Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Agriculture


Covered by: Elsevier - SCOPUS

Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index

CiteScore 2018: 0.78

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.246
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.916

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2391-9531
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Understanding and Changing Farming, Food & Fiber Systems. The Organic Cotton Case in Mali and West Africa

Gian L. Nicolay
Published Online: 2019-03-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2019-0008

Abstract

Science should be capable of covering issues as diverse as farming systems, technology, innovation, climate change adaptation, poverty alleviation, extension, policy and practice, as they all relate to sustainable agriculture and development. Some years ago, the call for a new farming systems approach was raised to accommodate the principles of interdisciplinary, systems thinking and participatory research. Society calls for systems performance that provides stability and sustainability (SDGs!), multi-scale and territorial approaches and looks for solutions for critical issues such as employment, migration and inclusion/exclusion at the global level (World Society). We propose here a way in dealing with this complexity by addressing the mentioned problem from the communication and symbolic perspective, i.e. to consider the "object" within agricultural science but mainly observe the dedicated systems of communication. By using the concept of social systems, we can accommodate under it systems as diverse as farms, extension organizations, innovation patterns, (agricultural) sciences, policy and politics, farmer and indigenous knowledge, markets and value chains, but always in the form of communication. As such, we remain within a discipline with the potential to evolve towards a promising sub-discipline of agricultural sciences (or of sociology?). The relatively new farming approach of certified organic in combination with agroecology is relevant for family farms and small-scale entities. It depends much more on societal support for extension, technology development and policy coherence than commercial farms. Organic agriculture, with its standards, technological requirements and consumer preferences is nested in socio-economic and political networks, which makes it challenging for researchers to integrate the various components. This challenge applies particularly to countries with poorly developed institutions, weak organizations and within the context of poverty and rural exodus. We therefore use a unified approach under a single scientific system. This system observes, analyses and reports on communication aspects of involved (observed!) social systems (including networks and interactions) within the society of any given nation, including the realities of globalized markets. We are developing a case study based in Mali, in which we apply this method. The case is describing a planning process involving cotton farmers from the Sikasso region, the cotton industry, public and private extension systems, farmer organizations, local governments, the NARS (IER), FiBL, donors and the national institutions involved in climate change adaptation and food security. Various technological options of production (conventional, organic) and farming systems are available. The reflexive use of science dealing with human behavior may facilitate the pragmatic participation of researchers from various disciplines in addressing the uncertainties and opportunities that lie ahead of us and achieve the required impacts together with the practitioners.

Keywords: farming system; socio-ecological system; organic agriculture; communication; sociology; organic cotton; Mali; sustainable development

References

  • Alexander J.C., The Dark Side of Modernity, Wiley, 2013Google Scholar

  • Alrøe H.F., and Noe E., Second-Order Science of Interdisciplinary Research: A Polyocular Framework for Wicked Problems. Constructivist Foundations, 2014, 10, 65-76Google Scholar

  • Arnason J., Figurational Sociology as a Counter-Paradigm. Theory, Culture & Society, 1987, 4, 429-456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Banson K.E., Nguyen N.C., Bosch O.J.H., Using System Archetypes to Identify Drivers and Barriers for Sustainable Agriculture in Africa: A Case Study in Ghana. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2016, 33, 79-99Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bergson H., Creative Evolution, H. Holt and Company, 1911Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu P., Raisons pratiques: Sur la théorie de l’action. Editions du Seuil, 1994Google Scholar

  • CFS, CONNECTING SMALLHOLDERS TO MARKETS, Committee on World Food Security (CFS), 2015Google Scholar

  • CFS, Global Strategic Framework for Food Security & Nutrition (GSF). Committee on World Food Security (CFS), 2016Google Scholar

  • Constance D.H., Choi J.Y., Lara D., Social Dimensions of Organic Production and Systems Research. Crop Management 2013, 12Google Scholar

  • Darnhofer I., Gibbon D., Dedieu B., Farming Systems Research: an approach to inquiry. In Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, (I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon and B. Dedieu, eds.), pp. 3-31. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2012Google Scholar

  • Elias N., The Civilizing Process, Blackwell, 1994Google Scholar

  • Foley J.A., Ramankutty N., Brauman K.A., Cassidy E.S., Gerber J.S., Johnston M., Mueller N.D., O’Connell C., Ray D.K., West P.C., Balzer C., Bennett E.M., Carpenter S.R., Hill J., Monfreda C., Polasky S., Rockström J., Sheehan J., Siebert S., Tilman D., Zaks D.P.M., Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 2011, 478, 337Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Folke C., Biggs R., Norström A.V., Reyers B., Rockström J., Socialecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 2016, 21Google Scholar

  • Godelier M., The Mental and the Material: Thought Economy and Society, Verso, London, 1986Google Scholar

  • Graeub B.E., Chappell M.J., Wittman H., Ledermann S., Kerr R.B., Gemmill-Herren B., The State of Family Farms in the World. World Development, 2016, 87, 1-15Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Habermas J., ed. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M, 1985Google Scholar

  • Harvey M., The Food-Energy-Climate Change Trilemma: Toward a Socio-Economic Analysis. Theory, Culture & Society, 2014, 31, 155-182Google Scholar

  • Hawking S., Mlodinow L., The Grand Design, Random House, 2011Google Scholar

  • Latour B., Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, OUP Oxford, 2005Google Scholar

  • Luhmann N., Social systems, Stanford University Press, 1995Google Scholar

  • Marx K., Aveling E.B., Moore S., Engels F., Untermann E., Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Modern Library, 1906Google Scholar

  • Nicolay G., The meaning of social and the role of social sciences in agriculture: Peasant driven research for food security in West Africa. FiBL, 2013bGoogle Scholar

  • Nicolay G., Scientific Foundation of Agriculture, Food systems and Rural development and some Practical Implications for Sociology. FiBL, ResearchGate, 2015Google Scholar

  • Nicolay G., Theory-based Innovation Platform management. A contribution of sociology to agriculture research and development. In “12th European IFSA Symposium, 2016. Theme 2: Methodology and frameworks of farming systems transformation.”. Harper Adams University, 2016bGoogle Scholar

  • Nicolay G.L., Dabire R., Fliessbach A., Glin L., Sissoko F., SYPROBIO: Driving farmer-led innovation platforms to address food security, poverty alleviation and resilience to climate change in West African cotton communities. In “Innovation in smallholder farming in Africa: recent advances and recommendations. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Agricultural Innovation Systems in Africa (AISA)” (W.-B. A. Triomphe B, Klerkx L, Schut M, Cullen B, Kamau G & Le Borgne E, ed.), pp. 229. CIRAD, Nairobi, Kenya. Montpellier, 2014Google Scholar

  • Ostrom E., Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton University Press, 2005Google Scholar

  • Ostrom E., A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science, 2009, 325, 419-422Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Peirce C.S., Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1958Google Scholar

  • Sodjinou E., Glin L., Nicolay G., Tovignan S., Hinvi J., Socioeconomic determinants of organic cotton adoption in Benin, West Africa. Agricultural and Food Economics, 2015, 3Google Scholar

  • Stephens E.C., Jones A.D., Parsons D., Agricultural systems research and global food security in the 21st century: An overview and roadmap for future opportunities. Agricultural Systems, 2017Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Stichweh R., Science in the system of world society. Social Science Information, 1996, 35, 327-340Google Scholar

  • Vanlauwe B., AbdelGadir A.H., Adewopo J., Adjei-Nsiah S., Ampadu- Boakye T., Asare R., Baijukya F., Baars E., Bekunda M., Coyne D., Dianda, M., Dontsop-Nguezet P.M., Ebanyat P., Hauser S., Huising J., Jalloh A., Jassogne, L., Kamai N., Kamara A., Kanampiu F., Kehbila A., Kintche K., Kreye C., Larbi, A., Masso C., Matungulu P., Mohammed I., Nabahungu L., Nielsen F., Nziguheba G., Pypers P., Roobroeck D., Schut M., Taulya G., Thuita M., Uzokwe V.N.E., van Asten P., Wairegi L., Yemefack M., Mutsaers H.J.W. , Looking back and moving forward: 50 years of soil and soil fertility management research in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 2017, 15, 613-631Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Vico G., Grafton A., Marsh D., New Science, Penguin Books Limited, 1999(1744)Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein L., Philosophical Investigations, Wiley, 2010(1953)Google Scholar

  • Ziegler J., ed. Destruction massive. Géopolitique de la faim (English: Massdestruction- The Geopolitics of Hunger). Éditions du Seuil, Paris, 2011Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-06-24

Accepted: 2018-12-26

Published Online: 2019-03-08

Published in Print: 2019-03-01


Citation Information: Open Agriculture, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 86–97, ISSN (Online) 2391-9531, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2019-0008.

Export Citation

© by Gian L. Nicolay, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in