Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Agriculture

1 Issue per year

Covered by: Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2391-9531
See all formats and pricing
More options …

A Strategic Niche Management approach for shaping bio-based economy in Europe

Almona Tani
Published Online: 2018-05-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2018-0010

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to investigate the transition towards a bio-based economy as part of a broader sustainable transition in Europe. To analyse the challenges and opportunities associated with the bio-based economy, we applied the Strategic Niche Management approach to investigate the drivers that boost the emergence of the bio-based economy, the factors hindering it, as well as institutional changes which are at the base of the socio-technological transition. Although considered as just one piece of the sustainability puzzle, the bio-based economy behaves as a socio-technical system on its own, providing valuable hints on systemic transitions.

Keywords: socio-technical system; sustainability transitions; Strategic Niche Management; bio-based economy

References

  • Acemoglu D., Aghion P., Burstyn L., Hemous D., The environment and directed technical change, NBER Working Papers, 2009Google Scholar

  • Albrecht J., Carrez D., Cunningham P., Daroda L., Mancia R., Mathé L., et al., The Knowledge Based Bio-Economy (KBBE) in Europe: Achievements and Challenges, Full report, 2010Google Scholar

  • Almenar E., Samsudin H., Auras R., Harte J., Consumer acceptance of fresh blueberries in bio-based packages, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2010, 90 (7), 1121-1128Google Scholar

  • BECOTEPS (Bio-Economy Technology Platforms), The European bioeconomy in 2030: Delivering sustainable growth by addressing the grand societal challenge, White Paper, Brussels, 2001, http://www.plantetp.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=57&Itemid=67Google Scholar

  • Bergek A., Jacobsson S., Carlsson B., Lindmark S., Rickne A., Analysing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis, Research Policy, 2008, 37 (3), 407-429Google Scholar

  • Berndes G., Hoogwijk M., van den Broek R., The Contribution of Biomass in the Future Global Energy Supply: A Review of 17 Studies, Biomass and Bioenergy, 2003, 25, 1-28Google Scholar

  • BIC, The Bio-Based Industries Vision: Accelerating Innovation and Market Uptake of Bio-Based Products, 2012, http://biconsortium.eu/sites/biconsortium.eu/files/downloads/BIC_BBI_Vision_web.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Bozeman B., Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory, Research Policy, 2000, 29, 627-655Google Scholar

  • Breschi S., Malerba F., Sectoral Innovation Systems: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries, In: Edquist C. (Eds.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group), London and New York, 2005Google Scholar

  • Brunori G, Biomass, bio-value and sustainability: Some thoughts on the definition of the bioeconomy, The Agricultural Economics Society and the European Association of Agricultural Economists, EuroChoices, 2013, 12, 1Google Scholar

  • Broman G., Robért K. H., A framework for strategic sustainable development, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 140, 17-31Google Scholar

  • Broman G., Robért K. H., Collins T., Basile G., Baumgartner R.J., Larsson T., et al., Science in support of systematic leadership towards sustainability, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 140, 1-9Google Scholar

  • Calvert K. E., Kedron P., Baka J., Birch K., Geographical perspectives on sociotechnical transitions and emerging bio-economies: introduction to a special issue, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2017, 29(5), 477-485Google Scholar

  • Cantner U., Graf H., Herrmann J., Kalthaus M., Inventor networks in renewable energies: The influence of the policy mix in Germany, Research Policy, 2016, 45, 1165-1184Google Scholar

  • Carley S., Historical analysis of U.S. electricity markets: Reassessing carbon lock-in, Energy Policy, 2011, 39(2), 720-732Google Scholar

  • Carlsson B., Stankiewicz R., On the nature, function and composition of technological systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1991, 1(2), 93-118Google Scholar

  • CEPI, Unfold the Future-2050 Roadmap to a Low-Carbon Bioeconomy, (last access on 20 March 2014), http://www.unfoldthefuture.eu/uploads/CEPI-2050-Roadmap-to-a-lowcarbon- bio-economy.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • D’Amato D., Droste N., Allen B., Kettunen M., Lähtinen K., Korhonen J., et al., Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 168, 716-734Google Scholar

  • Daly H.E., Economics in a Full World, Scientific American, 2005, 293, 100-107 Google Scholar

  • David P. A., Foray D., Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base, STI Review, 1995, 16Google Scholar

  • De Besi M., McCormick K., Towards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies, Sustainability, 2015, 7, 10461-10478Google Scholar

  • Debackere K., Veugelers R., The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links, Research Policy, 2005, 34, 321-342Google Scholar

  • Del Río González P., Analysing the factors influencing clean technology adoption: A Study of the Spanish pulp and paper industry, Business Strategy and the Environment, 2005, 14(1), 20-37Google Scholar

  • Deng Y. Y., Koper M., Haigh M., Dornburg V., Country-level Assessment of Long-term Global Bioenergy Potential, Biomass and Bioenergy, 2015, 74, 253-267Google Scholar

  • Doloreux D., Parto S., Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues, Technology in Society, 2005, 27, 133-153Google Scholar

  • Dosi G., Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Research Policy, 1982, 11 (3), 147-162Google Scholar

  • Elzen B., Geels F.W., Green K., System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, 2004Google Scholar

  • Essent, Natural Power: Essent and the Bio-Based Economy, 2011, http://issuu.com/essentnl/docs/bio-basedeconomy?e=2501171/2611512Google Scholar

  • European Commission (EC), Life Sciences and Biotechnology - A Strategy for Europe, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM (2002) 27, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium, 2002Google Scholar

  • European Commission (EC), New Perspectives on the Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy: Transforming Life Sciences Knowledge into New, Sustainable, Eco-Efficient and Competitive Products, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium, 2005Google Scholar

  • European Commission (EC), Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe, {SWD(2012) 11 final}, EC, Brussels, 2012Google Scholar

  • European Commission (EC), Towards a circular economy: a zero-waste programme for Europe, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, theGoogle Scholar

  • European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, 2014Google Scholar

  • European Technology Platform for Organic Food and Farming Research (TP Organics), Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda for Organic Food and Farming 2014, TP Organics, Brussels, Belgium, 2014Google Scholar

  • Frenken K., Political economies and environmental futures for the sharing economy, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 2017, 375 (2095)Google Scholar

  • Frondel M., Horbach J., Rennings K., End-of-pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries, Business strategy and the environment, 2007, 16(8), 571-584Google Scholar

  • Geels F.W., Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study, Research Policy, 2002, 31(8), 1257-1274Google Scholar

  • Geels F. W., From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory, Research Policy, 2004, 33, 897-920Google Scholar

  • Geels F. W., Co-evolution of technology and society: The transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850-1930)-a case study in multi-level perspective, Technology in Society, 2005, 27, 363-397Google Scholar

  • Geels F. W., Kemp R., Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies, Technology in Society, 2007, 29(4), 441-455Google Scholar

  • Geels F. W., Schot J., Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Research Policy, 2007, 36, 399-417Google Scholar

  • Gudynas E., Buen Vivir: Today’s tomorrow, Development, 2011, 54, 441-447 Google Scholar

  • Hajer M.A., The Politics of Environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process, Press, Clarendon, 1995Google Scholar

  • Hansen T., Coenen L., The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015, 17, 92-109Google Scholar

  • Hausknost D., Schriefl E., Lauk C., Kalt G., A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices, Sustainability, 2017, 9, 669Google Scholar

  • Heinrichs H., Sharing economy: A potential new pathway to sustainability, Gaia, 2013, 22(4), 228-231Google Scholar

  • Hoogma R. J. F., Exploiting Technological Niches: Strategies for Experimental Introduction of Electric Vehicles, Enschede: Universiteit Twente, 2000Google Scholar

  • Hopkins M., Lazonick W., Soaking up the sun and blowing in the wind: Renewable energy needs patient capital, Airnet Working Paper, 2012, http://www.theairnet.org/files/research/Hopkins/CleanTech_PatientCapital_20121129a.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Hughes T. P., The evolution of large technological systems, In: Bijker W. E., Hughes T. P., Pinch T. J. (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA, USA), London (England), 1987 Google Scholar

  • International Reference Centre for the Life Cycle of Products, Processes and Services (CIRAIG), Circular Economy: A Critical Literature Review of Concepts, Polytechnique Montréal Press Release, Canada, 2015Google Scholar

  • Jordan N., Boody G., Broussard W., Glover J. D., Keeney D., McCown B. H., et al., Sustainable development of the agricultural bio-economy, Science, 2007, 316, 14-15Google Scholar

  • Keegan D., Kretschmer B., Elbersen B., Panoutsou C., Cascading use: A systematic approach to biomass beyond the energy sector, Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefineries, 2013, 7, 193-206Google Scholar

  • Kemp R. P. M., Rip A., Schot J., Constructing Transition Paths Through the Management of Niches, In Garud R., Karnoe P. (Eds.), Path Dependence and Creation, Mahwa (N.J.) and London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001Google Scholar

  • Kharas H., The Emerging Middle Class in Developing Countries, OECD Development Centre, Working Paper Nr. 285, Research area: Global Development Outlook, OECD, Paris, 2010Google Scholar

  • Knight E. R. W., The economic geography of clean tech venture capital, Oxford University Working Paper Series in Employment, Work, and Finance, 2010Google Scholar

  • Korhonen J., Honkasalo A., Seppälä J., Circular Economy: The concept and its limitations, Ecological Economics, 2017, 143, 37-46Google Scholar

  • Langeveld J. W. A., Dixon J., Jaworski J. F., Development Perspectives of the Biobased Economy: A Review, Crop Science, 2010, 50, 142-151Google Scholar

  • Loorbach D., Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework, Governance, 2010, 23, 161-183Google Scholar

  • Lopolito A., Morone P., Sisto R., Innovation niches and sociotechnical transition: A case study of bio-refinery production, Futures, 2011, 43, 27-38Google Scholar

  • Lopolito A., Morone P., Taylor R., Emerging innovation niches: An agent-based model, Research Policy, 2013, 42, 1225-1238Google Scholar

  • Lundvall B. A., National Systems of Innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning, Anthem Press, London, 1992Google Scholar

  • Malerba F., Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research Policy, 2002, 31 (2), 247-264Google Scholar

  • Malthus T. R., An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society, with remarks on the speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and other writers, The Lawbook Exchange Ltd, Clark, New Jersey, 1798Google Scholar

  • Markard J., Truffer B., Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework, Research Policy, 2008, 37, 596-615Google Scholar

  • Martin C. J., The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?, Ecological Economics, 2016, 121, 149-159Google Scholar

  • Mazzucato M., The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking public vs. private sector myths, Public Affairs, New York, 2015Google Scholar

  • Morone P., The times they are a-changing: Making the transition toward a sustainable economy, Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefineries, 2016, 10, 369-377Google Scholar

  • Muraca B., Towards a fair degrowth-society: Justice and the right to a “good life” beyond growth, Futures, 2012, 44, 535-545Google Scholar

  • Nelson R. R., National innovation systems: A comparative analysis, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993Google Scholar

  • Neumayer E., Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, 2nd ed., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (MA, USA), 2003Google Scholar

  • Nissila H., Lempiala T., Lovio R., Constructing expectations for solar technology over multiple field-configuring events: A narrative perspective, Science and Technology Studies, 2014, 27, 54-75Google Scholar

  • OECD, The Bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a Policy Agenda. Main Findings and Policy Conclusions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2009Google Scholar

  • Pezzini M., OECD Observer: An emerging middle class, OECD, 2012, http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/printpage.php/aid/3681/An_emerging_middle_class.htmlGoogle Scholar

  • Pfau S. F., Hagens J. E., Dankbaar B., Smits A. J. M., Visions of Sustainability in Bioeconomy Research, Sustainability, 2014, 6, 1222-1249Google Scholar

  • Raghu S., Spencer J.L., Davis A.S., Wiedenmann R.N., Ecological considerations in the sustainable development of terrestrial biofuel crops, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2011, 3, 15-23Google Scholar

  • Rashid A., Farazee M. A., Krajnik P., Nicolescu C., Resource conservative manufacturing, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 57, 166-177Google Scholar

  • Raven R., Co-evolution of waste and electricity regimes: multi-regime dynamics in the Netherlands (1969-2003), Energy Policy, 2007, 35(4), 2197-2208Google Scholar

  • Rip A., Kemp R., Technological change, In: Rayner S., Malone E.L. (Eds), Human Choice and Climate Change, vol. 2, Batelle Press, Columbus, 1998Google Scholar

  • Robért K. H., Broman G., Basile G., Analyzing the concept of planetary boundaries from a strategic sustainability perspective: how does humanity avoid tipping the planet?, Ecology and Society, 2013, 18, http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05336-180205Google Scholar

  • Rockström J., Steffen W., Noone K., Persson Å., Chapin III F.S., Lambin E., et al., A safe operating space for humanity, Nature, 2009, 461(24), 472-475Google Scholar

  • Ronzon T., Lusser M., Klinkenberg M. (ed.), Landa L., Sanchez Lopez J. (ed.), M’Barek R., et al., Bioeconomy Report 2016, JRC Scientific and Policy Report, 2017Google Scholar

  • Schmid O., Padel S., Levidow L., The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective, Bio Based Applied Economics, 2012, 1, 47-63Google Scholar

  • Schor J., Debating the sharing economy, Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 2016, 4(3), 7-22Google Scholar

  • Schot J., Geels F. W., Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2008, 20(5), 537-554Google Scholar

  • Schot J., Hoogma R., Elzen B., Strategies for shifting technological systems: The case of the automobile system, Futures, 1994, 26(10), 1060-1076Google Scholar

  • Shellenberger M., Nordhaus T., Naviin J., Norris T., Van Noppen A., Fast, clean, and cheap: cutting global warming’s Gordian Knot, Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2008, 2, 93-118Google Scholar

  • Sheppard A.W., Gillespie I., Hirsch M., Begley C., Biosecurity and sustainability within the growing global bioeconomy, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2011, 3, 4-10Google Scholar

  • Sijtsema S. J., Onwezen M. C., Reinders M. J., Dagevos H., Partanen A., Meeusen M., Consumer perception of bio-based products - An exploratory study in 5 European countries, NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 2016, 77, 61-69Google Scholar

  • Sirkin T., Houten M.T., The cascade chain: A theory and tool for achieving resource sustainability with applications for product design, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 1994, 3, 213-276Google Scholar

  • Smith A., Kern F., Raven R., Verhees B., Spaces for sustainable innovation: Solar photovoltaic electricity in the UK, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2014, 81, 115-130Google Scholar

  • Smith A., Raven R., What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability, Research Policy, 2012, 41, 1025-1036Google Scholar

  • Smith A., Stirling A., Berkhout F., The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions, Research Policy, 2005, 34(10), 1491-1510Google Scholar

  • Smith A., Voß J. P., Grin J., Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges, Research Policy, 2010, 39, 435-448 Google Scholar

  • Spatial Foresight, SWECO, ÖIR, t33, Nordregio, Berman Group, et al., Bioeconomy development in EU regions: Mapping of EU Member States’/regions’ Research and Innovation plans & Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3) on Bioeconomy for 2014-2020, 2017Google Scholar

  • Staffas L., Gustavsson M., McCormick K., Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An analysis of official national approaches, Sustainability, 2013, 5, 2751-2769Google Scholar

  • The Fourth BioEconomy Stakeholders’ Conference, European Bioeconomy Stakeholders Manifesto: Building blocks, Draft version, Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2016Google Scholar

  • Truffer B., Metzner A., Hoogma R., The coupling of viewing and doing: strategic niche management and the electrification of individual transport, Greener Management International, 2002, 37, 11-125Google Scholar

  • United Nations, World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, New York: United Nations, 2015 Google Scholar

  • Vanholme B., Desmet T., Ronsse F., Rabaey K., Van Breusegem F., De Mey M., et al., Towards a carbon-negative sustainable bio-based economy, Frontiers in plant science, 2013, 4, 174Google Scholar

  • Wellisch M., Jungmeier G., Karbowski A., Patel M.K., Rogulska M., Biorefinery systems-Potential contributors to sustainable innovation, Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefineries, 2010, 4, 275-286Google Scholar

  • Wilson D., Dragusanu R., The Expanding Middle: The Exploding World Middle Class and Falling Global Inequality, Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Paper Nr. 170, Goldman Sachs, New York, 2008Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-11-23

Accepted: 2018-03-14

Published Online: 2018-05-15


Citation Information: Open Agriculture, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 98–109, ISSN (Online) 2391-9531, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2018-0010.

Export Citation

© 2018 Almona Tani, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in