Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Nanotechnology Reviews

Editor-in-Chief: Hui, David

Managing Editor: Skoryna, Juliusz

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 2.759

CiteScore 2018: 2.19

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.489
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.671

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 8, Issue 1


A critique on multi-jet electrospinning: State of the art and future outlook

Hosam El-Sayed
  • Corresponding author
  • Industrial Textile Research Division, National Research Centre, El-Behouth St., Dokki, Giza, Egypt
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Claudia Vineis
  • CNR-ISMAC, National Research Council of Italy-Institute for Macromolecular Studies, C. so G. Pella, 16-13900 Biella, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Alessio Varesano
  • CNR-ISMAC, National Research Council of Italy-Institute for Macromolecular Studies, C. so G. Pella, 16-13900 Biella, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Salwa Mowafi
  • Industrial Textile Research Division, National Research Centre, El-Behouth St., Dokki, Giza, Egypt
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Riccardo Andrea Carletto
  • CNR-ISMAC, National Research Council of Italy-Institute for Macromolecular Studies, C. so G. Pella, 16-13900 Biella, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Cinzia Tonetti
  • CNR-ISMAC, National Research Council of Italy-Institute for Macromolecular Studies, C. so G. Pella, 16-13900 Biella, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Marwa Abou Taleb
  • Industrial Textile Research Division, National Research Centre, El-Behouth St., Dokki, Giza, Egypt
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-11-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2019-0022


This review is devoted to discuss the unique characteristics of multi-jet electrospinning technique, compared to other spinning techniques, and its utilization in spinning of natural as well as synthetic polymers. The advantages and inadequacies of the current commercial chemical spinning methods; namely wet spinning, melt spinning, dry spinning, and electrospinning are discussed. The unconventional applications of electrospinning in textile and non-textile sectors are reported. Special emphasis is devoted to the theory and technology of the multijet electrospinning as well as its applications. The current status of multi-jet electrospining and future prospects are outlined. Using multi-jet electrospinning technique, various polymers have been electrospun into uniform blend nanofibrous mats with good dispersibility. In addition to the principle of multi-jet electro electrospinning, the different devices used for this technique are also highlighted.

Keywords: Multi-jet electrospinning; biopolymers; nanofibres; nonwoven mats

1 Introduction

Spinning is an art that has been utilized in formation of yarn by drawing out and twisting natural or synthetic fibers. Thousands of years ago, fibers were spun manually with simple tools as distaff and spindle. The spindle was the first tool used for spinning all the threads used for clothing and fabrics manufacture. In 1738 Lewis Paul was granted a patent for roller drafting spinning machinery [1]. Toward the end of the nineteenth century, the ring process was fairly well perfected, and its use was becoming standard throughout the world. Ring spinning is about 250% more productive than mule spinning and is simpler and less expensive to operate so; the mass production arose in the 18th century with the beginnings of the industrial revolution.

Yarns are usually spun from a various materials that could be natural fibers viz., animal and plant fibers, or synthetic ones.

2 Types of spinning

Spinning process is classified according to the fiber types which we want to process into: chemical spinning and mechanical spinning.

Mechanical spinning

Mechanical spinning is a multistep process in which fibers are spun into yarns physically. Viz., rotor, ring, friction, or self-twist spinning.

Chemical spinning

Making filament yarns from man-made fibers is feasible using chemical spinning operations. This is achieved by extruding the viscous polymer solution through a nozzle (spinneret). There are three main types of production processes to form synthetic fibers [2].

The wet-spinning process: in which solidification of the soluble polymer occurs after a counter current diffusion between the spinning dope and the coagulation bath.

The dry-spinning process: where the evaporation of the solvent contained in the spinning dope leads to solidification.

The melt-spinning process: where phase transformation is due to the solidification from a molten mass.

3 Different techniques of chemical spinning

3.1 Wet spinning technique

In this process a very viscous polymer solution is extruded through the small holes of a spinneret dipped in a liquid bath. Technological analysis of the wet spinning process is much more complicated than dry spinning where the spinning process is accompanied by chemical reaction. Solidification of the polymer occurs as a result of a diffusional exchange between the freshly prepared fluid filaments and this bath. During this process coagulation one or more of the bath components diffuse into the filament, while the solvent diffuses out of it [3]. The polymer precipitates or crystallizes as a consequence of this exchange, because it is rendered insoluble by chemical reaction of the polymer or by an excessive buildup of non-solvent or by both [4] (Figure 1).

Wet-spinning device [3]
Figure 1

Wet-spinning device [3]

Wet spinning technique is found to have the advantage of producing reelable fiber that can be drawn and tested for mechanical properties. Its main disadvantages are (a) the slow rate of processing, as the produced filaments need to be washed to remove impurities, and (b) low productivity. Polymers can be regenerated by wet spinning technique like, silk [5] and cellulose [6] by dissolution in ionic liquids, followed by spinning in a coagulating baths of methanol, acetonitrile, or water. Acrylic polymer can be spun by wet spinning technique by dissolving the polymer in dimethyl formamide which can be coagulated in water [4].

3.2 Melt spinning technique

Melt spinning is the most appropriate and economic process for polymer fiber manufacturing at industrial scales. Spinning of polyester, or any other molten polymers like nylon and polypropylene, begins upon cooling the molten filament once it is withdrawn from the spinneret. At the same time, the filament is drawn towards the take-up section and the resulting tension offers a stretching in the molten filament itself [7].

Because the apparent viscosity of the molten filament increases as it cools, most of the stretching takes place in a region relatively close to the spinneret hole, whereas most of the cooling takes place after leaving the hole as shown in Figure 2. The comparatively simple and easy processing is the most important advantage of melt spinning. However, this technique has some drawbacks; Viz. possible fiber breakdown, heterogeneous thickness of the filament, and limit to the fineness of fiber and spinneret clogging.

Melt-spinning process [8]
Figure 2

Melt-spinning process [8]

3.3 Dry spinning technique

In the process of dry spinning, the fiber structure is formed by forcing the polymer solution out through fine nozzle and then evaporating the solvent. Technological analysis of the dry spinning process is much more difficult than of melt spinning which is treated as a problem of structural formation in a one-component system. Unlike melt spinning, in both dry and wet spinning, the polymer dissolves in different solvents and the resulting solution or suspension is viscous spin dope [9]. This process mainly introduces another species, which is consequently removed, and therefore it is more expensive than conventional melt spinning processes. It is used in cases where the polymer may decompose thermally when melted or in cases where specific surface properties of the filaments are desired where melt spinning produces smooth surface filament and dry spinning produces rough surface filament. The rough surfaces may be necessary for better dyeing steps or for special yarn features (Figure 3).

Dry-spinning process [10]
Figure 3

Dry-spinning process [10]

4 Innovative processes for fiber manufacture

A number of processing techniques such as drawing [11], template synthesis [12, 13], phase separation [14], self-assembly [15, 16], electrospinning [17, 18] etc., have been used to prepare nanofibers in recent years. The drawing process is similar to dry spinning in fiber manufacture, as it can make very long single nanofibers. As per its name, the template synthesis uses templates of nanoporous membranes which make solid nanofibers (a fibril) or hollow shape (a tubule). The importance of this method arises from the fabrication of nanometer tubules and fibrils of various raw materials such as semiconductors, metals, and electrically conducting polymers. Unlike drawing process, this method cannot make one-by-one continuous nanofibers. The phase separation process consists of several steps; namely dissolution, gelation, extraction with various solvent, freeze-drying which leads to formation of porous nano-foam. The phase separation process is found to take a relatively long time to convert the polymer into the nano-porous foam. In self-assembly process, the pre-existing components are self-organized to the required forms and functions. Like the phase separation process, the self-assembly is a time-consuming process in spinning continuous polymer nanofibers. Electrospinning is a type of dry spinning technique where the solvent is evaporated under high voltage. Thus, the electrospinning process turns out to be the most developing process for mass production of one-by-one continuous nanofibers from different polymers.

5 Electrospinning and its applications

The process of polymer fiber formation within an electric field has been known since the 1930s. This technique was named electrostatic spinning or electro-spinning in the 1990s. Electro-spinning is the proper method to produce nanofibers [19]. Since 1980s and especially in recent years, the electrospinning process especially similar to that described by Baumgarten [20], has acquired more attention probably due to the excessive interest in nanotechnology, where ultrafine fibers for various polymers with submicrons or nanometer scale can be easily fabricated with this technique. A variety of polymers can be spun each from a specific solution and collected in the form of nonwoven mats. In addition, the ability to produce highly porous nano-fibrous membranes with structural integrity is also an attractive feature of electrospinning [21]. When the diameters of spun fibers are decreased from micro-scale (e.g. 10–100 μm) to submicro-scale or nano-scale (e.g. 10–100 × 10−3 μm), then the fibers exhibit new technically fascinating features; Viz. up to 100% increase in the surface area to volume ratio, enhanced superficial functions, improved mechanical performance, and high porosity. These outstanding properties make the polymer nanofibers to be optimal candidates for many important applications for example in medical applications [22] (viz., wound dressing) [23], membrane separation [24, 25, 26] filtration [25], composite reinforcement [27], scaffolding used in tissue engineering [28] and protective clothing [29].

Electrospinning works with both polymer solutions (solution electro-spinning) and molten polymers (meltelectrospinning).Melt electro-spinning currently seems to be less efficient and requires several additional pieces of equipment (e.g. heating devices, vacuum chamber, and higher voltage power supplies), although it would be more appealing for industrial production because of the absence of solvents [30]. Mowafi et al. have developed a non-woven keratin-based mats extracted from waste keratinous materials; namely wastes of combing process of coarse wool fleece and feather [31]. In another investigation, some biopolymers; such as keratin and cellulose in the nano-fiber form, were used successfully to purify water from heavy metal ions. Extraction of cellulose was carried out by cost-effective environmental friendly method from cotton stalks, banana leaves, and rice straw. Similar method was adopted to extract keratin from coarse wool. The said polymers were electro-sputtered on the surface of untreated viscose fabrics or polyester fabric pretreated with polyurethane [32].

Membranes of electrospun keratin/polyamide 6 blended nanofiber were prepared and used as adsorbents of Cu+2 ions. The adsorption tests showed that keratin-based nanofibers adsorb Cu2+ ions and the adsorption capacity increases as the specific surface area of the nanofiber membranes increase. The adsorption onto the keratin rich nanofibers depend on pH. The optimal pH was found to be above the isoelectric point of keratin [33].

Pure keratin nanofibers can be also electrospun from formic acid solution. The obtained membranes showed higher adsorption capacity and removal efficiency with respect to a wool fabric due to the high specific surface area of keratin nanofibers [34].

Electrospun keratin/polyamide 6 nanofibers were also used for water purification from chromium ions and air depuration from formaldehyde. Infrared analysis and viscosity suggested a negligible interaction between keratin and polyamide 6 despite the similar chemical structure characterized by amide bonds. However, all the blend solutions were suitable for electrospinning producing thin nanofibers with a mean diameter of ~150 nm. Keratin-based nanofibers demonstrated a good capacity to adsorb chromium ions from water. Moreover, keratin-based nanofibers showed a chromium adsorption capacity of one order of magnitude higher than that of the films with the same composition. Keratin-based nanofibers showed a good formaldehyde absorption capacity reducing airborne formaldehyde concentration up to 70% [35].

6 Device and theory

From 1934 to 1944, Formhals published a series of patents [36, 37, 38, 39, 40], describing an experimental setup for the production of polymer filaments using the electrostatic force. A polymer solution was subjected to an electric field between two electrodes of opposite polarity to produce filaments. One of the electrodes was placed into the solution and the other on a collector. Once the polymer left the spinneret, evaporation of the charged solution jets take place forming the fibers. The molecular mass and viscosity of the spinning polymer solution are the main parameters which assign the appropriate potential difference between the two electrodes. The distance between the spinneret and the collector is also an important factor where short distance caused the spun fibers to stick to the collecting device as well as to each other, due to incomplete solvent evaporation. There are three basic components to achieve the process: a high voltage supply, a needle of fine diameter, and a metal collector. In the electrospinning process, a high voltage power supply is used to make an electrically charged jet of polymer out of the needle. Within the distance between the needle and the collector, the polymer jet solidifies, and an interconnected web of very fine fibers is found [41]. Usually, the collector is earthed, as shown in Figure 4.

Nanofibers formation by electrospinning [41]
Figure 4

Nanofibers formation by electrospinning [41]

The charged polymer solution jet is unstable and undergoes elongation, which allows the fiber to become extremely long and thin. In case of melt polymers, solidification of the charged jet takes place while being in the air.

Up to our knowledge, around 50 polymeric materials have been efficaciously electrospun into nano-fibers of diameters in the range 3 nm - 1μm[42, 43]. Before elctrospinning, these polymers were solubilized in the respective appropriate solvents.

7 Multi-jet electrospinning

Electro-spun nanofibers have many potential applications as shown in Figure 5, and the production rate of a conventional electrospinning system is less than 10 g h−1 of nanofibers [44], depending on polymer concentration and process conditions (e.g. flow rate of solution). Multi-jet electrospinning systems are designed to increase both productivity and cover area for large scale nanofiber production.

Potential applications of electrospun polymer nanofibers.
Figure 5

Potential applications of electrospun polymer nanofibers.

It has been reported that, in multi-needles electrospinning can be used to prepare skin-core structures. Formation of nanofiber filaments included two processes: forming process of spun nanofiber filaments and post-drawing process. In the forming process of as-spun nanofiber filaments, when the auxiliary electrode was added, the electrostatic field interference between needles reduced, inducing the decrease of jet offsets and the enhancement of Taylor cone and jet stability, and nanofibers with skin-core structure were finally deposited on the bath in good condition [45].

Electrospun nanofibre jets can be obtained from either multi-nozzle electrospinning device or nozzleless electrospinnnig device. In other words, nanofibre mats can be produced using any of the aforementioned devices.

In our laboratories, we adopted a needleless electrospinning technique with a bottom up configuration. This technique is based on dipping a 30 cm wire with the electrospun polymer and subjecting the wire to a high voltage up to80 KV. The electrospun mat is collected on a nonwoven sheet of polyproplene with width 30cm (Figure 6).

Picture of needleless electro-spinning device at the Textile Research Division, National Research Centre (TRD-NRC) and the jets during the electro-spinning experiment (40 kV nozzles, 13 cm distance, polyamide 6, in a mixture of formic acid and acetic acid)
Figure 6

Picture of needleless electro-spinning device at the Textile Research Division, National Research Centre (TRD-NRC) and the jets during the electro-spinning experiment (40 kV nozzles, 13 cm distance, polyamide 6, in a mixture of formic acid and acetic acid)

Multi-jet electrospinning device affords the opportunity for electrospinning of multi-component polymers to obtain blend of nanofibrous mats of uniform thickness and adequate dispersibility. This approach also can be used to fabricate blend nanofibrous mats with multi-polymers which cannot be dissolved in the same solvent or kept in the same container [46]. CNR-ISMAC developed a multinozzle electrospinning plant with a bottom-up configuration. It consists of 31 to 62 nozzles and a 50-cm wide metal collector (Figure 7a) [47, 48]. The developed configurations produce overlapped deposition zones in order to have an even nanofiber deposition on the collector.

(a) Picture of 31-nozzle configuration plant at CNR-ISMAC Biella. (b) Picture of jet and whipping motion during a multi-nozzle electrospinning experiment (+35 kV nozzles, −20 kV collectors, 30 cm distance, 9 wt.% PEO solution in water).
Figure 7

(a) Picture of 31-nozzle configuration plant at CNR-ISMAC Biella. (b) Picture of jet and whipping motion during a multi-nozzle electrospinning experiment (+35 kV nozzles, −20 kV collectors, 30 cm distance, 9 wt.% PEO solution in water).

In multi-nozzle electrospinning, jet-jet repulsion may occur and can lead to a loss of nanofibers with a decrease in productivity [47], i.e. not all the solidified jets can be collected by the system. In the present plant, each electrospinning nozzle of plant produces an electrified jet. In order to tackle this effect, the metal collector is electrically charged with a polarity opposite to that of the spinneret and jets. In this way nanofibers gathering is more efficient and electrospinning is steady. Figure 7b shows the jets from the straight path to the whipping motion zones before reaching the negatively charged collector.

7.1 Different multi-jet devices

There are two main types of multi-jet electrospinning devices; namely nozzleless electrospinning and nozzles electrospinning. Different setups of these devices were designed by controlling the tips-to-collector distance and the applied voltage (working distance). Either the solution or the collector was electrically charged with positive or negative polarity. Also, varying the number of nozzles or the shape of the multi-jet electrospinning heads were designed for different applications. Some samples of the designed devices for different purposes and applications are presented below.

  1. A nozzleless electrospinning device was mainly developed for increasing the yield of nano-fibrous mats (Figure 8) [49].

  2. As it was mentioned, the yield of conventional electrospinning process is low compared to the applications. So, a multi-jet electrospinning system was designed to increase the productivity (Figure 9) [47].

  3. A device was designed to produce mats of blend nano-fibers with multi-component polymers. The movable multi-jet and movable earthed tubular layer is adopted to obtain a uniform thickness of blend nanofibrous mats with adequate dispersibility of multi-component as in (Figure 10) [46].

  4. A multi-jet electrospinning device was designed either with movable or immovable collector. The rotatable multi-jet and movable earthed tubular layer is adopted to obtain a uniform thickness of blend nanofibrous mats with adequate dispersibility of multi-component [50].

Schematics diagram of the nozzleless electrospinning setup [© 2016 Sasithorn N, Martinová L, Horáková J, Mongkholrattanasit R] [49].
Figure 8

Schematics diagram of the nozzleless electrospinning setup [© 2016 Sasithorn N, Martinová L, Horáková J, Mongkholrattanasit R] [49].

Scheme of multi-jet electrospinning setups: (a) electrically charged solution and grounded collector, (b) electrically charged collector and grounded solution, and (c) electrically charged solution and grounded collector with secondary electrode [47].
Figure 9

Scheme of multi-jet electrospinning setups: (a) electrically charged solution and grounded collector, (b) electrically charged collector and grounded solution, and (c) electrically charged solution and grounded collector with secondary electrode [47].

Scheme of the multi-jet with multi-nozzles [46].
Figure 10

Scheme of the multi-jet with multi-nozzles [46].

From the previous data about the different types of multi-jet devices, it can be noticed that:

Each device was built to be used in the production of nanofibres of specific properties. Also, the type of device may differ according to the type of spun polymer and its properties viz., molecular weight, viscosity and conductivity. So, it would be more p referable to use nozzleless multijet electrospinning technique for the spinning of highly viscous polymers to avoid the clogging of the needles in the multi-nozzle systems. On the other hand, it is more convenient to use the multi-nozzle system for the spinning of more than one polymer that could be soluble in different media.

8 Different substrates spun by different spinning techniques

  1. In 1968, fiber formation of gelled solution of acrylic polymer was performed by wet spinning method. This process was called coagulation process, where diffusional interchange between the freshly prepared fluid filaments and the liquid bath results in solidification of the polymer [4].

  2. In 1971, fibers from dimethylformamide (DMF) solution of acrylic resin were spun by electrostatic means [20].

  3. In 2001, fiber mats and yarns were electrospun from polyethylene oxide which are of interest for a variety of applications including semipermeable membranes, filters...etc [17].

  4. In 2004, a biodegradable blended nanofibrous mat composed of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and cellulose acetate (CA) was prepared by multi-jet electrospinning [46].

  5. In 2006, polyamide-6 fibers with average diameters below 500 nm were electrospun on conventional air filter media using a multi-nozzle head [51].

  6. Since 2007, wool keratin/poly (ethylene oxide) nanofibers were electrospun from aqueous solutions of polymer blends under different operating conditions [19, 52].

  7. In 2008, novel cellulose fibers (Biocelsol) were spun by wet spinning technique from alkaline solution. The fibers were spun into a coagulating bath containing sulphuric acid and sodium sulphate [53].

  8. In 2008, a direct approach to fabricate ceramic fibres of hydrous alumina from alkoxide-based precursors. These fibres were made for various applications that require faster electrospinning rates and lack of impurities from additives. Alkoxide-based solutions formed the backbone of these fibes, where the utilization of the hydrolysis and condensation kinetics allowed for stabilization of the jetn and hence continous fibre formation [54].

  9. In 2011, mats of random patterns of nano-filaments, from electrospun keratin/polyamide 6 blends in formic acid, were utilized as adsorbents of Cu2+ ions [33, 34].

  10. In 2012, activated carbon fibre webs (ACF) are prepared from electrospun PAN by air-oxidation stabilization and CO2-activation at different temperatures [55].

  11. In 2013, fabrication and characterization of silk sericin (SS) nanofibers via electrospinning was made [56] and silk fibroin (SF) [57].

  12. In 2016, wet spinning and drawing of human recombinant collagen which lead to significant progress in the field of advanced bio textile-based tissue engineering and regenerative medicine [58].

  13. In 2017, electrospinning was used for the first time to produce nanofibers including a host/guest complex in a protein-based matrix. A lipid binding protein was the host and Irgasan, an insoluble biocide molecule,was bound within the protein internal cavity as the guest [59].

Future outlook

Electrospinning technique can be utilized to produce extremely fine fibers in the form of a non-woven mat. It has been suggested that nanofibers have better mechanical properties than microfibers. So, high productivity using the multi-jet systems is required for practical applications of polymer nanofibers where most of these applications are only considered as future prospect. The possibility of blending more than biopolymer through multi-jet electrospinning would produce nanofibers exhibiting tailored properties for certain desired future applications.

(a-h) show the scanning electron micrographs of some electro-spun polymers.
Figure 11

(a-h) show the scanning electron micrographs of some electro-spun polymers.

The huge surface area of the electrospun nanofibers would produce an appropriate candidate for many applications; filtration for instance. Multi-jet electrospun polymer mats can be utilized in the following possible future applications: a) capture of heavy metal ions from highly contaminated effluents, b) absorption of dyes from dye-house drainage water. Within the frame of bio-medical applications; peculiar properties of nanofibrous materials such as high surface to volume ratio and high porosity, make them promising candidates for several biomedical applications, such as cell-growth scaffolds,wound dressing and drug delivery systems.


The authors are indebted to the National Research Centre (NRC) of Egypt, and the National Research Council (CNR) of Italy for their financial support through the Joint Bilateral Agreement CNR/NRC (Biennial Programme 2018-2019), project ID: IT II 031001.


  • [1]

    Rusca R.A., Brown R.A., Some Historical and Technical Aspects of Spinning, Text. Res. J., 1956, 26, 460-469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2]

    Griskey R.G., Polymer Process Engineering, Chapman & Hall, New-York, 1995, Chapter 5, 478. Google Scholar

  • [3]

    Weisser P., Barbier G., Richard C., Drean J.Y., Characterization of the Coagulation Process: Wet-Spinning Tool Development and Void Fraction Evaluation, Text. Res. J., 2015, 86, 1210-1219. Google Scholar

  • [4]

    Paul D. R., Diffusion During the Coagulation Step of Wet Spinning, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1968, 12, 383 - 402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    Phillips D.M., Drummy L.F., Naik R.R., De Long H.C., Fox D.M., Trulovec P.C., Mantz R.A., Regenerated Silk Fiber Wet Spinning From an Ionic Liquid Solution, J. Mat. Chem., 2005, 15, 42064208. Google Scholar

  • [6]

    Swatloski R.P., Spear S.K., Holbrey J.D., Rodgers R.D., Dissolution of Celluosewith Ionic Liquids, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 4974-4975. CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [7]

    Wente V.A., Superfine Thermoplastic Fibers, Ind. Eng. Chem., 1956, 48, 1342-1346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8]

    Pötschke P., Brünig H., Janke A., Fischer D., Jehnichen D., Orientation of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes in Composites with Polycarbonate by Melt Spinning, Polym. J., 2005, 46, 10355 - 10363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Takajima T., Kajiwara K., McIntyre J.E., Advanced Fiber Spinning Technology, Chapter 1. Fundamentals of Spinning. 1994, p. 8. Google Scholar

  • [10]

    WeiW., Zhang Y., Zhao Y., Luo J., Shao H., Hu X., Bio-Inspired Capillary Dry Spinning of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Aqueous Solution, Mater. Sci. & Eng. C., 2011, 31, 1602-1608. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Ondarcuhu T., Joachim C., Drawing a Single Nanofibre over Hundreds of Microns, Euro. Phys. Lett., 1998, 42, 210-220. Google Scholar

  • [12]

    Feng L., Li S., Li H., Zhai J., Song Y., Jiang L., Zhu D., Super-Hydrophobic Surface of Aligned Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1221-1223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    Martin C.R., Membrane-Based Synthesis of Nanomaterials, Chem. Mater., 1996, 8, 1739-1746 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14]

    Ma P.X., Zhang R., Synthetic Nano-Scale Fibrous Extracellular Matrix, J. Biomed. Mat. Res., 1999, 46, 60-72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15]

    Liu G.J., Ding J.F., Qiao L.J., Guo A., Dymov B.P., Gleeson J.T., Hashimoto T., Saijo K., Polystyrene-Block-Poly (2-Cinnamoylethyl Methacrylate) Nanofibers-Preparation, Characterization, and Liquid Crystalline Properties, Chem-A. European. J., 1999, 5, 2740-2749. Google Scholar

  • [16]

    Whitesides G.M., Grzybowski B., Self-Assembly at all Scales, Science., 2002, 295, 2418-2421. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17]

    Deitzel J.M., Kleinmeyer J., Hirvonen J.K., Beck T.N., Controlled Deposition of Electrospun Poly (Ethylene Oxide) Fibers, Polymer., 2001, 42, 8163-8170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18]

    Fong H., Reneker D.H., Electrospinning and Formation of Nanofibers, Salem D.R., editor; Structure Formation in Polymeric Fibers, Munich: Hanser., 2001, 225-246. Google Scholar

  • [19]

    Aluigi A., Varesano A., Montarsolo A., Vineis C., Ferrero F., Mazzuchetti G., Tonin C., Electrospinning of Keratin/Poly(ethylene oxide) Blend Nanofibers, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2007,104, 863-870. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20]

    Baumgarten P.K., Electrostatic Spinning of Acrylic Microfibers, J. Coll. Int. Sci., 1971, 36, 71-79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21]

    Thorvaldsson A., Stenhamre H., Gatenholm P., Walkenström P., Electrospinning of Highly Porous Scaffolds for Cartilage Regeneration, Biomacromol., 2008, 9, 1044-1049. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22]

    Al-Enizi A.M., Zagho M.M., Elzatahry A.A., Polymer-Based Electrospun Nanofibers for Biomedical Applications, Nanomater., 2018, 8, 259-281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23]

    Uppal R., Ramaswamy G.N., Arnold C., Goodband R., Wang Y.J., Hyaluronic Acid Nanofiber Wound Dressing-Production, Characterization, and In Vivo Behavior, Biomed. Mater. Res. B: Appl. Biomater., 2011, 97B, 20-29. Google Scholar

  • [24]

    Shin C., Chase G.G., Reneker D.H., The Effect of Nanofibers on Liquid-Liquid Coalescence Filters Performance, AICHE. J., 2005, 51, 3109-3113 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25]

    Gopal R., Kaur S., Ma Z., Chan C., Ramakrishna S., Matsuura T., Electrospun Nanofibrous Filtration Membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 2006, 281, 581-586. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26]

    Gibson P., Schreuder-Gibson H., Rivin D., Transport Properties of Porous Membranes Based on Electrospun Nanofibers, Colloids. Surf. A Physico. Chem. Eng. Asp., 2001,187, 469-481. Google Scholar

  • [27]

    Bhatnagar A., Sain M., Processing of Cellulose Nanofiber-Reinforced Composites, J. Rein. Plast. & Compos., 2005, 24, 1259-1268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28]

    Min B.M., Lee G., Kim S.H., Nam Y.S., Lee T.S., Park W.H., Electro-spinning of Silk Fibroin Nanofibers and Its Effect on the Adhesion and Spreading of Normal Human Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts In Vitro, Biomat., 2004, 25, 1289-1297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29]

    Lee S., Obendorf S.K., Use of Electrospun Nanofiber Web for Protective Textile Materials as Barriers to Liquid Penetration, Text. Res. J., 2007, 77, 696-702. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30]

    Varesano A., Rombaldoni F., Mazzuchetti G., Tonina C., Comottob R., Multi-jet Nozzle Electrospinning on Textile Substrates: Observations on Process and Nanofibre Mat Deposition, Polym. Int., 2010, 59, 1606-1615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31]

    Mowafi S., AbouTaleb M., Abou El-Kheir A., El-Sayed H., Electrospun Keratin/Polyvinyl Acohol Regenerated Fibres Part 1: Preliminary Study, J. Nat. Fib., 2013,10, 341-352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32]

    El-Sayed H., El-Gabry L., Ibrahim H.S., El-Sayed A.A., Abou Taleb E.M., Ammar N.S., Salama M., Abou El-Kheir A., Mowafi S., AbouTaleb M., Treatment of Selected Man-made Fabrics with biopolymers and Their Utilization in Removal of Copper II Cations from Industrial Wastewater, Proc. of the 9th Aachen Dresden Int. Textile Conf., Aachen, German., 2015, Nov 26-27. Google Scholar

  • [33]

    Aluigi A., Tonetti C., Vineis C., Tonin C., Mazzuchetti G., Adsorption of Copper (II) Ions by Keratin/PA6 Blend Nanofibres, Europ. Polym. J., 2011, 47, 1756-1764. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34]

    Aluigi A., Tonetti C., Vineis C., Tonin C., Casasola R., Ferrero F.J., Wool Keratin Nanofibres for Copper(II) Adsorption, Biobased Mater. Bioenergy., 2012, 6, 1-7. Google Scholar

  • [35]

    Aluigi A., Vineis C., Tonin C., Tonetti C., Varesano A.,Mazzuchetti G., Wool Keratin-Based Nanofibres for Active Filtration of Air and Water, J. Biobased. Mater. Bioenergy., 2009, 3, 1-9 Google Scholar

  • [36]

    Formhals A. US patent 1934, 1,975,504. 

  • [37]

    Formhals A. US patent 1939, 2,160,962. 

  • [38]

    Formhals A. US patent, 1940, 2,187,306. 

  • [39]

    Formhals A. US patent, 1943, 2,323,025. 

  • [40]

    Formhals A. US patent, 1944, 2,349,950. 

  • [41]

    Huang Z.M., Zhang Y.Z., Kotaki M., Ramakrishn S., Review on Polymer Nanofibers by Electrospinning and Their Applications in Nanocomposites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2003, 63, 2223-2253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [42]

    Ramirez D.S., Carletto R.A., Giachet F.T., Keratin Processing. In Keratin as a Protein Biopolymer, Springer, Cham., 2019, 77-121. Google Scholar

  • [43]

    Zhong C., Cooper A., Kapetanovic A., Fang Z., Zhanga M., Rolandi M., A Facile Bottom-Up Route to Self-Assembled Biogenic Chitin Nanofibers, Soft Matter., 2010, 6, 5298-5301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [44]

    Tsai P.P., Schreuder-Gibson H., Gibson P., Different Electrostatic Methods for Making Electret Filters, J. Electrostat., 2002, 54, 333-341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [45]

    Tian L., Yan T., Li J., Pan Z., Novel Aspects of Nanofibers, Chapter 2: Nanofiber Filaments Fabricated by a Liquid-Bath Electrospinning Method. Edited by Lin T., Intech. Open Ltd, London, UK, 2018. Google Scholar

  • [46]

    Ding B., Kimura E., Sato T., Fujita S., Shiratori S., Fabrication of Blend Biodegradable Nanofibrous Nonwoven Mats Via Multi-Jet Electrospinning, Polym. J., 2004, 45, 1895-1902. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [47]

    Varesano A., Carletto R.A., Mazzuchetti G., Experimental Investigations on the Multi-Jet Electrospinning Process, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2009, 209, 5178-5185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [48]

    Varesano A., Rombaldoni F., Mazzuchetti G., Tonin C., Comotto R., Multi-jet Nozzle Electrospinning On Textile Substrates: Observations On Process and Nanofibremat Deposition, Polym. Int., 2010, 59, 1606-1615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [49]

    Sasithorn N., Martinová L., Horáková J., Mongkholrattanasit R., Fabrication of Silk Fibroin Nanofibres by Needleless Electrospinning. In Electrospinning-Material, Techniques, and Biomedical Applications, InTech., 2016, 95-113. Google Scholar

  • [50]

    Tomaszewski W., Szadkowski M., Investigation of Electrospinning with the Use of a Multi-jet Electrospinning Head, Fibres. Text. East. Eur., 2005, 52, 22-26. Google Scholar

  • [51]

    Li L., Frey M.W., Green T.B., Modification of Air Filter Media with Nylon-6 Nanofibers, J. Eng. Fib. Fab., 2006, 1, 1-23. Google Scholar

  • [52]

    Aluigi A., Vineis C., Varesano A.,Mazzuchetti G., Ferrero F., Tonin C., Structure and Properties of Keratin/PEO Blend Nanofibres, Eur. Polym. J., 2008, 44, 2465-2475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [53]

    Vehviläinen M., Kamppuri T., Rom M., Janicki J., Ciechańska D., Grönqvist S., Siika-Aho M., Christoffersson K.E., Nousiainen P., Effect of Wet Spinning Parameters on The Properties of Novel Cellulosic Fibres, Cellulose., 2008, 15,671-680. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [54]

    Maneeratana V., Sigmund W.M., Continuous Hollow Alumina Gel Fibres by Direct Electrospinnig of An Alkoxide-Based Precursor, Chem. Eng. J., 2008,137, 137-143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [55]

    Wang G., Pan C., Wang L., Dong Q., Yu C., Zhao Z., Qiu J., Activated Carbon Nanofibre Webs Made by Electrospinning for Capacitive Deionization, Electrochimica Acta., 2012, 69, 65-70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [56]

    Khan M.M., Tsukada M., Zhang X., Morikawa H., Preparation and Characterization of Electrospun Nanofibers Based on Silk Sericin Powders, J. Mater. Sci., 2013, 48, 3731-3736. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [57]

    Tanha N.R., Nouri M., An Experimental Study On The Coaxial Electrospinning of Silk Fibroin/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)- Salicylic Acid Core-Shell Nanofibers and Process Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology, J. Indust. Text., 2018, 48(5), 884-903. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [58]

    Yaari A., Schilt Y., Tamburu C., Raviv U., Shoseyovt O., Wet Spinning and Drawing of Human Recombinant Collagen, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2016, 2, 349-360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [59]

    Tomaselli S., Ramirez D.S., Carletto R.A., Varesano A., Vineis C., Zanzoni S., Molinari H., Ragona L., Electrospun Lipid Binding Proteins Composite Nanofibers with Antibacterial Properties, Macromol Biosci., 2017,17, 1-6. Google Scholar

  • [60]

    El-Sayed H., Vineis C., Abou Taleb M., Varesano A., Mowafi S., Carletto R.A., (un-published data)

  • [61]

    Aluigi A., Varesano A., Vineis C., Rio A.D., Electrospinning of Immiscible Systems: The Wool Keratin/Polyamide-6 Case Study, Mater. Desig., 2017, 127, 144-153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2019-01-29

Accepted: 2019-07-01

Published Online: 2019-11-12

Citation Information: Nanotechnology Reviews, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 236–245, ISSN (Online) 2191-9097, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2019-0022.

Export Citation

© 2019 H. El-Sayed et al., published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in