Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

New Journal!

Open Agriculture

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2391-9531
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The XXI century mountains: sustainable management of mountainous areas based on animal traction

J.B. Rodrigues
  • Corresponding author
  • APTRAN – Portuguese Association of Animal Traction. Escola Superior Agrária de Bragança, Campus Sta. Apolónia - Caixa postal 87. 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ P. Schlechter
  • FECTU asbl – Fédération Européenne du Cheval de Trait pour la Promotion de son Utilisation. 21, rue principale, L-7475 Schoos, Luxembourg H. Spychiger, Association Suisse des Atteleurs Professionnels, Sumiswald, Switzerland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ H. Spychiger
  • Association Suisse des Atteleurs Professionnels, Sumiswald, Switzerland R. Spinelli, CNR IVALSA – Trees and Timber Institute, Via Madonna del Piano, 10, 50019 – Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ R. Spinelli
  • CNR IVALSA – Trees and Timber Institute, Via Madonna del Piano, 10, 50019 – Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ N. Oliveira / T. Figueiredo
  • CIMO – Mountain Research Center, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança (ESA/IPB), Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5301-253 Bragança, Portugal
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-06-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2017-0034

Abstract

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), there are around 300 million working animals worldwide. They play a fundamental role in human livelihoods through their contribution to financial, human and social capital, supporting between 300 and 600 million people globally, particularly in poorer areas, where animal energy represents a huge and extremely important sustainable power resource. Yet their recognition remains largely neglected, with animal traction being largely ignored by decision and policy makers and even by civil society at all levels, which compromises a real development and improvement of this technology as well as animal welfare. On the other hand, a collective ecological and economical consciousness and an increasing awareness of public opinion about the need to reduce the excessive industrialization and mechanization of agriculture and forestry has led some sectors of society to consider the (re)use of animal traction as a valid modern source of energy. Indeed, working animals optimally transform the consumed biomass in energy and natural fertilizer, which avoids soil degradation and contributes to a sustainable management of arable lands, forests and sensitive areas. The need to maintain biodiversity, reduce carbon emissions, encourage self-reliance and reduce consumption of resources also contributes to this trend.

Keywords : working animals; animal energy; mountain farming; family farming; sustainable development

References

  • Beja-Pereira A., Ferrand N., Os recursos genéticos e o desenvolvimento sustentável, In: SPI-Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovação (Ed.), Genética, biotecnologia e agricultura, 2005, 16-21Google Scholar

  • Cannelle J.-L., Une chance à saisir, le cheval vigneron, Attelages magazine, Hors-Série, Hiver, 2002, 2, 76-77Google Scholar

  • Ciolos D., A future for Europe’s small farms, European Union press release, 2010, europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-10-570_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Edelman M., Van der Ploeg, Jan Douwe: The New Peasantries: Struggles for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalization, Hum. Ecol., 2011, 39(1), 111-113Google Scholar

  • Euromontana, Bragança Declaration, Face the challenge of climate change: adaptation for future generations, 2016, http://cimo.esa.ipb.pt/mountains2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Declaration/Braganca-FINAL_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • European Parliament, Report on cohesion policy in mountainous regions of the EU (2015/2279(INI)), 2016, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&reference=A8-2016-0074&language=ENGoogle Scholar

  • FAO, Draught animal power…an overview, 2010b, http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ags/publications/draugth_ap_overview.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • FAO, Gender dimensions of agricultural and rural employment: differentiated pathways out of poverty Status, trends and gaps, 2010a, http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1638e/i1638e.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • FAO, Innovation in family farming, The State of Food and Agriculture in brief, 2014b, http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4036e.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • FAO, Mountain Farming is Family Farming, a contribution from mountain areas to the International Year of Family Farming 2014, 2013, http://www.fao.org/docrep/019/i3480e/i3480e.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • FAO, The role, impact and welfare of working (traction and transport) animals. Animal Production and Health Report, 2014a, 5Google Scholar

  • FAO, The state of food and agriculture - climate change, agriculture and food security, 2016, http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6030e.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • FECTU, Report meeting, in Fédération Européenne du Cheval de Trait pour la promotion de son Utilisation - FECTU asbl (ed), 2012, 1-4Google Scholar

  • Fernando P., Starkey, P., Donkeys and development: socio-economic aspects of donkey use in Africa, In: Fielding D., Starkey P. (Eds.), Donkeys, people and development. A resource book in the Animal Traction Network for Eastern and Southern Africa (ATNESA), ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), 2004Google Scholar

  • Fuller R., Ayeb L., Human and animal power - The forgotten renewables, Renew. Energ., 2012, 48, 326-332Google Scholar

  • Gandini G., Villa E., Analysis of the cultural value of local livestock breeds: a methodology, J. Anim. Breed Genet., 2010, 120, 1-11Google Scholar

  • Gantner R., Baban M., Glavas H., Ivanovic M., Schlechter P., Sumanovac L., Zimmer D., Indices of sustainability of horse traction in agriculture, Economy of eastern Croatia yesterday, today, tommorow, 2014, 3, 616-626Google Scholar

  • García-Tomillo A., Figueiredo T., Almeida A., Paz González A., Dafonte J., Rodrigues J.B., Nunes J., Bandeira D., Comparing effects of tillage treatments performed with animal traction on soil physical properties: preliminary experimental results, In: Sociedade Portuguesa da Ciência do Solo (Ed.) Solos e Água: fontes (esgotáveis) de vida e de desenvolvimento. Proceedings of the VII Congresso Ibérico das Ciências do Solo (CICS 2016) / VI Congresso Nacional de Rega e Drenagem (13-15 September 2016; Beja, Portugal), 2016, 239-242Google Scholar

  • Graeub B., Chappell M., Wittman H., Ledermann S., Kerr R., Gemmill-Herren B., The State of Family Farms in the World, World Dev., 2016, 87, 1-15Google Scholar

  • Herold P., Schlechter P., Scharnhölz R., Modern use of horses in organic farming, FECTU, 2014, www.fectu.org/Englisch/Horses%20in%20organic%20farming.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • HLPE, Investing in smallholder agriculture for food security. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, 2013, http://www.deza.admin.ch/ressources/resource_en_225682.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Hodges J., Conservation of genes and culture: historical and contemporary issues, Poult. Sci., 2006, 85, 200-209Google Scholar

  • Hoffmann I., Livestock biodiversity, Rev. Sci. Tech. OIE, 2010, 29, 73-86Google Scholar

  • Hubbard C., Small Farms in the EU: How Small is Small?, Proceedings of the 111th EAAE-IAAE Seminar “Small Farms: Decline or Persistence” (26-27 June 2009, Canterbury, United Kingdom), 2007, 1-13Google Scholar

  • Jansén J., Agriculture, Energy and Sustainability. Case studies of a local farming community in Sweden, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae - Agraria, 2000, 253, 34-39Google Scholar

  • Johansson S., Belfrage K., Olsson M., Impact on food productivity by fossil fuel independence - a case study of a Swedish small-scale integrated organic farm, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil & Plant Science, 2013, 63, 123-135Google Scholar

  • Kendell C., Economics of Horse Farming, Rural Heritage, 2005, 30(3), 71-74Google Scholar

  • Kugler W., Grunenfelder H-P., Broxham E., Donkey breeds in Europe: Inventory, description, need for action, conservation - report 2007/2008, Monitoring Institute for Rare Breeds and Seeds in Europe, 2008Google Scholar

  • Magagnotti N., Spinelli R., Financial and energy cost of low-impact wood extraction in environmentally sensitive areas, Ecol. Eng., 2011a, 37, 601-606Google Scholar

  • Magagnotti N., Spinelli R., Integrating Animal and Mechanical Operations in protected areas, Croat. J. For Eng., 2011b, 32, 489-499Google Scholar

  • Marshall F., Weissbrod L., Domestication processes and morphological change: Through the lens of the donkey and African pastoralism. Curr. Anthropol., 2011, 52, S4:S397-S413Google Scholar

  • Morrissey C., A Sustainability Comparison between Horse Traction and Tractor, Traction on Small Farm Holdings in Ireland. M.Sc. Thesis, Dublin Institute of Technology. Dublin, Ireland, 2009Google Scholar

  • Mountain partnership, Mountains as the water towers of the world - a call for action on the sustainable development goals (SDGs), 2014, http://www.mountainpartnership.org/fileadmin/templates/mountain_partnership/doc/POLICY_BRIEFS/SDGs_and_mountains_water_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Rossel S., Marshall F., Peters J., Pilgram T., Adams M.D., O’Connor D., Domestication of the donkey: timing, processes, and indicators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sc.i, 2008, 105(10), 3715-3720Google Scholar

  • Rydberg T., Jansen J., Comparison of horse and tractor traction using emergy analysis. Ecol. Eng., 2002, 19, 13-28Google Scholar

  • Scharnhölz R., Mit dem Ross im Wingert, Starke Pferde (12), 2009, 48, 48-49Google Scholar

  • Silva J., The Family Farming Revolution. An opinion article by FAO-Director General Jose´ Graziano da Silva, 2014, http://www.fao.org/about/who-we-are/director-gen/faodg-opinionarticles/detail/en/c/212364/Google Scholar

  • Spinelli R., Lombardini C., Magagnotti N., Salvaging windthrown trees with animal and machine systems in protected areas, Ecol. Eng., 2013, 53, 61-67Google Scholar

  • Stringer A., Improving animal health for poverty alleviation and sustainable livelihoods, Vet. Rec., 2014, 175, 526-529Google Scholar

  • Sundseth K., Mézard N., Wegefelt S., Natura 2000: Protecting Europe’s biodiversity, European Commission, Directorate-General for the Environment, 2008Google Scholar

  • Swann W. J., Improving the Welfare of Working Equine Animals in Developing Countries, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 2006, 100, 148-151Google Scholar

  • The Brooke, Bearing a Heavy Burden, 2007, http://www.thebrooke.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/50968/BROOKE_heavy_burden.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Voßbrink J., Bodenspannungen und Deformationen in Waldböden durch Ernteverfahren, PhD thesis, Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde, Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany, 2005 (in German)Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-01-30

Accepted: 2017-05-15

Published Online: 2017-06-30

Published in Print: 2017-02-23


Citation Information: Open Agriculture, ISSN (Online) 2391-9531, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2017-0034.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in