Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.674
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.854

CiteScore 2018: 0.84

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.318
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.518

Online
ISSN
1897-3191
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 44, Issue 4

Issues

Are beetles good indicators of insect diversity in freshwater lakes?

Joanna Pakulnicka
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Edyta Buczyńska
  • Department of Zoology, Animal Ecology and Wild Life Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-033 Lublin, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Paweł Buczyński
  • Department of Zoology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, ul. Akademicka 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Stanisław Czachorowski
  • Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Alicja Kurzątkowska
  • Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Krzysztof Lewandowski
  • Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Robert Stryjecki
  • Department of Zoology, Animal Ecology and Wild Life Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-033 Lublin, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Anna Frelik
  • Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-12-09 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ohs-2015-0046

Abstract

The study verifies the usefulness of aquatic beetles as an indicator of biodiversity of a simple ecological system. Detailed analyses were carried out at the elementary level for the purpose of determining the significance of correlations between the biodiversity of Coleoptera and other groups of aquatic insects in single samples. The relation of selected taxa to selected habitats of the lake Wukśniki (north-eastern Poland) was also investigated. Moreover, the possibility of application of biodiversity surrogates, i.e. higher taxonomic units (genera and orders), in the determination of biodiversity was examined. A significant high correlation was determined between Coleoptera and the total remaining taxa (RR - Remaining Richness) in samples collected in the entire lake. The correlation has the highest value at the species level. The complementarity analysis reveals that the percentage contribution of Coleoptera in the overall biodiversity of the lake is similarly high at the species and genus level, and substantially lower at the family level. In accordance with the hypothesis, aquatic beetles can be used as indicators of the overall biodiversity of insects in the ecosystem of a mesotrophic lake. Biodiversity surrogates, i.e. higher taxonomic units (genera and families), can be applied instead of the species level.

Keywords: Coleoptera; macroinvertebrates; lake; biodiversity indicators; surrogates

References

  • Bernard, R., Buczyński, P. & Tończyk, G. (2002). Present state, threats and conservation of dragonflies (Odonata) in Poland. Nat Conserv 59:53-71.Google Scholar

  • Biesiadka, E. (1980). Water beetles of the eutrophic lake Zbęchy (Leszno voiv.). Pol. Ecol. Stud. 6: 263-275.Google Scholar

  • Biesiadka, E., Kowalik, W. (1991). Water mites (Hydracarina) as indicators of trophy and pollution in lakes Pp., In Modern Acarology. Volume 1. (F Dusbabek & V. Bukva, eds .). Academia, Prague, Czechoslovakia, 475-481.Google Scholar

  • Bosi, G. (2001). Abundance, diversity and seasonal succession of dytiscid and noterid beetles (Coleoptera: Adephaga) in two marshes of the Eastern Po Plain (Italy). Hydrobiologia 459:1-7. doi: 10.1023/A:1012594615880.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Briers, R.A. & Biggs, J. (2003). Indicator taxa for the conservation of pond invertebrate diversity. Aquat Conserv Marine Freshwater Ecosyst 13: 323-330. doi: 10.1002/aqc.576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brooks, M., Balmford, A., Burgess, N., Fjeldsa, J., Hansen, L.A., Moore, J., Rahbek, C. & Williams, P. (2001). Toward a blueprint for conservation in Africa. BioSci 51: 613-624. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0613:TABFCI]2.0.CO;2.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caro, T.M. & O’Doherty, G. (1999). On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 13: 805-814. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98338.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ciecierska, H., Boroń, A. & Cichocka, M. (2008). Jezioro Wukśniki. In: Hołdyński C, Krupa M (eds.) Obszary Natura 2000 w województwie warmińsko-mazurskim. Mantis, Olsztyn, pp 164-166.Google Scholar

  • Clausen, S.E. (1998). Applied correspondence analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar

  • Czachorowski, S. (1998). Chruściki (Trichoptera) jezior Polski - charakterystyka rozmieszczenia larw. Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Pedagogicznej w Olsztynie, OlsztynGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, J.A., Rolls, S.W. & Balla, S.A. (1987). The role of the Odonata and aquatic Coleoptera as indicators of environmental quality in wetlands. In: Majer, J.D (Ed) The Role of in Invertebrates Conservation and Biological Survey. Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management, Perth, pp 31-42.Google Scholar

  • Eyre, M.D., Foster, G.N. & Foster, A.P.(1992). Factors affecting the distribution of water beetle species assemblages in drains of eastern England. J Appl Entomol 109:217-225. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1990.tb00043.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frelik, A., Pakulnicka, J. (2015). Relations between the structure of benthic macro-invertebrates and the composition of adult water beetle diets from the Dytisciae family. Environ. Entomol. 44(5): 1348-1357. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvv113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Foster, G.N. & Eyre, M.D. (1992). Classification Ranking of Water Beetle Communities. UK Nature Conservation: 1. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK Google Scholar

  • Foster, G.N., Foster, A.P., Eyre, M.D. & Bilton, D.T. (1990). Classification of water beetle assemblages in arable fenland and ranking of sites in relation to conservation value. Freshwater Biol 22:343-354. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1989. tb01109.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heino J. (2002) Concordance of species richness patterns among multiple freshwater taxa: a regional perspective. Biodiv Conserv 11:137-147. doi: 10.1023/A:1014075901605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heino, J. (2010). Are indicator groups and cross-taxon congruence useful for predicting biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems? Ecol Indic 10:112-117. doi:10.1016/j. ecolind.2009.04.013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heino, J., Paavola, R., Virtanen, R. & Muotka, T. (2005). Searching for biodiversity indicators in running waters: do bryophytes, macroinvertebrates, and fish show congruent diversity patterns? Biodiv Conserv 14:415-428. doi:10.1016/j. ecolind.2009.04.013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hornung, J.P. & Rice, C.L. (2003). Odonata and wetland quality in southern Alberta, Canada: a preliminary study. Odonatologica 32:119-129.Google Scholar

  • Humphries, C.J., Williams, P.H. & Vane-Wright, R.I. (1995). Measuring biodiversity value for conservation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 26:93-111. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.000521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jurkiewicz-Karnkowska, E. (2006). Communities of aquatic molluscs in floodplain water bodies of lowland river (Bug river, East Poland). Pol J Ecol 54: 253-266.Google Scholar

  • Jurkiewicz-Karnkowska, E. (2011). Effect of habitat conditions on the diversity and abundance of molluscs in floodplain water bodies of different permanence of flooding. Pol J Ecol 59: 165-178.Google Scholar

  • Kati, V., Devillers, P., Dufrene, M., Legakis, A., Vokou, D. & Lebrun, P. (2004). Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at a local scale. Conserv Biol 18:667-675. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00465.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kirkpatrick, J.B. (1983). An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol Conserv 25:127-134. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(83)90056-3.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klecka, J., Boukal, D.S. (2012). Who Eats Whom in a Pool? A Comparative Study of Prey Selectivity by Predatory Aquatic Insects. PLoS ONE 7:e37741. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0037741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kurzątkowska, A., Zawal, A. (2007). Water Bugs (Heteroptera) in the nature reserve “Szare Lake” and its buffer zone. Parki nar. Rez. Przyr. 26(4): 93 - 104.Google Scholar

  • Lee Foote, A. & Rice Hornung, C.L. (2005). Odonates as biological indicators of grazing effects of Canadian praire wetland. Ecol Entomol 30: 273-283. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00701.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lenda, M., Skorka, P., Moron, D., Rosin, Z.M. & Tryjanowski, P. (2012). The importance of the gravel excavation industry for the conservation of grassland butterflies. Biol Conserv 148:180-190. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Margules, C.R. & Pressey, R.L. (2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243-253. doi:10.1038/35012251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Menetrey, N., Sager, L., Oertli, B. &, Lachavanne, J.B. (2005). Looking for metrics to assess the trophic state of ponds. Macroinvertebrates and amphibians. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwater Ecosyst 15:653-664. doi: 10.1002/aqc.746.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moore, J.L., Balmford, A., Brooks, T., Burgess, N.D., Hansen, L.A., Rahbek, C. & Williams, P.H. (2003). Performance of sub-Saharan vertebrates as indicator groups for identifying priority areas for conservation. Conserv Biol 17:207-218. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01126.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Da Fonseca, G.A.B. & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853-858. doi:10.1038/35002501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Noss, R.F. (1990). Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 12:822-835. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Obolewski, K., Glińska-Lewczuk, K. & Kobus, S. (2009). Effect of hydrological connectivity on the molluscan community structure in oxbow lakes of the Łyna River. Oceanol Hydrobiol St 38:75-88. doi: 10.2478/v10009-009-0045-1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ohba, S. (2009a). Feeding habits of the diving beetle larvae, Cybister brevis Aube (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) in Japanese wetlands. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 44 (3): 447-453Google Scholar

  • Ohba, S. (2009b). Ontogenetic Dietary Shift in the Larvae of Cybister japonicus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) in Japanese Rice Fields. Environ. Entomol. 38(3): 856-860Google Scholar

  • Ohba, S. & Inatani, Y. (2012). Feeding Preferences of the Endangered Diving Beetle Cybister tripunctatus orientalis Gschwendtner (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche: 1-3.Google Scholar

  • Pakulnicka, J. & Bartnik, W. (1999). Changes in the fauna of aquatic beetles (Coleoptera aquatica) in Lake Luterskie (1981-1993). Fragm Faun 42: 71-93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pakulnicka, J., Gorski, A. & Bielecki, A. (2015). Environmental factors associated with biodiversity and the occurrence of rare, threatened, thermophilous species of aquatic beetles in the anthropogenic ponds of the Masurian Lake District. Biodiv Conserv. 24: 429-445. doi: 10.1007/s10531-014-0774-7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pakulnicka, J., Górski, A., Bielecki, A., Buczyński, P., Tończyk, G. & Cichocka, J.M. (2013). Relationships within aquatic beetle (Coleoptera) communities in the light of ecological theories. Fundam Appl Limnol 183:249-258. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/1863-9135/2013/0413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pakulnicka, J. & Nowakowski, J.J. (2012). The effect of hydrological connectivity on water beetles fauna in water bodies within the floodplain of a lowland river (Neman river, Belarus). Oceanol Hydrobiol St 41: 7-17. doi: 10.2478/ s13545-012-0012-4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pakulnicka. J. & Zawal, A. (2007). Chrząszcze wodne (Coleoptera) rezerwatu jezioro Szare i jego otuliny. Parki Nar Rez Przyr 26: 121-133.Google Scholar

  • Paszkowski, C.A. & Tonn, W.M. (2000). Community concordance between the fish and aquatic birds of lakes in northern Alberta: the relative importance of environmental and biotic factors. Freshwater Biol 43: 421-437. doi: 10.2478/ s13545-012-0012-4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearson, D.L. (1994). Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond (B) 345: 75-79. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0088.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pressey, R.L., Humphries, C.J., Margules, C.R., Vane-Wright, R.I. & Williams, P.H. (1993). Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol Evol 8: 124-128. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(93)90023-I .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reyers, B. & van Jaarsveld, A.S. (2000). Assessment techniques for biodiversity surrogates. S Afr J Sci 96: 406-408.Google Scholar

  • Ricketts, T.H., Dinerstein, E., Olson, D.M. & Loucks, C. (1999). Who’s where in North America? Patterns of species richness and the utility of indicator taxa for conservation. BioSci 49: 369-381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sahlén, G. & Ekestubbe, K. (2001). Identification of dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of general species richness in boreal forest lakes. Biodiv Conserv 10: 673-690. doi:10.1023/A:1016681524097.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sánchez-Fernández, D., Abellan, P., Mellado, A., Velasco, J. & Millán, A. (2006). Are water beetles good indicators of biodiversity in Mediterranean aquatic ecosystems? The case of the Segura river basin (SE Spain). Biodiv Conserv 15: 4507-4520. doi 10.1007/s10531-005-5101-x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sauberer, N., Zulka, K.P., Abensperg-Traun, M., Berg, H.M., Bieringer, G., Milasowszky, N., Moser, D., Plutzar, C., Pollheimer, M., Storch, C., Tröstl, R., Zechmeister, H. & Grabherr, G.( 2004,) Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria. Biol Conserv 117: 181-190. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00291-X.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sebastiao, H. & Grelle, E.V. (2009). Taxon surrogates among Amazonian mammals: Can total species richness be predicted by single orders? Ecol Indic 9: 160-166. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.03.002.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shaalan, E.A. & Canyon, D.V. (2009). Aquatic insect predators and mosquito control. Trop Bio-med 26: 223-261. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2987/8756-971X(2007)23[110:AIAPO M]2.0.CO;2.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995). Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edition. WH Freeman, New York. Google Scholar

  • Usseglio-Polatera, P., Bournaud, M, & Tachet, H. (2000). Biological and ecological traits of benthic freshwater macroinvertebrates: relationships and definition of groups with similar traits. Freshw Biol 43: 175-205. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00535.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wendzonka, J. (2004). Ważki (Odonata) kaszubskich jezior lobeliowych. Parki Nar Rez Przyr 23: 395-410.Google Scholar

  • Williams, D.D. (1996). Environmental constraints in temporary fresh waters and their consequences for the insect fauna. J N Am Benthol Soc 15: 634-650.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, P., Faith, D., Manne, L., Sechrest, W. & Prestone, C. (2006). Complementarity analysis: Mapping the performance of surrogates for biodiversity. Biol Conserv 128:253-264. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.047.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, P.H. (1996). Measuring biodiversity value. World Conserv 1:12-14. Winfield Fairchild, G., Faulds, A.M. & Matta, J. F. (2000). Beetle assemblages in ponds: effects of habitat and site age. Freshwater Biol 44: 523-534. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00601.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zawal, A. (1993). Typologia jezior oparta na wodopojkach (Hydracarina). Konferencja Młodych Pracownikow Nauki Wydziału Biologii i Nauk o Morzu, Szczecin - 29 maja 1991. Wyd. Nauk. US. Materiały, Konferencje: 13-17.Google Scholar

  • Zawal, A. (1996). Wodopojki (Hydracarina) jako bioindykatory. w: Hłyńczak A.J., Poleszczuk G. (red.), Przyrodnicze aspekty badania wod estuarium Odry i wod jeziornych wojewodztwa szczecińskiego. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 229-235.Google Scholar

  • Zawal, A. (2007). Water mites (Hydrachnidia) of the “Szare Lake” nature reserve and its buffer zone. Parki nar. Rez. Przyr. 26(4): 57-78. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-04-27

Accepted: 2015-06-15

Published Online: 2015-12-09

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Citation Information: Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 487–499, ISSN (Online) 1897-3191, ISSN (Print) 1730-413X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ohs-2015-0046.

Export Citation

Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, University of Gdansk, Poland.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
J. Pakulnicka, P. Buczyński, P. Dąbkowski, E. Buczyńska, E. Stępień, R. Stryjecki, A. Szlauer-Łukaszewska, and A. Zawal
Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 2016, Number 417, Page 29
[2]
J. Pakulnicka and A. Zawal
Marine and Freshwater Research, 2019, Volume 70, Number 2, Page 195

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in