Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Open Archaeology

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6560
See all formats and pricing




A Manifesto for an Introspective Digital Archaeology

Jeremy Huggett
  • Archaeology, School of Humanities, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Published Online: 2015-03-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0002

Abstract

This paper presents a grand challenge for Digital Archaeology of a different kind: it is not technical in and of itself, it does not seek out technological solutions for archaeological problems, it does not propose new digital tools or digital methodologies as such. Instead, it proposes a broader challenge, one which addresses the very stuff of archaeology: an understanding of how digital technologies influence and alter our relationships with data, from their creation and storage ultimately through to the construction of archaeological knowledge. It argues that currently this area is under-theorised, under-represented, and under-valued, yet it is increasingly fundamental to the way in which we arrive at an understanding of the past.

Keywords: digital archaeology; digital data; introspection; digital intervention; digital intermediation

References

  • [1] Bridle, J., About The New Aesthetic, nd, http://new-aesthetic.tumblr.com/about

  • [2] Bridle, J., #sxaesthetic, 2012, http://booktwo.org/notebook/sxaesthetic/

  • [3] Sterling, B., An essay on the New Aesthetic, Wired, 2012, 20 (4), http://www.wired.com/2012/04/an-essay-on-the-newaesthetic/

  • [4] Bridle, J., The New Aesthetic and its Politics, 2013, http://booktwo.org/notebook/new-aesthetic-politics/

  • [5] Thomas, J., Archaeology and Modernity, Routledge, Abingdon, 2004 [Web of Science]

  • [6] Berry, D.M., Critical Theory and the Digital, Bloomsbury Academic, London, 2014

  • [7] Huggett, J., What lies beneath: Lifting the lid on archaeological computing, In: Crysanthi, A., Murietta Flores, P., Papadopoulos, C. (Eds.), Thinking beyond the Tool: Archaeological computing and the interpretive process, British Archaeological Reports International Series 2344, Archeopress, Oxford, 2012

  • [8] Huggett, J., Archaeology and the new technological fetishism, Archeologia e Calcolatori, 2004, 15, 81-92

  • [9] Poster, M., The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Polity, Cambridge, 1990.

  • [10] Schnapp, J., Presner, T., The Digital Humanities Manifesto 2.0, 2009, http://www.humanitiesblast.com/manifesto/ Manifesto_V2.pdf

  • [11] Huggett, J., The Past in Bits: towards an archaeology of information technology, Internet Archaeology, 2004, 15, http:// dx.doi.org/10.11141/ia.15.4

  • [12] Huggett, J., Core or periphery? Digital Humanities from an archaeological perspective, Historical Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 2012, 37 (3), 86-105

  • [13] Ihde, D., Philosophy of technology, In: Kemp, P., (Ed.) World and Worldhood, 2004, Springer, Netherlands, 2004

  • [14] Berry, D.M., The computational turn - thinking about the digital humanities, Culture Machine, 2011, 12, 1-22

  • [15] Berry, D.M., The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age, Palgrave, London, 2011 [Web of Science]

  • [16] Denning, K., ‘The Storm of Progress’ and Archaeology for an Online Public, Internet Archaeology, 2004, 15. http://dx.doi. org/10.11141/ia.15.1

  • [17] Florman, S., The Introspective Engineer, St Martin’s Press, New York, 1997

  • [18] Kansa, E., Whitcher Kansa, S., Burton, M., Stankowsli, C., Googling the grey: open data, web services and semantics, Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 2010, 6 (2), 301-326 [Web of Science]

  • [19] Lucas, G., Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2012

  • [20] Huggett, J., Digital haystacks: open data and the transformation of archaeological knowledge, In: Edwards, B., Wilson, A., (Eds.), Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice, De Gruyter Open, Warsaw, 2015

  • [21] Llobera, M., Archaeological visualization: towards an Archaeological Information Science (AISc), Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2011, 18, 193-223

  • [22] Huggett, J., Promise and paradox: accessing open data in archaeology, In: Mills, C., Pidd, M., Ward, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Congress 2012 (Studies in the Digital Humanities), HRI Online Publications, Sheffield, 2014, http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/openbook/chapter/dhc2012-huggett

  • [23] Naylor, J., Richards, J., Third-party data for first class research, Archeologia e Calcolatori, 2005, 16, 83-91

  • [24] Faniel, I., Kansa, E., Witcher Kansa, S., Barrera-Gomez, J., Yakel, E., The challenges of digging data: a study of context in archaeological data reuse, Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL ‘13), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2013, 295-304, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2467696.2467712 [Crossref]

  • [25] Beagrie, N., Houghton, J., The Value and Impact of the Archaeology Data Service: A study and methods for enhancing sustainability, 2013, http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/research/impact

  • [26] Huggett, J., Lost in information? Ways of knowing and modes of representation in e-archaeology, World Archaeology, 2012, 44 (4), 538-552

  • [27] Postman, N., Technopoly. The Surrender of Culture to Technology, Random House, New York, 1993

  • [28] Weinberger, D., Too Big to Know, Basic Books, New York, 2011

  • [29] Anderson, C., The End of Theory: the Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete, Wired, 2008, 16 (7), http://www. wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory/

  • [30] boyd, d., Crawford, K., Critical questions for Big Data, Information, Communication & Society, 2012, 15 (5), 662-679

  • [31] Lock, G., Harris, T., Introduction: return to Ravello, In: Lock, G. (Ed.), Beyond the map: archaeology and spatial technologies, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2000, xiii-xxv

  • [32] Haraway, D., Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective, Feminist Studies, 1988, 14 (3), 575-599

  • [33] Hodder, I., Archaeology and global information systems, Internet Archaeology, 1999, 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.11141/ia.6.1

  • [34] Holtorf, C., The future of electronic scholarship, Internet Archaeology, 2004, 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.11141/ia.15.11

  • [35] Moretti, F., Conjectures on World Literature, New Left Review, 2000, 1, 54-68

  • [36] Serlen, R., The Distant Future? Reading Franco Moretti, Literature Compass, 2010, 7 (3), 214-225

  • [37] Ross, S., In Praise of Overstating the Case: A review of Franco Moretti, Distant Reading (London: Verso, 2013), Digital Humanities Quarterly, 2014, 8 (1).1. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/8/1/000171/000171.html

  • [38] Beale, G., Reilly, P., Additive Archaeology: the spirit of virtual archaeology reprinted, In: Papadopoulos, C., Paliou, E., Chrysanthi, A., Kotoula, E., Sarris, A. (Eds.) Archaeological Research in the Digital Age: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Greek Chapter (CAA-GR), Institute for Mediterranean Studies - Foundation of Research and Technology (IMS-FORTH), Rethymno, 2015, 120-128

  • [39] Floridi, L., The information society and its philosophy: introduction to the special Issue on the philosophy of information, The Information Society, 2009, 25 (3), 153-58


Received: 2014-12-04

Accepted: 2015-02-02

Published Online: 2015-03-04


Citation Information: Open Archaeology. Volume 1, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0002, March 2015

© 2015 Jeremy Huggett. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.