Z, Wadajkar AS, Nattama S, Rahimi M, Nwariaku F, Nguyen KT. Temperature-sensitive polymer-coated magnetic nanoparticles as a potential drug delivery system for targeted therapy of thyroid cancer. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2012, 8, 983–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kale SN, Jadhav AD, Verma S, Koppikar SJ, Kaul-Ghanekar R, Dhole SD, Ogale SB. Characterization of biocompatible NiCo2O4 nanoparticles for applications in hyperthermia and drug delivery. Nanomedicine 2012, 8, 452–459.Google Scholar
Cheng J, Wang J, Chen B, Xia G, Cai X, Liu R, Ren Y, Bao W, Wang X. A promising strategy for overcoming MDR in tumor by magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles co-loaded with daunorubicin and 5-bromotetrandrin. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 2123–2131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shapira A, Livney YD, Broxterman HJ, Assaraf YG. Nanomedicine for targeted cancer therapy: towards the overcoming of drug resistance. Drug Resist. Updat. 2011, 14, 150–163.Google Scholar
Yang F, Jin C, Yang D, Jiang Y, Li J, Di Y, Hu J, Wang C, Ni Q, Fu D. Magnetic functionalised carbon nanotubes as drug vehicles for cancer lymph node metastasis treatment. Eur. J. Cancer 2011, 47, 1873–1882.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
About the article
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section for Experimental Oncology and Nanomedicine (SEON) The SEON emerged from Professor Alexiou’s working group after his receiving of the first chair for Nanomedicine in Germany, which was endowed by the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung in 2009. The group can look back to more than 15 years of experience in the application of iron oxide nanoparticles in cancer treatment. The favored therapy approach is “Magnetic Drug Targeting.” The main goal of SEON is to enhance cancer treatment and simultaneously to reduce the side effects of chemotherapy, by accumulating the nanoparticle-bound drug with strong external magnetic forces. In the nearer past, SEON has broadened its activities to the use of iron oxide particles in the treatment of arteriosclerosis and also in regenerative medicine.
Stephan Dürr earned a Medical Degree from the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg and received his MD at the Institute of Pathology at the University Hospital Erlangen. Since 2004, he has been working at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, where he specialized as an otorhinolaryngologist/head and neck surgeon in 2009. Within the ENT Department, he joined the Section for Experimental Oncology and Nanomedicine in 2010. There, he works as a research fellow on Magnetic Drug Targeting.
Christina Janko studied Biology at the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg from 2002 to 2007. After her diploma thesis in 2007, she was a PhD student in the group of Prof. Dr. Martin Herrmann at the Institute of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology at the University Hospital Erlangen from 2007 to 2012. In her dissertation in 2012, she focused on CRP-mediated effects in the clearance of dying and dead cells. Since 2013, she works as a postdoctoral research fellow in the group of Prof. Dr. Christoph Alexiou in the Section for Experimental Oncology and Nanomedicine at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, where she analyzes the toxicology of nanoparticles.
Stefan Lyer studied Biology at the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg. After finishing his PhD theses at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)/Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, he stayed as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Department of Genome Analysis at the DKFZ. In 2008, he moved back to Erlangen starting a postdoc position in the group of Prof. Dr. Christoph Alexiou at the ENT Department of the University Hospital Erlangen, which was renamed as the Section for Experimental Oncology and Nanomedicine (SEON) in 2009. Here, he focused on the application of nanoparticles in cancer therapy. Since 2011, he has been the assistant group leader of the SEON.
Philipp Tripal studied Biology at the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg. In September 2003, he graduated in the field of Microbiology. From 2003 until 2006, he studied for his PhD within the field of tumor research, which he received in May 2007. From 2007 to 2011, Philipp Tripal worked as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, studying the pharmacologic consequences of antidepressants on neuronal cells. In 2011, he moved back to tumor research. In the Department of Nuclear Medicine, he investigated the use of radioactive, tumor-specific compounds for tumor therapy and cell labeling. In January 2013, he joined the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen. Within the Section for Experimental Oncology and Nanomedicine, he is investigating the use of magnetic nanoparticles for their application in tissue engineering and three-dimensional cell cultures.
Marc Schwarz studied Biology at the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg. After finishing his PhD theses at the Department of Neurosurgery of the University Hospital Erlangen, he stayed as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Department of Neuroradiology and focused on glioma imaging and treatment. Since the Section for Experimental Oncology and Nanomedicine and the Department of Neuroradiology started cooperating, he expanded his field of research on magnetic nanoparticles in cancer therapy and imaging.
Jan Zaloga studied Pharmacy at the University of Regensburg, from which he graduated in April 2011. From November 2011 to May 2012, he worked as a visiting scientist at the School of Pharmacy, RGU Aberdeen. He is currently studying for his PhD at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section for Experimental Oncology and Nanomedicine. His main research topic is the synthesis and characterization of nanoparticles and their translation to GMP standards.
Rainer Tietze studied Food Chemistry at the J.W. Goethe-University in Frankfurt/Main from 1998 to 2002. He did a postgraduate internship at the Federal Institute for Animal Food Production in Kulmbach and at the State Authority for Food Supervision in Kassel. From 2004 to 2007, he worked on a PhD position at the Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, in the Clinic of Nuclear Medicine at the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg. Thereby, he developed radio-labeled subtype-selective dopamine receptor ligands for positron emission tomography. Since 2007, he is a postdoc in the Section for Experimental Oncology and Nanomedicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung Professorship at the ENT Department of the University Hospital Erlangen, Germany. He is responsible for synthesis and analytics of nano-scaled material.
Christoph Alexiou received his MD from the Technical University of Munich, Medical School in 1995. After finishing his internship at the Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, he started as a physician and researcher at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and founded a research group working in the field of local chemotherapy with magnetic nanoparticles (Magnetic Drug Targeting). In the year 2000, he received his degree as an ENT Physician, and in 2002, he moved to the ENT Department in Erlangen, Germany, where he performed his postdoctoral lecture qualification (Habilitation). There he has been working as an assistant medical director in the clinic and leading the Section for Experimental Oncology and Nanomedicine (SEON). Since 2009, he owns the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Foundation-Professorship for Nanomedicine at the University Hospital Erlangen. His research focuses on the translation of Magnetic Drug Targeting and the application of magnetic nanoparticles into clinical application. For his work, he received several national and international awards.
Published Online: 2013-06-04
Published in Print: 2013-08-01