Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Agriculture

1 Issue per year

Covered by: Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2391-9531
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Gender-sensitive Value Chain Intervention Improved Profit Efficiency among Orange-fleshed Sweetpotato Producers in Rwanda

Temesgen Bocher / Jan W. Low / Kirimi Sindi / Srinivasulu Rajendran
Published Online: 2017-07-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2017-0041

Abstract

The Rwanda Super Foods project sought to develop a value chain for processed orange-fleshed sweetpotato products to respond to farmer concerns over lack of markets. This study used data collected from five districts in rural Rwanda under supper food project between August and September 2014. The study applied a stochastic profit frontier model to data collected from 846 households growing sweetpotato, among which 327 were value chain participants; 312 were “spillover” households that received planting material from participant households, and the remainder control households with no project links. Results showed that average level of profit efficiency in sweetpotato production systems is 55%; suggesting that an estimated 45% of profit is lost due to the combined effect of technical, allocative and scale inefficiency. The profit efficiency of participant households was 64% compared to 20% of the control households. Moreover, the profit efficiency of the female beneficiary, female spillover, and male beneficiary households was found to be 55%, 70%, and 90% against 17% for male control households, respectively. Findings suggest that an orange-fleshed sweetpotato based value chain intervention can enhance the profit efficiency of the poor and disadvantageous households, if designed with special attention to women’s needs. Thus, polices and programs aiming at improving the livelihood of smallholder should be designed targeting women and resource poor.

Keywords: Gross margin; biofortified crops; stochastic profit frontier; efficiency; economic efficiency; Rwanda

References

  • Ali M., Flinn J.C., Profit Efficiency among Basmati Rice Producers in Pakistan Punjab. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1989, 71(2), 303-310Google Scholar

  • Asfaw S., et al., Impact of modern agricultural technologies on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia. Food Policy, 2012, 37(3), 283-295CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Battese G.E., Coelli T.J., A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 1995, 20(2), 325-332Google Scholar

  • Bozoğlu M., Ceyhan V., Measuring the technical efficiency and exploring the inefficiency determinants of vegetable farms in Samsun province, Turkey. Agricultural Systems, 2007, 94(3), 649-656CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization (2011). The state of food and agriculture: Women in agriculture: Closing the gender gap for development. 2011, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar

  • Fischer E., Qaim M., Gender, agricultural commercialization, and collective action in Kenya. Food Security, 2012, 4(3), 441-453CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ghimire R., Wen-chi H., Shrestha R.B., Factors Affecting Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties among Rural Farm Households in Central Nepal. Rice Science, 2015, 22(1), 35-43Google Scholar

  • González-Flores M., et al., The impact of high value markets on smallholder productivity in the Ecuadorean Sierra: A Stochastic Production Frontier approach correcting for selectivity bias. Food Policy, 2014, 44, 237-247CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kassali R., Economics of Sweet Potato Production. International Journal of Vegetable Science, 2011, 17(4), 313-321Google Scholar

  • Kassie M., Ndiritu S.W., Stage J., What Determines Gender Inequality in Household Food Security in Kenya? Application of Exogenous Switching Treatment Regression. World Development, 2014, 56, 153-171Google Scholar

  • Kassie M., Shiferaw B., Muricho G., Agricultural Technology, Crop Income, and Poverty Alleviation in Uganda. World Development, 2011, 39(10), 1784-1795Google Scholar

  • Kumbhakar S.C., Biswas B., Bailey D., A Study of Economic Efficiency of Utah Dairy Farmers: A System Approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1989, 71(4), 595-604Google Scholar

  • Mango N., et al., A stochastic frontier analysis of technical efficiency in smallholder maize production in Zimbabwe: The post-fasttrack land reform outlook. Cogent Economics & Finance, 2015, 3(1), 1117189: DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1117189Google Scholar

  • Mendola M., Agricultural technology adoption and poverty reduction: A propensity-score matching analysis for rural Bangladesh. Food Policy, 2007, 32(3), 372-393CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Muhinda J.J.M., Rwanda Agricultural Sector and its Impact on Food Security and Economy in Asian Lessons and Agriculture Transformation, Kigali, Rwanda, 2013Google Scholar

  • Rahman S., Profit efficiency among Bangladeshi rice farmers. Food Policy, 2003, 28(5-6), 487-503Tzouvelekas V., Pantzios C.J., Fotopoulos C., Technical efficiency of alternative farming systems: the case of Greek organic and conventional olivegrowing farms. Food Policy, 2001, 26(6), 549-569CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Udry C., Gender, Agricultural Production, and the Theory of the Household. Journal of Political Economy, 1996, 104(5), 1010-1046Google Scholar

  • Wang J., Cramer G.L., Wailes E.J., Production efficiency of Chinese agriculture: evidence from rural household survey data. Agricultural Economics, 1996, 15(1), 17-28CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-12-13

Accepted: 2017-03-31

Published Online: 2017-07-06

Published in Print: 2017-02-23


Citation Information: Open Agriculture, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 386–393, ISSN (Online) 2391-9531, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2017-0041.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in