Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Agriculture


Covered by: Elsevier - SCOPUS

Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index

CiteScore 2018: 0.78

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.246
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.916

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2391-9531
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Effect of biodynamic preparations on the soil biological and agrochemical properties and coloured potato tubers quality

Nijolė Vaitkevičienė
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Akademija, Kaunas district, Lithuania
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Elvyra Jarienė
  • Institute of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Akademija, Kaunas district, Lithuania
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Reto Ingold
  • Ecology and Innovation, Training and consulting for biodynamic farming, In Zelg 4, Arlesheim, Switzerland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jasmin Peschke
  • Coordination Centre for Nutrition within the Section for Agriculture at the Goetheanum, Hügelweg Dornach, Switzerland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-02-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2019-0002

Abstract

The aim of this research, which was undertaken in three years (2013-2015), was to evaluate the effect of biodynamic (BD) preparations 500 and 501 on soil biological and agrochemical properties and potato tuber quality. The soil samples were analyzed for: available phosphorus, available potassium, ammonia nitrogen, nitrogen (sum of nitrate and nitrite nitrogen) and mineral nitrogen. The potato samples were analyzed for: total polyphenols content, total anthocyanin’s content and antiradical activity. The research revealed that significantly the highest concentrations of available phosphorus, available potassium, nitrogen and mineral nitrogen in the soil throughout the growing season were identified on the 14th day after soil application of BD preparation 500 (before potato planting). As well as, soil spray application of BD preparation 500 resulted in higher enzyme activity (urease and saccharase). When the BD preparation 501 was applied, the content of total phenolic compounds in the tubers of cultivars Blue Congo and Red Emmalie was significantly higher, 20.1% and 5.4%, respectively; the content of anthocyanins were significantly higher in the tubers of three tested cultivars. However, the application of this preparation did not have any effect on the content of total phenolic compounds and on the antioxidant activity of Vitelotte tubers. The use of both preparations (500+501) had significant effects only on anthocyanins accumulation in the tubers of Blue Congo and Vitelotte. The application of preparation 500 significantly decreased the content of anthocyanins in the tubers of cvs. Red Emmalie and Vitelotte.

Keywords: Biodynamic agriculture; Solanum tuberosum L; nitrogen; phosphorus; anthocyanin

References

  • Bacchus G.L., An evaluation of the influence of biodynamic practices including foliar-applied silica spray on nutrient quality of organic and conventionally fertilised lettuce (Lactuca Sativa L.), J. Org. System., 2010, 5, 4-13Google Scholar

  • Baležentienė L., Indicating soil quality using urease and saccharase activity in abandoned grassland and differently managed crop fields, In: Sokolović D., Huyghe C., Radović J. (Eds.), Quantitative traits breeding for multifunctional grasslands and turf, Springer, Dordrecht, 2014Google Scholar

  • Burkitt L.L., Small D.R., Mcdonald J.W., Wales W.J., Jenkin M.L., Comparing irrigated biodynamic and conventionally managed dairy farms. 1. Soil and pasture properties, Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 2007, 47, 479-488Google Scholar

  • Carbonaro M., Mattera M., Vicoli S., Cappelloni M., Antioxidant power of apples from organic and conventional agriculture and changes during preservation, Riv. Sci. Aliment., 2000, 30 267-274Google Scholar

  • Carpenter-Boggs L., Kennedy A., Reganold J., Organic and biodynamic management: effects on soil biology. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2000, 64, 1651-1659CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Demeter International. 2013. Handbuch - Einführung in die biodynamische präparatearbeitGoogle Scholar

  • Deng G., Liu L.J., Zhong X.Y., Lao C.Y., Wang H.Y., Wang B., et al., Comparative proteome analysis of the response of ramie under N, P and K deficiency, Planta, 2014, 239, 1175-1186Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Dick R.P., Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health, In: Pankhurst C.E., Doube B.M., Gupta V.V.S.R. (Eds.), Biological indicators of soil health, CABI Publishing, USA, 1997Google Scholar

  • Gao X., Bjork L., Trajkovski V., Uggla M., Evaluation of antioxidant activities of rosehip ethanol extracts in different test systems, J. Sci. Food Agric., 2000, 80, 2021-2027CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Giannattasio M., Vendramin E., Fornasier F., Alberghini S., Zanardo M, Stellin F, et al., Microbiological features and bioactivity of a fermented manure product (preparation 500) used in biodynamic agriculture, J. Microb. Biotech., 2013, 23, 644-651Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Gilsenan C., Burke R., Barry-Ryan C., A study of the physicochemical and sensory properties of organic and conventional potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) before and after baking, Int. J. Food Sci. Tech., 2010, 45, 475-481Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hamouz K., Lachman J., Hejtmánková K., Pazderů K., Čížek M., Dvořák P., Effect of natural and growing conditions on the content of phenolics in potatoes with different flesh colour, Plant Soil Envir., 2010, 56, 368-374CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hamouz K., Lachman J., Pazderů K., Tomášek J., Hejtmánková K., Pivec V., Differences in anthocyanin content and antioxidant activity of potato tubers with different flesh colour, Plant Soil Envir., 2011, 57, 478-485CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Heimler D., Vignolini P., Arfaioli P., Isolani L., Romani A., Conventional, organic and biodynamic farming: differences in polyphenol content and antioxidant activity of Batavia lettuce, J. Sci. Food Agric., 2012, 92, 551-556CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hejtmankova K., Kotikova Z., Hamouz K., Pivec V., Vacek J., Lachman J., Influence of flesh colour, year and growing area on carotenoid and anthocyanin content in potato tubers, J. Food Compost. Anal., 2013, 32, 20-27CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann E., Schmidt W., Uber das enzymsystem unserer kulturboden-II. Urease, Biochem. Zeits., 1953, 324, 125-127Google Scholar

  • Hofmann E., Seegerer A., Der fermenten gehalt des bodens als masstab seiner biologischen aktivität, Biochem. Zeits., 1950, 321, 97-99Google Scholar

  • Juknevičienė E. The effect of biodynamic preparations on the pr operties of soil, yield of great pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima D.) fruits and their quality, PhD thesis, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Akademija, LT, 2015 (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar

  • Lachman J., Hamouz K., Orsák M., Pivec V., Hejtmánková K., Pazderů K., et al., Impact of selected factors - cultivar, storage, cooking and baking on the content of anthocyanins in coloured-flesh potatoes, Food Chem., 2012, 133, 1107-1116Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Langenkämper G., Zörb C., Seifert M., Mäder P., Fretzdorff B., Betsche T., Nutritional quality of organic and conventional wheat, J. Appl. Botany Food Qual., 2006, 80, 150-154Google Scholar

  • Maciel L.F., Oliveira C., Bispo E., Miranda M.P.S., Antioxidant activity, total phenolic compounds and flavonoids of mangoes coming from biodynamic, organic and conventional cultivations in three maturation stages, Brit. Food J., 2011, 113, 1103-1113Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Maggio A., Carillo P., Bulmetti, G.S., Fuggi A., Barbieri G., Pascale S.D., Potato yield and metabolic profiling under conventional and organic farming, Europ. J. Agr., 2008, 28, 343-350Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Mie A., Andersen H.R., Gunnarsson S., Kahl J., Kesse-Guyot E., Rembiałkowska E., Quaglio G., Grandjean P., Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture: a comprehensive review, Environ. Health, 2017, 16(1), 111. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nayak B., Berrios J.J., Powers J.R., Tang J., Ji Y, Colored potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) dried for antioxidant-rich value-added foods, J. Food Process. Preserv., 2011, 35, 5, 571-580Google Scholar

  • Nicolopoulou-Stamati P., Maipas S., Kotampasi C., Stamatis P., Hens L., Chemical pesticides and human health: the urgent need for a new concept in agriculture, Front. Public Health, 2016, 4, 148. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ponzio C., Gangatharan R., Neri D., Organic and biodynamic agriculture: A review in relation to sustainability, Int. J. Plant Soil Sci., 2013, 2, 95-110CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raupp J., Konig U.J., Biodynamic preparations cause opposite yield effects depending upon yield levels, Biol. Agric. Hortic., 1996, 13, 175-185CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Re R., Pellegrini N., Proteggente A., Pannala A., Yang M., Rice-Evans C., Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolourisation assay, Free Radic. Biol. Medic., 1999, 26, 1231-1237Google Scholar

  • Reeve J.R., Carpenter-Boggs L., Reganold J.P., York A.L., Mcgourthy G., Mccloskey L.P., Soil and winegrape quality in biodynamically and organically managed vineyards, Am. J. Eno. Viticul., 2005, 56, 367-376Google Scholar

  • Sahebi M., Hanafi M.M., Siti N.O.R., Akmar A., Rafii M.Y., Azizi P., et al., Importance of silicon and mechanisms of biosilica formation in plants, Biomed Res. Int., 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/396010CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tassoni A., Tango N., Ferri M., Polyphenol and biogenic amine profiles of albana and lambrusco grape berries and wines obtained following different agricultural and oenological practices, Food Nutr. Sci., 2014, 5, 8-16Google Scholar

  • Turinek M., Grobelnik-Mlakar S., Bavec M., Bavec F., Biodynamic agriculture from past to present, Agricultura, 2008, 6, 1-4Google Scholar

  • Zaller J. G., Köpke U., Effects of traditional and biodynamic farmyard manure amendment on yields, soil chemical, biochemical and biological properties in a long-term field experiment, Biol Fertil Soils., 2004, 40, 222-229.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-08-23

Accepted: 2018-12-06

Published Online: 2019-02-28


Citation Information: Open Agriculture, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 17–23, ISSN (Online) 2391-9531, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2019-0002.

Export Citation

© by Nijolė Vaitkevičienė, et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Christopher Brock, Uwe Geier, Ramona Greiner, Michael Olbrich-Majer, and Jürgen Fritz
Open Agriculture, 2019, Volume 4, Number 1, Page 743

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in