Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Nanotechnology Reviews

Editor-in-Chief: Hui, David

Managing Editor: Skoryna, Juliusz


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 2.759

CiteScore 2018: 2.19

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.489
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.671

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2191-9097
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2, Issue 5

Issues

Magnetic nanocatalysts: supported metal nanoparticles for catalytic applications

Liane M. Rossi
  • Corresponding author
  • Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, São Paulo, SP 05508-000, Brazil
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Natália J.S. Costa
  • Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, São Paulo, SP 05508-000, Brazil
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Fernanda P. Silva
  • Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, São Paulo, SP 05508-000, Brazil
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Renato V. Gonçalves
  • Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, São Paulo, SP 05508-000, Brazil
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-07-02 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2013-0021

Abstract

This review is focused on metal nanoparticles (NPs) supported on magnetic responsive solids and their recent applications as magnetically recoverable nanocatalysts. Magnetic separation is a powerful tool for the fast separation of catalysts from reaction medium and an alternative to time-, solvent-, and energy-consuming separation procedures. Metal NPs attached to a magnetic solid can be easily carried and recovered by magnetic separation. Some examples of magnetically recoverable metal NPs used in hydrogenation, oxidation, C-C coupling reactions, photocatalysis, and other organic reactions will be given.

Keywords: catalysis; magnetic separation; metal nanoparticles; photocatalysis

1 Introduction

The application of metal nanoparticles (NPs) in catalysis has received great attention in recent decades, thanks to the improvement made in the synthesis methodologies, especially by the introduction of bottom-up approaches. Reproducible syntheses and high control of particle size and size distribution are properties not found in traditional metal colloids synthesis, which are typically larger, polydisperse, and poorly reproducible [1]. The synthesis and stabilization of metal NPs require the presence of capping ligands, such as organic ligands, surfactants, and polymers, to stop the particle growth process and to control the size of NPs, otherwise bulk metal is favored [2–4]. These organic components play a key role in the synthesis of NPs but are also indispensable to keep the NPs stable in solution by steric or electrostatic interactions between them and with the solvent. High stabilization of the metal NPs in solution facilitates their characterization and is useful for many applications, for example, to explore their optical properties and to perform catalytic studies in the absence of interfering supports. Thus, they can be considered model systems for their heterogeneous catalyst analogous; however, if they are in the same phase as the reactants in a catalytic reaction system, separation is difficult. Filtration and centrifugation are not effective techniques to separate NPs from stable solutions unless they are precipitated by adding a counter solvent or other precipitating agent. For practical applications in catalysis, the immobilization of metal NPs on inorganic supports is advantageous for many reasons: the metal NPs can be handled as heterogeneous catalysts, which means they can be washed, separated by filtration or centrifugation, redispersed, and reused. As a consequence of the immobilization process, the excess capping ligands can be washed off and partially removed [5] or thermally decomposed in posttreatment steps [6] to recover catalytic activities. The role of capping ligands on the catalytic activity and selectivity of metal NPs has been discussed in the recent literature [7–9].

Methods to prepare well-defined supported metal NP catalysts are highly desired as well as innovative methods for catalyst separation and recycling. In this respect, strategies for supporting metal NPs on magnetic materials have received considerable attention and magnetic separation has been applied for many kinds of reactions catalyzed by metal NPs. The application of magnetic separation in nanocatalysis will be the subject of this review article. By definition, in nanocatalysis, the prefix “nano” refers to the catalyst itself (that are in the nano-size domain, mainly <10 nm) and do not refer to the support, which may or may not be in the nanoscale. Taking this into account, we will not include homogeneous catalysts supported on nanostructured magnetic supports in this review.

Superparamagnetic NPs have received a great deal of attention recently because of their unique properties and potential technological applications [10]. This kind of material is susceptible to an external magnetic field, and in this regard, they behave like a paramagnetic material, but removing the applied magnetic field immediately reduces the overall net magnetic moment back to zero. Thus, the superparamagnetic NPs have no “magnetic memory” and they (or any other entity firmly attached to them) can be recovered by applying a remote magnetic field and redispersed immediately after the magnetic field is interrupted (Figure 1).

Magnetic properties of Fe3O4 NPs in the presence and absence of an applied magnetic field.
Figure 1

Magnetic properties of Fe3O4 NPs in the presence and absence of an applied magnetic field.

The first reports on the application of magnetic separation in the field of catalysis were regarding the use of intrinsic magnetic properties of metal catalysts, such as Fe, Ni, and Co [11–16], although examples of such materials as magnetically recoverable catalysts can still be found in the recent literature [17, 18]. However, the scope of application of magnetic separation in catalysis was broadened by the introduction of magnetic nanomaterials and nanocomposites, especially those based on iron oxides and cobalt, as solid supports for the immobilization of catalytically active metals, metal complexes, biocatalysts, and even organocatalysts [19–23].

A variety of methodologies were developed for the immobilization of catalysts on such kinds of supports with superparamagnetic properties, which include chemical modification of magnetic NP surfaces or coating the magnetic NPs with inorganic or organic polymer materials. Magnetic separation is a powerful tool for easy and fast separation of catalysts from the final product while improving their recycling and reuse in successive batch reactions. In contrast to conventional procedures such as filtration, centrifugation, or extraction (liquid-liquid or chromatographic), the magnetic separation avoids the use of auxiliary substances (solvents, filters, etc.) and makes the process cleaner, environmentally safer, and faster while using less energy in the catalyst separation process. The whole separation process can be performed without removing the catalyst from inside the reactors, which greatly simplifies procedures such as repeated washing steps and isolation and recycling of moisture-sensitive components. The performance of a magnetic separation system depends on a strong catalyst-support interaction allowing repeated cycles of separation and redispersion. Coating the magnetic NP surface is a strategy to give extra protection to the magnetic material, because naked iron oxides (e.g., magnetite) and zero-valence metals (e.g., cobalt) easily oxidize in air atmosphere, which is reflected in changes of the magnetic properties and compromises the catalyst stability. Besides that, coating the magnetic particles with other oxides (e.g., SiO2) helps the immobilization of catalysts through a covalent approach [19] and makes increasing the surface area by adding mesoporous silica layers possible [24]. In this review, we will focus our discussion on metal NPs immobilized on magnetic NPs and their application in various organic catalyzed transformations.

2 Hydrogenation reactions

Hydrogenation reactions are very important transformations in organic synthesis and are typically carried out in the presence of heterogeneous catalysts, which are composed of small metallic particles, as has been known for a long time. However, there is still room for the development of hydrogenation catalysts obtained with metal NPs prepared by modern colloidal synthesis approaches. The possibility of preparing controlled-size metal NPs opens the opportunity for the design of more active and selective catalysts than the traditional heterogeneous catalysts. The best-known metal catalysts for hydrogenations in liquid-phase reactions have been prepared as magnetically recoverable catalysts, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Selected examples of magnetically recoverable metal NP catalysts and their application in the hydrogenation of cyclohexene.

The hydrogenation of cyclohexene is a standard reduction process and as such is often selected as a reference example for testing newly developed hydrogenation catalysts. The catalytic activity is usually expressed as the turnover frequency (TOF) that refers to the number of moles of substrate converted per mole of metal (or metal surface sites) per hour. In the literature, this value has been obtained using the time required for the complete substrate conversion or using the initial rates. It is worth noting that one should select one of these methods to compare distinct catalysts and also pay attention to the reaction conditions.

2.1 Palladium NPs

Palladium NPs have been supported directly on the surface of magnetite NPs [25, 34] or on silica-coated magnetic NPs [26, 35] to produce easily recoverable catalysts for hydrogenations under mild conditions. The strategies to immobilize Pd NPs on magnetic NPs involve chemical modification of their surfaces to provide anchoring groups to the metal atoms. Examples of surface modifiers include mercaptopropyl acid (MPA) [25] and dopamine molecules [34] (Figure 2). These ligands were considered as stabilizers for the Pd NPs that could be easily recycled via magnetic separation with no deterioration in the catalytic efficiency after five and 10 reuses.

Amino- and thiol-functionalized magnetite NPs using MPA and dopamine molecules.
Figure 2

Amino- and thiol-functionalized magnetite NPs using MPA and dopamine molecules.

The utilization of bare magnetic NPs is possible, but it has been shown that the coating of the magnetic material with a layer of dense silica improves the chemical stability (protects the magnetic NPs) and provides surface silanol groups that are reactive for further functionalization with alkoxyorganosilanes. Rossi et al. [26] and Yi et al. [36] prepared magnetically recoverable Pd NPs immobilized on the surface of silica-coated iron oxide NPs functionalized with organosilanes (Figure 3).

Magnetically recoverable Pd NPs immobilized on the surface of silica-coated iron oxide NPs functionalized with organosilanes.
Figure 3

Magnetically recoverable Pd NPs immobilized on the surface of silica-coated iron oxide NPs functionalized with organosilanes.

The influence of these functional groups grafted on the support surfaces on the catalytic properties of metal NPs is still not well elucidated, but it is true that there are changes in the metal loading, reactivity, selectivity, and morphology of NPs prepared by salt impregnation and reduction. Rossi et al. [26] reported that the amine and ethylenediamine groups grafted on the surface of the silica support assisted the preparation of magnetically recoverable Pd NPs of different size by H2 reduction of Pd2+ ions impregnated on modified silica surfaces. The ethylenediamine-supported catalyst is composed of small Pd NPs (∼1 nm), which are less active in the hydrogenation of cyclohexene and deactivates faster (fourth recycle) than the amine-supported catalyst. The amino groups assisted the formation of highly active ∼5 nm Pd NPs, which were reused for up to 20 successive runs corresponding to 50,000 mol mol-1 Pd (cyclohexene, 75°C, 6 atm H2) (Figure 4).

Core-shell silica-coated magnetite functionalized with amine and ethylenediamine groups as support for palladium NPs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [26]. © 2009 American Chemical Society.
Figure 4

Core-shell silica-coated magnetite functionalized with amine and ethylenediamine groups as support for palladium NPs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [26]. © 2009 American Chemical Society.

Yi et al. [36] prepared magnetically recoverable Pd NPs supported on silica-coated maghemite NPs functionalized with mercaptopropyl and aminoethyl groups and then loaded with palladium acetate and heated under microwave to produce Pd NPs of 2 to 3 nm. The catalysts were examined for the hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline and resulted in reaction rates higher than a commercially available Pd/C catalyst. The catalysts could be reused but gradually deactivated after the sixth reaction cycle.

Ligands with more complex chemical structures were designed to be anchored on the surfaces of silica. Guerrero et al. [27] synthesized a modified terpyridine ligand and this ligand provided the stabilization of approximately 2.5 nm Pd NPs, which resulted in active and recyclable catalysts for hydrogenation of cyclohexene (Figure 5). In this example, the organometallic Pd2(dba)3 was used as the palladium precursor and the catalytic activity was superior to a catalyst prepared with palladium(II) acetate (same support). Even more important was the selectivity obtained in the hydrogenation of polyunsaturated substrates. The terpyridine-stabilized Pd NPs are much less effective in the activation of nonconjugated double bonds, which allows for the selective synthesis of monohydrogenated products. This catalytic behavior is very interesting because such a kind of selectivity was not obtained with Pd/C under similar conditions.

Core-shell silica-coated magnetite functionalized with terpyridine groups as support for palladium NPs.
Figure 5

Core-shell silica-coated magnetite functionalized with terpyridine groups as support for palladium NPs.

Magnetic support materials other than silica have been prepared and are equally effective in the magnetic separation from the reaction mixtures. Lu et al. [37] reported the stabilization of Pd NPs on ordered mesoporous carbons (OMC) with surface-grafted magnetic particles. Such magnetic nanocomposites have a very high surface area, a large pore volume, and uniform pore size, which are very interesting properties for the application of this Co-OMC as magnetically separable catalyst support. Amali and Rana [38] reported the coating of the surface of Fe3O4 NPs with highly branched polyethylenimine (PEI). The amine groups of branched PEI on the magnetite surface stabilize Pd NPs and prevent metal leaching during the reaction. The versatility of the catalyst was demonstrated for hydrogenation reactions involving reduction of various unsaturated compounds with excellent effectiveness.

2.2 Rhodium, platinum, and iridium NPs

Magnetically recoverable rhodium [39], platinum [30], and iridium [31] NPs were prepared by H2 reduction of metal ion precursors loaded on the silica-coated magnetic support previously modified with amine groups. The magnetically separable catalytic system, composed of Rh NPs of approximately 3 to 5 nm immobilized on Fe3O4@SiO2, is very active and could be reused for up to 20 times for hydrogenation of cyclohexene (180,000 mol mol-1 Rh) and benzene (11,550 mol mol-1 Rh) under mild conditions (Figure 6). This same catalyst has shown very interesting catalytic activities in the liquid hydrogenation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [40]. The magnetically recoverable Pt(0) NP catalyst exhibited high catalytic activities in the hydrogenation of ketones, olefins, and arenes in liquid-phase solventless reactions. The substrates were converted to the fully hydrogenated forms, but partially hydrogenated products were also isolated by stopping the reaction at the time indicated by the H2 consumption profile of hydrogenation curve (e.g., ethylbenzene was isolated with 98.9% selectivity during hydrogenation of styrene). The catalyst could be reused for up to 14 successive reductions of ketones (15,600 mol mol-1 Pt) without deactivation. The NH2 groups present on the silica surface guarantee an enhanced metal uptake (65 times higher compared with nonfunctionalized particles) and most probably contributed to metal retention, which is confirmed by the negligible metal leaching into the liquid products and the high reusability of Rh, Pt, and Ir NP catalysts [31].

Magnetically recoverable Rh NPs immobilized on the surface of silica-coated iron oxide NPs and illustration of magnetic separation of the catalyst after catalytic reaction. Adapted from Ref. [39]. © 2008 With permission from Elsevier.
Figure 6

Magnetically recoverable Rh NPs immobilized on the surface of silica-coated iron oxide NPs and illustration of magnetic separation of the catalyst after catalytic reaction.

Adapted from Ref. [39]. © 2008 With permission from Elsevier.

Very active Rh NP catalysts were prepared by the deposition of preformed colloidal NPs on the surface of silica-coated magnetite NPs. Examples of capping ligands used in the preparation of colloidal Rh NPs include Rh-HEA16Cl [HEA16Cl=N,N-dimethyl-N-cetyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl) ammonium chloride] [29], Rh-PVA (PVA=polyvinyl alcohol) [27], and Rh-TOAB (TOAB=tetraoctylammonium bromide) [27]. Rh-HEA16Cl and Rh-PVA have their catalytic activity improved after immobilization on the solid support in comparison with the activities obtained when using them soluble in water for biphasic catalysis. In all cases, the Rh NPs are more stable, and recyclable catalysts after immobilization and the preformed metal NPs displayed higher catalytic activities than the catalysts prepared by salt impregnation and reduction. Rh-TOAB NPs exhibited similar activities in solution and after immobilization, which is a good opportunity for the preparation of highly active Rh NP catalysts to be studied and characterized in solution and then used as a heterogeneous catalyst.

Jun et al. [41] prepared a core-shell-type cobalt-platinum magnetic catalyst for the hydrogenation of various unsaturated organic molecules under mild conditions and also demonstrated the magnetic separation and recycling capabilities.

Abu-Reziq et al. [42] prepared magnetically recoverable Pt NPs supported on ionic liquid-modified magnetite NPs (Figure 7). The NPs were applied by the selective hydrogenation of alkynes and α,β-unsaturated aldehydes. Cinnamaldehyde was chemoselectively hydrogenated to 3-phenylprop-2-en-1-ol in 99% yield.

Preparation of magnetite NP functionalized with ionic liquid.
Figure 7

Preparation of magnetite NP functionalized with ionic liquid.

2.3 Ruthenium NPs

Magnetically recoverable ruthenium NPs were prepared by NaBH4 reduction of Ru3+ loaded into different magnetic supports. Jacinto et al. [33] prepared a Ru NP catalyst using a silica-coated magnetic support previously modified with amine groups. The Ru NPs were active for hydrogenation of cyclohexene under mild conditions, but the reaction rate was not comparable with other platinum group metals. Baruwati et al. [43] prepared a Ru NP catalyst supported on dopamine-modified magnetic NPs. The magnetically recoverable Ru NP catalyst was active for the hydrogenation of alkynes to their respective alkanes at room temperature as well as the transfer hydrogenation of a variety of carbonyl compounds under microwave conditions. Magnetically recoverable ruthenium hydroxide catalysts were also reported [44, 45]. Those catalysts are active for the hydration of nitriles with high yield and excellent selectivity and for aerobic oxidations and reductions with 2-propanol. A wide variety of substrates including aromatic, aliphatic, and heterocyclic could be converted into the desired products in high to excellent yields without any additives such as bases and electron transfer mediators.

2.4 Nickel NPs

Nickel NPs, in addition to their intrinsic magnetic properties, have been immobilized on the surface of magnetic supports based on iron oxides to improve the magnetic separation in catalytic reactions (magnetic separation of 1–2 wt.% of nickel on silica is not efficient). Costa et al. [32] prepared a robust, oxidation-resistant, and very active nickel catalyst by the controlled decomposition of the organometallic complex [bis(1,5-cyclooctadiene)nickel(0)], Ni(COD)2, on a magnetic support. The Ni NP catalyst was characterized by the presence of Ni(0) and only partial surface oxidation could be detected after storage in air [X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results]. Moreover, the catalytic results indicate that these oxidized nickel species can be reduced back to the Ni(0) active catalyst under mild hydrogenation reaction conditions (1 bar H2 and 75°C), in contrast with NiO bulk that is nonreactive under these conditions. The catalyst exhibited high activity in the hydrogenation of cyclohexene and was recycled 15 times without deactivation (TOF up to 1500 h-1, 75°C, and 6 atm H2). For comparison, the widely used Raney nickel catalyst was tested in the hydrogenation of cyclohexene under similar conditions (0.33 mol% Ni, 75°C, and 6 bar H2), but only 29% conversion was reached after 48 h of reaction, which means that Raney Ni was not activated in the reaction conditions. An important feature of the Ni catalyst prepared from the organometallic precursor is that it can be activated in situ in the hydrogenation reaction under very mild condition.

Polshettiwar et al. [44] prepared a Ni NP catalyst by reduction of nickel chloride with hydrazine/NaBH4 into dopamine-modified iron oxide NPs. The catalyst was not as well characterized as Ni(0), but the catalytic results are interesting. The catalyst was selective for the reduction of alkynes to alkenes or alkanes depending on the reaction conditions. The reduction of carbonyl compounds to the corresponding alcohols was also explored via catalytic transfer hydrogenation in isopropanol.

All the NP-supported catalysts reviewed here could be isolated and recycled with the assistance of an external magnet, which greatly simplifies the workup procedure and purification of products, minimizing the use of solvents, costly consumables, energy, and time.

3 Oxidation reactions

Oxidations are one of the most important reactions in chemical industry; in particular, epoxydation and allylic oxidation of olefins and selective oxidation of alcohols are of great interest for the synthesis of important chemical intermediates. Catalytic oxidations using molecular oxygen or hydrogen peroxide are preferable from both an ecologic and economic point of view, as these reactions traditionally are performed using chromium and manganese oxides and produce equimolar amounts of toxic waste. However, unlike the traditional oxidants, molecular oxygen is not a selective and active oxidant without a catalyst. Thus, the search for efficient metal-containing catalysts (e.g., metal NPs) has become the key to most of the aerobic oxidations and the possibility of using magnetic separation minimizes the problem of expensive and wasteful workup procedures.

3.1 Iron oxide NPs

Iron catalysts are among the most used to promote aerobic oxidations due to the efficiency of Fe as an active site for the oxygen transfer to organic substrates. In the last decade, since the discovery of Fe-containing enzymes, many studies have focused on biomimetic catalysis, such as Fe-containing porphyrin and Schiff’s base. However, the difficult separation and the high cost of these catalysts make commercialization impracticable. The immobilization of this kind of catalyst became attractive, although both activity and selectivity can decrease after immobilization. Therefore, there is a need for more simple, efficient, safe, and cheap catalysts containing iron. Shi et al. [17] reported the catalytic activity and selectivity of free nano-Fe2O3 in oxidation of alcohols and olefins using hydrogen peroxide as an oxidizing agent. The Fe2O3 bulk displayed very low activity; however, the nano-γ-Fe2O3 with particle sizes of 20 to 50 nm rendered 33% conversion and 97% selectivity to benzaldehyde. Higher activities could be reached when using nano-γ-Fe2O3 with sizes of 3 to 5 nm. The conversion reached 85%, but the benzaldehyde selectivity dropped to 35%. Besides, the intrinsic magnetic properties of the maghemite NPs allowed the catalyst to be easily separated from the reaction media simply by using a permanent magnet. Gao et al. [46] reported the peroxidase-like activity of magnetite NPs. The authors reported that all sizes of magnetite catalyzes the reaction of the substrate 3,3,5,5-tetramethylbenzidine using H2O2 as the oxidant just like the enzymatic peroxidase activity. The catalyst was also active for the oxidation of other typical peroxidase substrates, and unlike the proteins, magnetite does not have the problems associated with degradation and cost of production and purification. Importantly, Fe3O4 NPs have the additional property of being magnetic, which allows them to be recovered for recycling. The use of iron oxide as catalysts for oxidation of different substrates was reported in the literature. El-Sheikh et al. [47] reported the catalytic performance of nanostructured iron oxides synthesized by a thermal decomposition technique. The catalytic process was essentially affected by the presence of the maghemite phase, crystal size, and surface area of the nanostructured iron oxide. The results showed that CO is completely oxidized to CO2 at 200°C. Xue et al. [48] reported the oxidation of pentachlorophenol on the surface of magnetite used as a heterogeneous catalyst. The magnetite catalyst exhibited low iron leaching, good structural stability, and recyclability.

3.2 Cobalt oxide NPs

Zhang et al. [49] reported a magnetically recoverable heterogeneous catalyst based on cobalt oxide NPs supported on hydroxyapatite encapsulated with maghemite NPs. The mixed Co3O4 and CoFe2O4 oxides were present on the surface of CoHAP-γ-Fe2O3, which exhibited good catalytic activity for the oxidation of various alkenes based on a cooperation effect between these two oxides. The magnetic properties of the CoHAP-γ-Fe2O3 provided a convenient route for separation of the catalyst from the reaction mixture by application of an external permanent magnet (Figure 8). The spent catalyst could be recycled without loss of catalytic activity.

Separation of CoHAP-γ-Fe2O3 catalyst from the reaction mixture under an external magnetic field. Reprinted from Ref. [49]. © 2008 With permission from Elsevier.
Figure 8

Separation of CoHAP-γ-Fe2O3 catalyst from the reaction mixture under an external magnetic field.

Reprinted from Ref. [49]. © 2008 With permission from Elsevier.

Tong et al. [50] reported a heterogeneous catalyst consisting of magnetic CoFe2O4 nanocrystals used for the aerobic oxidation of cyclohexane in the presence of neither solvents nor reducing agents. The catalyst showed high activity for the oxidation of cyclohexane, especially when pure CoFe2O4 was used. The catalyst showed excellent selectivity for the formation of cyclohexanone and cyclohexanol (92.4% of selectivity) and could be easily separated by an external magnet and no obvious loss of activity was observed when reused in five consecutive runs. CoFe2O4 was also efficient for oxidation of linear alkanes. Silva et al. [51] reported a magnetically recoverable cobalt oxide NP catalyst. The catalyst was based on the immobilization of cobalt(II) ions on the surface of core-shell silica-coated magnetite NPs. In the next step, the cobalt(II) ions are precipitated using an aqueous solution of NaOH leading to the formation in a first step of cobalt hydroxide that are transformed in cobalt oxide by air oxidation, and the mean particle size of the supported CoO NPs was 2 to 3 nm. The catalyst was used in the oxidation of cyclohexene and exhibits selectivity for the allylic oxidation of the substrate and gains selectivity as the catalyst loss activity. The allylic oxidation occurs when the olefin undergoes oxidation on the double-bound adjacent carbon, and it is of great interest for the pharmaceutical and fragrances industries as a route for the formation of product precursors.

3.3 Ruthenium NPs

Ruthenium is a versatile catalyst and can be used in different reactions, including hydrogenation, metathesis, and oxidation. As an oxidation catalyst, Ru exhibits activity for oxidation of CO [52] and oxidation of alcohols with high selectivity. Mori et al. [53] reported a heterogeneous catalyst consisting of Ru NPs encapsulated in a hydroxyapatite matrix containing nanocrystallites of γ-Fe2O3 (Figure 9). The catalyst was used as an efficient catalyst for the oxidation of various alcohols to the corresponding carbonyl compound using molecular oxygen as a primary oxidant. The catalyst showed high selectivity for the formation of the carbonyl compound, even when the alcohol had a different functional group, such as -C=C-, and the catalyst was selective for the oxidation of the alcohol group, leaving the double bond intact. Costa et al. [54] reported the synthesis of heterogeneous ruthenium hydroxide supported on silica-coated magnetite NPs. The catalyst was used for the liquid-phase oxidation of a wide range of alcohols with molecular oxygen as a solo oxidant and in the absence of cocatalysts or additives. The material was prepared through the loading of the amino-modified support with ruthenium(III) ions followed by treatment with sodium hydroxide. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images showed that the ruthenium hydroxide is highly dispersed on the support surface. The catalyst was used in the oxidation of monoterpenic alcohols and was active and selective for the formation of corresponding carbonyl groups with good yields.

Separation of RuHAP-γ-Fe2O3 from the reaction mixture under an external magnetic field. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. © 2007 American Chemical Society.
Figure 9

Separation of RuHAP-γ-Fe2O3 from the reaction mixture under an external magnetic field.

Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. © 2007 American Chemical Society.

3.4 Palladium NPs

Pd is also known for its high activity in oxidation reactions. Polshettiwar et al. [55] reported a magnetically recoverable Pd catalyst that showed high turnover numbers and selectivity in the oxidation of alcohols and olefins to carbonyl compounds. The catalyst was prepared by the functionalization of nanoferrites with dopamine followed by addition of palladium chloride at basic pH. The dopamine acts as a robust anchor and avoids Pd leaching. Excellent turnover numbers were observed for various aromatic alcohols as well as aliphatic alcohols within 6 h. A turnover number of 720 were achieved in the oxidation of benzyl alcohol.

3.5 Gold NPs

Au has received attention as a selective catalyst for oxidation of alcohols to the corresponding ketones and aldehydes. Oliveira et al. [56] reported a magnetically recoverable gold NP catalyst. The catalyst was based on the immobilization of gold(III) ions on the surface of amino-functionalized core-shell silica-coated magnetite NPs followed by metal reduction using two different methods. The gold NPs were prepared by thermal reduction in air and by hydrogen reduction at mild temperature. Interestingly, the mean particle size of the supported gold NPs was similar (∼5.9 nm), but the polydispersity of the samples was quite different and the catalysts showed a distinct selectivity for benzyl alcohol oxidation. Another important feature in the preparation of supported gold catalysts is that gold(III) ions have shown very low affinity with silica surfaces of silica-coated magnetite, but an enhanced interaction was obtained by functionalization of silica surfaces with amino groups. Nonfunctionalized and amino-functionalized silica supports were loaded with Au3+ precursor and the intermediate species were characterized by XANES. The nonfunctionalized solid was prepared by wetness impregnation in such a way that both solids were loaded with the same amount of gold. The XANES spectra obtained from the material with and without functionalization, and the standards Au0 and Au3+ indicated a strong interaction between the amino groups and the gold ion, thus causing a change in coordination environment and oxidation state of the metal. The nonfunctionalized support suggested a weak interaction with the oxygenated species on silica surfaces. After reduction of gold, the nonfunctionalized support contained NPs that were not attached to the support, indicating the weak interaction with the silanol groups. In the amino-functionalized support, the NPs formed were exclusively deposited on the support (Figure 10) [57]. The magnetically recoverable Au NP catalyst was able to discriminate oxygen-sensitive functionalities such as carbon-carbon double-bond functional groups and hydroxyl groups, for example, the oxidation of allyl alcohols to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds [57], as known for other gold catalysts [58].

TEM images of gold NPs supported on (a) amino-functionalized and (b) nonfunctionalized silica. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [57]. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons.
Figure 10

TEM images of gold NPs supported on (a) amino-functionalized and (b) nonfunctionalized silica.

Reprinted with permission from Ref. [57]. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons.

In summary, despite the enormous amount of work currently found in the literature on oxidations by metal NPs, much remains to be explored on the subject, in particular, the mechanism that drives some of these particles to lose activity during successive cycles of reaction or even the mechanism of oxidation itself.

4 Carbon-carbon coupling reactions

An important reaction for organic synthesis is the formation of C-C bonds, especially Heck and Suzuki reactions. Usually, these reactions are catalyzed with great performance by Pd complexes, although Ni, Ru, and Rh also presented catalytic activity [59–61]. The major problem related to the use of soluble complexes in C-C coupling reactions is the catalyst separation, product contamination, and the very low possibility of reusing the catalyst. An alternative to these problems is the use of supported metal complexes, but in many cases this is followed by a decrease of activity [60, 62, 63]. NPs have demonstrated catalytic performance in C-C coupling reactions, although if the metal particles are the true catalysts or if they deliver active species to the solution is still under debate [64–66]. The use of magnetic separation for this kind of reaction is highly desired because it avoids the exposure of the catalyst to air. Most of the studies involve Pd NPs on a magnetic-responsive support as a catalyst for Heck and Suzuki cross-coupling reactions. Wang et al. [67] prepared a Pd/Fe3O4 magnetic catalyst based on Fe3O4 NPs functionalized with amino groups using 3-aminopropryltriethoxysilane for the Heck reaction. To achieve the maximum loading of Pd, the metal was deposited in successive steps using ethanol as the reducing agent; thus, the deposition of Pd(0) atoms on the magnetic support was gentle. The catalytic behavior of Pd/Fe3O4 NPs in the coupling of acrylic acid with iodobenzene yielded 81% conversion, and when the catalyst was reused, a decrease of activity was observed. The reduction in the activity was explained by the fact that the catalyst agglomerated upon recycling. To improve the stability of the catalyst in both aqueous and nonaqueous solvent, Wang et al. [68] coated the magnetic NPs with a silica shell before functionalizing the solid with amino groups. A colloidal Pd NP solution (particle size of 3 nm) was previously synthesized and impregnated on the magnetic solid. This catalyst was also tested in the C-C coupling of acrylic acid or styrene with iodobenzene with a maximum yield of 58% and 71%, respectively. During the reuse, an amount of metal leached into the solution and some Pd NPs grew up, thus decreasing the catalytic activity. In both studies reported by Wang et al., the catalyst was separated from the reaction medium using a magnet while keeping the solid in the flask for the next reaction cycle.

Zhu et al. [69] enriched commercially available magnetic NPs with phosphate functional groups for use as catalyst support. The enriched suspension was submitted to a solution containing Pd(acac)2 for impregnation of metal. The Pd was reduced using glycol under argon atmosphere to prepare ultra-small supported Pd NPs. This catalyst was studied in the Suzuki reaction of bromobenzene and phenylboronic acid yielding 83% conversion. For the Heck reaction, they have used the coupling of bromobenzene and styrene obtaining trans-stilbene as the major product in 56% yield. In both C-C coupling reactions, the catalyst did not lose activity in the reuses. The differences of the catalytic behavior of Pd(0) particles and Pd(II) complexes on magnetic solids were investigated by Laska et al. [70]. In the Heck reaction, the catalysts showed similar conversion (>99%), whereas in the Suzuki reaction the catalysts with Pd(II) complexes on a magnetic solid surface presented better performance than the Pd(0) catalyst.

Amali and Rana [39] reported a magnetic support based on magnetite NPs functionalized with PEI. Pd(0) deposited on the magnetic particles was tested in the Suzuki reaction with 75% to 95% yield for aryl chlorides bearing a variety of substituents. The authors compared the activity of their catalyst with the commercial Pd/C, and the latter showed low activity. The explanation for the high activity of the magnetic catalyst was the small size of the Pd NPs. An important feature of this catalytic system was the absence of drastic change in the shape and size on Pd NPs after the reaction and negligible metal leaching. Moreover, no reaction was observed with the filtrate, which is strong evidence of the heterogeneous nature of the catalyst.

Costa et al. [71] reported the preparation of magnetically recoverable Pd NPs stabilized by pendant phosphine groups on the support, by reacting a palladium complex containing the ligand 2-(diphenylphosphino)benzaldehyde with an amino-functionalized silica surface (Figure 11). The Pd(0) NPs prepared after reflux are active for a Suzuki cross-coupling reaction (>99% conversion and 100% selectivity to the biaryl coupling product), avoiding any addition of other sources of phosphine ligands. The catalyst could be reused for up to 10 recycles. The Pd catalyst prepared on the phosphine-functionalized support was more active and selective than a similar Pd catalyst prepared on an amino-functionalized support. Pd NPs in the presence of phosphine-containing ligands presented high activity for C-C coupling reactions.

Core-shell silica-coated magnetite functionalized with iminophosphine groups as support for palladium NPs.
Figure 11

Core-shell silica-coated magnetite functionalized with iminophosphine groups as support for palladium NPs.

The search for different ligands and the development of greener processes are still necessary, because phosphine ligands are often expensive, air sensitive, and toxic. Zhang et al. [72] explored the functionalization of silica-coated magnetite NPs with iminopyridine by the “click” system to be used as a support for Pd(0) (Figure 12). The catalyst could be used successfully for several representative Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reactions in ethanol/water media. The functionalization of the surface of silica-coated NPs with ionic liquid was also explored for the preparation of Pd(0) NPs as a C-C coupling catalyst. Wang et al. [73] used an amine-functionalized ionic liquid that acts as a good stabilizer for the Pd NPs and improves the catalytic activity while making the catalyst more accessible to organic substrates. The resulting catalyst showed excellent activity for aryl iodides and bromides in the Suzuki coupling reactions at room temperature, and once again, the catalyst was reused seven times with yields higher than 90%.

Core-shell silica-coated magnetite functionalized with iminopyridine by the “click” chemistry strategy.
Figure 12

Core-shell silica-coated magnetite functionalized with iminopyridine by the “click” chemistry strategy.

Although silica-coated magnetite NPs are the most explored magnetic supports mainly due to the facility of surface modification, other coatings were explored (e.g., carbon). The catalytic activity of Pd(0) supported on Fe3O4@C was investigated in the model Suzuki coupling reaction of bromobenzene and phenylboronic acid and demonstrated superior catalytic activity to several catalytic systems reported in the literature [74]. The speculation of the high conversion rate in Suzuki-Miyaura C-C coupling reaction resulted from the ease with which the reactants accessed the active sites of noble metal particles due to the interaction between graphene and aromatic compounds encouraged Hu et al. [75] to explore magnetic graphene as support for Pd NPs. The magnetic graphene was obtained by coprecipitation of FeSO4·7H2O and FeCl3·6H2O with ammonia solution in the presence of graphene solution, resulting in magnetite NPs immersed in graphene. The next step was the reduction of Pd(OAc)2 on the magnetic solid under reflux, resulting in Pd(0) NPs. With a magnetic graphene, the problems of dramatic loss of activity of Pd/graphene catalysts occasioned by filtration or centrifugation methods could be avoided and the catalyst could be successfully reused in 10 reaction cycles maintaining good conversion. However, the catalysts were instable and aggregation of Pd(0) and Fe3O4 NPs was observed. The same catalyst was further investigated by Zong et al. [76] in a one-pot diazotization cross-coupling reaction of anilines and arylboronic acids. The interest in this reaction emerged from the search for suitable electrophilic reactants for enlarging the applied range of C-C coupling reaction that initially used aryl halides as electrophiles. The Pd(0) NPs supported on magnetic graphene demonstrated high activity but deactivated after the fourth cycle.

It is not only magnetite NPs that have been explored as a support for catalysts in C-C coupling reactions, because other ferrites also have superparamagnetic behavior. NPs of NiFe2O4 were used as a support for a Pd catalyst by Baruwati et al. [77]. The magnetic NPs were synthesized by a hydrothermal route and their surfaces were modified with dopamine molecules. The catalyst was prepared by reducing Na2PdCl4 with hydrazine in the presence of the magnetic support. The catalyst was tested in Heck and Suzuki reactions with good conversion (>80%) for a variety of substrates and only 0.19% of metal leaching. An increase of the catalyst size after the reaction was also observed.

Ni(0) NPs were also explored for C-C bond formation reaction. The Ni NPs have intrinsic magnetic properties, and in principle, they can be used as catalysts for C-C coupling without the need for a magnetic support to provide the advantages of magnetic separation. Although some researchers have investigated the catalytic performance of Ni NPs in C-C bond formation, none of them explored the magnetic separation of Ni(0) colloidal NPs [78–80].

5 Photocatalytic reactions

Photocatalytic reactions using semiconductor NPs have received considerable attention over the past three decades because of their imminent potential for large-scale application in water purification, air treatment, and solar hydrogen production [81–84]. Among the various transition metal oxides, titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been the most commonly applied photocatalyst due to its use in solar-hydrogen production from water in the early 1970s [85]. Many research papers and review articles have pointed to three important factors (among others) that involve the basic principles of photocatalysis using semiconductor materials under UV and visible light irradiation:

  • The semiconductor photocatalyst should have suitable solar UV or visible light absorption capacity, and appropriate band-edge potentials [86, 87].

  • Formation of electron-hole pairs (e-, h+) and migration to surface reaction sites [88, 89].

  • Photocatalyst with high crystallinity and large surface area [90, 91].

Figure 13 illustrates the basic mechanism of photogeneration of electron and hole pairs in a semiconductor photocatalyst. Under irradiation with an energy equivalent to or greater than the band gap of the semiconductor photocatalyst, an electron in the valence band (VB) is excited into the conduction band (CB), leaving a positive hole in the VB [88, 92]. After photoexcitation, electron-hole pairs (e-, h+) formed can migrate to the surface of the photocatalyst and induce a series of reductive and oxidative reactions in the presence of electron donors or acceptors adsorbed on the surface of the photocatalyst or recombine in a defect dissipating the input energy as heat [93]. The defects operate as trapping and recombination centers between photogenerated electrons and holes, resulting in a decrease in the photocatalytic activity. A strategy for decreasing the recombination of photogenerated electrons is the use of cocatalyst NPs loaded on the semiconductor photocatalysts. Cocatalysts such as Pt, Au, and NiO NPs are usually loaded to promote the separation of photoexcited electrons and holes [92, 94–96].

Basic principles of photocatalysis on the semiconductor materials. CB, conduction band; VB, valence band.
Figure 13

Basic principles of photocatalysis on the semiconductor materials. CB, conduction band; VB, valence band.

Recently, different compounds such as phenols, organic dyes, carboxylic acid, drugs, herbicides, and insecticides have been photodegraded (mineralized) by using magnetic NP photocatalysts. The great advantage in the use of magnetic photocatalysts is the possibility of separating the catalyst by applying a magnetic field, whereas their photocatalytic activity remains after repeated uses. Fe3O4/SiO2/TiO2 photocatalyst with controlled shape and magnetization properties were recently reported to exhibit excellent photocatalytic activity for organic dyes photodegradation [97, 98]. The presence of a thin layer of SiO2 between Fe3O4 NPs and TiO2 shell serves as a electron-hole trap center, which decreases the recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs leading to the enhancement of photocatalytic performance [98]. Ye et al. [99] synthesized a core-shell Fe3O4/SiO2/TiO2 nanostructured via two steps of a sol-gel process. The core-shell structure is composed of a central magnetite core with an interlayer of SiO2 and an outer layer of TiO2 nanocrystals with a tunable average size. The core-shell structure samples exhibit high photocatalytic activity for degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) and good magnetic separation without significant mass loss [99]. The high photocatalytic activity of the Fe3O4/SiO2/TiO2 composites is attributed to the small size of the anatase nanocrystals and the presence of the SiO2 interlayer. In addition, the authors studied the effect of the thickness of the TiO2 layer on the photodegradation of RhB. The sample with a 12.6-nm-thick titania shell exhibited the highest photocatalytic efficiency compared with the samples with 13.08 and 14.7 nm thickness. Most significantly, Fe3O4/SiO2/TiO2 was stable during 18 cycles of reaction of photodegradation of RhB. Furthermore, the concentration of Fe3+ in the solution after recycles (40.6 mg L-1) was only 0.0083% of total Fe3O4 in the system [99].

Wang et al. [100] reported the preparation of (γ-Fe2O3@SiO2)n@TiO2 functional hybrid NPs. The synthesis involved three steps: (i) preparation of Fe3O4@SiO2 composite NPs [101], (ii) resuspension of Fe3O4@SiO2 particles in the hexane followed by the addition of tetrabutyl titanate and a few water drops (hydrolization), and (iii) the mixture was transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave and kept at 100°C for 2 h [100]. The mean sizes of hybrid NPs with titania matrix and magnetic γ-Fe2O3 core particles are about 100 and 15 nm, respectively. The photocatalytic performance of (γ-Fe2O3@SiO2)n@TiO2 NPs was evaluated in the degradation of methylene blue under UV light. A photodegradation of about 80% of methylene blue was obtained in only 80 min of irradiation [100].

Belessi et al. [102] obtained a novel kind of γ-Fe2O3/TiO2 photocatalyst (without silica coating on the Fe3O4 cores) using TiO2 NPs (Degussa P25) and γ-Fe2O3 NPs (3, 8, 13, 20, and 30 wt.%) through a protective lining made up of two oppositely charged polyelectrolytes. The developed nanocomposites with 20 wt.% γ-Fe2O3 (Fe(20)Ti) exhibit similarly catalytic activity to the commercial photocatalyst Degussa P25 for the degradation of a chloroacetanilide herbicide (propachlor) in water. The main advantage of Fe3O4/TiO2 core-shell NP over TiO2 NPs (Degussa P25) is the magnetic separation, which facilitates the catalyst reuse without any change in photocatalytic activity or mass loss. Figure 14 shows that the magnetically separable photocatalyst is stable and effective for the decomposition of pesticide propachlor after four successive cycles.

Degradation of propachlor with recycled Fe(20)Ti catalyst after successive cycles. Inset: Illustration of the magnetic separation of the Fe(20)Ti photocatalyst from the liquid media. Reprinted from Ref. [102]. © 2009 With permission from Elsevier.
Figure 14

Degradation of propachlor with recycled Fe(20)Ti catalyst after successive cycles.

Inset: Illustration of the magnetic separation of the Fe(20)Ti photocatalyst from the liquid media. Reprinted from Ref. [102]. © 2009 With permission from Elsevier.

Very recently, a novel magnetic photocatalyst with a hybrid nanostructure consisting of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), Fe3O4 NPs, and a TiO2 layer was reported by Zhou et al. [103]. The photocatalytic activity of the MWCNT/Fe3O4/TiO2 hybrids was validated for phenol degradation under irradiation of UV-visible light. The MWCNT/Fe3O4/TiO2 hybrids exhibited higher photocatalytic activity than the neat TiO2 powder. This behavior was attributed to the positive effect of MWCNTs acting as a dispersing agent (the MWCNTs prevent TiO2 from agglomeration) and as an adsorbent (the adsorption efficiency of TiO2-Fe3O4-MWCNTs is higher than that of neat TiO2) [103].

Another potentially promising strategy is the application of magnetic NPs in photodynamic therapy. He et al. [104] have reported the photokilling ability of Fe3O4/TiO2 core-shell NP on HeLa cells in malignant tumor therapy. They have demonstrated that Fe3O4/TiO2 core-shell NP is nontoxic and much more efficient than traditional TiO2 NP for killing tumor cells. The external magnetic field makes Fe3O4/TiO2 core-shell NPs cover the surface of HeLa cells well, which increases the efficiency of the photocatalysis of Fe3O4/TiO2 core-shell NPs and further increases their killing efficiency. Furthermore, Fe3O4/TiO2 core-shell magnetic NP photocatalysts are promising candidates in the field of malignant tumor therapy in the future [104].

6 Other reactions

Polshettiwar and Varma [105] reported a magnetically recyclable ruthenium hydroxide Ru(OH)x catalyst and its application in the hydration of nitriles in a benign aqueous medium.

Abu-Reziq et al. [106] combined the features of magnetic NPs and dendrimers to prepare a magnetically recoverable catalyst for hydroformylation reactions. After phosphination of the heterogenized dendron with various generations, it was complexed with rhodium and used as the catalyst for hydroformylation reactions. The reactivity and selectivity of the catalyst were very high.

As observed previously in this text, Pd is a very active metal for various different kinds of reaction, so it is common to find in the literature studies with Pd/magnetic support in unusual or emergent reactions explored in green chemistry [107, 108]. Pd(0) NPs supported on Fe3O4 were active for the carbonylation of aryl halides using atmospheric pressure of carbon monoxide and could be reused five times without loosing activity (proposed mechanism in Figure 15). Carbonylation reactions by Pd usually occur via homogeneous catalysis; however, the association of Pd(0) with magnetite surface can result in a synergic effect that allows the alkoxycarbonylation of aryl iodides with different alcohols at mild reaction conditions. Therefore, not only the possibility of magnetic separation but also the presence of synergic effects makes metal NPs supported on superparamagnetic magnetite an interesting system to be explored for complex reactions [109].

Role of magnetite in carbonylation of aryl halides by Pd(0) NPs. Mechanism proposed by Prasad et al. [109]. Reprinted from Ref. [109]. © 2013 With permission from Elsevier.
Figure 15

Role of magnetite in carbonylation of aryl halides by Pd(0) NPs.

Mechanism proposed by Prasad et al. [109]. Reprinted from Ref. [109]. © 2013 With permission from Elsevier.

A similar system containing Pd(0) NPs on Fe3O4 was also active for one-pot reductive amination of aldehydes with nitroarenes under mild conditions. Wei et al. [110] demonstrated that the catalyst Pd/Fe3O4 yielded 92% in 6 h of reaction for reductive amination of benzaldehyde with nitrobenzene, whereas the commercial Pd/C yielded only 16% for the same reaction conditions. The magnetically recoverable catalysts explored by Wei could be reused for eight cycles without a significant loss of yield and Pd leaching was negligible. However, the role of magnetite support for this reaction was not investigated.

7 Concluding remarks

Magnetically responsive solid supports that can be easily separated due to the magnetic interaction between the magnetic NPs and an external applied magnetic field have been used for the immobilization of various kind of catalysts, such as metal NPs, metal complexes, organocatalysts, and even enzymes for biocatalysis. In this review, we have selected examples of metal NPs supported on magnetic solid carriers and their application in catalysis and photocatalysis. This separation technique has received a great deal of attention lately, as it is an alternative to traditional time-, energy-, and solvent-consuming steps during catalysis purification processes. Magnetic separation is clean, fast, and easy to scale-up and avoids the use of chemical supplies and solvents that present considerable environmental hazards. Moreover, it allows the complete recovery of the catalyst inside the reactor wall with minimal mass loss and without over exposition to air. Therefore, it can be regarded as a new separation technology with great possibilities for applications in the field of catalysis.

The authors acknowledge the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for fellowships.

References

  • [1]

    Finke RG. Transition-metal nanoclusters: solution-phase synthesis, then characterization and mechanism of formation of polyoxoanion and tetrabutylammonium stabilized nanoclusters. In Metal Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications, Feldheim DL, Foss Jr. CA, Eds. Marcel Dekker: New York, 2002.Google Scholar

  • [2]

    Astruc D, Lu F, Aranzaes JR. Nanoparticles as recyclable catalysts: the frontier between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7852–7872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3]

    Dahl JA, Maddux BLS, Hutchison JE. Toward greener nanosynthesis. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2228–2269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4]

    Doyle AM, Shaikhutdinov SK, Jackson SD, Freund HJ. Hydrogenation on metal surfaces: why are nanoparticles more active than single crystals? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5240–5243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    Lopez-Sanchez JA, Dimitratos N, Hammond C, Brett GL, Kesavan L, White S, Miedziak P, Tiruvalam R, Jenkins RL, Carley AF, Knight D, Kiely CJ, Hutchings GJ. Facile removal of stabilizer-ligands from supported gold nanoparticles. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 551–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6]

    Boennemann H, Endruschat U, Hormes J, Koehl G, Kruse S, Modrow H, Moertel R, Nagabhushana KS. Activation of colloidal PtRu fuel cell catalysts via a thermal “conditioning process”. Fuel Cells 2004, 4, 297–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7]

    Wu B, Huang H, Yang J, Zheng N, Fu G. Selective hydrogenation of alpha,beta-unsaturated aldehydes catalyzed by amine-capped platinum-cobalt nanocrystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3440–3443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8]

    Kwon SG, Krylova G, Sumer A, Schwartz MM, Bunel EE, Marshall CL, Chattopadhyay S, Lee B, Jellinek J, Shevchenko EV. Capping ligands as selectivity switchers in hydrogenation reactions. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 5382–5388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Costa NJS, Rossi LM. Synthesis of supported metal nanoparticle catalysts using ligand assisted methods. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 5826–5834.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    Lu AH, Salabas EL, Schuth F. Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1222–1244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Arnett RL, Buell BO. Magnetic separator for removing nickel-on-kieselguhr catalyst from conjugated diene solutions. U.S. Patent 2,760,638, May 6, 1956.Google Scholar

  • [12]

    Bremer JWJ. Recovery of nickel catalysts from hydrogenated fats. U.S. Patent 2,875,220, February 24, 1959.Google Scholar

  • [13]

    Johnston WDJ. Separation of magnetic catalysts from polymers such as hydrogenated coumarone-indene resins. U.S. Patent 2,264,756, December 2, 1941.Google Scholar

  • [14]

    Reynolds PW, Lamb SA. Magnetic separation of metal catalysts. U.S. Patent 670,423, April 16 1952.Google Scholar

  • [15]

    Reynolds PW, Lamb SA. Magnetic separation of metal catalysts. U.S. Patent 2,723,9978, November 15 1955.Google Scholar

  • [16]

    Yoo JS. Metal recovery and rejuvenation of metal-loaded spent catalysts. Catal. Today 1998, 44, 27–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17]

    Shi F, Tse MK, Pohl MM, Bruckner A, Zhang SM, Beller M. Tuning catalytic activity between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis: Improved activity and selectivity of free nano-Fe2O3 in selective oxidations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8866–8868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18]

    Zeng TQ, Chen WW, Cirtiu CM, Moores A, Song GH, Li CJ. Fe3O4 nanoparticles: a robust and magnetically recoverable catalyst for three-component coupling of aldehyde, alkyne and amine. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 570–573.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19]

    Shylesh S, Schünemann V, Thiel WR. Magnetically separable nanocatalysts: bridges between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3428–3459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20]

    Tsang SC, Caps V, Paraskevas I, Chadwick D, Thompsett D. Magnetically separable, carbon-supported nanocatalysts for the manufacture of fine chemicals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5645–5649.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21]

    Zhu Y, Stubbs LP, Ho F, Liu R, Ship CP, Maguire JA, Hosmane NS. Magnetic nanocomposites: a new perspective in catalysis. Chemcatchem 2010, 2, 365–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22]

    Baig RBN, Varma RS. Magnetically retrievable catalysts for organic synthesis. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 752–770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23]

    Polshettiwar V, Luque R, Fihri A, Zhu H, Bouhrara M, Bassett J-M. Magnetically recoverable nanocatalysts. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3036–3075.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24]

    Deng Y, Qi D, Deng C, Zhang X, Zhao D. Superparamagnetic high-magnetization microspheres with an Fe3O4@SiO2 core and perpendicularly aligned mesoporous SiO2 shell for removal of microcystins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 28–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25]

    Rossi LM, Vono LLR, Silva FP, Kiyohara PK, Duarte EL, Matos JR. Magnetically recoverable scavenger for palladium based on thiol-modified magnetite nanoparticles. Appl. Catal. A 2007, 330, 139–144.Google Scholar

  • [26]

    Rossi LM, Nangoi IM, Costa NJS. Ligand-assisted preparation of palladium supported nanoparticles: a step toward size control. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 4640–4642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27]

    Guerrero M, Costa NJS, Vono LLR, Rossi LM, Gusevskaya EV, Philippot K. Taking advantage of a terpyridine ligand for the deposition of Pd nanoparticles onto a magnetic material for selective hydrogenation reactions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 1441–1449.Google Scholar

  • [28]

    Rossi LM, Vono LLR, Garcia MAS, Faria TLT, Lopez-Sanchez JA. Top. Catal. 2013. DOI 10.1007/s11244-013-0089-z.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29]

    Pelisson CH, Vono LLR, Hubert C, Denicourt-Nowicki A, Rossi LM, Roucoux A. Moving from surfactant-stabilized aqueous rhodium (0) colloidal suspension to heterogeneous magnetite-supported rhodium nanocatalysts: synthesis, characterization and catalytic performance in hydrogenation reactions. Catal. Today 2012, 183, 124–129.Google Scholar

  • [30]

    Jacinto MJ, Landers R, Rossi LM. Preparation of supported Pt(0) nanoparticles as efficient recyclable catalysts for hydrogenation of alkenes and ketones. Catal. Commun. 2009, 10, 1971–1974.Google Scholar

  • [31]

    Jacinto MJ, Silva FP, Kiyohara PK, Landers R, Rossi LM. Catalyst recovery and recycling facilitated by magnetic separation: iridium and other metal nanoparticles. Chemcatchem 2012, 4, 698–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32]

    Costa NJS, Jardim RF, Masunaga SH, Zanchet D, Landers R, Rossi LM. Direct access to oxidation-resistant nickel catalysts through an organometallic precursor. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 925–929.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [33]

    Jacinto MJ, Santos O, Jardim RF, Landers R, Rossi LM. Preparation of recoverable Ru catalysts for liquid-phase oxidation and hydrogenation reactions. Appl. Catal. A 2009, 360, 177–182.Google Scholar

  • [34]

    Guin D, Baruwati B, Manorama SV. Pd on amine-terminated ferrite nanoparticles: a complete magnetically recoverable facile catalyst for hydrogenation reactions. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1419–1421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35]

    Rossi LM, Silva FP, Vono LLR, Kiyohara PK, Duarte EL, Itri R, Landers R, Machado G. Superparamagnetic nanoparticle-supported palladium: a highly stable magnetically recoverable and reusable catalyst for hydrogenation reactions. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 379–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [36]

    Yi DK, Lee SS, Ying JY. Synthesis and applications of magnetic nanocomposite catalysts. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 2459–2461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [37]

    Lu AH, Schmidt W, Matoussevitch N, Bonnemann H, Spliethoff B, Tesche B, Bill E, Kiefer W, Schuth F. Nanoengineering of a magnetically separable hydrogenation catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4303–4306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [38]

    Amali AJ, Rana RK. Stabilisation of Pd(0) on surface functionalised Fe3O4 nanoparticles: magnetically recoverable and stable recyclable catalyst for hydrogenation and Suzuki-Miyaura reactions. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1781–1786.Google Scholar

  • [39]

    Jacinto MJ, Kiyohara PK, Masunaga SH, Jardim RF, Rossi LM. Recoverable rhodium nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and catalytic performance in hydrogenation reactions. Appl. Catal. A 2008, 338, 52–57.Google Scholar

  • [40]

    Jacinto MJ, Santos O, Landers R, Kiyohara PK, Rossi LM. On the catalytic hydrogenation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons into less toxic compounds by a facile recoverable catalyst. Appl. Catal. B 2009, 90, 688–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [41]

    Jun CH, Park YJ, Yeon YR, Choi JR, Lee WR, Ko SJ, Cheon J. Demonstration of a magnetic and catalytic Co@Pt nanoparticle as a dual-function nanoplatform. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1619–1621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [42]

    Abu-Reziq R, Wang D, Post M, Alper H. Platinum nanoparticles supported on ionic liquid-odified magnetic nanoparticles: selective hydrogenation catalysts. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2145–2150.Google Scholar

  • [43]

    Baruwati B, Polshettiwar V, Varma RS. Magnetically recoverable supported ruthenium catalyst for hydrogenation of alkynes and transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1215–1218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [44]

    Polshettiwar V, Baruwati B, Varma RS. Nanoparticle-supported and magnetically recoverable nickel catalyst: a robust and economic hydrogenation and transfer hydrogenation protocol. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 127–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [45]

    Kotani M, Koike T, Yamaguchi K, Mizuno N. Ruthenium hydroxide on magnetite as a magnetically separable heterogeneous catalyst for liquid-phase oxidation and reduction. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 735–741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [46]

    Gao LZ, Zhuang J, Nie L, Zhang JB, Zhang Y, Gu N, Wang TH, Feng J, Yang DL, Perrett S, Yan X. Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 577–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [47]

    El-Sheikh SM, Harraz FA, Abdel-Halim KS. Catalytic performance of nanostructured iron oxides synthesized by thermal decomposition technique. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 487, 716–723.Google Scholar

  • [48]

    Xue XF, Hanna K, Abdelmoula M, Deng NS. Adsorption and oxidation of PCP on the surface of magnetite: kinetic experiments and spectroscopic investigations. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2009, 89, 432–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [49]

    Zhang Y, Li Z, Sun W, Xia C. A magnetically recyclable heterogeneous catalyst: cobalt nano-oxide supported on hydroxyapatite-encapsulated γ-Fe2O3 nanocrystallites for highly efficient olefin oxidation with H2O2. Catal Commun. 2008, 10, 237–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [50]

    Tong JH, Bo LL, Li Z, Lei ZQ, Xia CG. Magnetic CoFe2O4 nanocrystal: a novel and efficient heterogeneous catalyst for aerobic oxidation of cyclohexane. J. Mol. Cat. A-Chem. 2009, 307, 58–63.Google Scholar

  • [51]

    Silva FP, Jacinto MJ, Landers R, Rossi LM. Selective allylic oxidation of cyclohexene by a magnetically recoverable cobalt oxide catalyst. Catal. Lett. 2011, 141, 432–437.Google Scholar

  • [52]

    Joo SH, Park JY, Renzas JR, Butcher DR, Huang WY, Somorjai GA. Size effect of ruthenium nanoparticles in catalytic carbon monoxide oxidation. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 2709–2713.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [53]

    Mori K, Kanai S, Hara T, Mizugaki T, Ebitani K, Jitsukawa K, Kaneda K. Development of ruthenium-hydroxyapatite-encapsulated superparamagnetic gamma-Fe2O3 nanocrystallites as an efficient oxidation catalyst by molecular oxygen. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 1249–1256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [54]

    Costa VV, Jacinto MJ, Rossi LM, Landers R, Gusevskaya EV. Aerobic oxidation of monoterpenic alcohols catalyzed by ruthenium hydroxide supported on silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles. J. Catal. 2011, 282, 209–214.Google Scholar

  • [55]

    Polshettiwar V, Varma RS. Nanoparticle-supported and magnetically recoverable palladium (Pd) catalyst: a selective and sustainable oxidation protocol with high turnover number. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 37–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [56]

    Oliveira RL, Kiyohara PK, Rossi LM. High performance magnetic separation of gold nanoparticles for catalytic oxidation of alcohols. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 144–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [57]

    Oliveira RL, Zanchet D, Kiyohara PK, Rossi LM. On the sStabilization of gold nanoparticles over silica-based magnetic supports modified with organosilanes. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 4626–4631.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [58]

    Abad A, Corma A, García H. Catalyst parameters determining activity and selectivity of supported gold nanoparticles for the aerobic oxidation of alcohols: the molecular reaction mechanism. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 212–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [59]

    Phan NTS, Van Der Sluys M, Jones CW. On the nature of the active species in palladium catalyzed Mizoroki-Heck and Suzuki-Miyaura couplings – homogeneous or heterogeneous catalysis, a critical review. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 609–679.Google Scholar

  • [60]

    Torborg C, Beller M. Recent applications of palladium-catalyzed coupling reactions in the pharmaceutical, agrochemical, and fine chemical industries. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 3027–3043.Google Scholar

  • [61]

    Fihri A, Bouhrara M, Nekoueishahraki B, Basset J-M, Polshettiwar V. Nanocatalysts for Suzuki cross-coupling reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5181–5203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [62]

    Motokura K, Tada M, Iwasawa Y. Organofunctionalized catalyst surfaces highly active and selective for carbon-carbon bond-forming reactions. Catal. Today 2009, 147, 203–210.Google Scholar

  • [63]

    Trzeciak AM, Ziolkowski JJ. Monomolecular, nanosized and heterogenized palladium catalysts for the Heck reaction. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007, 251, 1281–1293.Google Scholar

  • [64]

    Astruc D. Palladium nanoparticles as efficient green homogeneous and heterogeneous carbon-carbon coupling precatalysts: a unifying view. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 1884–1894.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [65]

    Corma A, Garcia H. Crossing the borders between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis: developing recoverable and reusable catalytic systems. Top. Catal. 2008, 48, 8–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [66]

    Durand J, Teuma E, Gomez M. An overview of palladium nanocatalysts: surface and molecular reactivity. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 3577–3586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [67]

    Wang ZF, Shen B, Zou AH, He NY. Synthesis of Pd/Fe3O4 nanoparticle-based catalyst for the cross-coupling of acrylic acid with iodobenzene. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 113, 27–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [68]

    Wang ZF, Xiao PF, Shen B, He NY. Synthesis of palladium-coated magnetic nanoparticle and its application in Heck reaction. Colloids Surf. A 2006, 276, 116–121.Google Scholar

  • [69]

    Zhu YH, Peng SC, Emi A, Zhenshun S, Monalisa, Kemp RA. Supported ultra small palladium on magnetic nanoparticles used as catalysts for suzuki cross-coupling and heck reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1917–1922.Google Scholar

  • [70]

    Laska U, Frost CG, Price GJ, Plucinski PK. Easy-separable magnetic nanoparticle-supported Pd catalysts: kinetics, stability and catalyst re-use. J. Catal. 2009, 268, 318–328.Google Scholar

  • [71]

    Costa NJS, Kiyohara PK, Monteiro AL, Coppel Y, Philippot K, Rossi LM. A single-step procedure for the preparation of palladium nanoparticles and a phosphine-functionalized support as catalyst for Suzuki cross-coupling reactions. J. Catal. 2010, 276, 382–389.Google Scholar

  • [72]

    Zhang Q, Su H, Luo J, Wei Y. “Click’’ magnetic nanoparticle-supported palladium catalyst: a phosphine-free, highly efficient and magnetically recoverable catalyst for Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reactions. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 235–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [73]

    Wang J, Xu B, Sun H, Song G. Palladium nanoparticles supported on functional ionic liquid modified magnetic nanoparticles as recyclable catalyst for room temperature Suzuki reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 238–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [74]

    Li R, Zhang P, Huang Y, Zhang P, Zhong H, Chen Q. Pd-Fe3O4@C hybrid nanoparticles: preparation, characterization, and their high catalytic activity toward Suzuki coupling reactions. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 22750–22755.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [75]

    Hu J, Wang Y, Han M, Zhou Y, Jiang X, Sun P. A facile preparation of palladium nanoparticles supported on magnetite/s-graphene and their catalytic application in Suzuki-Miyaura reaction. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 2332–2340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [76]

    Zong Y, Hu J, Sun P, Jiang X. Synthesis of biaryl derivatives via a magnetic Pd-NPs-catalyzed one-pot diazotization-cross-coupling reaction. Synlett. 2012, 2393–2396.Google Scholar

  • [77]

    Baruwati B, Guin D, Manorama SV. Pd on surface-modified NiFe2O4 nanoparticles: a magnetically recoverable catalyst for Suzuki and Heck reactions. Organic Lett. 2007, 9, 5377–5380.Google Scholar

  • [78]

    Pachon LD, Thathagar MB, Hartl F, Rothenberg G. Palladium-coated nickel nanoclusters: new Hiyama cross-coupling catalysts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 151–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [79]

    Park J, Kang E, Son SU, Park HM, Lee MK, Kim J, Kim KW, Noh HJ, Park JH, Bae CJ, Park JG, Hyeon T. Monodisperse nanoparticles of Ni and NiO: synthesis, characterization, self-assembled superlattices, and catalytic applications in the Suzuki coupling reaction. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 429–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [80]

    Zhang W, Qi HL, Li LS, Wang X, Chen J, Peng KS, Wang ZH. Hydrothermal Heck reaction catalyzed by Ni nanoparticles. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1194–1200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [81]

    Barber J, Tran PD. From natural to artificial photosynthesis. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2013, 10, 1–16.Google Scholar

  • [82]

    Tian C, Zhang Q, Wu A, Jiang M, Liang Z, Jiang B, Fu H. Cost-effective large-scale synthesis of ZnO photocatalyst with excellent performance for dye photodegradation. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 2858–2860.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [83]

    Lazar M, Varghese S, Nair S. Photocatalytic water treatment by titanium dioxide: recent updates. Catalysts 2012, 2, 572–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [84]

    Lewis NS, Nocera DG. Powering the planet: chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 15729–15735.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [85]

    Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38.Google Scholar

  • [86]

    Mills A, LeHunte S. An overview of semiconductor photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem. 1997, 108, 1–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [87]

    Linsebigler AL, Lu GQ, Yates JT. Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces – principles, mechanisms, and selected results. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 735–758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [88]

    Ni M, Leung MKH, Leung DYC, Sumathy K. A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2007, 11, 401–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [89]

    Beydoun D, Amal R, Low G, McEvoy S. Role of nanoparticles in photocatalysis. J. Nanopart. Res. 1999, 1, 439–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [90]

    Gonçalves RV, Migowski P, Wender H, Eberhardt D, Weibel DE, Sonaglio FvC, Zapata MJM, Dupont J, Feil AF, Teixeira SR. Ta2O5 nanotubes obtained by anodization: effect of thermal treatment on the photocatalytic activity for hydrogen production. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012, 116, 14022–14030.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [91]

    Kazuhiko M. Photocatalytic water splitting using semiconductor particles: history and recent developments. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2011, 12, 237–268.Google Scholar

  • [92]

    Fan Y, Li D, Deng M, Luo Y, Meng Q. An overview on water splitting photocatalysts. Front. Chem. China 2009, 4, 343–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [93]

    Hoffmann MR, Martin ST, Choi WY, Bahnemann DW. Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 69–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [94]

    Subramanian V, Wolf EE, Kamat PV. Catalysis with TiO2/gold nanocomposites. Effect of metal particle size on the Fermi level equilibration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4943–4950.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [95]

    Osterloh FE. Inorganic nanostructures for photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2294–2320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [96]

    Kudo A, Miseki Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 253–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [97]

    Gad-Allah TA, Kato S, Satokawa S, Kojima T. Role of core diameter and silica content in photocatalytic activity of TiO2/SiO2/Fe3O4 composite. Solid State Sci. 2007, 9, 737–743.Google Scholar

  • [98]

    Pang SC, Kho SY, Chin SF. Fabrication of magnetite/silica/titania core-shell nanoparticles. J. Nanomater. 2012, 6, 1–6.Google Scholar

  • [99]

    Ye M, Zhang Q, Hu Y, Ge J, Lu Z, He L, Chen Z, Yin Y. Magnetically recoverable core-shell nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6243–6250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [100]

    Wang CX, Yin LW, Zhang LY, Kang L, Wang XF, Gao R. Magnetic (gamma-Fe2O3@SiO2)(n)@TiO2 functional hybrid nanoparticles with actived photocatalytic ability. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 4008–4011.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [101]

    Kang YS, Risbud S, Rabolt JF, Stroeve P. Synthesis and characterization of nanometer-size Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 particles. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 2209–2211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [102]

    Belessi V, Lambropoulou D, Konstantinou I, Zboril R, Tucek J, Jancik D, Albanis T, Petridis D. Structure and photocatalytic performance of magnetically separable titania photocatalysts for the degradation of propachlor. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009, 87, 181–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [103]

    Zhou H, Zhang C, Wang X, Li H, Du Z. Fabrication of TiO2-coated magnetic nanoparticles on functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes and their photocatalytic activity. Synth. Metals 2011, 161, 2199–2205.Google Scholar

  • [104]

    He Q, Zhang Z, Xiong J, Xiong Y, Xiao H. A novel biomaterial – Fe3O4:TiO2 core-shell nano particle with magnetic performance and high visible light photocatalytic activity. Opt. Mater. 2008, 31, 380–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [105]

    Polshettiwar V, Varma RS. Nanoparticle-supported and magnetically recoverable ruthenium hydroxide catalyst: efficient hydration of nitriles to amides in aqueous medium. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1582–1586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [106]

    Abu-Reziq R, Alper H, Wang DS, Post ML. Metal supported on dendronized magnetic nanoparticles: highly selective hydroformylation catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5279–5282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [107]

    Polshettiwar V, Varma RS. Green chemistry by nano-catalysis. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 743–754.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [108]

    Polshettiwar V, Basset J-M, Astruc D. Editorial: manoscience makes catalysis greener. Chemsuschem 2012, 5, 6–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [109]

    Prasad AS, Satyanarayana B. Fe3O4 supported Pd(0) nanoparticles catalyzed alkoxycarbonylation of aryl halides. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2013, 370, 205–209.Google Scholar

  • [110]

    Wei S, Dong Z, Ma Z, Sun J, Ma J. Palladium supported on magnetic nanoparticles as recoverable catalyst for one-pot reductive amination of aldehydes with nitroarenes under ambient conditions. Catal. Commun. 2013, 30, 40–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Liane M. Rossi

Liane M. Rossi received her PhD in Inorganic Chemistry from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (Brazil) in 2001. After a 2-year postdoctoral stay at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) and a 1-year postdoctoral stay at University of New Orleans (USA), in 2004, she joined the Institute of Chemistry at University of São Paulo (Brazil), where she has been an Associate Professor since 2010. Her research interests include novel approaches for the synthesis of supported metal nanoparticles with controlled sizes and morphologies for applications in the field of catalysis and the development of magnetically recoverable catalysts to facilitate catalyst recovery and recycling in liquid-phase reactions.

Natália J.S. Costa

Natália J.S. Costa received her BS degree (2008) and PhD degree (2012) from the Institute of Chemistry at University of São Paulo. She is currently a postdoctoral researcher under the supervision of Prof. Liane M. Rossi. Her research interests include the development of ligand-assisted methods for the preparation of supported metal nanoparticles and the preparation of supported nanocatalysts through organometallic precursors.

Fernanda P. Silva

Fernanda P. Silva studied chemistry at the University of São Paulo (Brazil), where she also obtained her MSc degree in Chemistry in 2011. She is currently a PhD student in Prof. Rossi’s group at the Institute of Chemistry at University of São Paulo. Her current research interests include the development of magnetic supported nanocatalysts for oxidation of olefins and alcohols.

Renato V. Gonçalves

Renato V. Gonçalves received his PhD in Physics from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) in 2012, on the subject of semiconductors nanomaterials applied in photocatalysis. He recently joined the Institute of Chemistry at University of São Paulo as a postdoctoral researcher under the supervision of Prof. Liane M. Rossi. His research interests include the synthesis and characterization of metal nanoparticles and their application in conversion of carbon dioxide.


Corresponding author: Liane M. Rossi, Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, São Paulo, SP 05508-000, Brazil, Phone: +55 11 30912181


Received: 2013-04-25

Accepted: 2013-05-31

Published Online: 2013-07-02

Published in Print: 2013-10-01


Citation Information: Nanotechnology Reviews, Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages 597–614, ISSN (Online) 2191-9097, ISSN (Print) 2191-9089, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2013-0021.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Prakash B. Rathod, Sankararao Chappa, K. S. Ajish Kumar, Ashok K. Pandey, and Anjali A. Athawale
ChemistrySelect, 2019, Volume 4, Number 40, Page 11796
[2]
Davood Azarifar, Younes Abbasi, Mehdi Jaymand, Mohammad Ali Zolfigol, Masoumeh Ghaemi, and Omolbanin Badalkhani
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, 2019, Volume 895, Page 55
[3]
Nuno M.R. Martins, Armando J.L. Pombeiro, and Luísa M.D.R.S. Martins
Catalysis Communications, 2019, Volume 125, Page 15
[4]
Priti Mishra, Sulagna Patnaik, and Kulamani Parida
Catalysis Science & Technology, 2019, Volume 9, Number 4, Page 916
[6]
Davood Azarifar, Roshanak Asadpoor, Omolbanin Badalkhani, Mehdi Jaymand, Elham Tavakoli, and Mona Bazouleh
ChemistrySelect, 2018, Volume 3, Number 48, Page 13722
[7]
Najmieh Ahadi, Mohammad Ali Bodaghifard, and Akbar Mobinikhaledi
Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2018, Page e4738
[8]
Jiangjiexing Wu, Xiaoyu Wang, Quan Wang, Zhangping Lou, Sirong Li, Yunyao Zhu, Li Qin, and Hui Wei
Chemical Society Reviews, 2019
[9]
Mehtap Aygün, Thomas W. Chamberlain, Maria del Carmen Gimenez-Lopez, and Andrei N. Khlobystov
Advanced Functional Materials, 2018, Page 1802869
[10]
Ali Mansouri and Natalia Semagina
Catalysis Science & Technology, 2018, Volume 8, Number 9, Page 2323
[11]
Somayeh Ostovar, Pepijn Prinsen, Alfonso Yepez, Hamid Reza Shaterian, and Rafael Luque
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2018
[13]
Farhad Panahi, Esmaeil Niknam, Samira Sarikhani, Fatemeh Haghighi, and Ali Khalafi-Nezhad
New J. Chem., 2017
[16]
Seyed Jamal Tabatabaei Rezaei, Azin Shamseddin, Ali Ramazani, Asemeh Mashhadi Malekzadeh, and Pegah Azimzadeh Asiabi
Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2017, Volume 31, Number 9, Page e3707
[18]
Davood Azarifar, Masoumeh Ghaemi, Maryam Golbaghi, Roya Karamian, and Mostafa Asadbegy
RSC Adv., 2016, Volume 6, Number 94, Page 92028
[19]
Farhad Panahi, Soheila Khajeh Dangolani, and Ali Khalafi-Nezhad
ChemistrySelect, 2016, Volume 1, Number 13, Page 3541
[20]
Marina V. Kirillova, Carla I.M. Santos, Wenyu Wu, Yu Tang, and Alexander M. Kirillov
Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2017, Volume 426, Page 343
[23]
Liane M. Rossi, Natalia J. S. Costa, Fernanda P. Silva, and Renato V. Goncalves
ChemInform, 2014, Volume 45, Number 46, Page no
[25]
Katla Sai Krishna, Pilarisetty Tarakeshwar, Vladimiro Mujica, and Challa S. S. R. Kumar
Small, 2014, Volume 10, Number 5, Page 907

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in